gcc archive
date index for March, 2010

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

March 31, 2010
22:18 State of the mercurial mirror Thomas Capricelli
21:47 Passing call argument and return values Juan Carlos Martinez Santos
19:33 Re: Autoconf tests, libtool symlist files, undefined behavior, and LTO Ralf Wildenhues
19:17 Ulrich Weigand appointed co-maintainer of Cell SPU port David Edelsohn
19:13 Diego Novillo appointed Plugins Reviewer David Edelsohn
16:41 Re: __emutls_v.__gcov_indirect_call_counters and ___emutls_v.__gcov_indirect_call_callee Paolo Bonzini
16:28 Re: __emutls_v.__gcov_indirect_call_counters and ___emutls_v.__gcov_indirect_call_callee Paolo Bonzini
16:24 Re: __emutls_v.__gcov_indirect_call_counters and ___emutls_v.__gcov_indirect_call_callee Jack Howarth
16:09 Re: GCC 4.5.0 Status Report (2010-03-31), trunk is frozen Jack Howarth
16:00 Re: __emutls_v.__gcov_indirect_call_counters and ___emutls_v.__gcov_indirect_call_callee Jack Howarth
15:55 GCC 4.5.0 Status Report (2010-03-31), trunk is frozen Richard Guenther
15:50 Re: __emutls_v.__gcov_indirect_call_counters and ___emutls_v.__gcov_indirect_call_callee Paolo Bonzini
15:29 Re: __emutls_v.__gcov_indirect_call_counters and ___emutls_v.__gcov_indirect_call_callee Dave Korn
14:51 Re: Optimizing floating point *(2^c) and /(2^c) Geert Bosch
13:49 Re: Fwd: Swap32 built in function Paolo Carlini
13:47 Re: __emutls_v.__gcov_indirect_call_counters and ___emutls_v.__gcov_indirect_call_callee Jack Howarth
13:47 GNU assembler bug fix H.J. Lu
13:22 Fwd: Swap32 built in function simeon
12:34 Re: __emutls_v.__gcov_indirect_call_counters and ___emutls_v.__gcov_indirect_call_callee Dominique Dhumieres
12:14 Re: __emutls_v.__gcov_indirect_call_counters and ___emutls_v.__gcov_indirect_call_callee Richard Guenther
12:03 __emutls_v.__gcov_indirect_call_counters and ___emutls_v.__gcov_indirect_call_callee Jack Howarth
09:25 Re: Optimizing floating point *(2^c) and /(2^c) Vincent Lefevre
09:04 Re: Optimizing floating point *(2^c) and /(2^c) Marc Glisse
09:02 Re: Autoconf tests, libtool symlist files, undefined behavior, and LTO Richard Guenther
06:07 List for discussion in French on GCC MELT = gcc-melt-french@googlegroups.com Basile Starynkevitch
02:38 Re: Optimizing floating point *(2^c) and /(2^c) Vincent Lefevre

March 30, 2010
22:49 gcc-4.4-20100330 is now available gccadmin
21:40 -enable-tls and emulated tls Jack Howarth
19:52 Autoconf tests, libtool symlist files, undefined behavior, and LTO Ralf Wildenhues
19:20 Re: accepting a new write-after-approval maintainer (student, Jeremie Salvucci) Joseph S. Myers
19:07 Re: Peculiar XPASS of gcc.dg/guality/inline-params.c Jakub Jelinek
19:06 Re: accepting a new write-after-approval maintainer (student, Jeremie Salvucci) Basile Starynkevitch
19:03 Re: accepting a new write-after-approval maintainer (student, Jeremie Salvucci) Joseph S. Myers
18:36 Re: Optimizing floating point *(2^c) and /(2^c) Jeroen Van Der Bossche
18:13 Re: Peculiar XPASS of gcc.dg/guality/inline-params.c Janis Johnson
18:03 Re: GSoC 2010 Project Idea Michael Meissner
17:47 Re: accepting a new write-after-approval maintainer (student, Jeremie Salvucci) David Edelsohn
17:42 Re: Peculiar XPASS of gcc.dg/guality/inline-params.c Martin Jambor
17:14 Re: Peculiar XPASS of gcc.dg/guality/inline-params.c Janis Johnson
17:03 accepting a new write-after-approval maintainer (student, Jeremie Salvucci) Basile Starynkevitch
15:49 Re: GSoC 2010 Project Idea Артем Шинкаров
15:11 Re: Software FP Support Paulo J. Matos
14:29 Re: Software FP Support Joseph S. Myers
14:26 Re: Software FP Support Paulo J. Matos
14:09 Re: Peculiar XPASS of gcc.dg/guality/inline-params.c Martin Jambor
13:55 Re: Software FP Support Paulo J. Matos
13:39 Re: Software FP Support Paulo J. Matos
13:29 Re: Software FP Support Joseph S. Myers
13:22 Software FP Support Paulo J. Matos
13:16 Re: libgcc-arch.ver details Paulo J. Matos
13:06 Re: GSoC 2010 Project Idea Joseph S. Myers
12:03 RE: BB reorder forced off for -Os Ian Bolton
11:57 Re: gmp 5.0.1 and gcc 4.5? Vincent Lefevre
11:49 Re: Submitting a patch for an architecture without a maintainer Richard Guenther
11:41 Re: Submitting a patch for an architecture without a maintainer Joel Sherrill
10:14 Re: Submitting a patch for an architecture without a maintainer Richard Guenther
09:47 Submitting a patch for an architecture without a maintainer Samuel Tardieu
08:33 Re: libgcc-arch.ver details Paulo J. Matos
06:07 Re: GSoC 2010 Project Idea Andi Kleen

March 29, 2010
22:43 Re: Peculiar XPASS of gcc.dg/guality/inline-params.c Jan Hubicka
20:30 Re: Optimizing floating point *(2^c) and /(2^c) Tim Prince
17:51 Re: Optimizing floating point *(2^c) and /(2^c) Geert Bosch
17:38 Re: Ask for suggestions on init_caller_save Jie Zhang
17:20 Optimizing floating point *(2^c) and /(2^c) Jeroen Van Der Bossche
17:05 Re: gmp 5.0.1 and gcc 4.5? Joseph S. Myers
16:55 gmp 5.0.1 and gcc 4.5? Jack Howarth
16:34 Peculiar XPASS of gcc.dg/guality/inline-params.c Martin Jambor
16:11 Re: Ask for suggestions on init_caller_save Jeff Law
14:59 Is gcc-bugs archive down? H.J. Lu
12:18 Re: bug linear loop transforms Alexander Monakov
11:05 bug linear loop transforms Alex Turjan
07:57 Re: Error saying cannot compute suffix while building compiler gcc-4.3.2 Jonathan Wakely
04:44 Stepping down as SPU backend maintainer Andrew Pinski

March 28, 2010
22:47 gcc-4.3-20100328 is now available gccadmin
21:37 GSoC 2010 Project Idea Артем Шинкаров
21:00 how difficult to make UNITS_PER_WORD 1 Dave Milter
14:45 Where can I put the optimization of got for arm back end at? Carrot Wei
01:39 Re: expected behavior for --with-cloog? Sebastian Pop

March 27, 2010
18:48 Re: race condition in indirect call value profiling? Jack Howarth
17:17 Re: expected behavior for --with-cloog? Jack Howarth
06:56 Re: expected behavior for --with-cloog? Ralf Wildenhues

March 26, 2010
19:48 Re: Issue in combine pass. Richard Henderson
18:21 Re: race condition in indirect call value profiling? Neil Vachharajani
17:57 race condition in indirect call value profiling? Jack Howarth
17:03 Re: Question about gen_rtx_VAR_LOCATION Jie Zhang
15:36 Re: Question about gen_rtx_VAR_LOCATION Jakub Jelinek
15:28 Question about gen_rtx_VAR_LOCATION Jie Zhang
13:14 Adding statement to an already defined function in GCC Basile Starynkevitch
12:42 Re: CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET and config/mt-gnu Doug Semler
07:55 Error saying cannot compute suffix while building compiler gcc-4.3.2 Vaibhav Shrimali
04:29 Re: [G++ 4.4.2] ABI changing? Ian Lance Taylor
03:50 [G++ 4.4.2] ABI changing? 甜瓜
00:13 expected behavior for --with-cloog? Jack Howarth

March 25, 2010
22:56 gcc-4.5-20100325 is now available gccadmin
22:01 Re: Problem with ADDR_EXPR array offset Massimo Nazaria
19:33 BEST OFFER Rick Roberts
17:43 Re: Test Failures on sparc-rtems not repeatable by hand Joel Sherrill
17:31 Re: CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET and config/mt-gnu Ian Lance Taylor
16:30 Re: Question about RTL code hoisting Jeff Law
16:29 Re: Question about RTL code hoisting Jie Zhang
16:19 Re: Question about RTL code hoisting Jie Zhang
15:29 Re: About behavior of -save-temps=obj option on GCC 4.5 Michael Meissner
15:25 Re: Question about RTL code hoisting Steven Bosscher
15:23 Re: Question about RTL code hoisting Jeff Law
15:21 Re: Question about RTL code hoisting Steven Bosscher
15:14 Re: Question about RTL code hoisting Bernd Schmidt
15:04 Question about RTL code hoisting Jie Zhang
14:33 Re: About behavior of -save-temps=obj option on GCC 4.5 Tadashi Koike
13:55 Re: Issue in combine pass. Paolo Bonzini
13:41 CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET and config/mt-gnu Doug Semler
11:32 Re: Issue in combine pass. Eric Botcazou
11:08 mirror proposition James Miller
10:22 Issue in combine pass. Bingfeng Mei
00:01 Re: Problem with ADDR_EXPR array offset Ian Lance Taylor

March 24, 2010
21:27 Problem with ADDR_EXPR array offset Massimo Nazaria
18:37 Question about -Os handling of fold_builtin_strcpy() Dave Hudson
18:33 Re: BB reorder forced off for -Os Dave Hudson
13:10 Re: About "STARTING_FRAME_OFFSET" definition redriver jiang
06:09 Re: Compiler option for SSE4 Tim Prince
06:02 Compiler option for SSE4 Rayne
03:31 Ask for suggestions on init_caller_save Jie Zhang

March 23, 2010
22:55 gcc-4.4-20100323 is now available gccadmin
22:30 Re: BB reorder forced off for -Os Steven Bosscher
22:01 Re: How to get the Tree ARRAY_TYPE declaration size Max N.
21:10 Re: Test Failures on sparc-rtems not repeatable by hand Janis Johnson
20:25 Re: BB reorder forced off for -Os Joe Buck
20:20 Re: Test Failures on sparc-rtems not repeatable by hand Joel Sherrill
20:01 Re: Test Failures on sparc-rtems not repeatable by hand Janis Johnson
19:21 RE: BB reorder forced off for -Os Paul Koning
18:29 Re: About "STARTING_FRAME_OFFSET" definition Richard Henderson
18:29 Re: [rfc] common location for plugins Basile Starynkevitch
18:24 [rfc] common location for plugins Matthias Klose
18:05 BB reorder forced off for -Os Ian Bolton
17:56 Test Failures on sparc-rtems not repeatable by hand Joel Sherrill
12:55 About "STARTING_FRAME_OFFSET" definition redriver jiang
11:14 Re: Understanding Scheduling Dave Hudson
03:04 Re: GCC vs ICC Tim Prince
02:46 GCC vs ICC Rayne
02:23 Re: How to get the Tree ARRAY_TYPE declaration size Ian Lance Taylor

March 22, 2010
21:24 How to get the Tree ARRAY_TYPE declaration size Massimo Nazaria
19:32 Re: libgcc-arch.ver details Paulo J. Matos
17:49 Re: libgcc-arch.ver details Ian Lance Taylor
17:45 RE: Understanding Scheduling Ian Bolton
16:29 Re: Coloring problem - Pass 0 for finding allocno costs Jeff Law
13:32 Re: Hash Function for "switch statement" Andrew Haley
13:22 Help with gimple_build_call ashish jain
12:44 Re: Hash Function for "switch statement" Robert Dewar
12:20 Re: Hash Function for "switch statement" Unruh, Erwin
10:29 Re: libgcc-arch.ver details Paulo J. Matos
09:30 Re: libgcc-arch.ver details Paulo J. Matos

March 21, 2010
22:46 gcc-4.3-20100321 is now available gccadmin
15:03 Re: Fwd: constant hoisting out of loops fanqifei
10:42 Inserting code into prologue/epilogue Vaibhav Shrimali

March 20, 2010
19:44 Re: Fwd: constant hoisting out of loops Jim Wilson
19:40 Re: Fwd: constant hoisting out of loops fanqifei
18:47 Re: Fwd: constant hoisting out of loops Jim Wilson
16:59 Re: About behavior of -save-temps=obj option on GCC 4.5 Richard Guenther
16:40 About behavior of -save-temps=obj option on GCC 4.5 Tadashi Koike
06:29 Re: Fwd: constant hoisting out of loops fanqifei

March 19, 2010
23:52 Re: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile Bruce Korb
23:33 Google Summer of Code 2010 - Call for mentors Diego Novillo
23:33 Re: Hash Function for "switch statement" Robert Dewar
23:28 Re: Hash Function for "switch statement" Robert Dewar
23:17 Re: Hash Function for "switch statement" Robert Dewar
23:09 Re: Hash Function for "switch statement" Robert Dewar
23:06 Re: Hash Function for "switch statement" Robert Dewar
22:57 Re: [RFC][i*86]appropriate target triplet for Android on x86? =?big5?b?RG91ZyBLd2FuICjD9q62v
22:55 Re: Hash Function for "switch statement" Jae Hyuk Kwak
22:53 Re: implementing load 8 byte instruction Pranav Bhandarkar
22:43 Re: [RFC][i*86]appropriate target triplet for Android on x86? Joseph S. Myers
22:30 Re: Hash Function for "switch statement" Dave Korn
22:24 Re: Fwd: constant hoisting out of loops Jim Wilson
22:23 Re: Hash Function for "switch statement" Dave Korn
22:18 Re: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile Ralf Wildenhues
22:08 Re: Hash Function for "switch statement" Robert Dewar
21:53 [RFC][i*86]appropriate target triplet for Android on x86? =?big5?b?RG91ZyBLd2FuICjD9q62v
21:30 Re: Hash Function for "switch statement" Jae Hyuk Kwak
21:26 Re: Hash Function for "switch statement" Robert Dewar
20:58 Re: Hash Function for "switch statement" Jae Hyuk Kwak
20:47 Re: Understanding Scheduling Jeff Law
20:24 Re: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile Ctalk Project
19:14 new MILEPOST GCC pre-release Grigori Fursin
18:11 Re: Hash Function for "switch statement" Andrew Haley
18:00 Re: Hash Function for "switch statement" Jae Hyuk Kwak
17:13 Re: Idea for Google Summer Code : C Compiler for EFI Byte Code implement in gcc Chris Lattner
17:02 Re: Understanding Scheduling Vladimir N. Makarov
16:48 RE: Understanding Scheduling Ian Bolton
16:43 Re: Understanding Scheduling Steven Bosscher
16:41 RE: Understanding Scheduling Ian Bolton
16:34 Re: Understanding Scheduling Vladimir N. Makarov
16:27 Re: Understanding Scheduling Alexander Monakov
16:22 Re: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile Bruce Korb
16:13 Re: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile Dave Korn
16:12 Re: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile Richard Guenther
16:10 Understanding Scheduling Ian Bolton
16:02 error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile Bruce Korb
14:51 Re: fixincl 'make check' regressions... Bruce Korb
14:06 Fwd: constant hoisting out of loops fanqifei
13:04 Re: Idea for Google Summer Code : C Compiler for EFI Byte Code implement in gcc Tristan Gingold
13:04 Re: Idea for Google Summer Code : C Compiler for EFI Byte Code implement in gcc Tristan Gingold
12:58 Re: fixed-point support in c++ Dave Korn
12:35 Re: where is gone -fstack-usage? Eric Botcazou
12:33 Re: Idea for Google Summer Code : C Compiler for EFI Byte Code implement in gcc b95705030
12:26 Re: where is gone -fstack-usage? Massimiliano Cialdi
12:23 Re: Hash Function for "switch statement" Frank Ch. Eigler
12:21 Re: where is gone -fstack-usage? Eric Botcazou
12:10 Re: Idea for Google Summer Code : C Compiler for EFI Byte Code implement in gcc b95705030
12:07 where is gone -fstack-usage? Massimiliano Cialdi
11:55 Re: Idea for Google Summer Code : C Compiler for EFI Byte Code implement in gcc b95705030
05:26 Re: fixincl 'make check' regressions... David Miller
00:10 Re: Hash Function for "switch statement" Jae Hyuk Kwak

March 18, 2010
22:58 gcc-4.5-20100318 is now available gccadmin
21:30 Re: Question on mips multiply patterns in md file Jim Wilson
20:53 The Linux binutils 2.20.51.0.7 is released H.J. Lu
20:40 Re: Questions about "Handle constant exponents." in gcc/builtins.c Dominique Dhumieres
17:10 Re: libgcc-arch.ver details Ian Lance Taylor
17:06 Re: constant hoisting out of loops fanqifei
16:08 Re: Questions about "Handle constant exponents." in gcc/builtins.c Vincent Lefevre
16:07 Re: RFC: VTA alias set discrepancy Jakub Jelinek
15:56 Re: Sub-optimal code Richard Guenther
15:49 Re: Questions about "Handle constant exponents." in gcc/builtins.c Joseph S. Myers
15:41 Re: Questions about "Handle constant exponents." in gcc/builtins.c Nathan Froyd
15:35 Re: Questions about "Handle constant exponents." in gcc/builtins.c Vincent Lefevre
15:32 RE: Coloring problem - Pass 0 for finding allocno costs Ian Bolton
15:29 implementing load 8 byte instruction roy rosen
15:25 Re: RFC: VTA alias set discrepancy Richard Guenther
15:13 Re: Coloring problem - Pass 0 for finding allocno costs Michael Matz
15:10 Re: Questions about "Handle constant exponents." in gcc/builtins.c Jakub Jelinek
15:07 Re: Questions about "Handle constant exponents." in gcc/builtins.c Dominique Dhumieres
14:51 RE: Coloring problem - Pass 0 for finding allocno costs Ian Bolton
14:32 Re: Questions about "Handle constant exponents." in gcc/builtins.c Michael Matz
14:30 Re: Coloring problem - Pass 0 for finding allocno costs Frank Isamov
14:10 Re: Questions about "Handle constant exponents." in gcc/builtins.c Vincent Lefevre
13:51 RE: Coloring problem - Pass 0 for finding allocno costs Ian Bolton
13:43 Re: Questions about "Handle constant exponents." in gcc/builtins.c Vincent Lefevre
13:20 Re: Is it possible to port GCC backend to a architecture with very limited hard registers? redriver jiang
12:32 Coloring problem - Pass 0 for finding allocno costs Frank Isamov
12:18 feature request - Static Stack Usage Analysis for C/C++ Massimiliano Cialdi
11:23 Sub-optimal code Alain Ketterlin
11:20 Re: Question on mips multiply patterns in md file Amker.Cheng
10:09 Re: Hash Function for "switch statement" Andrew Haley
08:56 Re: libgcc-arch.ver details Paulo J. Matos
07:08 Re: libgcc-arch.ver details Paulo J. Matos
06:51 Re: libgcc-arch.ver details Andrew Pinski
06:39 Re: libgcc-arch.ver details Paulo J. Matos
05:22 Re: Hash Function for "switch statement" Jae Hyuk Kwak
00:35 Re: libgcc-arch.ver details Ian Lance Taylor

March 17, 2010
23:37 Re: inconsistencies in the documentation regarding side effects with auto inc-dec Kenneth Zadeck
23:28 inconsistencies in the documentation regarding side effects with auto inc-dec Ramana Radhakrishnan
22:29 Re: RFC: VTA alias set discrepancy Jakub Jelinek
22:20 DWARF Version 4 Released Michael Eager
22:08 Re: RFC: VTA alias set discrepancy Aldy Hernandez
20:33 Re: RFC: VTA alias set discrepancy Jakub Jelinek
20:22 Re: RFC: VTA alias set discrepancy Jakub Jelinek
19:16 Re: Question on mips multiply patterns in md file Jim Wilson
18:31 Re: constant hoisting out of loops Jim Wilson
18:10 Re: Is it possible to port GCC backend to a architecture with very limited hard registers? Ian Lance Taylor
17:41 Re: RFC: VTA alias set discrepancy Richard Guenther
17:40 Re: RFC: VTA alias set discrepancy Richard Guenther
17:28 Re: RFC: VTA alias set discrepancy Aldy Hernandez
17:19 Re: RFC: VTA alias set discrepancy Aldy Hernandez
16:54 Re: RFC: VTA alias set discrepancy Richard Guenther
16:51 Re: RFC: VTA alias set discrepancy Richard Guenther
16:42 mingw32 gnat build on based on GCC gcc-4.4-20100223 PeteGarbett
16:28 Re: RFC: VTA alias set discrepancy Jakub Jelinek
16:07 RFC: VTA alias set discrepancy Aldy Hernandez
15:43 libgcc-arch.ver details Paulo J. Matos
15:01 Re: (un)aligned accesses on x86 platform. Mikael Pettersson
14:10 Re: Is it possible to port GCC backend to a architecture with very limited hard registers? Dave Hudson
14:01 Re: Is it possible to port GCC backend to a architecture with very limited hard registers? Alan Lehotsky
12:55 Is it possible to port GCC backend to a architecture with very limited hard registers? redriver jiang
03:27 Re: constant hoisting out of loops fanqifei

March 16, 2010
23:11 Re: Why is __i686 undefined for x86_64 -m32 (in mainline) Paolo Carlini
23:04 Re: Why is __i686 undefined for x86_64 -m32 (in mainline) H.J. Lu
22:57 gcc-4.4-20100316 is now available gccadmin
22:39 Re: Why is __i686 undefined for x86_64 -m32 (in mainline) Paolo Carlini
22:36 Re: Why is __i686 undefined for x86_64 -m32 (in mainline) H.J. Lu
22:32 Re: Why is __i686 undefined for x86_64 -m32 (in mainline) Paolo Carlini
22:27 Re: Why is __i686 undefined for x86_64 -m32 (in mainline) H.J. Lu
21:36 Re: Why is __i686 undefined for x86_64 -m32 (in mainline) Paolo Carlini
21:34 Re: Why is __i686 undefined for x86_64 -m32 (in mainline) H.J. Lu
21:31 Re: Why is __i686 undefined for x86_64 -m32 (in mainline) Paolo Carlini
21:21 Re: Why is __i686 undefined for x86_64 -m32 (in mainline) H.J. Lu
21:15 Re: Why is __i686 undefined for x86_64 -m32 (in mainline) Paolo Carlini
21:08 Re: Why is __i686 undefined for x86_64 -m32 (in mainline) H.J. Lu
21:06 Re: Why is __i686 undefined for x86_64 -m32 (in mainline) H.J. Lu
21:06 Re: Why is __i686 undefined for x86_64 -m32 (in mainline) H.J. Lu
21:03 Re: Why is __i686 undefined for x86_64 -m32 (in mainline) Paolo Carlini
20:58 Re: Why is __i686 undefined for x86_64 -m32 (in mainline) Jakub Jelinek
20:53 Re: Why is __i686 undefined for x86_64 -m32 (in mainline) Paolo Carlini
20:40 Re: Why is __i686 undefined for x86_64 -m32 (in mainline) H.J. Lu
20:14 Re: Why is __i686 undefined for x86_64 -m32 (in mainline) Paolo Carlini
20:00 Re: LTO and asm specs... H.J. Lu
19:58 Re: Why is __i686 undefined for x86_64 -m32 (in mainline) H.J. Lu
19:57 Re: LTO and asm specs... David Miller
19:53 Re: LTO and asm specs... Richard Henderson
19:34 Why is __i686 undefined for x86_64 -m32 (in mainline) Paolo Carlini
19:28 Re: LTO and asm specs... David Miller
18:31 Re: LTO and asm specs... Richard Henderson
16:16 Re: (un)aligned accesses on x86 platform. Jakub Jelinek
16:16 Re: (un)aligned accesses on x86 platform. Piotr Wyderski
16:10 Re: Question about removing multiple elements from VEC Jie Zhang
16:08 Re: Question about removing multiple elements from VEC Richard Guenther
16:04 Re: (un)aligned accesses on x86 platform. Alexey Salmin
16:02 Question about removing multiple elements from VEC Jie Zhang
15:48 Re: (un)aligned accesses on x86 platform. Tristan Gingold
15:37 Re: (un)aligned accesses on x86 platform. Alexey Salmin
15:18 Re: Questions about "Handle constant exponents." in gcc/builtins.c Richard Guenther
15:11 Questions about "Handle constant exponents." in gcc/builtins.c Dominique Dhumieres
15:05 Re: (un)aligned accesses on x86 platform. Tristan Gingold
14:50 Re: (un)aligned accesses on x86 platform. H.J. Lu
14:13 Re: fixincl 'make check' regressions... Bruce Korb
13:49 Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2010-03-15) Joseph S. Myers
13:09 Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2010-03-15) Paul Richard Thomas
11:40 Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2010-03-15) Steven Bosscher
11:26 Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2010-03-15) Richard Guenther
10:55 Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2010-03-15) Steven Bosscher
10:12 Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2010-03-15) Richard Guenther
09:15 Re: fixed-point support in c++ Sean D'Epagnier
08:55 Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2010-03-15) Ramana Radhakrishnan
07:12 Re: Question on mips multiply patterns in md file Amker.Cheng
06:48 Re: Hash Function for "switch statement" Basile Starynkevitch
06:00 fixincl 'make check' regressions... David Miller
01:41 Re: Hash Function for "switch statement" Dave Korn
01:32 Re: Hash Function for "switch statement" Jae Hyuk Kwak
01:28 Re: fixed-point support in c++ Dave Korn

March 15, 2010
22:03 fixed-point support in c++ Sean D'Epagnier
20:38 Re: Question on mips multiply patterns in md file Jim Wilson
17:51 Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2010-03-15) Basile Starynkevitch
17:10 Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2010-03-15) NightStrike
17:00 Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2010-03-15) Richard Guenther
16:25 Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2010-03-15) Jeff Law
16:18 GCC 4.5 Status Report (2010-03-15) Richard Guenther
08:52 Re: status of GCC 4.5 w.r.t. plugins? Laurynas Biveinis
08:00 Question on mips multiply patterns in md file Amker.Cheng
07:35 Re: Hash Function for "switch statement" Jae Hyuk Kwak
03:12 Re: Long paths with ../../../../ throughout Ian Lance Taylor

March 14, 2010
22:58 Re: Hash Function for "switch statement" Basile Starynkevitch
22:47 gcc-4.3-20100314 is now available gccadmin
21:39 Re: packaging GCC plugins using gengtype (e.g. MELT)? Basile Starynkevitch
21:24 Re: constant hoisting out of loops Jim Wilson
21:01 Re: packaging GCC plugins using gengtype (e.g. MELT)? Duncan Sands
20:48 Re: packaging GCC plugins using gengtype (e.g. MELT)? Matthias Klose
20:44 Hash Function for "switch statement" Jae Hyuk Kwak
12:14 packaging GCC plugins using gengtype (e.g. MELT)? Basile Starynkevitch
06:25 Re: The scope of a for statement Magnus Fromreide

March 13, 2010
15:11 Re: Long paths with ../../../../ throughout Jon
12:42 status of GCC 4.5 w.r.t. plugins? Basile Starynkevitch
05:33 LTO and asm specs... David Miller

March 12, 2010
23:57 missing C++ typeinfo for __float128 Roman Kononov
23:14 how do I achieve a weaker UNSPEC_VOLATILE? Mat Hostetter
21:57 Re: Use the wctype builtins functions Daniel Jacobowitz
21:43 Re: Defining a libffi.so.4 ABI Anthony Green
12:07 Testcase that causes excessive loads inserted by IRA Christian Borntraeger
08:15 Re: Does gengtyped gt-*.h depends upon the configuration of the compiler? Laurynas Biveinis
06:36 Re: Does gengtyped gt-*.h depends upon the configuration of the compiler? Basile Starynkevitch
06:24 Re: Does gengtyped gt-*.h depends upon the configuration of the compiler? Laurynas Biveinis

March 11, 2010
23:14 gcc-4.5-20100311 is now available gccadmin
14:35 Re: Does gengtyped gt-*.h depends upon the configuration of the compiler? Basile Starynkevitch
14:04 Re: [lto] elfutils-libelf-0.145 vs libelf-0.8.13? PaweÅ Sikora
13:51 Re: [lto] elfutils-libelf-0.145 vs libelf-0.8.13? H.J. Lu
13:25 [lto] elfutils-libelf-0.145 vs libelf-0.8.13? PaweÅ Sikora
09:46 Re: Use the wctype builtins functions Paolo Bonzini
08:13 Re: Does gengtyped gt-*.h depends upon the configuration of the compiler? Laurynas Biveinis
07:49 Re: Does gengtyped gt-*.h depends upon the configuration of the compiler? Basile Starynkevitch
06:48 constant hoisting out of loops fanqifei

March 10, 2010
23:51 Re: ICE with nontype template parameter Dodji Seketeli
22:35 Does gengtyped gt-*.h depends upon the configuration of the compiler? Basile Starynkevitch
21:02 test listarch Frank Ch. Eigler
20:59 Re: legitimate parallel make check? IainS

March 09, 2010
22:58 gcc-4.4-20100309 is now available gccadmin
20:33 Re: legitimate parallel make check? IainS
19:36 Re: legitimate parallel make check? IainS
19:36 Re: legitimate parallel make check? Rainer Orth
19:31 Re: legitimate parallel make check? NightStrike
19:28 Re: legitimate parallel make check? IainS
19:14 Re: clearing many bytes variables (could use one machine instruction)? Dave Korn
18:42 Re: clearing many bytes variables (could use one machine instruction)? Basile Starynkevitch
18:19 Re: clearing many bytes variables (could use one machine instruction)? Dave Korn
18:16 Incorrect casting? Marcin BaczyÅski
17:51 Re: [trans-mem] __sync_add_and_fetch_8 on ia32 H.J. Lu
17:42 Re: clearing many bytes variables (could use one machine instruction)? Basile Starynkevitch
17:28 Re: [trans-mem] __sync_add_and_fetch_8 on ia32 Richard Henderson
15:17 Re: legitimate parallel make check? Rainer Orth
15:05 Re: legitimate parallel make check? IainS
15:04 Re: Puzzle about mips pipeline description Ian Lance Taylor
14:23 Re: legitimate parallel make check? Tim Prince
12:46 Re: legitimate parallel make check? Rainer Orth
12:35 Dia da Mulher Jô calçados !!! jocalcados at jocalcadosnet do
12:29 Re: legitimate parallel make check? IainS
12:11 Re: legitimate parallel make check? Rainer Orth
11:43 legitimate parallel make check? IainS
11:26 Re: clearing many bytes variables (could use one machine instruction)? Alexey Salmin
09:58 clearing many bytes variables (could use one machine instruction)? Basile Starynkevitch
05:22 Puzzle about mips pipeline description Amker.Cheng

March 08, 2010
21:11 Re: (un)aligned accesses on x86 platform. PaweÅ Sikora
19:33 Re: Phil's regression hunter: How does it work? Janis Johnson
17:24 Re: IRA conflict graph, multiple alternatives and commutative operands Vladimir Makarov
15:46 Re: (un)aligned accesses on x86 platform. Richard Guenther
15:45 Re: (un)aligned accesses on x86 platform. Andrew Pinski
15:42 IRA conflict graph, multiple alternatives and commutative operands Jie Zhang
15:37 (un)aligned accesses on x86 platform. PaweÅ Sikora
14:29 Re: How to make 'long int' type be a PDImode? Frank Isamov
14:27 Re: How to make 'long int' type be a PDImode? Frank Isamov
10:17 Re: Unroller gone wild Richard Guenther
08:50 Unroller gone wild Piotr Wyderski
06:29 Re: How to make 'long int' type be a PDImode? Joern Rennecke

March 07, 2010
23:55 How to make 'long int' type be a PDImode? Frank Isamov
22:51 gcc-4.3-20100307 is now available gccadmin
19:41 Re: A 2 % gain for the past week on my code. Jack Howarth
19:18 Re: A 2 % gain for the past week on my code. Toon Moene
18:59 Re: A 2 % gain for the past week on my code. Jack Howarth
18:34 A 2 % gain for the past week on my code. Toon Moene
10:18 Re: gcc 4.4.1/linux 64bit: code crashes with -O3, works with -O2 Kai Henningsen

March 06, 2010
19:32 Re: FROM FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION SEEKING TO WIRETAP NTERNET FBI
18:56 Anybody interested in a dead code analysis tool for gcc D.J. Barrow
18:19 Re: expression statements, volatiles, and C vs. C++ Andrew Haley
15:54 Re: expression statements, volatiles, and C vs. C++ John Regehr
11:44 Phil's regression hunter: How does it work? Peter Maier
10:10 Re: expression statements, volatiles, and C vs. C++ Andrew Haley
04:43 expression statements, volatiles, and C vs. C++ John Regehr

March 05, 2010
23:07 Re: The scope of a for statement Joe Buck
22:40 Re: The scope of a for statement Magnus Fromreide
21:32 Have you tried Cooliris? mercy
20:06 Re: The scope of a for statement Joe Buck
19:38 The scope of a for statement Magnus Fromreide
16:05 Re: Use the wctype builtins functions Joseph S. Myers
15:39 Re: Definition of an instruction Jean Christophe Beyler
15:39 Re: Use the wctype builtins functions Ian Lance Taylor
14:41 Re: Passing compiler option to bootstrap compiler Andreas Schwab
14:34 Passing compiler option to bootstrap compiler Paulo J. Matos
14:26 Re: Handling of builtins Paulo J. Matos
13:45 Re: Use the wctype builtins functions Dave Korn
09:43 Re: Idea for Google Summer Code : C Compiler for EFI Byte Code implement in gcc Andrew Haley
07:58 Re: Idea for Google Summer Code : C Compiler for EFI Byte Code implement in gcc Joe Vernaci
02:34 Use the wctype builtins functions Shujing Zhao

March 04, 2010
23:42 Re: Definition of an instruction Andrew Pinski
23:38 Re: Definition of an instruction Jean Christophe Beyler
23:29 Re: Definition of an instruction Andrew Pinski
23:23 Definition of an instruction Jean Christophe Beyler
23:10 gcc-4.5-20100304 is now available gccadmin
19:29 Re: Idea for Google Summer Code : C Compiler for EFI Byte Code implement in gcc b95705030
09:16 Re: gcc miscompiling duff's device (probaby two different bugs) Peter Kourzanov

March 03, 2010
13:05 Re: GUPC: A GCC frontend for UPC Ludovic Courtès
12:35 Re: Bootstraping i686-linux gcc on x86_64-linux fails during libgcc stage1 on trunk Laurent GUERBY
12:30 Re: Bootstraping i686-linux gcc on x86_64-linux fails during libgcc stage1 on trunk Laurent GUERBY
11:35 Re: Idea for Google Summer Code : C Compiler for EFI Byte Code implement in gcc Andrew Haley
10:54 Re: Idea for Google Summer Code : C Compiler for EFI Byte Code implement in gcc Tristan Gingold
10:37 Re: Idea for Google Summer Code : C Compiler for EFI Byte Code implement in gcc Andrew Haley
10:33 Re: GUPC: A GCC frontend for UPC Giuseppe Scrivano
10:17 Re: Handling of builtins Richard Guenther
09:47 Re: GUPC: A GCC frontend for UPC Ludovic Courtès
09:28 Handling of builtins Paulo J. Matos
05:00 Idea for Google Summer Code : C Compiler for EFI Byte Code implement in gcc b95705030
00:34 Re: Bootstraping i686-linux gcc on x86_64-linux fails during libgcc stage1 on trunk H.J. Lu
00:33 Re: Bootstraping i686-linux gcc on x86_64-linux fails during libgcc stage1 on trunk Joseph S. Myers
00:18 Bootstraping i686-linux gcc on x86_64-linux fails during libgcc stage1 on trunk Laurent GUERBY

March 02, 2010
23:10 gcc-4.4-20100302 is now available gccadmin
19:07 GUPC: A GCC frontend for UPC Gary Funck
13:07 Re: gcc miscompiling duff's device (probaby two different bugs) Peter Kourzanov
13:04 Re: a gcc plugin to show cfg graphically when debug gcc Martin Jambor
11:26 Re: gcc miscompiling duff's device (probaby two different bugs) Richard Guenther
11:00 Re: gcc miscompiling duff's device (probaby two different bugs) Pjotr Kourzanov
10:58 Re: gcc miscompiling duff's device (probaby two different bugs) Andreas Schwab
10:47 Re: gcc miscompiling duff's device (probaby two different bugs) Andrew Haley
10:42 Re: Useless conditional branches Richard Guenther
10:39 Re: gcc miscompiling duff's device (probaby two different bugs) Pjotr Kourzanov
10:35 Re: Useless conditional branches Alain Ketterlin
10:34 Re: gcc miscompiling duff's device (probaby two different bugs) Pjotr Kourzanov
10:27 Re: gcc miscompiling duff's device (probaby two different bugs) Richard Guenther
10:24 Re: gcc miscompiling duff's device (probaby two different bugs) Andrew Haley
09:56 Re: Useless conditional branches Andrew Haley
09:40 Re: Useless conditional branches Piotr Wyderski
09:38 gcc miscompiling duff's device (probaby two different bugs) Peter Kourzanov
08:56 Useless conditional branches Alain Ketterlin

March 01, 2010
23:23 Re: why multiple libiberty directories Joseph S. Myers
22:49 Re: why multiple libiberty directories DJ Delorie
22:37 Re: why multiple libiberty directories Paolo Bonzini
21:47 Defining a libffi.so.4 ABI Rainer Orth
20:49 Re: why multiple libiberty directories DJ Delorie
20:31 Re: Defining a libobjc.so.2 ABI Rainer Orth
13:55 Re: optimizing the pushing of constant parameters to functions Michael Matz
12:36 Adding statement to an already defined function Nikola Ikonic
07:21 Re: why multiple libiberty directories Kaveh R. GHAZI
05:00 Re: why multiple libiberty directories Jack Howarth
01:40 Re: why multiple libiberty directories Joseph S. Myers
01:32 Re: why multiple libiberty directories Andreas Schwab
01:17 why multiple libiberty directories Jack Howarth


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3