This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
March 31, 2010
March 30, 2010
March 29, 2010
22:43 | Re: Peculiar XPASS of gcc.dg/guality/inline-params.c | Jan Hubicka |
20:30 | Re: Optimizing floating point *(2^c) and /(2^c) | Tim Prince |
17:51 | Re: Optimizing floating point *(2^c) and /(2^c) | Geert Bosch |
17:38 | Re: Ask for suggestions on init_caller_save | Jie Zhang |
17:20 | Optimizing floating point *(2^c) and /(2^c) | Jeroen Van Der Bossche |
17:05 | Re: gmp 5.0.1 and gcc 4.5? | Joseph S. Myers |
16:55 | gmp 5.0.1 and gcc 4.5? | Jack Howarth |
16:34 | Peculiar XPASS of gcc.dg/guality/inline-params.c | Martin Jambor |
16:11 | Re: Ask for suggestions on init_caller_save | Jeff Law |
14:59 | Is gcc-bugs archive down? | H.J. Lu |
12:18 | Re: bug linear loop transforms | Alexander Monakov |
11:05 | bug linear loop transforms | Alex Turjan |
07:57 | Re: Error saying cannot compute suffix while building compiler gcc-4.3.2 | Jonathan Wakely |
04:44 | Stepping down as SPU backend maintainer | Andrew Pinski |
March 28, 2010
22:47 | gcc-4.3-20100328 is now available | gccadmin |
21:37 | GSoC 2010 Project Idea | Артем Шинкаров |
21:00 | how difficult to make UNITS_PER_WORD 1 | Dave Milter |
14:45 | Where can I put the optimization of got for arm back end at? | Carrot Wei |
01:39 | Re: expected behavior for --with-cloog? | Sebastian Pop |
March 27, 2010
18:48 | Re: race condition in indirect call value profiling? | Jack Howarth |
17:17 | Re: expected behavior for --with-cloog? | Jack Howarth |
06:56 | Re: expected behavior for --with-cloog? | Ralf Wildenhues |
March 26, 2010
19:48 | Re: Issue in combine pass. | Richard Henderson |
18:21 | Re: race condition in indirect call value profiling? | Neil Vachharajani |
17:57 | race condition in indirect call value profiling? | Jack Howarth |
17:03 | Re: Question about gen_rtx_VAR_LOCATION | Jie Zhang |
15:36 | Re: Question about gen_rtx_VAR_LOCATION | Jakub Jelinek |
15:28 | Question about gen_rtx_VAR_LOCATION | Jie Zhang |
13:14 | Adding statement to an already defined function in GCC | Basile Starynkevitch |
12:42 | Re: CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET and config/mt-gnu | Doug Semler |
07:55 | Error saying cannot compute suffix while building compiler gcc-4.3.2 | Vaibhav Shrimali |
04:29 | Re: [G++ 4.4.2] ABI changing? | Ian Lance Taylor |
03:50 | [G++ 4.4.2] ABI changing? | 甜瓜 |
00:13 | expected behavior for --with-cloog? | Jack Howarth |
March 25, 2010
March 24, 2010
21:27 | Problem with ADDR_EXPR array offset | Massimo Nazaria |
18:37 | Question about -Os handling of fold_builtin_strcpy() | Dave Hudson |
18:33 | Re: BB reorder forced off for -Os | Dave Hudson |
13:10 | Re: About "STARTING_FRAME_OFFSET" definition | redriver jiang |
06:09 | Re: Compiler option for SSE4 | Tim Prince |
06:02 | Compiler option for SSE4 | Rayne |
03:31 | Ask for suggestions on init_caller_save | Jie Zhang |
March 23, 2010
March 22, 2010
21:24 | How to get the Tree ARRAY_TYPE declaration size | Massimo Nazaria |
19:32 | Re: libgcc-arch.ver details | Paulo J. Matos |
17:49 | Re: libgcc-arch.ver details | Ian Lance Taylor |
17:45 | RE: Understanding Scheduling | Ian Bolton |
16:29 | Re: Coloring problem - Pass 0 for finding allocno costs | Jeff Law |
13:32 | Re: Hash Function for "switch statement" | Andrew Haley |
13:22 | Help with gimple_build_call | ashish jain |
12:44 | Re: Hash Function for "switch statement" | Robert Dewar |
12:20 | Re: Hash Function for "switch statement" | Unruh, Erwin |
10:29 | Re: libgcc-arch.ver details | Paulo J. Matos |
09:30 | Re: libgcc-arch.ver details | Paulo J. Matos |
March 21, 2010
22:46 | gcc-4.3-20100321 is now available | gccadmin |
15:03 | Re: Fwd: constant hoisting out of loops | fanqifei |
10:42 | Inserting code into prologue/epilogue | Vaibhav Shrimali |
March 20, 2010
19:44 | Re: Fwd: constant hoisting out of loops | Jim Wilson |
19:40 | Re: Fwd: constant hoisting out of loops | fanqifei |
18:47 | Re: Fwd: constant hoisting out of loops | Jim Wilson |
16:59 | Re: About behavior of -save-temps=obj option on GCC 4.5 | Richard Guenther |
16:40 | About behavior of -save-temps=obj option on GCC 4.5 | Tadashi Koike |
06:29 | Re: Fwd: constant hoisting out of loops | fanqifei |
March 19, 2010
March 18, 2010
March 17, 2010
March 16, 2010
March 15, 2010
22:03 | fixed-point support in c++ | Sean D'Epagnier |
20:38 | Re: Question on mips multiply patterns in md file | Jim Wilson |
17:51 | Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2010-03-15) | Basile Starynkevitch |
17:10 | Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2010-03-15) | NightStrike |
17:00 | Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2010-03-15) | Richard Guenther |
16:25 | Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2010-03-15) | Jeff Law |
16:18 | GCC 4.5 Status Report (2010-03-15) | Richard Guenther |
08:52 | Re: status of GCC 4.5 w.r.t. plugins? | Laurynas Biveinis |
08:00 | Question on mips multiply patterns in md file | Amker.Cheng |
07:35 | Re: Hash Function for "switch statement" | Jae Hyuk Kwak |
03:12 | Re: Long paths with ../../../../ throughout | Ian Lance Taylor |
March 14, 2010
22:58 | Re: Hash Function for "switch statement" | Basile Starynkevitch |
22:47 | gcc-4.3-20100314 is now available | gccadmin |
21:39 | Re: packaging GCC plugins using gengtype (e.g. MELT)? | Basile Starynkevitch |
21:24 | Re: constant hoisting out of loops | Jim Wilson |
21:01 | Re: packaging GCC plugins using gengtype (e.g. MELT)? | Duncan Sands |
20:48 | Re: packaging GCC plugins using gengtype (e.g. MELT)? | Matthias Klose |
20:44 | Hash Function for "switch statement" | Jae Hyuk Kwak |
12:14 | packaging GCC plugins using gengtype (e.g. MELT)? | Basile Starynkevitch |
06:25 | Re: The scope of a for statement | Magnus Fromreide |
March 13, 2010
15:11 | Re: Long paths with ../../../../ throughout | Jon |
12:42 | status of GCC 4.5 w.r.t. plugins? | Basile Starynkevitch |
05:33 | LTO and asm specs... | David Miller |
March 12, 2010
23:57 | missing C++ typeinfo for __float128 | Roman Kononov |
23:14 | how do I achieve a weaker UNSPEC_VOLATILE? | Mat Hostetter |
21:57 | Re: Use the wctype builtins functions | Daniel Jacobowitz |
21:43 | Re: Defining a libffi.so.4 ABI | Anthony Green |
12:07 | Testcase that causes excessive loads inserted by IRA | Christian Borntraeger |
08:15 | Re: Does gengtyped gt-*.h depends upon the configuration of the compiler? | Laurynas Biveinis |
06:36 | Re: Does gengtyped gt-*.h depends upon the configuration of the compiler? | Basile Starynkevitch |
06:24 | Re: Does gengtyped gt-*.h depends upon the configuration of the compiler? | Laurynas Biveinis |
March 11, 2010
23:14 | gcc-4.5-20100311 is now available | gccadmin |
14:35 | Re: Does gengtyped gt-*.h depends upon the configuration of the compiler? | Basile Starynkevitch |
14:04 | Re: [lto] elfutils-libelf-0.145 vs libelf-0.8.13? | PaweÅ Sikora |
13:51 | Re: [lto] elfutils-libelf-0.145 vs libelf-0.8.13? | H.J. Lu |
13:25 | [lto] elfutils-libelf-0.145 vs libelf-0.8.13? | PaweÅ Sikora |
09:46 | Re: Use the wctype builtins functions | Paolo Bonzini |
08:13 | Re: Does gengtyped gt-*.h depends upon the configuration of the compiler? | Laurynas Biveinis |
07:49 | Re: Does gengtyped gt-*.h depends upon the configuration of the compiler? | Basile Starynkevitch |
06:48 | constant hoisting out of loops | fanqifei |
March 10, 2010
23:51 | Re: ICE with nontype template parameter | Dodji Seketeli |
22:35 | Does gengtyped gt-*.h depends upon the configuration of the compiler? | Basile Starynkevitch |
21:02 | test listarch | Frank Ch. Eigler |
20:59 | Re: legitimate parallel make check? | IainS |
March 09, 2010
March 08, 2010
21:11 | Re: (un)aligned accesses on x86 platform. | PaweÅ Sikora |
19:33 | Re: Phil's regression hunter: How does it work? | Janis Johnson |
17:24 | Re: IRA conflict graph, multiple alternatives and commutative operands | Vladimir Makarov |
15:46 | Re: (un)aligned accesses on x86 platform. | Richard Guenther |
15:45 | Re: (un)aligned accesses on x86 platform. | Andrew Pinski |
15:42 | IRA conflict graph, multiple alternatives and commutative operands | Jie Zhang |
15:37 | (un)aligned accesses on x86 platform. | PaweÅ Sikora |
14:29 | Re: How to make 'long int' type be a PDImode? | Frank Isamov |
14:27 | Re: How to make 'long int' type be a PDImode? | Frank Isamov |
10:17 | Re: Unroller gone wild | Richard Guenther |
08:50 | Unroller gone wild | Piotr Wyderski |
06:29 | Re: How to make 'long int' type be a PDImode? | Joern Rennecke |
March 07, 2010
23:55 | How to make 'long int' type be a PDImode? | Frank Isamov |
22:51 | gcc-4.3-20100307 is now available | gccadmin |
19:41 | Re: A 2 % gain for the past week on my code. | Jack Howarth |
19:18 | Re: A 2 % gain for the past week on my code. | Toon Moene |
18:59 | Re: A 2 % gain for the past week on my code. | Jack Howarth |
18:34 | A 2 % gain for the past week on my code. | Toon Moene |
10:18 | Re: gcc 4.4.1/linux 64bit: code crashes with -O3, works with -O2 | Kai Henningsen |
March 06, 2010
19:32 | Re: FROM FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION SEEKING TO WIRETAP NTERNET | FBI |
18:56 | Anybody interested in a dead code analysis tool for gcc | D.J. Barrow |
18:19 | Re: expression statements, volatiles, and C vs. C++ | Andrew Haley |
15:54 | Re: expression statements, volatiles, and C vs. C++ | John Regehr |
11:44 | Phil's regression hunter: How does it work? | Peter Maier |
10:10 | Re: expression statements, volatiles, and C vs. C++ | Andrew Haley |
04:43 | expression statements, volatiles, and C vs. C++ | John Regehr |
March 05, 2010
23:07 | Re: The scope of a for statement | Joe Buck |
22:40 | Re: The scope of a for statement | Magnus Fromreide |
21:32 | Have you tried Cooliris? | mercy |
20:06 | Re: The scope of a for statement | Joe Buck |
19:38 | The scope of a for statement | Magnus Fromreide |
16:05 | Re: Use the wctype builtins functions | Joseph S. Myers |
15:39 | Re: Definition of an instruction | Jean Christophe Beyler |
15:39 | Re: Use the wctype builtins functions | Ian Lance Taylor |
14:41 | Re: Passing compiler option to bootstrap compiler | Andreas Schwab |
14:34 | Passing compiler option to bootstrap compiler | Paulo J. Matos |
14:26 | Re: Handling of builtins | Paulo J. Matos |
13:45 | Re: Use the wctype builtins functions | Dave Korn |
09:43 | Re: Idea for Google Summer Code : C Compiler for EFI Byte Code implement in gcc | Andrew Haley |
07:58 | Re: Idea for Google Summer Code : C Compiler for EFI Byte Code implement in gcc | Joe Vernaci |
02:34 | Use the wctype builtins functions | Shujing Zhao |
March 04, 2010
23:42 | Re: Definition of an instruction | Andrew Pinski |
23:38 | Re: Definition of an instruction | Jean Christophe Beyler |
23:29 | Re: Definition of an instruction | Andrew Pinski |
23:23 | Definition of an instruction | Jean Christophe Beyler |
23:10 | gcc-4.5-20100304 is now available | gccadmin |
19:29 | Re: Idea for Google Summer Code : C Compiler for EFI Byte Code implement in gcc | b95705030 |
09:16 | Re: gcc miscompiling duff's device (probaby two different bugs) | Peter Kourzanov |
March 03, 2010
March 02, 2010
March 01, 2010
23:23 | Re: why multiple libiberty directories | Joseph S. Myers |
22:49 | Re: why multiple libiberty directories | DJ Delorie |
22:37 | Re: why multiple libiberty directories | Paolo Bonzini |
21:47 | Defining a libffi.so.4 ABI | Rainer Orth |
20:49 | Re: why multiple libiberty directories | DJ Delorie |
20:31 | Re: Defining a libobjc.so.2 ABI | Rainer Orth |
13:55 | Re: optimizing the pushing of constant parameters to functions | Michael Matz |
12:36 | Adding statement to an already defined function | Nikola Ikonic |
07:21 | Re: why multiple libiberty directories | Kaveh R. GHAZI |
05:00 | Re: why multiple libiberty directories | Jack Howarth |
01:40 | Re: why multiple libiberty directories | Joseph S. Myers |
01:32 | Re: why multiple libiberty directories | Andreas Schwab |
01:17 | why multiple libiberty directories | Jack Howarth |
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]