This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
February 28, 2010
23:21 | gcc-4.3-20100228 is now available | gccadmin |
February 27, 2010
20:45 | Re: optimizing the pushing of constant parameters to functions | Joern Rennecke |
19:26 | Re: optimizing the pushing of constant parameters to functions | Andrew Pinski |
18:17 | optimizing the pushing of constant parameters to functions | Daniel R. Grayson |
17:27 | Re: Gcc plugin: error: âLAST_AND_UNUSED_RTX_CODE â undeclared | Andrew Pinski |
15:07 | Re: [RFH] A simple way to figure out the number of bits used by a long double | Dave Korn |
13:16 | Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? | Gerald Pfeifer |
10:27 | Idea for Google Summer Code : C Compiler for EFI Byte Code implement in gcc | b95705030 |
08:55 | Re: Gcc plugin: error: âLAST_AND_UNUSED_RTX _CODEâ undeclared | ashish jain |
February 26, 2010
February 25, 2010
23:14 | gcc-4.5-20100225 is now available | gccadmin |
22:17 | Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? | H.J. Lu |
22:01 | Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? | Jason Merrill |
15:50 | Re: Defining a libgnat.so, libgnarl.so ABI | Laurent GUERBY |
15:02 | Re: Defining a libgnat.so, libgnarl.so ABI | Arnaud Charlet |
14:50 | RE: Overhead in C and C++ | Paul Koning |
14:43 | Re: Defining a libgnat.so, libgnarl.so ABI | Paolo Bonzini |
14:40 | Re: Overhead in C and C++ | Steven Bosscher |
14:36 | Overhead in C and C++ | cmauchle |
10:48 | Re: a gcc plugin to show cfg graphically when debug gcc | Richard Guenther |
10:37 | Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? | Paolo Bonzini |
10:23 | branches within C++ destructors | Rohit Gupta |
07:51 | Re: Defining a libgnat.so, libgnarl.so ABI | Arnaud Charlet |
07:49 | a gcc plugin to show cfg graphically when debug gcc | Eric Fisher |
07:07 | Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? | Uros Bizjak |
06:44 | Re: Defining a libgnat.so, libgnarl.so ABI | Florian Weimer |
00:15 | Re: Gprof can account for less than 1/3 of execution time?!?! | Anthony Foiani |
February 24, 2010
23:00 | Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? | Jason Merrill |
20:52 | Re: Dumping CPP symbol table stats | Ian Lance Taylor |
19:13 | Dumping CPP symbol table stats | Victor Norman |
16:09 | Re: Defining a libobjc.so.2 ABI | Andreas Schwab |
15:47 | Re: Defining a libgnat.so, libgnarl.so ABI | Arnaud Charlet |
15:14 | Common handling of Sun/GNU symbol versioning | Rainer Orth |
15:11 | Defining a libgnat.so, libgnarl.so ABI | Rainer Orth |
15:10 | Defining a libobjc.so.2 ABI | Rainer Orth |
15:07 | Defining a libffi.so.4 ABI | Rainer Orth |
10:51 | Re: c++ compile error | Andrew Pinski |
10:43 | c++ compile error | lists . gcc |
February 23, 2010
February 22, 2010
February 21, 2010
February 20, 2010
13:34 | Re: gcc 4.4.1/linux 64bit: code crashes with -O3, works with -O2 | Richard Guenther |
13:30 | Власть должна отвечать перед народом! | dmitiy . obuhov |
12:38 | Re: gcc 4.4.1/linux 64bit: code crashes with -O3, works with -O2 | Christoph Rupp |
11:48 | Re: Long paths with ../../../../ throughout | Joseph S. Myers |
07:58 | Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? | Erik Trulsson |
07:57 | Re: Long paths with ../../../../ throughout | Jon |
00:18 | RE: If/When will GCC accept a compiler options file? -- please ignore, my mistake | Anthony Wong |
00:11 | If/When will GCC accept a compiler options file? | Anthony Wong |
February 19, 2010
February 18, 2010
23:30 | Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? | Joe Buck |
22:53 | Re: No integral promotions when calling library function? | Jie Zhang |
22:50 | gcc-4.5-20100218 is now available | gccadmin |
22:09 | Change x86 default arch for 4.5? | Jason Merrill |
15:46 | Re: No integral promotions when calling library function? | Dave Korn |
15:12 | Re: What's the policy for bug priorities, again | Dave Korn |
15:00 | Re: Problem in printf float values in range (-1 < value < 1) | Dave Korn |
13:41 | Re: subscrite | Diego Novillo |
13:21 | subscrite | Elijah Simonov |
10:21 | Looking for an active mmix maintainer | Paolo Carlini |
10:20 | Re: What's the policy for bug priorities, again | Richard Guenther |
10:15 | Problem in printf float values in range (-1 < value < 1) | Naveen H. S |
10:14 | Re: What's the policy for bug priorities, again | Piotr Wyderski |
07:17 | No integral promotions when calling library function? | Jie Zhang |
01:07 | Re: AC_CHECK_DECLS(basename) (Was: Re: Ping: patches required for --enable-build-with-cxx) | Joern Rennecke |
February 17, 2010
23:26 | Re: AC_CHECK_DECLS(basename) (Was: Re: Ping: patches required for --enable-build-with-cxx) | Paolo Bonzini |
21:12 | Re: Segfault inserting a pass | Richard Guenther |
21:10 | Re: What's the policy for bug priorities, again | Richard Guenther |
19:00 | Segfault inserting a pass | Saleel Kudchadker |
18:46 | Re: What's the policy for bug priorities, again | Mark Mitchell |
18:39 | What's the policy for bug priorities, again | Steven Bosscher |
18:11 | Re: AC_CHECK_DECLS(basename) (Was: Re: Ping: patches required for --enable-build-with-cxx) | Joern Rennecke |
17:46 | Re: AC_CHECK_DECLS(basename) (Was: Re: Ping: patches required for --enable-build-with-cxx) | Paolo Bonzini |
15:41 | Re: AC_CHECK_DECLS(basename) (Was: Re: Ping: patches required for --enable-build-with-cxx) | Joern Rennecke |
09:26 | Re: parse tree | Andrew Haley |
08:15 | Заставь власть служить народу! | dmitiy . obuhov |
07:03 | Re: AC_CHECK_DECLS(basename) (Was: Re: Ping: patches required for --enable-build-with-cxx) | Ralf Wildenhues |
04:50 | parse tree | dib . coolguy |
February 16, 2010
22:45 | gcc-4.4-20100216 is now available | gccadmin |
21:20 | Re: Simple question/help request on emit_move_insn. | Andrew Pinski |
21:15 | Simple question/help request on emit_move_insn. | Douglas B Rupp |
17:47 | Re: Gcc 4.3.5, when? | Paolo Bonzini |
17:28 | Re: Inserting instrument calls before and after a function | Harald Servat |
17:20 | Inserting instrument calls before and after a function | Saleel Kudchadker |
16:15 | Re: Gcc 4.3.5, when? | Richard Guenther |
16:00 | Gcc 4.3.5, when? | Paulo J. Matos |
10:16 | Re: GCC freezing for a Multiply Chain | Dominique Dhumieres |
February 15, 2010
19:33 | Re: Exception handling mechanism | Dave Korn |
18:43 | RE: GCC freezing for a Multiply Chain | Ian Bolton |
18:30 | Re: gcc -O1 performs better than gcc -O2 | sam tygier |
18:11 | Re: Exception handling mechanism | Paolo Carlini |
18:07 | Exception handling mechanism | Xiaolong Tang |
17:42 | Re: GCC freezing for a Multiply Chain | Basile STARYNKEVITCH |
17:04 | GCC freezing for a Multiply Chain | Balaji.Iyer |
12:26 | [PR] Now That's What I Call Fashion - February 2010 | Vivienne - OK Hello |
February 14, 2010
23:22 | C++ DR/354 | Magnus Fromreide |
22:48 | gcc-4.3-20100214 is now available | gccadmin |
19:33 | Re: gcc -O1 performs better than gcc -O2 | Joakim Tjernlund |
19:24 | Re: gcc -O1 performs better than gcc -O2 | Bernd Roesch |
19:22 | Re: gcc -O1 performs better than gcc -O2 | Jakub Jelinek |
19:17 | Re: gcc -O1 performs better than gcc -O2 | Richard Guenther |
19:08 | Re: gcc -O1 performs better than gcc -O2 | Joakim Tjernlund |
18:05 | Re: gcc -O1 performs better than gcc -O2 | Richard Guenther |
16:53 | gcc -O1 performs better than gcc -O2 | Joakim Tjernlund |
14:18 | Re: suggestion to use lzma for snapshots, maybe more? | Gerald Pfeifer |
February 13, 2010
February 12, 2010
22:08 | Greetings With Love, | Miss Jameela . |
20:00 | Re: How to get AST for C source in plugin? | Ilya Caramishev |
17:51 | Re: How to get AST for C source in plugin? | Joern Rennecke |
13:40 | Re: Are pointers to be supposed to be sign or zero extended to wider integers? | Martin Guy |
11:19 | Re: Are pointers to be supposed to be sign or zero extended to wider integers? | Richard Guenther |
10:09 | Re: [C++-0x] Status of constexpr | Gabriel Dos Reis |
10:02 | How to get AST for C source in plugin? | Ilya Caramishev |
09:41 | Are pointers to be supposed to be sign or zero extended to wider integers? | Jakub Jelinek |
04:37 | Re: Zero extractions and zero extends | Adam Nemet |
01:41 | [C++-0x] Status of constexpr | Ed Smith-Rowland |
February 11, 2010
22:59 | gcc-4.5-20100211 is now available | gccadmin |
17:46 | Re: RTL question for I64 | Nathan Froyd |
17:43 | RTL question for I64 | Douglas B Rupp |
14:35 | Re: Starting an OpenMP parallel section is extremely slow on a hyper-threaded Nehalem | Edwin Bennink |
14:12 | Re: Starting an OpenMP parallel section is extremely slow on a hyper-threaded Nehalem | Tim Prince |
10:00 | Starting an OpenMP parallel section is extremely slow on a hyper-threaded Nehalem | Edwin Bennink |
00:09 | [trans-mem] merge from trunk @ 156607 | Aldy Hernandez |
February 10, 2010
19:56 | New C++0x initializer_list/variadic template benchmark | Niels Dekker - address until 2 |
19:28 | Looking To Purchase - Networking and Telephony | Chris james Perry |
19:19 | Re: porting GCC to a micro with a very limited addressing mode --- enforcing a 'register indirect memory operand' through a constraint in md | Sergio Ruocco |
16:17 | Re: insn length attribute and code size optimization | Daniel Jacobowitz |
15:55 | Re: insn length attribute and code size optimization | Quentin Neill |
14:20 | how to identify a part of a multi-word register | Mohamed Shafi |
09:45 | Re: porting GCC to a micro with a very limited addressing mode --- enforcing a 'register indirect memory operand' through a constraint in md | Sergio Ruocco |
08:22 | Re: porting GCC to a micro with a very limited addressing mode --- success with LEGITIMATE / LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS, stuck with ICE ! | Michael Hope |
06:17 | Re: Linkage order in Linux | Ian Lance Taylor |
06:03 | Linkage order in Linux | michael kapelko |
February 09, 2010
February 08, 2010
18:00 | ping - plugin directory | Basile STARYNKEVITCH |
14:10 | Possible bug in GCC front end | Nikola Ikonic |
03:04 | Re: Jie Zhang appointed bfin maintainer | Jie Zhang |
00:53 | Jie Zhang appointed bfin maintainer | Gerald Pfeifer |
February 07, 2010
22:44 | gcc-4.3-20100207 is now available | gccadmin |
21:45 | Re: Why auto variables NOT overlap on stack? | Gerald Pfeifer |
21:13 | Re: Problem with stores and loads from unions and proposed fix | Michael Matz |
15:28 | The Linux binutils 2.20.51.0.6 is released | H.J. Lu |
13:54 | Re: trunk's genmodes crashes on Ubuntu/Lucid (alpha2 snapshot) not on Debian/Sid [both AMD64 architecture] | H.J. Lu |
09:35 | Re: trunk's genmodes crashes on Ubuntu/Lucid (alpha2 snapshot) not on Debian/Sid [both AMD64 architecture] | Justin P. Mattock |
09:02 | Re: trunk's genmodes crashes on Ubuntu/Lucid (alpha2 snapshot) not on Debian/Sid [both AMD64 architecture] | Basile STARYNKEVITCH |
02:44 | Re: Why auto variables NOT overlap on stack? | Ding Curie |
01:40 | Re: Why auto variables NOT overlap on stack? | Andrew Pinski |
01:13 | Why auto variables NOT overlap on stack? | Ding Curie |
February 06, 2010
22:27 | trunk's genmodes crashes on Ubuntu/Lucid (alpha2 snapshot) not on Debian/Sid [both AMD64 architecture] | Basile STARYNKEVITCH |
16:21 | Re: Support for export keyword to use with C++ templates ? | Kai Henningsen |
13:36 | Re: powerpc-eabi-gcc no implicit FPU usage | Kai Henningsen |
13:31 | Re: Problem with stores and loads from unions and proposed fix | Richard Guenther |
02:44 | Problem with stores and loads from unions and proposed fix | Martin Chaney |
02:14 | Re: _cpp_line_note structure in front end | Ian Lance Taylor |
February 05, 2010
23:18 | Re: aliases without a _DECL? | Jan Hubicka |
23:07 | Re: aliases without a _DECL? | Jason Merrill |
22:57 | Re: aliases without a _DECL? | Jan Hubicka |
22:34 | aliases without a _DECL? | Jason Merrill |
20:58 | Re: Exception handling information in the macintosh | Jack Howarth |
20:49 | Re: Exception handling information in the macintosh | Dave Korn |
20:38 | Re: Long paths with ../../../../ throughout | Jon |
20:22 | _cpp_line_note structure in front end | Nikola Ikonic |
18:46 | Re: Exception handling information in the macintosh | jacob navia |
16:59 | Re: Unwanted IRA copies via process_reg_shuffles | Vladimir Makarov |
16:07 | Re: Contributing | Diego Novillo |
15:40 | Contributing | krishna kishore |
13:50 | Re: gen_lowpart called where 'truncate' needed? | Mat Hostetter |
06:30 | Re: gen_lowpart called where 'truncate' needed? | Adam Nemet |
00:45 | Re: Exception handling information in the macintosh | Jack Howarth |
February 04, 2010
23:30 | Unwanted IRA copies via process_reg_shuffles | Jeff Law |
22:47 | gcc-4.5-20100204 is now available | gccadmin |
19:53 | help splitting instruction with two memory operands | King, Steven R |
19:29 | Re: gen_lowpart called where 'truncate' needed? | Mat Hostetter |
19:12 | Exception handling information in the macintosh | jacob navia |
16:48 | MicroBlaze branch updated | Michael Eager |
15:39 | Failure to combine SHIFT with ZERO_EXTEND | Rahul Kharche |
06:35 | Re: gen_lowpart called where 'truncate' needed? | Adam Nemet |
03:12 | Re: Support for export keyword to use with C++ templates ? | Richard Kenner |
03:06 | Re: Support for export keyword to use with C++ templates ? | Richard Kenner |
01:50 | Re: Support for export keyword to use with C++ templates ? | Ian Lance Taylor |
01:49 | Re: gen_lowpart called where 'truncate' needed? | Ian Lance Taylor |
01:01 | Re: Long paths with ../../../../ throughout | Ian Lance Taylor |
February 03, 2010
February 02, 2010
22:47 | Re: Long paths with ../../../../ throughout | Ian Lance Taylor |
22:46 | gcc-4.4-20100202 is now available | gccadmin |
22:42 | Re: Problems with `Installing GCC' | Joseph S. Myers |
22:38 | Re: Long paths with ../../../../ throughout | Jon |
22:35 | Re: Problems with `Installing GCC' | Ian Lance Taylor |
21:09 | Problems with `Installing GCC' | Rainer Orth |
17:58 | Modulo Scheduling | Cameron Lowell Palmer |
16:36 | Re: [trans-mem] ipa tm pass and dominator walks | Richard Henderson |
08:43 | Re: C++: How does pthread_cancel() work? | Jonathan Wakely |
08:26 | C++: How does pthread_cancel() work? | Christian FrÃbel |
04:04 | Re: Support for export keyword to use with C++ templates ? | Michael Witten |
00:43 | Working Part Time | maria8791maria8791 |
February 01, 2010
22:07 | Re: Register allocation and multi-reg HARD_FRAME_POINTER | Uros Bizjak |
17:50 | Re: GCC-How does the coding style affect the insv pattern recognization? | Adam Nemet |
17:47 | Re: An information about GIMPLE | Ian Lance Taylor |
17:22 | An information about GIMPLE | Ugo Mezzogori |
15:24 | Re: Git mirror needs a run of "git gc" | Frank Ch. Eigler |
14:07 | Re: Obsoleting IRIX < 6.5, Solaris 7, and Tru64 UNIX < V5.1 | Rainer Orth |
09:27 | Re: Bugzilla and setting priorities | Jonathan Wakely |
08:13 | Re: Help-The possible places where insn is splitted in greg pass | fanqifei |
04:56 | Re: Support for export keyword to use with C++ templates ? | Ian Lance Taylor |
00:38 | Re: Support for export keyword to use with C++ templates ? | Paolo Carlini |
00:34 | Re: Support for export keyword to use with C++ templates ? | Timothy Madden |
00:26 | Support for export keyword to use with C++ templates ? | Timothy Madden |
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]