gcc archive
date index for February, 2010

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

February 28, 2010
23:21 gcc-4.3-20100228 is now available gccadmin

February 27, 2010
20:45 Re: optimizing the pushing of constant parameters to functions Joern Rennecke
19:26 Re: optimizing the pushing of constant parameters to functions Andrew Pinski
18:17 optimizing the pushing of constant parameters to functions Daniel R. Grayson
17:27 Re: Gcc plugin: error: âLAST_AND_UNUSED_RTX_CODE â undeclared Andrew Pinski
15:07 Re: [RFH] A simple way to figure out the number of bits used by a long double Dave Korn
13:16 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Gerald Pfeifer
10:27 Idea for Google Summer Code : C Compiler for EFI Byte Code implement in gcc b95705030
08:55 Re: Gcc plugin: error: âLAST_AND_UNUSED_RTX _CODEâ undeclared ashish jain

February 26, 2010
20:59 Re: Re: [RFH] A simple way to figure out the number of bits used by a long double 3dw4rd
19:25 Re: [RFH] A simple way to figure out the number of bits used by a long double Ian Lance Taylor
19:19 Re: Parallelization of tokenizer in GCC!!! Tom Tromey
19:03 Re: Dumping CPP symbol table stats Tom Tromey
18:42 Re: [RFH] A simple way to figure out the number of bits used by a long double Andreas Schwab
18:18 Re: [RFH] A simple way to figure out the number of bits used by a long double Paolo Carlini
18:08 Re: [RFH] A simple way to figure out the number of bits used by a long double Paolo Carlini
18:07 Re: [RFH] A simple way to figure out the number of bits used by a long double Daniel Jacobowitz
18:05 Re: [RFH] A simple way to figure out the number of bits used by a long double Andreas Schwab
17:52 Parallelization of tokenizer in GCC!!! vivhari
17:31 Re: Gcc plugin: error: âLAST_AND_UNUSED_RTX_CODE â undeclared Andrew Pinski
17:26 Gcc plugin: error: âLAST_AND_UNUSED_RTX_COD Eâ undeclared ashish jain
17:09 Re: [RFH] A simple way to figure out the number of bits used by a long double Paolo Carlini
16:36 Re: [RFH] A simple way to figure out the number of bits used by a long double Andreas Schwab
16:35 Re: [RFH] A simple way to figure out the number of bits used by a long double Dave Korn
16:19 Re: [RFH] A simple way to figure out the number of bits used by a long double Paolo Carlini
16:06 Re: [RFH] A simple way to figure out the number of bits used by a long double Paolo Carlini
16:03 Re: [RFH] A simple way to figure out the number of bits used by a long double Andreas Schwab
15:55 Re: [RFH] A simple way to figure out the number of bits used by a long double Paolo Carlini
15:51 Re: [RFH] A simple way to figure out the number of bits used by a long double Andreas Schwab
15:45 Re: [RFH] A simple way to figure out the number of bits used by a long double Paolo Carlini
15:43 Re: [RFH] A simple way to figure out the number of bits used by a long double Andreas Schwab
15:41 Re: [RFH] A simple way to figure out the number of bits used by a long double Andreas Schwab
15:10 Re: [RFH] A simple way to figure out the number of bits used by a long double Paolo Carlini
14:58 Re: [RFH] A simple way to figure out the number of bits used by a long double Paolo Carlini
14:56 Re: [RFH] A simple way to figure out the number of bits used by a long double Andreas Schwab
14:50 Re: [RFH] A simple way to figure out the number of bits used by a long double Paolo Carlini
14:47 Re: [RFH] A simple way to figure out the number of bits used by a long double Tim Prince
14:30 Re: [RFH] A simple way to figure out the number of bits used by a long double Paolo Carlini
13:52 Re: [RFH] A simple way to figure out the number of bits used by a long double Ed Smith-Rowland
13:44 Re: [RFH] A simple way to figure out the number of bits used by a long double Ed Smith-Rowland
12:07 Re: [RFH] A simple way to figure out the number of bits used by a long double Paolo Carlini
12:03 Re: [RFH] A simple way to figure out the number of bits used by a long double Andreas Schwab
11:00 [RFH] A simple way to figure out the number of bits used by a long double Paolo Carlini

February 25, 2010
23:14 gcc-4.5-20100225 is now available gccadmin
22:17 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? H.J. Lu
22:01 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Jason Merrill
15:50 Re: Defining a libgnat.so, libgnarl.so ABI Laurent GUERBY
15:02 Re: Defining a libgnat.so, libgnarl.so ABI Arnaud Charlet
14:50 RE: Overhead in C and C++ Paul Koning
14:43 Re: Defining a libgnat.so, libgnarl.so ABI Paolo Bonzini
14:40 Re: Overhead in C and C++ Steven Bosscher
14:36 Overhead in C and C++ cmauchle
10:48 Re: a gcc plugin to show cfg graphically when debug gcc Richard Guenther
10:37 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Paolo Bonzini
10:23 branches within C++ destructors Rohit Gupta
07:51 Re: Defining a libgnat.so, libgnarl.so ABI Arnaud Charlet
07:49 a gcc plugin to show cfg graphically when debug gcc Eric Fisher
07:07 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Uros Bizjak
06:44 Re: Defining a libgnat.so, libgnarl.so ABI Florian Weimer
00:15 Re: Gprof can account for less than 1/3 of execution time?!?! Anthony Foiani

February 24, 2010
23:00 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Jason Merrill
20:52 Re: Dumping CPP symbol table stats Ian Lance Taylor
19:13 Dumping CPP symbol table stats Victor Norman
16:09 Re: Defining a libobjc.so.2 ABI Andreas Schwab
15:47 Re: Defining a libgnat.so, libgnarl.so ABI Arnaud Charlet
15:14 Common handling of Sun/GNU symbol versioning Rainer Orth
15:11 Defining a libgnat.so, libgnarl.so ABI Rainer Orth
15:10 Defining a libobjc.so.2 ABI Rainer Orth
15:07 Defining a libffi.so.4 ABI Rainer Orth
10:51 Re: c++ compile error Andrew Pinski
10:43 c++ compile error lists . gcc

February 23, 2010
22:59 gcc-4.4-20100223 is now available gccadmin
21:08 Re: Conditional clobbering Joern Rennecke
20:16 Re: Conditional clobbering Paulo Matos
19:12 Re: Conditional clobbering Joern Rennecke
19:04 Re: Hunting backend bugs Joern Rennecke
17:51 Re: How to update my SSH authorized_keys on gcc.gnu.org? H.J. Lu
17:35 Re: How to update my SSH authorized_keys on gcc.gnu.org? Christopher Faylor
17:29 Re: How to update my SSH authorized_keys on gcc.gnu.org? H.J. Lu
17:27 Re: How to update my SSH authorized_keys on gcc.gnu.org? H.J. Lu
17:26 Re: How to update my SSH authorized_keys on gcc.gnu.org? Tobias Burnus
17:22 Re: How to update my SSH authorized_keys on gcc.gnu.org? Andreas Schwab
17:10 How to update my SSH authorized_keys on gcc.gnu.org? H.J. Lu
16:32 Re: Register Allocation Pref. in 3.3.3 Michael Matz
15:29 Re: PR 42485 Delete both -b and -V options Matthias Klose
14:45 Hunting backend bugs garbett peter
14:42 Re: Register Allocation Pref. in 3.3.3 Paulo J. Matos
14:09 Re: Register Allocation Pref. in 3.3.3 Dave Korn
13:25 Conditional clobbering Paulo J. Matos
13:23 Re: Register Allocation Pref. in 3.3.3 Paulo J. Matos
11:11 Re: PR 42485 Delete both -b and -V options Manuel López-Ibáñez
11:00 Re: PR 42485 Delete both -b and -V options Richard Guenther
10:10 Re: is -fno-toplevel-reorder going to deprecate Richard Guenther
09:25 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Piotr Wyderski
03:10 Building GCC 4.3.3 for ARM. Vincent Forbes

February 22, 2010
23:50 Re: Gprof can account for less than 1/3 of execution time?!?! Andreas Schwab
23:18 Re: Gprof can account for less than 1/3 of execution time?!?! Daniel Jacobowitz
23:10 Re: Gprof can account for less than 1/3 of execution time?!?! Jon Turner
22:04 Re: is -fno-toplevel-reorder going to deprecate Ian Lance Taylor
21:47 Re: Gprof can account for less than 1/3 of execution time?!?! Nathan Froyd
21:42 Re: gcc 4.4.1/linux 64bit: code crashes with -O3, works with -O2 Janis Johnson
21:24 Re: Gprof can account for less than 1/3 of execution time?!?! Jon Turner
21:11 Re: gcc 4.4.1/linux 64bit: code crashes with -O3, works with -O2 Andrew Pinski
21:06 Re: gcc 4.4.1/linux 64bit: code crashes with -O3, works with -O2 Janis Johnson
20:37 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Dave Korn
20:32 Re: is -fno-toplevel-reorder going to deprecate Sergey Yakoushkin
20:32 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Toon Moene
20:21 Re: is -fno-toplevel-reorder going to deprecate Ian Lance Taylor
20:17 Re: gcc 4.4.1/linux 64bit: code crashes with -O3, works with -O2 Christoph Rupp
19:58 is -fno-toplevel-reorder going to deprecate Sergey Yakoushkin
17:09 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Dave Korn
17:07 Re: Gprof can account for less than 1/3 of execution time?!?! Dave Korn
15:53 Re: Gprof can account for less than 1/3 of execution time?!?! Axel Freyn
14:46 RE: Gprof can account for less than 1/3 of execution time?!?! Maucci, Cyrille
14:43 Re: Gprof can account for less than 1/3 of execution time?!?! Jon Turner
14:16 Re: Gprof can account for less than 1/3 of execution time?!?! Joern Rennecke
14:12 Re: Register Allocation Pref. in 3.3.3 Joern Rennecke
13:59 Re: Gprof can account for less than 1/3 of execution time?!?! Michael Matz
11:34 RE: Function versioning tests? Ian Bolton
11:04 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Andrew Haley
10:45 Register Allocation Pref. in 3.3.3 Paulo J. Matos
10:39 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Richard Guenther
10:27 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Andrew Haley
09:58 RE: Function versioning tests? Bingfeng Mei
04:32 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Vincent Lefevre
04:23 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Vincent Lefevre
03:26 Re: Long paths with ../../../../ throughout Ian Lance Taylor
02:58 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Joseph S. Myers
02:33 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Geert Bosch
02:25 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Vincent Lefevre
02:09 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Vincent Lefevre
01:57 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Joseph S. Myers
01:41 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Geert Bosch
01:39 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Geert Bosch
01:21 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Geert Bosch
00:29 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Erik Trulsson
00:06 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Steven Bosscher
00:06 GCC 4.5 Status Report (2010-02-21) Mark Mitchell

February 21, 2010
23:39 Re: Gprof can account for less than 1/3 of execution time?!?! Jon Turner
23:28 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Martin Guy
23:17 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Dave Korn
23:15 Re: Gprof can account for less than 1/3 of execution time?!?! Alan Modra
23:10 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Erik Trulsson
22:51 gcc-4.3-20100221 is now available gccadmin
22:50 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Erik Trulsson
22:19 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Dave Korn
22:05 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? H.J. Lu
21:59 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Steven Bosscher
21:55 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Steven Bosscher
21:54 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? H.J. Lu
21:54 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Steven Bosscher
21:14 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Erik Trulsson
20:39 Re: Gprof can account for less than 1/3 of execution time?!?! Jon Turner
20:37 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Laurent GUERBY
20:27 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? H.J. Lu
20:26 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Dave Korn
20:23 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Erik Trulsson
20:10 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Joe Buck
20:03 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Martin Guy
20:03 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Dave Korn
19:46 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Martin Guy
19:29 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Dave Korn
19:09 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Steven Bosscher
18:52 RE: Gprof can account for less than 1/3 of execution time?!?! Maucci, Cyrille
18:28 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Martin Guy
18:27 Gprof can account for less than 1/3 of execution time?!?! Jon Turner
18:25 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Martin Guy
18:02 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Dave Korn
17:48 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Joseph S. Myers
17:36 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Richard Guenther
17:34 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Joseph S. Myers
17:34 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Richard Guenther
17:27 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? H.J. Lu
17:22 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? H.J. Lu
17:15 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Geert Bosch
14:58 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Joseph S. Myers
12:33 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Paolo Carlini
12:13 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Richard Guenther
12:06 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Geert Bosch
11:21 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Paolo Carlini
11:18 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Steven Bosscher
00:43 Re: Long paths with ../../../../ throughout Jon

February 20, 2010
13:34 Re: gcc 4.4.1/linux 64bit: code crashes with -O3, works with -O2 Richard Guenther
13:30 Власть должна отвечать перед народом! dmitiy . obuhov
12:38 Re: gcc 4.4.1/linux 64bit: code crashes with -O3, works with -O2 Christoph Rupp
11:48 Re: Long paths with ../../../../ throughout Joseph S. Myers
07:58 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Erik Trulsson
07:57 Re: Long paths with ../../../../ throughout Jon
00:18 RE: If/When will GCC accept a compiler options file? -- please ignore, my mistake Anthony Wong
00:11 If/When will GCC accept a compiler options file? Anthony Wong

February 19, 2010
23:06 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Joel Dice
22:57 Re: student internship & GCC Ludovic Courtès
20:56 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Florian Weimer
19:26 Re: Adding a statement to statement list before pass_cfg_build Saleel Kudchadker
19:19 Re: Adding a statement to statement list before pass_cfg_build Richard Guenther
19:07 Adding a statement to statement list before pass_cfg_build Saleel Kudchadker
17:31 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Joe Buck
17:09 Function versioning tests? Ian Bolton
17:02 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Paolo Bonzini
12:19 Re: [trans-mem] __sync_add_and_fetch_8 on ia32 Paolo Carlini
12:08 Re: [trans-mem] __sync_add_and_fetch_8 on ia32 Paolo Carlini
11:38 [trans-mem] __sync_add_and_fetch_8 on ia32 Aldy Hernandez
09:11 student internship & GCC Basile Starynkevitch
02:57 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Jason Merrill
02:00 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Tim Prince
00:54 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Joe Buck
00:46 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Joseph S. Myers
00:31 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? David Daney

February 18, 2010
23:30 Re: Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Joe Buck
22:53 Re: No integral promotions when calling library function? Jie Zhang
22:50 gcc-4.5-20100218 is now available gccadmin
22:09 Change x86 default arch for 4.5? Jason Merrill
15:46 Re: No integral promotions when calling library function? Dave Korn
15:12 Re: What's the policy for bug priorities, again Dave Korn
15:00 Re: Problem in printf float values in range (-1 < value < 1) Dave Korn
13:41 Re: subscrite Diego Novillo
13:21 subscrite Elijah Simonov
10:21 Looking for an active mmix maintainer Paolo Carlini
10:20 Re: What's the policy for bug priorities, again Richard Guenther
10:15 Problem in printf float values in range (-1 < value < 1) Naveen H. S
10:14 Re: What's the policy for bug priorities, again Piotr Wyderski
07:17 No integral promotions when calling library function? Jie Zhang
01:07 Re: AC_CHECK_DECLS(basename) (Was: Re: Ping: patches required for --enable-build-with-cxx) Joern Rennecke

February 17, 2010
23:26 Re: AC_CHECK_DECLS(basename) (Was: Re: Ping: patches required for --enable-build-with-cxx) Paolo Bonzini
21:12 Re: Segfault inserting a pass Richard Guenther
21:10 Re: What's the policy for bug priorities, again Richard Guenther
19:00 Segfault inserting a pass Saleel Kudchadker
18:46 Re: What's the policy for bug priorities, again Mark Mitchell
18:39 What's the policy for bug priorities, again Steven Bosscher
18:11 Re: AC_CHECK_DECLS(basename) (Was: Re: Ping: patches required for --enable-build-with-cxx) Joern Rennecke
17:46 Re: AC_CHECK_DECLS(basename) (Was: Re: Ping: patches required for --enable-build-with-cxx) Paolo Bonzini
15:41 Re: AC_CHECK_DECLS(basename) (Was: Re: Ping: patches required for --enable-build-with-cxx) Joern Rennecke
09:26 Re: parse tree Andrew Haley
08:15 Заставь власть служить народу! dmitiy . obuhov
07:03 Re: AC_CHECK_DECLS(basename) (Was: Re: Ping: patches required for --enable-build-with-cxx) Ralf Wildenhues
04:50 parse tree dib . coolguy

February 16, 2010
22:45 gcc-4.4-20100216 is now available gccadmin
21:20 Re: Simple question/help request on emit_move_insn. Andrew Pinski
21:15 Simple question/help request on emit_move_insn. Douglas B Rupp
17:47 Re: Gcc 4.3.5, when? Paolo Bonzini
17:28 Re: Inserting instrument calls before and after a function Harald Servat
17:20 Inserting instrument calls before and after a function Saleel Kudchadker
16:15 Re: Gcc 4.3.5, when? Richard Guenther
16:00 Gcc 4.3.5, when? Paulo J. Matos
10:16 Re: GCC freezing for a Multiply Chain Dominique Dhumieres

February 15, 2010
19:33 Re: Exception handling mechanism Dave Korn
18:43 RE: GCC freezing for a Multiply Chain Ian Bolton
18:30 Re: gcc -O1 performs better than gcc -O2 sam tygier
18:11 Re: Exception handling mechanism Paolo Carlini
18:07 Exception handling mechanism Xiaolong Tang
17:42 Re: GCC freezing for a Multiply Chain Basile STARYNKEVITCH
17:04 GCC freezing for a Multiply Chain Balaji.Iyer
12:26 [PR] Now That's What I Call Fashion - February 2010 Vivienne - OK Hello

February 14, 2010
23:22 C++ DR/354 Magnus Fromreide
22:48 gcc-4.3-20100214 is now available gccadmin
19:33 Re: gcc -O1 performs better than gcc -O2 Joakim Tjernlund
19:24 Re: gcc -O1 performs better than gcc -O2 Bernd Roesch
19:22 Re: gcc -O1 performs better than gcc -O2 Jakub Jelinek
19:17 Re: gcc -O1 performs better than gcc -O2 Richard Guenther
19:08 Re: gcc -O1 performs better than gcc -O2 Joakim Tjernlund
18:05 Re: gcc -O1 performs better than gcc -O2 Richard Guenther
16:53 gcc -O1 performs better than gcc -O2 Joakim Tjernlund
14:18 Re: suggestion to use lzma for snapshots, maybe more? Gerald Pfeifer

February 13, 2010
01:47 Re: porting GCC to a micro with a very limited addressing mode --- enforcing a 'register indirect memory operand' through a constraint in md Dave Korn
01:45 Memo: Coca cola email notification (REF NO: LT/7914290166/CTV, BATCH: LM/51390-0/WGP). Coca cola in collaboration wit

February 12, 2010
22:08 Greetings With Love, Miss Jameela .
20:00 Re: How to get AST for C source in plugin? Ilya Caramishev
17:51 Re: How to get AST for C source in plugin? Joern Rennecke
13:40 Re: Are pointers to be supposed to be sign or zero extended to wider integers? Martin Guy
11:19 Re: Are pointers to be supposed to be sign or zero extended to wider integers? Richard Guenther
10:09 Re: [C++-0x] Status of constexpr Gabriel Dos Reis
10:02 How to get AST for C source in plugin? Ilya Caramishev
09:41 Are pointers to be supposed to be sign or zero extended to wider integers? Jakub Jelinek
04:37 Re: Zero extractions and zero extends Adam Nemet
01:41 [C++-0x] Status of constexpr Ed Smith-Rowland

February 11, 2010
22:59 gcc-4.5-20100211 is now available gccadmin
17:46 Re: RTL question for I64 Nathan Froyd
17:43 RTL question for I64 Douglas B Rupp
14:35 Re: Starting an OpenMP parallel section is extremely slow on a hyper-threaded Nehalem Edwin Bennink
14:12 Re: Starting an OpenMP parallel section is extremely slow on a hyper-threaded Nehalem Tim Prince
10:00 Starting an OpenMP parallel section is extremely slow on a hyper-threaded Nehalem Edwin Bennink
00:09 [trans-mem] merge from trunk @ 156607 Aldy Hernandez

February 10, 2010
19:56 New C++0x initializer_list/variadic template benchmark Niels Dekker - address until 2
19:28 Looking To Purchase - Networking and Telephony Chris james Perry
19:19 Re: porting GCC to a micro with a very limited addressing mode --- enforcing a 'register indirect memory operand' through a constraint in md Sergio Ruocco
16:17 Re: insn length attribute and code size optimization Daniel Jacobowitz
15:55 Re: insn length attribute and code size optimization Quentin Neill
14:20 how to identify a part of a multi-word register Mohamed Shafi
09:45 Re: porting GCC to a micro with a very limited addressing mode --- enforcing a 'register indirect memory operand' through a constraint in md Sergio Ruocco
08:22 Re: porting GCC to a micro with a very limited addressing mode --- success with LEGITIMATE / LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS, stuck with ICE ! Michael Hope
06:17 Re: Linkage order in Linux Ian Lance Taylor
06:03 Linkage order in Linux michael kapelko

February 09, 2010
23:02 Re: insn length attribute and code size optimization Richard Sandiford
22:49 gcc-4.4-20100209 is now available gccadmin
21:54 Re: Questions about compute_transpout in gcse.c code hoisting implementation Jeff Law
20:02 Re: porting GCC to a micro with a very limited addressing mode --- success with LEGITIMATE / LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS, stuck with ICE ! Sergio Ruocco
19:54 Re: [GRAPHITE] Re: Loop Transformations Question Tobias Grosser
19:08 Zero extractions and zero extends Jean Christophe Beyler
18:40 Re: [GRAPHITE] Re: Loop Transformations Question Sebastian Pop
18:34 Re: [GRAPHITE] Re: Loop Transformations Question Cristianno Martins
17:17 Re: [GRAPHITE] Re: Loop Transformations Question Richard Guenther
17:02 [GRAPHITE] Re: Loop Transformations Question Cristianno Martins
16:07 Generating store after fdivd: how to avoid delay slot k e
15:56 Re: RTX costs Paulo J. Matos
15:53 Re: Modulo Scheduling Alexander Monakov
14:24 Re: RTX costs Richard Kenner
14:12 Re: RTX costs Joern Rennecke
13:55 RTX costs Paulo J. Matos
13:12 Re: Exception handling information in the macintosh jacob navia
13:05 Your Fund Release! African Development Bank
10:58 RE: Failure to combine SHIFT with ZERO_EXTEND Rahul Kharche
10:46 Re: AC_CHECK_DECLS(basename) (Was: Re: Ping: patches required for --enable-build-with-cxx) Joern Rennecke
09:15 Re: AC_CHECK_DECLS(basename) (Was: Re: Ping: patches required for --enable-build-with-cxx) Paolo Bonzini
09:01 Re: Why auto variables NOT overlap on stack? Alexey Salmin
03:29 Re: Problem with stores and loads from unions and proposed fix Martin Chaney
01:17 AC_CHECK_DECLS(basename) (Was: Re: Ping: patches required for --enable-build-with-cxx) Joern Rennecke
00:45 Re: Failure to combine SHIFT with ZERO_EXTEND Jeff Law

February 08, 2010
18:00 ping - plugin directory Basile STARYNKEVITCH
14:10 Possible bug in GCC front end Nikola Ikonic
03:04 Re: Jie Zhang appointed bfin maintainer Jie Zhang
00:53 Jie Zhang appointed bfin maintainer Gerald Pfeifer

February 07, 2010
22:44 gcc-4.3-20100207 is now available gccadmin
21:45 Re: Why auto variables NOT overlap on stack? Gerald Pfeifer
21:13 Re: Problem with stores and loads from unions and proposed fix Michael Matz
15:28 The Linux binutils 2.20.51.0.6 is released H.J. Lu
13:54 Re: trunk's genmodes crashes on Ubuntu/Lucid (alpha2 snapshot) not on Debian/Sid [both AMD64 architecture] H.J. Lu
09:35 Re: trunk's genmodes crashes on Ubuntu/Lucid (alpha2 snapshot) not on Debian/Sid [both AMD64 architecture] Justin P. Mattock
09:02 Re: trunk's genmodes crashes on Ubuntu/Lucid (alpha2 snapshot) not on Debian/Sid [both AMD64 architecture] Basile STARYNKEVITCH
02:44 Re: Why auto variables NOT overlap on stack? Ding Curie
01:40 Re: Why auto variables NOT overlap on stack? Andrew Pinski
01:13 Why auto variables NOT overlap on stack? Ding Curie

February 06, 2010
22:27 trunk's genmodes crashes on Ubuntu/Lucid (alpha2 snapshot) not on Debian/Sid [both AMD64 architecture] Basile STARYNKEVITCH
16:21 Re: Support for export keyword to use with C++ templates ? Kai Henningsen
13:36 Re: powerpc-eabi-gcc no implicit FPU usage Kai Henningsen
13:31 Re: Problem with stores and loads from unions and proposed fix Richard Guenther
02:44 Problem with stores and loads from unions and proposed fix Martin Chaney
02:14 Re: _cpp_line_note structure in front end Ian Lance Taylor

February 05, 2010
23:18 Re: aliases without a _DECL? Jan Hubicka
23:07 Re: aliases without a _DECL? Jason Merrill
22:57 Re: aliases without a _DECL? Jan Hubicka
22:34 aliases without a _DECL? Jason Merrill
20:58 Re: Exception handling information in the macintosh Jack Howarth
20:49 Re: Exception handling information in the macintosh Dave Korn
20:38 Re: Long paths with ../../../../ throughout Jon
20:22 _cpp_line_note structure in front end Nikola Ikonic
18:46 Re: Exception handling information in the macintosh jacob navia
16:59 Re: Unwanted IRA copies via process_reg_shuffles Vladimir Makarov
16:07 Re: Contributing Diego Novillo
15:40 Contributing krishna kishore
13:50 Re: gen_lowpart called where 'truncate' needed? Mat Hostetter
06:30 Re: gen_lowpart called where 'truncate' needed? Adam Nemet
00:45 Re: Exception handling information in the macintosh Jack Howarth

February 04, 2010
23:30 Unwanted IRA copies via process_reg_shuffles Jeff Law
22:47 gcc-4.5-20100204 is now available gccadmin
19:53 help splitting instruction with two memory operands King, Steven R
19:29 Re: gen_lowpart called where 'truncate' needed? Mat Hostetter
19:12 Exception handling information in the macintosh jacob navia
16:48 MicroBlaze branch updated Michael Eager
15:39 Failure to combine SHIFT with ZERO_EXTEND Rahul Kharche
06:35 Re: gen_lowpart called where 'truncate' needed? Adam Nemet
03:12 Re: Support for export keyword to use with C++ templates ? Richard Kenner
03:06 Re: Support for export keyword to use with C++ templates ? Richard Kenner
01:50 Re: Support for export keyword to use with C++ templates ? Ian Lance Taylor
01:49 Re: gen_lowpart called where 'truncate' needed? Ian Lance Taylor
01:01 Re: Long paths with ../../../../ throughout Ian Lance Taylor

February 03, 2010
23:50 Re: Support for export keyword to use with C++ templates ? Timothy Madden
22:46 Re: Long paths with ../../../../ throughout Jon
21:56 Re: Long paths with ../../../../ throughout Jon
20:24 Re: Question about IRA (setup_allocno_priorities) Jeff Law
20:07 gen_lowpart called where 'truncate' needed? Mat Hostetter
19:36 Re: [trans-mem] ipa tm pass and dominator walks Aldy Hernandez
18:48 Re: [trans-mem] ipa tm pass and dominator walks Richard Henderson
18:26 Re: [trans-mem] ipa tm pass and dominator walks Aldy Hernandez
16:31 Re: Parser extension points for plug-ins Ludovic Courtès
16:30 Re: insn length attribute and code size optimization Daniel Jacobowitz
16:22 Parser extension points for plug-ins Ludovic Courtès
14:23 Re: insn length attribute and code size optimization Ian Lance Taylor
13:22 insn length attribute and code size optimization fanqifei
11:19 RE: GCC calling GNU assembler Bingfeng Mei
10:03 Re: Support for export keyword to use with C++ templates ? Paolo Bonzini
09:26 GCC calling GNU assembler Nikola Ikonic
02:35 Re: Support for export keyword to use with C++ templates ? Tim Prince
02:14 Re: Support for export keyword to use with C++ templates ? Richard Kenner
01:14 Re: Support for export keyword to use with C++ templates ? Timothy Madden

February 02, 2010
22:47 Re: Long paths with ../../../../ throughout Ian Lance Taylor
22:46 gcc-4.4-20100202 is now available gccadmin
22:42 Re: Problems with `Installing GCC' Joseph S. Myers
22:38 Re: Long paths with ../../../../ throughout Jon
22:35 Re: Problems with `Installing GCC' Ian Lance Taylor
21:09 Problems with `Installing GCC' Rainer Orth
17:58 Modulo Scheduling Cameron Lowell Palmer
16:36 Re: [trans-mem] ipa tm pass and dominator walks Richard Henderson
08:43 Re: C++: How does pthread_cancel() work? Jonathan Wakely
08:26 C++: How does pthread_cancel() work? Christian FrÃbel
04:04 Re: Support for export keyword to use with C++ templates ? Michael Witten
00:43 Working Part Time maria8791maria8791

February 01, 2010
22:07 Re: Register allocation and multi-reg HARD_FRAME_POINTER Uros Bizjak
17:50 Re: GCC-How does the coding style affect the insv pattern recognization? Adam Nemet
17:47 Re: An information about GIMPLE Ian Lance Taylor
17:22 An information about GIMPLE Ugo Mezzogori
15:24 Re: Git mirror needs a run of "git gc" Frank Ch. Eigler
14:07 Re: Obsoleting IRIX < 6.5, Solaris 7, and Tru64 UNIX < V5.1 Rainer Orth
09:27 Re: Bugzilla and setting priorities Jonathan Wakely
08:13 Re: Help-The possible places where insn is splitted in greg pass fanqifei
04:56 Re: Support for export keyword to use with C++ templates ? Ian Lance Taylor
00:38 Re: Support for export keyword to use with C++ templates ? Paolo Carlini
00:34 Re: Support for export keyword to use with C++ templates ? Timothy Madden
00:26 Support for export keyword to use with C++ templates ? Timothy Madden


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3