This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Sorry to mention aliasing again, but is the standard IN6_ARE_ADDR_EQUAL really wrong?

Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> writes:

> On 01/10/2010 12:39 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> writes:
>> 
>>> Why do you say the effective type is different?
>> 
>> The object type is uint8_t, but accessed as uint32_t.  That is
>> undefined.
>
> Unless uint8_t is a character type, as I understand it.

In which way does it make a difference?  For aliasing consideration,
only the type of access matters.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]