This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
January 31, 2010
22:47 | gcc-4.3-20100131 is now available | gccadmin |
10:26 | Git mirror needs a run of "git gc" | Florian Weimer |
January 30, 2010
January 29, 2010
January 28, 2010
22:55 | gcc-4.5-20100128 is now available | gccadmin |
19:30 | Re: Question about IRA (setup_allocno_priorities) | Vladimir Makarov |
19:20 | Question about IRA (setup_allocno_priorities) | Ian Bolton |
18:53 | Re: Treatment of builtin that receives function pointer | Andrew Haley |
18:03 | Re: gccgo language contribution accepted | Ian Lance Taylor |
17:52 | Re: Possible IRA bug in assign_hard_reg | Vladimir Makarov |
16:38 | Best -march & -mtune flags for XScale-PXA270 rev 7 (v5l) | Oleg Kravchenko |
16:14 | Problem initializing volatile structures | Byron Stanoszek |
14:45 | Re: Treatment of builtin that receives function pointer | Paulo J. Matos |
13:13 | Re: porting GCC to a micro with a very limited addressing mode --- what to write in LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS, LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS and micro.md ?! | Sergio Ruocco |
12:32 | FW: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2009-07/msg00484.html | Jonas Paulsson J |
12:24 | Re: _cplusplus symbol's value | Paolo Carlini |
12:16 | _cplusplus symbol's value | koala01 |
January 27, 2010
22:59 | Re: Strange conversion to int64 | Ian Lance Taylor |
19:08 | Strange conversion to int64 | Tony Bernardin |
16:27 | Obsoleting IRIX < 6.5, Solaris 7, and Tru64 UNIX < V5.1 | Rainer Orth |
14:52 | RE: Possible IRA bug in assign_hard_reg | Ian Bolton |
12:25 | Treatment of builtin that receives function pointer | Paulo J. Matos |
01:47 | Re: gccgo language contribution accepted | Joseph S. Myers |
January 26, 2010
January 25, 2010
January 24, 2010
22:50 | gcc-4.3-20100124 is now available | gccadmin |
22:13 | Re: speed of double-precision divide | Tim Prince |
21:48 | Re: speed of double-precision divide | Richard Guenther |
21:32 | Re: speed of double-precision divide | Steve White |
18:52 | Re: Question about code licensing | Paolo Bonzini |
17:55 | Re: Question about code licensing | Joe Buck |
15:07 | Re: int vs. bool / _Bool (Was: Re: Committed: Fix distribute_loop) | Paolo Bonzini |
15:01 | Re: Question about code licensing | Paolo Bonzini |
January 23, 2010
January 22, 2010
January 21, 2010
23:07 | gcc-4.5-20100121 is now available | gccadmin |
21:40 | Re: Question about peephole2 and addressing mode | Richard Henderson |
21:07 | Re: Possible IRA bug in assign_hard_reg | Vladimir Makarov |
18:22 | Possible IRA bug in assign_hard_reg | Ian Bolton |
15:53 | Re: [trans-mem] STM GCC Implementation | Riyadh Baghdadi |
14:23 | Question about peephole2 and addressing mode | Mohamed Shafi |
14:20 | GCC 4.5 Status Report (2010-01-21) | Jakub Jelinek |
14:05 | GCC 4.4.3 Status Report (2010-01-21) | Jakub Jelinek |
12:21 | A question about GGC/gengtype | Alexei I. Adamovich |
11:02 | Support for export keyword to use with C++ templates ? | Timothy Madden |
06:06 | Re: --enable-build-with-cxx vs plugins (Was: Re: Extra regressions for --enable-build-with-cxx) | Ian Lance Taylor |
01:05 | Dave Korn appointed Cygwin maintainer | Gerald Pfeifer |
January 20, 2010
16:14 | --enable-build-with-cxx vs plugins (Was: Re: Extra regressions for --enable-build-with-cxx) | Joern Rennecke |
15:56 | updated code size comparison | John Regehr |
15:30 | Re: Extra regressions for --enable-build-with-cxx | Ian Lance Taylor |
14:54 | Extra regressions for --enable-build-with-cxx | Joern Rennecke |
14:39 | Re: Changing the ABI | Jean Christophe Beyler |
14:14 | Re: GCC development plan | Ed Smith-Rowland |
13:28 | Re: GCC development plan | Piotr Wyderski |
12:45 | Re: GCC development plan | Tobias Burnus |
11:22 | Re: GCC development plan | Paolo Carlini |
11:17 | GCC development plan | Piotr Wyderski |
05:18 | Fwd: Help - as a beginner how to get started to contribute | Michael Han |
01:33 | Re: Why Thumb-2 only allows very limited access to the PC? | Carrot Wei |
January 19, 2010
January 18, 2010
January 17, 2010
23:16 | Re: Target hook definition licensing problems (GPL vs GFDL) | Gerald Pfeifer |
22:50 | gcc-4.3-20100117 is now available | gccadmin |
20:29 | Re: GCC-How does the coding style affect the insv pattern recognization? | Adam Nemet |
18:23 | Re: GCC 4.4.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org | Jakub Jelinek |
18:06 | Re: GCC 4.4.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org | H.J. Lu |
January 16, 2010
23:14 | Re: powerpc-eabi-gcc no implicit FPU usage | Paul Brook |
15:32 | Re: powerpc-eabi-gcc no implicit FPU usage | Robert Grimm |
15:23 | GCC 4.4.3 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org | Jakub Jelinek |
14:00 | Re: powerpc-eabi-gcc no implicit FPU usage | Martin Guy |
13:23 | Re: powerpc-eabi-gcc no implicit FPU usage | David Edelsohn |
02:22 | Re: GCC and binutils dependencies | Ian Lance Taylor |
00:50 | Re: powerpc-eabi-gcc no implicit FPU usage | Joel Sherrill |
January 15, 2010
January 14, 2010
January 13, 2010
January 12, 2010
January 11, 2010
January 10, 2010
January 09, 2010
January 08, 2010
16:50 | Re: errors in example on profile mode libstdc++ (gcc-4.5/changes.html) | Paolo Carlini |
16:00 | errors in example on profile mode libstdc++ (gcc-4.5/changes.html) | HyperQuantum |
15:52 | Re: pro_and_epilogue pass ran several time for same function? | Paulo J. Matos |
15:35 | Re: pro_and_epilogue pass ran several time for same function? | Ian Lance Taylor |
15:06 | pro_and_epilogue pass ran several time for same function? | Paulo J. Matos |
13:57 | Re: Deciding when to sibcall | Paulo J. Matos |
12:11 | Use -fprofile-generate get basic block counts | Jianzhang Peng |
January 07, 2010
January 06, 2010
January 05, 2010
January 04, 2010
January 03, 2010
January 02, 2010
17:59 | Re: The "right way" to handle alignment of pointer targets in the compiler? | Benjamin Redelings I |
17:11 | Re: WTF? | Gerald Pfeifer |
15:30 | Re: Please update GNU GCC mirror list | Gerald Pfeifer |
14:56 | Re: Big regression showing up on darwin | Dave Korn |
08:12 | Fleaser | Fleaser |
02:52 | Re: The "right way" to handle alignment of pointer targets in the compiler? | Tim Prince |
00:12 | The "right way" to handle alignment of pointer targets in the compiler? | Benjamin Redelings I |
January 01, 2010
16:46 | Re: Big regression showing up on darwin | Andrew Pinski |
12:07 | Big regression showing up on darwin | FX |
11:48 | Re: gcc-2.95 OK, gcc-{3,4}.X not OK | Andrew Haley |
11:39 | question about replace_in_call_usage in regmove.c | Amker.Cheng |
05:44 | gcc-2.95 OK, gcc-{3,4}.X not OK | Andris Kalnozols |
Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]