gcc archive
date index for December, 2009

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

December 31, 2009
22:56 gcc-4.5-20091231 is now available gccadmin
15:55 [LTO, RFA] Re: [PATCH] Fix PR42531: lto generates invalid assembler ".section" directives. Dave Korn
07:15 RE: target hooks / plugins Grigori Fursin
03:37 RE: AVR gives weird error with LTO Weddington, Eric

December 30, 2009
23:34 Re: AVR gives weird error with LTO Andrew Hutchinson
23:23 Re: AVR gives weird error with LTO Richard Guenther
23:04 Re: AVR gives weird error with LTO Andrew Hutchinson
22:39 Re: AVR gives weird error with LTO Dave Korn
22:35 Re: AVR gives weird error with LTO Rafael Espindola
22:22 Re: Unnecessary PRE optimization Richard Guenther
22:18 Re: ping^2 [rfc][patch] Document RETURN_EXPR better Richard Guenther
22:12 Re: target hooks / plugins Richard Guenther
21:58 Re: AVR gives weird error with LTO Dave Korn
20:21 Re: AVR gives weird error with LTO Andrew Hutchinson
16:31 Re: AVR gives weird error with LTO Dave Korn
15:58 AVR gives weird error with LTO Andrew Hutchinson
09:54 Re: Problem while configuring gcc3.2 Jonathan Wakely
00:40 Re: problem posting to gdb-patches@gnu.org Ian Lance Taylor

December 29, 2009
22:46 gcc-4.4-20091229 is now available gccadmin
20:35 Re: Need an assembler consult! Tim Prince
20:14 Objective-C 2.0 support Vincent R.
19:43 problem posting to gdb-patches@gnu.org gcc at cyberfiber dot org
19:40 no subject gcc at cyberfiber dot org
19:23 Need an assembler consult! FX
19:02 Re: Debugging lto1, how? Rafael Espindola
18:43 Re: Debugging lto1, how? Steven Bosscher
17:50 Re: Debugging lto1, how? Rafael Espindola
17:15 Re: Debugging lto1, how? Steven Bosscher
16:41 Re: Debugging lto1, how? Rafael Espindola
16:10 Debugging lto1, how? Steven Bosscher
10:48 CALL FOR PARTICIPATION: GROW'10 - 2nd Workshop on GCC Research Opportunities Dorit Nuzman
02:54 Re: LTO FAILs: invalid section name on non-ELF platform? Dave Korn
00:48 How to stream trees in lto-cgraph.c? Martin Jambor
00:09 Re: Problem while configuring gcc3.2 Pardis Beikzadeh

December 28, 2009
20:23 Re: tree check: expected SSA_NAME, have var_decl Justin Seyster
16:31 Re: libgomp forces -Werror even when top level configure --disable-werror Alexander Monakov
16:10 your parcel withheld Sir William R Gillian , Jnr
15:43 roportajlar ikincigundem
15:18 Re: libgomp forces -Werror even when top level configure --disable-werror Laurent GUERBY
11:56 Re: Problem while configuring gcc3.2 Kai Ruottu
06:54 Re: Problem while configuring gcc3.2 Jie Zhang
04:59 Re: Problem while configuring gcc3.2 Pardis Beikzadeh
04:43 Re: GCC (mirror) Gerald Pfeifer
02:51 Re: MPC required in one week. Jie Zhang
02:47 Re: MPC required in one week. Jie Zhang

December 27, 2009
22:49 gcc-4.3-20091227 is now available gccadmin
15:39 Re: in asm: where does ".zero 2102063220" come from? Daniel Franke
08:11 Re: GCC presentation targeted to users (43 slides in english) erlv
07:05 Re: MPC required in one week. Silvius Rus
06:09 Re: in asm: where does ".zero 2102063220" come from? Jerry DeLisle
04:15 in asm: where does ".zero 2102063220" come from? Daniel Franke

December 26, 2009
21:21 Re: CSE & compare/branch template problem Paolo Bonzini
01:07 Re: Unnecessary PRE optimization Daniel Berlin
00:14 ping^2 [rfc][patch] Document RETURN_EXPR better Jerry Quinn

December 25, 2009
04:15 Re: CSE & compare/branch template problem Michael Eager

December 24, 2009
22:48 gcc-4.5-20091224 is now available gccadmin
14:16 Re: Approval as AVR maintainer David Edelsohn
12:26 Re: target hooks / plugins Joseph S. Myers
12:15 Re: target hooks / plugins Joseph S. Myers
00:33 Re: target hooks / plugins Joern Rennecke

December 23, 2009
22:30 RE: Approval as AVR maintainer Weddington, Eric
22:25 Approval as AVR maintainer Andrew Hutchinson
22:19 tree check: expected SSA_NAME, have var_decl Aravinda
20:22 Re: Which optimizer should remove redundant subreg of sign_extension? Andrew Hutchinson
19:41 Re: Unnecessary PRE optimization Xinliang David Li
18:29 Re: Unnecessary PRE optimization H.J. Lu
18:06 Re: Unnecessary PRE optimization Paolo Bonzini
17:47 Re: Unnecessary PRE optimization H.J. Lu
17:42 Re: How should I prototype cpp_define in target patch? Andrew Hutchinson
16:41 Re: Unnecessary PRE optimization Paolo Bonzini
16:02 Re: Unnecessary PRE optimization Ramana Radhakrishnan
15:46 Re: How should I prototype cpp_define in target patch? Joseph S. Myers
15:19 RE: Unnecessary PRE optimization Bingfeng Mei
15:13 target hooks / plugins Joern Rennecke
15:01 Re: Unnecessary PRE optimization Paolo Bonzini
14:57 Re: Preserving order of variable declarations Diego Novillo
14:27 RE: Unnecessary PRE optimization Bingfeng Mei
14:10 Re: Unnecessary PRE optimization Paolo Bonzini
14:06 Re: Unnecessary PRE optimization Joern Rennecke
13:28 Re: Unnecessary PRE optimization Paolo Bonzini
13:05 How should I prototype cpp_define in target patch? Andrew Hutchinson
12:03 RE: Unnecessary PRE optimization Bingfeng Mei
12:01 Re: Unnecessary PRE optimization Steven Bosscher
11:50 Unnecessary PRE optimization Bingfeng Mei
10:13 Re: Question on PR36873 Jie Zhang
09:56 Re: How to implement pattens with more that 30 alternatives Richard Earnshaw
09:56 Re: Question on PR36873 Dave Korn
09:24 Re: Which optimizer should remove redundant subreg of sign_extension? Paolo Bonzini
09:21 Re: Question on PR36873 Jie Zhang
09:20 Re: CSE & compare/branch template problem Paolo Bonzini
07:09 Package hosting sites for MPC Kaveh R. Ghazi
06:46 Question on PR36873 Jie Zhang
04:42 Re: How to implement pattens with more that 30 alternatives Mohamed Shafi

December 22, 2009
22:49 gcc-4.4-20091222 is now available gccadmin
21:25 Check out Expect a Miracle Alfred Jones
18:27 Re: How to implement pattens with more that 30 alternatives Martin Guy
18:24 Re: Which optimizer should remove redundant subreg of sign_extension? Jeff Law
18:16 Which optimizer should remove redundant subreg of sign_extension? Andrew Hutchinson
16:47 Preserving order of variable declarations Aravinda
16:31 Re: How to implement pattens with more that 30 alternatives Daniel Jacobowitz
16:24 Re: How to implement pattens with more that 30 alternatives Martin Guy
15:51 Re: LTO FAILs: invalid section name - asterisks in DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME. Dave Korn
14:33 Re: [PATCH] ARM: Convert BUG() to use unreachable() Dave Korn
14:26 Re: How to implement pattens with more that 30 alternatives Daniel Jacobowitz
14:13 Re: How to implement pattens with more that 30 alternatives Richard Earnshaw
14:12 Re: [PATCH] ARM: Convert BUG() to use unreachable() Russell King - ARM Linux
14:10 Re: How to implement pattens with more that 30 alternatives Daniel Jacobowitz
13:52 Re: [PATCH] ARM: Convert BUG() to use unreachable() Dave Korn
12:10 Re: How to implement pattens with more that 30 alternatives Paul Brook
11:33 Re: [PATCH] ARM: Convert BUG() to use unreachable() Paolo Bonzini
09:57 Re: How to implement pattens with more that 30 alternatives Richard Earnshaw

December 21, 2009
20:12 Re: [PATCH] ARM: Convert BUG() to use unreachable() Russell King - ARM Linux
19:31 Re: [PATCH] ARM: Convert BUG() to use unreachable() Richard Henderson
19:10 Re: CSE & compare/branch template problem Richard Henderson
18:44 Re: How to implement pattens with more that 30 alternatives Paul Brook
18:39 Re: How to implement pattens with more that 30 alternatives Richard Earnshaw
16:07 Re: How to implement pattens with more that 30 alternatives Paul Brook
13:46 How to implement pattens with more that 30 alternatives Mohamed Shafi
11:00 Re: LTO FAILs: invalid section name - asterisks in DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME. Dave Korn
02:58 LTO FAILs: invalid section name on non-ELF platform? Dave Korn
02:55 memory predicate in RTL pattern daniel tian

December 20, 2009
22:53 gcc-4.3-20091220 is now available gccadmin
18:11 Re: CSE & compare/branch template problem Paolo Bonzini

December 19, 2009
22:45 Re: Caused by unknown alignment, was: Re: On the x86_64, does one have to zero a vector register before filling it completely ? Steven Bosscher
22:43 Re: Caused by unknown alignment, was: Re: On the x86_64, does one have to zero a vector register before filling it completely ? Daniel Berlin
22:12 Re: CSE & compare/branch template problem Michael Eager
19:48 Re: Caused by unknown alignment, was: Re: On the x86_64, does one have to zero a vector register before filling it completely ? Steven Bosscher
00:08 Re: CSE & compare/branch template problem Joern Rennecke

December 18, 2009
23:19 CSE & compare/branch template problem Michael Eager
15:33 Possible IRA improvements for irregular register architectures Ian Bolton
14:46 Re: GMP and GCC 4.3.2 Jean Christophe Beyler
11:08 Re: GCC presentation targeted to users (43 slides in english) Laurent GUERBY
10:43 Re: GCC presentation targeted to users (43 slides in english) Richard Earnshaw
09:18 Re: How to support 40bit GP register - Take two Hans-Peter Nilsson
07:26 Re: How to support 40bit GP register - Take two Mohamed Shafi
06:41 Re: How to support 40bit GP register - Take two Hans-Peter Nilsson
05:20 Re: updated code size comparison John Regehr
02:29 Re: GMP and GCC 4.3.2 Jie Zhang

December 17, 2009
22:56 gcc-4.5-20091217 is now available gccadmin
22:27 Re: GMP and GCC 4.3.2 Jean Christophe Beyler
21:53 Re: [LLVMdev] updated code size comparison Bill Wendling
20:28 Re: GCC presentation targeted to users (43 slides in english) Eric Botcazou
20:01 Re: GCC presentation targeted to users (43 slides in english) Laurent GUERBY
19:59 Re: GCC presentation targeted to users (43 slides in english) Eric Botcazou
19:58 Re: [PATCH] ARM: Convert BUG() to use unreachable() Russell King - ARM Linux
19:54 Re: updated code size comparison Paolo Bonzini
19:49 Re: [PATCH] ARM: Convert BUG() to use unreachable() Russell King - ARM Linux
19:38 Re: [PATCH] ARM: Convert BUG() to use unreachable() Jamie Lokier
19:34 Re: [PATCH] ARM: Convert BUG() to use unreachable() David Daney
19:33 Re: [PATCH] ARM: Convert BUG() to use unreachable() Russell King - ARM Linux
19:14 Re: [PATCH] ARM: Convert BUG() to use unreachable() Joe Buck
19:06 Re: [PATCH] ARM: Convert BUG() to use unreachable() Russell King - ARM Linux
19:05 Re: [PATCH] ARM: Convert BUG() to use unreachable() Jamie Lokier
19:04 Re: Linking against an specific glibc H.J. Lu
18:51 Re: updated code size comparison Eric Botcazou
18:48 Re: Linking against an specific glibc Douglas Gemignani
18:35 Re: [PATCH] ARM: Convert BUG() to use unreachable() Joe Buck
18:21 Re: [PATCH] ARM: Convert BUG() to use unreachable() Russell King - ARM Linux
18:11 Re: Linking against an specific glibc H.J. Lu
18:01 Linking against an specific glibc Douglas Gemignani
17:22 Re: updated code size comparison John Regehr
17:17 Re: [PATCH] ARM: Convert BUG() to use unreachable() Richard Guenther
17:12 Re: [PATCH] ARM: Convert BUG() to use unreachable() David Daney
16:27 Re: A question about loop-unroll Richard Guenther
13:23 Re: A question about loop-unroll Zdenek Dvorak
12:48 Re: A question about loop-unroll Richard Guenther
12:07 A question about loop-unroll Revital1 Eres
11:55 Re: GCC presentation targeted to users (43 slides in english) Richard Guenther
11:29 GCC presentation targeted to users (43 slides in english) Laurent GUERBY
11:19 Re: GMP and GCC 4.3.2 Jay Foad
10:27 Re: GMP and GCC 4.3.2 Andrew Haley
04:37 Successful make profiledbootstrap of GCC 4.4.2 on Snow Leopard 10.6.2 x86_64-apple-darwin10.2.0 Olexa Bilaniuk
04:04 [034/151] x86: Prevent GCC 4.4.x (pentium-mmx et al) function prologue wreckage Greg KH

December 16, 2009
21:59 Re: GMP and GCC 4.3.2 Steven Bosscher
20:54 Re: GMP and GCC 4.3.2 Jean Christophe Beyler
19:37 Re: GMP and GCC 4.3.2 Richard Guenther
18:50 GMP and GCC 4.3.2 Jean Christophe Beyler
15:07 Re: updated code size comparison John Regehr
14:21 Please update GNU GCC mirror list JohnT
09:26 Re: updated code size comparison Paolo Bonzini
06:55 Re: updated code size comparison Miles Bader
02:21 updated code size comparison John Regehr

December 15, 2009
22:48 gcc-4.4-20091215 is now available gccadmin
21:14 Re: a question about argument ARG_POINTER_REGNUM Ivan Shcherbakov
18:56 Re: detailed comparison of generated code size for GCC and other compilers Andreas Schwab
18:26 Re: generate RTL sequence Jeff Law
17:17 Re: detailed comparison of generated code size for GCC and other compilers John Regehr
17:00 Re: CFI statements vs. -pg Thomas Schwinge
16:27 Re: [RFC] LTO and debug information Richard Guenther
16:10 Re: a question about argument ARG_POINTER_REGNUM Ian Lance Taylor
15:53 Re: a question about argument ARG_POINTER_REGNUM Ivan Shcherbakov
15:49 Re: New RTL instruction for my port Jean Christophe Beyler
15:44 Re: a question about argument ARG_POINTER_REGNUM Ian Lance Taylor
15:28 Re: a question about argument ARG_POINTER_REGNUM Ivan Shcherbakov
15:21 Re: New RTL instruction for my port Daniel Jacobowitz
15:08 Re: a question about argument ARG_POINTER_REGNUM Ian Lance Taylor
15:08 Re: New RTL instruction for my port Jean Christophe Beyler
14:07 Re: [RFC] LTO and debug information Diego Novillo
13:45 Re: detailed comparison of generated code size for GCC and other compilers Andi Kleen
12:34 Re: a question about argument ARG_POINTER_REGNUM Ivan Shcherbakov
11:46 Re: detailed comparison of generated code size for GCC and other compilers Mathieu Lacage
10:24 Re: detailed comparison of generated code size for GCC and other compilers Andi Kleen
10:15 Re: CFI statements vs. -pg Richard Earnshaw
09:20 Re: Performance regression of generated numerical code Martin Reinecke
09:00 Re: detailed comparison of generated code size for GCC and other compilers Paolo Bonzini
08:52 an array's offset from the stack point Jianzhang Peng
08:44 Re: detailed comparison of generated code size for GCC and other compilers Chris Lattner
08:28 Re: detailed comparison of generated code size for GCC and other compilers Paolo Bonzini
06:35 Re: detailed comparison of generated code size for GCC and other compilers Robert Dewar
06:33 Re: detailed comparison of generated code size for GCC and other compilers Robert Dewar
06:30 Re: detailed comparison of generated code size for GCC and other compilers Robert Dewar
01:38 Re: GCC's data dependence analyse may inaccuracy Jianzhang Peng
01:37 Google immobilier du Maroc info2
00:38 Re: detailed comparison of generated code size for GCC and other compilers John Regehr

December 14, 2009
23:59 Re: Performance regression of generated numerical code H.J. Lu
23:50 Performance regression of generated numerical code Martin Reinecke
23:32 Re: a question about argument ARG_POINTER_REGNUM Ian Lance Taylor
23:10 Re: New RTL instruction for my port Daniel Jacobowitz
22:52 Re: New RTL instruction for my port Jean Christophe Beyler
22:38 strange dependency_libs in libstdc++.la on *-*-mingw32 Rainer Emrich
22:32 trunk with shared libstdc++ on x86_64-w64-mingw32 fails to build libgmpxx Rainer Emrich
22:06 Re: detailed comparison of generated code size for GCC and other compilers Joe Buck
22:04 Re: New RTL instruction for my port Daniel Jacobowitz
21:53 Re: detailed comparison of generated code size for GCC and other compilers John Regehr
21:47 New RTL instruction for my port Jean Christophe Beyler
21:46 Re: detailed comparison of generated code size for GCC and other compilers Joe Buck
20:36 Re: detailed comparison of generated code size for GCC and other compilers John Regehr
20:31 Re: detailed comparison of generated code size for GCC and other compilers John Regehr
18:18 CFI statements vs. -pg Thomas Schwinge
17:49 Re: detailed comparison of generated code size for GCC and other compilers Steven Bosscher
17:46 Re: detailed comparison of generated code size for GCC and other compilers Daniel Jacobowitz
17:37 The Linux binutils 2.20.51.0.4 is released H.J. Lu
17:17 Re: detailed comparison of generated code size for GCC and other compilers Andi Kleen
16:31 Re: detailed comparison of generated code size for GCC and other compilers John Regehr
16:15 Re: detailed comparison of generated code size for GCC and other compilers Andi Kleen
15:35 detailed comparison of generated code size for GCC and other compilers John Regehr
15:14 Re: Graphite: Collapsing of loop nests ? Armin Größlinger
13:25 Re: GCC's data dependence analyse may inaccuracy Richard Guenther
13:08 Re: GCC's data dependence analyse may inaccuracy Revital1 Eres
11:15 RE: Understanding IRA (The Story so far) Ian Bolton
09:15 a question about argument ARG_POINTER_REGNUM Ivan Shcherbakov
08:04 Re: Vectorizing 16bit signed integers Ira Rosen
02:20 GCC's data dependence analyse may inaccuracy Jianzhang Peng

December 13, 2009
22:43 gcc-4.3-20091213 is now available gccadmin
21:36 Re: GCC server is down? Andreas Tobler
21:33 Re: GCC server is down? Andrew Pinski
21:25 GCC server is down? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
20:51 Re: [RFC] LTO and debug information Richard Guenther
19:56 Re: [RFC] LTO and debug information Michael Matz
19:46 Re: [RFC] LTO and debug information Richard Guenther
19:43 Re: [RFC] LTO and debug information Richard Guenther

December 12, 2009
04:47 Re: Bad mailing list index? Nicholas Sherlock

December 11, 2009
20:10 Re: Bitfields problem Jean Christophe Beyler
18:25 Vectorizing 16bit signed integers Allan Sandfeld Jensen
18:18 Dwarf announcements mailing list Michael Eager
16:57 Bitfields problem Jean Christophe Beyler
15:31 Re: generate RTL sequence Ian Lance Taylor
15:07 [RFC] LTO and debug information Richard Guenther
11:05 Re: identifying indirect references in a loop Richard Guenther
10:16 How to make a array aligned with 16 byte Jianzhang Peng
06:41 Re: generate RTL sequence Joern Rennecke
05:03 Re: generate RTL sequence Richard Kenner
04:23 Re: generate RTL sequence Ian Lance Taylor
04:16 identifying indirect references in a loop Aravinda
03:57 Re: generate RTL sequence daniel tian
03:52 Re: generate RTL sequence daniel tian
03:50 Re: generate RTL sequence daniel tian
03:49 Re: generate RTL sequence Ian Lance Taylor
03:45 Re: generate RTL sequence Jianzhang Peng
03:37 Re: generate RTL sequence daniel tian
03:31 Re: generate RTL sequence Ian Lance Taylor
01:33 generate RTL sequence daniel tian

December 10, 2009
22:52 gcc-4.5-20091210 is now available gccadmin
19:53 Re: Is the GCC optimazer too smart? Jonathan Wakely
12:52 Re: Is the GCC optimizer too smart? Paolo Carlini
12:03 Is the GCC optimazer too smart? sergio borghese
06:54 HELP: combine 2 insn error Jianzhang Peng

December 09, 2009
18:57 Re: Bad mailing list index? H.J. Lu
18:55 Re: Bad mailing list index? David Daney
18:52 Re: Bad mailing list index? Dave Korn
18:44 Bad mailing list index? H.J. Lu
18:31 Re: New location for FTensor library Janis Johnson
17:57 New location for FTensor library Walter Landry
17:49 Re: Bug in x86-64 psABI or in gcc? H.J. Lu
16:47 Re: Bug in x86-64 psABI or in gcc? Andrew Haley
16:30 Re: Bug in x86-64 psABI or in gcc? H.J. Lu
16:09 Re: issue building ppl with trunk Rainer Emrich
15:58 Re: Bug in x86-64 psABI or in gcc? Andrew Haley
15:51 Re: Bug in x86-64 psABI or in gcc? Andrew Haley
15:49 Re: Bug in x86-64 psABI or in gcc? Michael Matz
15:32 Re: Bug in x86-64 psABI or in gcc? Michael Matz
15:25 Re: Bug in x86-64 psABI or in gcc? H.J. Lu
15:24 Re: Bug in x86-64 psABI or in gcc? Dave Korn
15:18 Re: Bug in x86-64 psABI or in gcc? H.J. Lu
15:15 Re: Bug in x86-64 psABI or in gcc? H.J. Lu
15:10 Re: Bug in x86-64 psABI or in gcc? Michael Matz
15:10 Re: Bug in x86-64 psABI or in gcc? Andrew Haley
15:08 Re: Bug in x86-64 psABI or in gcc? Michael Matz
15:04 Re: Bug in x86-64 psABI or in gcc? H. Peter Anvin
15:04 Re: Bug in x86-64 psABI or in gcc? H.J. Lu
14:57 Re: Bug in x86-64 psABI or in gcc? Michael Matz
14:48 Re: Bug in x86-64 psABI or in gcc? H. Peter Anvin
14:44 Re: Bug in x86-64 psABI or in gcc? H.J. Lu
14:26 review of dwarf2out.c changes? Jack Howarth
10:04 Re: Bug in x86-64 psABI or in gcc? Michael Matz

December 08, 2009
22:47 gcc-4.4-20091208 is now available gccadmin
20:58 Re: GCC 4.3.3 Configure and Build for DDRescue Jonathan Wakely
20:34 GCC 4.3.3 Configure and Build for DDRescue Tim Murdoch
18:58 Re: Bug in x86-64 psABI or in gcc? H. Peter Anvin
18:25 Re: Bug in x86-64 psABI or in gcc? H.J. Lu
16:50 Re: Bug in x86-64 psABI or in gcc? Michael Matz
13:55 Re: i370 port - 3.4.6 to 4.4 upgrade attempt Ulrich Weigand
10:01 Re: Bug in GCC 4.5 c++0x version of std::list<T>::merge(&&)? Paolo Carlini
09:54 Re: Bug in GCC 4.5 c++0x version of std::list<T>::merge(&&)? Piotr Wyderski
08:26 Re: Bug in GCC 4.5 c++0x version of std::list<T>::merge(&&)? Jonathan Wakely
06:11 Re: Insn missing in Size optimization(-Os) daniel tian
05:25 Re: How to define target-specific PSImode? Lev Yudalevich
04:04 Re: Insn missing in Size optimization(-Os) Jeff Law
03:39 Bug in GCC 4.5 c++0x version of std::list<T>::merge(&&)? Benjamin Redelings I

December 07, 2009
21:23 Re: How to define target-specific PSImode? DJ Delorie
19:33 outage 2009-12-12 weekend, gcc.gnu.org / sourceware / cygwin Frank Ch. Eigler
18:39 Re: Bug in x86-64 psABI or in gcc? H. Peter Anvin
18:38 Re: Bug in x86-64 psABI or in gcc? H. Peter Anvin
18:33 Bug in x86-64 psABI or in gcc? H.J. Lu
13:30 RE: Understanding IRA Ian Bolton
12:05 Re: i370 port - 3.4.6 to 4.4 upgrade attempt Paul Edwards
10:53 Re: GCC 4.3.5 ? Richard Guenther
06:14 Re: How to define target-specific PSImode? Joern Rennecke
05:40 Re: How to define target-specific PSImode? Lev Yudalevich
04:10 Re: How to define target-specific PSImode? Joern Rennecke
03:10 Re: Insn missing in Size optimization(-Os) daniel tian

December 06, 2009
22:45 gcc-4.3-20091206 is now available gccadmin
22:05 Re: Need help to correct vla-dealloc testcase Andrew Hutchinson
17:57 Re: How to define target-specific PSImode? Joseph S. Myers
17:55 Re: Need help to correct vla-dealloc testcase Joseph S. Myers
16:47 Re: How to define target-specific PSImode? Lev Yudalevich
15:48 Re: How to define target-specific PSImode? Robert Dewar
15:43 How to define target-specific PSImode? Lev Yudalevich
15:33 Need help to correct vla-dealloc testcase Andrew Hutchinson
03:59 GCC 4.3.5 ? Frédéric L. W. Meunier

December 05, 2009
16:18 Re: Insn missing in Size optimization(-Os) Jeff Law
10:57 Re: issue building ppl with trunk Rainer Emrich
08:01 Re: Insn missing in Size optimization(-Os) daniel tian
03:23 Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2009-12-02) Dave Korn
03:19 Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2009-12-02) Jack Howarth

December 04, 2009
18:55 Re: Graphite: Collapsing of loop nests ? Cédric Bastoul
18:29 Re: i need help Justin P. Mattock
18:20 Re: Graphite: Collapsing of loop nests ? Sebastian Pop
18:02 i need help jose manuel Herrera Magana
17:24 Re: Graphite: Collapsing of loop nests ? Tobias Grosser
17:12 Re: issue building ppl with trunk Jason Merrill
17:09 Re: Graphite: Collapsing of loop nests ? Cédric Bastoul
16:55 Re: Graphite: Collapsing of loop nests ? Sebastian Pop
16:51 Re: Graphite: Collapsing of loop nests ? Sebastian Pop
16:44 Re: Graphite: Collapsing of loop nests ? Cédric Bastoul
16:40 Re: Graphite: Collapsing of loop nests ? Tobias Grosser
16:30 Re: Graphite: Collapsing of loop nests ? Sebastian Pop
15:41 Graphite: Collapsing of loop nests ? Toon Moene
12:24 Re: issue building ppl with trunk Dodji Seketeli
11:23 Re: issue building ppl with trunk Rainer Emrich
09:23 GCC (mirror) fikri fadzil
09:11 . fikri fadzil
07:01 Re: Insn missing in Size optimization(-Os) daniel tian

December 03, 2009
22:45 gcc-4.5-20091203 is now available gccadmin
22:16 Re: plugin issues to fix (or document) before 4.5 release Kai Tietz
22:12 Re: plugin issues to fix (or document) before 4.5 release Dave Korn
21:31 Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2009-12-02) Ralf Wildenhues
21:16 Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2009-12-02) Jack Howarth
21:03 Re: plugin issues to fix (or document) before 4.5 release Joseph S. Myers
20:55 Who would have figured... Web Solutions
20:55 Who would have figured... Web Solutions
20:32 Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2009-12-02) Ralf Wildenhues
19:16 Re: Understanding IRA Jeff Law
18:14 RE: TLS support on ARM Thomas Klein
16:13 Re: TLS support on ARM Daniel Jacobowitz
16:07 RE: TLS support on ARM Thomas Klein
14:05 Re: TLS support on ARM Daniel Jacobowitz
13:28 TLS support on ARM Thomas Klein
10:14 RE: HELP: data dependence Bingfeng Mei
09:56 HELP: data dependence Jianzhang Peng
08:42 Re: plugin issues to fix (or document) before 4.5 release Dave Korn
07:37 Re: plugin issues to fix (or document) before 4.5 release Arnaud Charlet
02:23 Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2009-12-02) Jack Howarth
00:43 Re: [alpha] Request for help wrt gcc bugs 27468, 27469 Richard Henderson

December 02, 2009
22:46 [alpha] Request for help wrt gcc bugs 27468, 27469 Matt Turner
22:17 Re: plugin issues to fix (or document) before 4.5 release Rafael Espindola
22:08 Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2009-12-02) Richard Guenther
22:03 Re: i370 port Paul Edwards
21:39 Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2009-12-02) Ralf Wildenhues
20:29 RE: Understanding IRA Ian Bolton
17:35 Re: Insn missing in Size optimization(-Os) Jeff Law
16:21 Re: Insn missing in Size optimization(-Os) Ian Lance Taylor
12:32 GCC 4.5 Status Report (2009-12-02) Richard Guenther
12:29 Re: Insn missing in Size optimization(-Os) daniel tian
10:18 Insn missing in Size optimization(-Os) daniel tian
05:05 Re: IRA memory cost calculation Michael Eager
03:58 Re: [Patch, libfortran] PR 40812 Large file support on MinGW Danny Smith

December 01, 2009
22:53 gcc-4.4-20091201 is now available gccadmin
21:47 Re: Delay loaded shared objects Robert Huo
18:18 [Patch, libfortran] PR 40812 Large file support on MinGW Janne Blomqvist
15:48 ICE on unique_ptr Piotr Wyderski
14:08 Re: issue building ppl with trunk Jason Merrill
14:02 issue building ppl with trunk Rainer Emrich
13:32 Plugin callback interface (Was: plugin events for ICI) Joern Rennecke
10:33 Re: Support for VLE code in PowerPC Nick Clifton
10:26 Re: MPC required in one week. Paolo Bonzini
09:12 Re: Question about filling multi delay slots Amker.Cheng
04:59 تم اختيارك للأنضمام لفريق MTZ MasTerZ Team
04:02 Support for VLE code in PowerPC Kaushik M Phatak
02:46 Medical Doctor List in the USA Crandall V Rusty
00:43 Re: IRA memory cost calculation Michael Eager
00:19 Re: Delay loaded shared objects Richard Henderson


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3