This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: WTF?

From: Ben Elliston <bje at au1 dot ibm dot com>
To: "Kaveh R. GHAZI" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
Cc: Richard Guenther <rguenther at suse dot de>, Richard Kenner <kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu>, matz at suse dot de, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, hongjiu dot lu at intel dot com, law at redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:12:39 +1100
Subject: Re: WTF?
References: <alpine.LNX.2.00.0911251737500.17161@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <alpine.LNX.2.00.0911251739340.17161@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <10911251651.AA00241@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <4B0D6245.3010601@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0911251803590.15566@wotan.suse.de> <10911251719.AA00825@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <alpine.LNX.2.00.0911252028550.17161@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0911251504290.15211@caipclassic.rutgers.edu>

On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 15:17 -0500, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:

> Finally, we have a process for reverting a patch.  If anyone wants to
> revert some part, it needs to be followed.  Otherwise *that* would be
> breaking the rules...

Won't reverting the patch just attribute all of the lines to the
username of the reverter?  Losing the svn blame facility is a serious
regression to my mind.

Ben

Follow-Ups:
- Re: WTF?
  - From: Vincent Lefevre

References:
- WTF?
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: WTF?
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: WTF?
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: WTF?
  - From: Jeff Law
- Re: WTF?
  - From: Michael Matz
- Re: WTF?
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: WTF?
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: WTF?
  - From: Kaveh R. GHAZI

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]