Re: How to support 40bit GP register

[Mohamed Shafi <shafitvm at gmail dot com>]

2009/10/22 Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>:
> On 10/21/2009 07:25 AM, Mohamed Shafi wrote:
>>
>> For accessing a->b GCC generates the following code:
>>
>> ? ? ? ?move.l ?(sp-16), d3
>> ? ? ? ?lsrr.l ?#<16, d3
>> ? ? ? ?move.l ?(sp-12),d2
>> ? ? ? ?asll ? ?#<16,d2
>> ? ? ? ?or ? ? ?d3,d2
>> ? ? ? ?cmpeq.w #<2,d2
>> ? ? ? ?jf ? ? ?_L2
>>
>> Because data registers are 40 bit for 'asll' operation the shift count
>> should be 16+8 or there should be sign extension from 32bit to 40 bits
>> after the 'or' operation. The target has instruction to sign extend
>> from 32bit to 40 bit.
>>
>> Similarly there are other operation that requires sign/zero extension.
>> So is there any way to tell GCC that the data registers are 40bit and
>> there by expect it to generate sign/zero extension accordingly ?
>
> Define a machine mode for your 40-bit type in cpu-modes.def. ?Depending on
> how your 40-bit type is stored in memory, you'll use either
>
> ?INT_MODE (RI, 5) ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?// load-store uses exactly 5 bytes
> ?FRACTIONAL_INT_MODE (RI, 40, 8) // load-store uses 8 bytes
>
> Where I've arbitrarily chosen "RImode" as a mnemonic for Register Integral
> Mode. ?Now you define arithmetic operations, as needed, on
> RImode. ?You define the "extendsiri" pattern to be that sign-extend from
> 32-to-40-bit instruction. ?You define your comparison patterns on RImode,
> and not on SImode, since your comparison instruction works on the entire 40
> bits.
>
> You'll wind up with a selection of patterns in your machine description that
> have a sign-extension pattern built in, depending on the exact behaviour of
> your ISA. ?There are plenty of examples on x86_64, mips64, and Alpha (to
> name a few) that have similar properties with SI and DImodes. ?Examine the
> -fdump-rtl-combine-details dump for exemplars of the canonical forms that
> the combiner creates when it tries to merge sign-extension instructions into
> preceeding patterns.
>
  Ok i have comparison patterns written in RImode. When you say that i
will wind up with a selection of patterns do you mean to say that i
should have patterns for operations that operate on full 40bits in
RImode and disable the corresponding SImode patterns? Or is it that i
have to write nameless patterns in RImode for arithmetic operations
and look at the dumps to see how the combiner will merge the patterns
so that it can match the comparison operations?

Regards,
Shafi