gcc archive
date index for November, 2009

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

November 30, 2009
23:14 Re: Understanding IRA Jeff Law
22:53 Delay loaded shared objects Robert Huo
22:35 Re: Graphite and Loop fusion. Toon Moene
22:00 Re: IRA memory cost calculation Jeff Law
21:50 Re: MPC required in one week. Kaveh R. Ghazi
21:48 Re: IRA memory cost calculation Michael Eager
21:35 Re: IRA memory cost calculation Jeff Law
21:32 Re: Question about filling multi delay slots Jeff Law
21:17 IRA memory cost calculation Michael Eager
21:15 Re: Graphite and Loop fusion. Sebastian Pop
21:06 Re: Graphite and Loop fusion. Tim Prince
20:48 Re: MPC required in one week. Michael Witten
19:51 Graphite and Loop fusion. Toon Moene
12:48 Re: Caused by unknown alignment, was: Re: On the x86_64, does one have to zero a vector register before filling it completely ? Toon Moene
12:45 Announce: GNU MPFR 2.4.2 is released Vincent Lefevre
11:10 Re: Caused by unknown alignment, was: Re: On the x86_64, does one have to zero a vector register before filling it completely ? Steven Bosscher
10:02 Re: Caused by unknown alignment, was: Re: On the x86_64, does one have to zero a vector register before filling it completely ? Toon Moene
08:07 Re: Caused by unknown alignment, was: Re: On the x86_64, does one have to zero a vector register before filling it completely ? Dorit Nuzman
07:27 Re: No .got section in ELF Yunfeng ZHANG
07:01 Re: Caused by unknown alignment, was: Re: On the x86_64, does one have to zero a vector register before filling it completely ? Steven Bosscher
06:05 MPC required in one week. Kaveh R. GHAZI

November 29, 2009
23:40 Re: Caused by unknown alignment, was: Re: On the x86_64, does one have to zero a vector register before filling it completely ? Daniel Berlin
22:50 gcc-4.3-20091129 is now available gccadmin
21:15 plugin issues to fix (or document) before 4.5 release Basile STARYNKEVITCH
20:33 Re: Caused by unknown alignment, was: Re: On the x86_64, does one have to zero a vector register before filling it completely ? Richard Guenther
20:18 Re: Caused by unknown alignment, was: Re: On the x86_64, does one have to zero a vector register before filling it completely ? Daniel Berlin
19:54 Re: Caused by unknown alignment, was: Re: On the x86_64, does one have to zero a vector register before filling it completely ? Steven Bosscher
18:12 Re: Caused by unknown alignment, was: Re: On the x86_64, does one have to zero a vector register before filling it completely ? Toon Moene
17:24 Re: Reminder: Stage3 ends Nov 30th Dave Korn
15:40 Re: Two corrupted libstdc++-v3 files in gcc-4.4.2.tar.gz (invalid file extension) Nicolai Josuttis
15:35 Re: Reminder: Stage3 ends Nov 30th Richard Guenther
15:33 Re: Reminder: Stage3 ends Nov 30th Kaveh R. GHAZI
15:18 Re: Reminder: Stage3 ends Nov 30th Dave Korn
14:31 Re: Two corrupted libstdc++-v3 files in gcc-4.4.2.tar.gz (invalid file extension) Richard Guenther
14:18 Re: i370 port - music/sp - possible generic gcc problem Paul Edwards
14:10 Caused by unknown alignment, was: Re: On the x86_64, does one have to zero a vector register before filling it completely ? Toon Moene
14:07 Two corrupted libstdc++-v3 files in gcc-4.4.2.tar.gz (invalid file extension) Nicolai Josuttis
14:01 Induction variable elimination, was: Re: On the x86_64, does one have to zero a vector register before filling it completely ? Toon Moene
11:43 Reminder: Stage3 ends Nov 30th Richard Guenther
07:57 Re: i370 port - music/sp - possible generic gcc problem Paul Edwards
01:08 Re: avr: optimizing assignment to a bit field Shaun Jackman

November 28, 2009
23:44 Re: i370 port - music/sp - possible generic gcc problem Paul Edwards
22:57 Re: avr: optimizing assignment to a bit field Richard Guenther
22:44 avr: optimizing assignment to a bit field Shaun Jackman
21:01 Re: On the x86_64, does one have to zero a vector register before filling it completely ? Tim Prince
19:20 Re: On the x86_64, does one have to zero a vector register before filling it completely ? Toon Moene
19:03 Re: On the x86_64, does one have to zero a vector register before filling it completely ? Toon Moene
17:03 Re: i370 port - music/sp - possible generic gcc problem Richard Guenther
16:57 Re: On the x86_64, does one have to zero a vector register before filling it completely ? Richard Guenther
16:35 Re: i370 port - music/sp - possible generic gcc problem Paul Edwards
16:32 Re: On the x86_64, does one have to zero a vector register before filling it completely ? Tim Prince
16:06 Re: On the x86_64, does one have to zero a vector register before filling it completely ? Richard Guenther
16:03 Re: i370 port - music/sp - possible generic gcc problem Richard Guenther
15:27 Re: On the x86_64, does one have to zero a vector register before filling it completely ? Tim Prince
15:14 i370 port - music/sp - possible generic gcc problem Paul Edwards
13:47 Re: On the x86_64, does one have to zero a vector register before filling it completely ? Toon Moene
12:52 Re: On the x86_64, does one have to zero a vector register before filling it completely ? H.J. Lu
11:21 On the x86_64, does one have to zero a vector register before filling it completely ? Toon Moene

November 27, 2009
18:54 Re: MELT help: how to autoconf-igure makefile fragments? Ralf Wildenhues
18:43 Re: MELT help: how to autoconf-igure makefile fragments? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
16:56 MELT help: how to autoconf-igure makefile fragments? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
16:31 New branch: gcc-4_4-plugins Diego Novillo
15:35 Re: SVN pre-commit filter (Was: Re: WTF?) Joseph S. Myers
14:43 Re: SVN pre-commit filter (Was: Re: WTF?) Richard Earnshaw
14:40 SVN pre-commit filter (Was: Re: WTF?) Joern Rennecke
14:32 Re: doh? Dave Korn
14:22 Re: doh? Joern Rennecke
14:16 Re: doh? Paolo Bonzini
14:16 Re: No .got section in ELF Ian Lance Taylor
14:05 Re: doh? Dave Korn
13:48 Re: doh? Michael Matz
13:41 Re: doh? Dave Korn
13:35 Re: No .got section in ELF Alexandre Oliva
13:03 Moving loop induction variable calculation to the head of loop. red_river
10:36 Re: WTF? Peter Zijlstra
10:35 Re: WTF? Richard Earnshaw
10:24 Re: WTF? Richard Earnshaw
08:08 Re: trivial trailing whitespace issue Sebastian Huber
06:42 Re: No .got section in ELF yunfeng zhang
04:58 Re: No .got section in ELF Jie Zhang
04:51 Re: No .got section in ELF Dmitry Gorbachev
04:46 Re: No .got section in ELF Dave Korn
04:43 Re: No .got section in ELF yunfeng zhang
04:12 Re: No .got section in ELF Dave Korn
02:18 Re: No .got section in ELF yunfeng zhang

November 26, 2009
23:17 RE: WTF? Lu, Hongjiu
22:47 gcc-4.5-20091126 is now available gccadmin
19:38 Re: trivial trailing whitespace issue Mark Mielke
18:46 Re: trivial trailing whitespace issue Basile STARYNKEVITCH
18:32 Re: WTF? Dave Korn
15:11 Re: WTF? Jeff Law
13:18 Re: trivial trailing whitespace issue Michael Matz
13:08 Re: WTF? Michael Matz
12:46 Re: WTF? Vincent Lefevre
12:14 Re: WTF? Vincent Lefevre
10:43 Re: WTF? Philip Martin
10:07 Re: WTF? Richard Guenther
09:13 Re: [C++0x]: non-public defaulted copy c-tor Piotr Wyderski
08:56 Re: WTF? Paolo Bonzini
08:50 Re: [C++0x]: non-public defaulted copy c-tor Jonathan Wakely
08:46 Re: [C++0x]: non-public defaulted copy c-tor Jonathan Wakely
07:55 Re: No .got section in ELF Alexandre Oliva
07:03 Re: [C++0x]: non-public defaulted copy c-tor Piotr Wyderski
06:04 Re: No .got section in ELF yunfeng zhang
03:11 Re: No .got section in ELF Richard Henderson
02:24 Re: No .got section in ELF yunfeng zhang
00:54 Re: WTF? Joern Rennecke
00:36 Re: [C++0x]: non-public defaulted copy c-tor Jonathan Wakely
00:09 Re: WTF? H.J. Lu

November 25, 2009
23:52 RE: WTF? Lu, Hongjiu
23:30 Re: WTF? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
23:27 Re: WTF? Joseph S. Myers
23:21 Re: WTF? Alexandre Oliva
23:12 Re: WTF? Ben Elliston
23:08 Re: WTF? Richard Guenther
23:05 Re: WTF? Tom Tromey
22:36 Re: trivial trailing whitespace issue Basile STARYNKEVITCH
22:26 Re: trivial trailing whitespace issue Joern Rennecke
21:55 Re: WTF? Paolo Bonzini
21:47 Re: WTF? Paolo Bonzini
21:39 Re: trivial trailing whitespace issue Basile STARYNKEVITCH
21:29 Re: GNU MPFR 2.4.2 Release Candidate 3 Kaveh R. GHAZI
21:04 Re: trivial trailing whitespace issue Andrew Haley
21:01 Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL][v2.6.32] tracing/x86: Add check to detect GCC messing with mcount prologue Andrew Haley
20:58 Re: trivial trailing whitespace issue Joseph S. Myers
20:57 Hotwo use -fprofile-generate with shared libraries? Clemens Eisserer
20:51 Re: WTF? Kaveh R. Ghazi
20:48 Re: [annoyed grunt]? Dave Korn
20:42 Re: [annoyed grunt]? Kaveh R. Ghazi
20:37 Re: [annoyed grunt]? Dave Korn
20:35 Re: WTF? Richard Kenner
20:33 Re: WTF? Kaveh R. Ghazi
20:31 Re: WTF? Kaveh R. Ghazi
20:28 Re: WTF? Richard Guenther
20:22 Re: WTF? Dave Korn
20:18 Re: WTF? Dave Korn
20:17 Re: WTF? Kaveh R. GHAZI
20:13 Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL][v2.6.32] tracing/x86: Add check to detect GCC messing with mcount prologue H. Peter Anvin
20:08 Re: trivial trailing whitespace issue Basile STARYNKEVITCH
20:05 Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL][v2.6.32] tracing/x86: Add check to detect GCC messing with mcount prologue H. Peter Anvin
20:01 Re: WTF? Jeff Law
19:59 Re: WTF? Jeff Law
19:58 Re: trivial trailing whitespace issue Jeff Law
19:55 Re: WTF? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
19:47 trivial trailing whitespace issue Dennis Clarke
19:44 Re: WTF? Daniel Jacobowitz
19:43 Re: WTF? Richard Guenther
19:41 Re: WTF? Dennis Clarke
19:39 Re: WTF? Richard Guenther
19:34 Re: WTF? Richard Guenther
19:31 Re: WTF? Richard Guenther
19:00 Re: WTF? Richard Kenner
18:18 Re: WTF? Michael Matz
17:32 Re: WTF? Dave Korn
17:29 Re: WTF? Dave Korn
17:28 Re: WTF? Richard Kenner
17:25 Re: WTF? Joseph S. Myers
17:19 Re: WTF? Jeff Law
17:16 Re: WTF? Richard Kenner
17:09 Re: WTF? Michael Matz
17:03 Re: WTF? Michael Matz
16:58 Re: WTF? Jeff Law
16:50 Re: WTF? Richard Guenther
16:47 Re: WTF? Richard Kenner
16:45 Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL][v2.6.32] tracing/x86: Add check to detect GCC messing with mcount prologue Jakub Jelinek
16:42 GNU MPFR 2.4.2 Release Candidate 3 Vincent Lefevre
16:40 Re: WTF? Richard Guenther
16:39 WTF? Richard Guenther
16:26 Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL][v2.6.32] tracing/x86: Add check to detect GCC messing with mcount prologue Ingo Molnar
16:04 Re: Worth balancing the tree before scheduling? Daniel Berlin
15:53 Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL][v2.6.32] tracing/x86: Add check to detect GCC messing with mcount prologue Thomas Gleixner
15:45 Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL][v2.6.32] tracing/x86: Add check to detect GCC messing with mcount prologue Ingo Molnar
15:37 How to handle address which contain SUBREG Andy H
15:29 Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL][v2.6.32] tracing/x86: Add check to detect GCC messing with mcount prologue Thomas Gleixner
14:34 Question about filling multi delay slots Amker.Cheng
14:21 Re: Worth balancing the tree before scheduling? Richard Guenther
13:52 RE: Worth balancing the tree before scheduling? Bingfeng Mei
13:44 Re: Problems compiling Mozilla with GCC 4.5 Ehren Metcalfe
13:12 Re: Problems compiling Mozilla with GCC 4.5 Ehren Metcalfe
11:19 Re: [variadic templates]feature request: n-th element of expansion Larry Evans
10:39 [C++0x]: non-public defaulted copy c-tor Piotr Wyderski
10:32 Re: Trunk fixes Richard Guenther
09:30 Trunk fixes Piotr Wyderski
09:24 Re: Problems compiling Mozilla with GCC 4.5 Andrew Pinski
09:18 Re: Problems compiling Mozilla with GCC 4.5 Andrew Haley
07:16 Problems compiling Mozilla with GCC 4.5 Ehren Metcalfe
00:29 RE: On strategies for function call instrumentation Grigori Fursin

November 24, 2009
22:47 gcc-4.4-20091124 is now available gccadmin
22:11 exact role[s] of the plugin directory? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
20:11 Re: copyright assignment Grigori Fursin
19:56 Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL][v2.6.32] tracing/x86: Add check to detect GCC messing with mcount prologue H. Peter Anvin
19:19 Re: Updating Primary and Secondary platform list for gcc-4.5 ??? Richard Sandiford
17:30 Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL][v2.6.32] tracing/x86: Add check to detect GCC messing with mcount prologue Steven Rostedt
17:12 Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL][v2.6.32] tracing/x86: Add check to detect GCC messing with mcount prologue Andrew Haley
17:11 Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL][v2.6.32] tracing/x86: Add check to detect GCC messing with mcount prologue Andrew Haley
17:10 Re: No .got section in ELF Richard Henderson
17:05 Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL][v2.6.32] tracing/x86: Add check to detect GCC messing with mcount prologue Ross Ridge
16:56 Re: On strategies for function call instrumentation Yuri Kashnikoff
16:39 Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL][v2.6.32] tracing/x86: Add check to detect GCC messing with mcount prologue H. Peter Anvin
16:38 Re: On strategies for function call instrumentation Basile STARYNKEVITCH
16:08 Re: On strategies for function call instrumentation Mark Mitchell
15:48 Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL][v2.6.32] tracing/x86: Add check to detect GCC messing with mcount prologue Andrew Haley
15:36 Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL][v2.6.32] tracing/x86: Add check to detect GCC messing with mcount prologue Jakub Jelinek
15:32 Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL][v2.6.32] tracing/x86: Add check to detect GCC messing with mcount prologue Andrew Haley
15:06 Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL][v2.6.32] tracing/x86: Add check to detect GCC messing with mcount prologue Jakub Jelinek
15:01 Re: Possible endless loop in lto-wrapper Rafael Espindola
14:56 Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL][v2.6.32] tracing/x86: Add check to detect GCC messing with mcount prologue Thomas Gleixner
14:43 Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL][v2.6.32] tracing/x86: Add check to detect GCC messing with mcount prologue Andrew Haley
14:36 Re: i370 port - 3.4.6 to 4.4 upgrade attempt Paul Edwards
14:08 AIX C++ failures David Edelsohn
14:05 Re: i370 port - 3.4.6 to 4.4 upgrade attempt Ulrich Weigand
10:00 Re: No .got section in ELF Andrew Haley
03:44 On strategies for function call instrumentation Derrick Coetzee
01:58 No .got section in ELF yunfeng zhang

November 23, 2009
19:03 Re: Possible endless loop in lto-wrapper Diego Novillo
19:00 Re: Possible endless loop in lto-wrapper Rafael Espindola
17:11 internal compiler error: in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5138 Wu Zhangjin
16:18 Re: Worth balancing the tree before scheduling? Geert Bosch
15:43 Re: i370 port - 3.4.6 to 4.4 upgrade attempt Paolo Bonzini
15:18 RE: Worth balancing the tree before scheduling? Ian Bolton
14:04 Re: GCC 4.5 is uncompilable Dave Korn
10:43 Re: [cygwin-1.7] bootstrap failure: ../../gcc/gcc/config/i386/i386.c:24542:24: error: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions Christian Joensson
10:43 Re: i370 port - 3.4.6 to 4.4 upgrade attempt Andreas Schwab
10:42 Re: GCC 4.5 is uncompilable Piotr Wyderski
10:33 Re: i370 port - 3.4.6 to 4.4 upgrade attempt Paul Edwards
09:53 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Thomas Gleixner
09:17 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Jakub Jelinek
08:56 [cygwin-1.7] bootstrap failure: ../../gcc/gcc/config/i386/i386.c:24542:24: error: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions Christian Joensson
08:26 Re: copyright assignment Paolo Bonzini

November 22, 2009
23:31 Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL][v2.6.32] tracing/x86: Add check to detect GCC messing with mcount prologue H.J. Lu
22:47 gcc-4.3-20091122 is now available gccadmin
21:31 Re: Impressively difficult to compile code for GNAT Eric Botcazou
18:10 How to define PSImode for a target? Lev Yudalevich
17:21 Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL][v2.6.32] tracing/x86: Add check to detect GCC messing with mcount prologue Andrew Haley
16:25 Re: Build logs of GCC, G++ and GNAT on FreeBSD x86_64 now available Gerald Pfeifer
10:45 mis-set value for trial in function fill_simple_delay_slots? Amker.Cheng
09:49 copyright assignment John Nowak
09:39 Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL][v2.6.32] tracing/x86: Add check to detect GCC messing with mcount prologue H.J. Lu
09:06 Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL][v2.6.32] tracing/x86: Add check to detect GCC messing with mcount prologue Ingo Molnar
08:54 Possible endless loop in lto-wrapper Leandro Nini
05:24 Re: Impressively difficult to compile code for GNAT gcc
04:57 Re: Impressively difficult to compile code for GNAT gcc
02:15 Re: How does builtin_sqrt get used - or not Ian Lance Taylor
00:51 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Paolo Bonzini
00:46 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Paolo Bonzini

November 21, 2009
21:31 How does builtin_sqrt get used - or not Andrew Hutchinson
17:10 Re: Impressively difficult to compile code for GNAT Robert Dewar
16:51 Re: Impressively difficult to compile code for GNAT gcc
16:36 Impressively difficult to compile code for GNAT gcc
13:40 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Paul Edwards
12:28 Re: GCC 4.5 is uncompilable Dave Korn
01:19 Re: GCC 4.5 is uncompilable Matt

November 20, 2009
23:19 Re: GNU MPFR 2.4.2 Release Candidate 2 Paolo Carlini
23:17 Re: GCC 4.5 is uncompilable Richard Guenther
22:59 GNU MPFR 2.4.2 Release Candidate 2 Vincent Lefevre
21:53 Re: Supporting decimal float on additional platforms Joseph S. Myers
21:28 Re: Supporting decimal float on additional platforms Rainer Orth
21:12 Re: Supporting decimal float on additional platforms Rainer Orth
19:51 Re: GCC 4.5 is uncompilable Dave Korn
19:50 Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL][v2.6.32] tracing/x86: Add check to detect GCC messing with mcount prologue H. Peter Anvin
19:48 Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL][v2.6.32] tracing/x86: Add check to detect GCC messing with mcount prologue Steven Rostedt
19:36 Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL][v2.6.32] tracing/x86: Add check to detect GCC messing with mcount prologue Andrew Haley
19:10 check for valid location of zero length dwarf block forms? Jack Howarth
19:08 Re: [PATCH] gcc mcount-nofp was Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions H. Peter Anvin
18:13 Re: Call func address spill out Richard Henderson
17:15 Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL][v2.6.32] tracing/x86: Add check to detect GCC messing with mcount prologue H. Peter Anvin
17:02 Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL][v2.6.32] tracing/x86: Add check to detect GCC messing with mcount prologue Steven Rostedt
15:25 Re: Worth balancing the tree before scheduling? Richard Earnshaw
15:23 Re: Worth balancing the tree before scheduling? Richard Guenther
15:19 Re: Worth balancing the tree before scheduling? David Edelsohn
15:06 Worth balancing the tree before scheduling? Ian Bolton
12:55 Re: GCC 4.5 is uncompilable Piotr Wyderski
12:50 Re: GCC 4.5 is uncompilable Kai Tietz
12:45 GCC 4.5 is uncompilable Piotr Wyderski
12:35 Re: [PATCH] gcc mcount-nofp was Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Steven Rostedt
12:23 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Andrew Haley
12:22 Call func address spill out daniel tian
12:06 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Andrew Haley
09:58 [PATCH] gcc mcount-nofp was Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Andi Kleen
06:23 How to support 40bit GP register - Take two Mohamed Shafi
05:40 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Ingo Molnar
05:33 Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL][v2.6.32] tracing/x86: Add check to detect GCC messing with mcount prologue Steven Rostedt
05:24 [PATCH][GIT PULL][v2.6.32] tracing/x86: Add check to detect GCC messing with mcount prologue Steven Rostedt
02:51 Re: git mirror repacked, new branches Bernie Innocenti
02:16 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Thomas Gleixner
01:52 Re: with rev. 154329 ppl doesn't build anymore Rainer Emrich
01:30 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions H. Peter Anvin
01:29 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Thomas Gleixner
01:00 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Linus Torvalds
00:37 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Thomas Gleixner
00:29 Re: [variadic templates]feature request: n-th element of expansion Larry Evans
00:00 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Jeff Law

November 19, 2009
23:24 Re: [variadic templates]feature request: n-th element of expansion Jason Merrill
23:24 missed IPA/whopr optimization? Matt
22:53 gcc-4.5-20091119 is now available gccadmin
22:49 Re: C++ comp_cdtor FUNCTION_DECL tree nodes with DECL_LANG_SPECIFIC but no DECL_CONTEXT: valid or not? Jason Merrill
22:46 Re: git mirror repacked, new branches Jason Merrill
22:44 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Steven Rostedt
21:26 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Jeff Law
21:16 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions H. Peter Anvin
21:13 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Jeff Law
21:07 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Jeff Law
20:56 Re: with rev. 154329 ppl doesn't build anymore Rainer Emrich
20:50 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions H. Peter Anvin
20:45 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Steven Rostedt
20:38 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Linus Torvalds
20:37 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Thomas Gleixner
20:29 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Frederic Weisbecker
20:26 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Frederic Weisbecker
20:18 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Steven Rostedt
20:11 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Steven Rostedt
20:08 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Linus Torvalds
20:06 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Steven Rostedt
20:06 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Frederic Weisbecker
19:55 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Kai Tietz
19:51 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions H. Peter Anvin
19:51 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Ingo Molnar
19:47 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Frederic Weisbecker
19:29 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Steven Rostedt
19:12 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions David Daney
19:08 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Steven Rostedt
19:03 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Thomas Gleixner
18:56 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Linus Torvalds
18:48 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Ingo Molnar
18:45 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Linus Torvalds
18:42 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Linus Torvalds
18:40 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Linus Torvalds
18:40 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Thomas Gleixner
18:38 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions H. Peter Anvin
18:38 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Andrew Haley
18:37 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Andrew Pinski
18:34 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Thomas Gleixner
18:34 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Steven Rostedt
18:23 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Andrew Haley
18:22 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Andrew Haley
18:04 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Richard Guenther
18:00 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Steven Rostedt
17:52 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Thomas Gleixner
17:41 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Linus Torvalds
17:38 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Andi Kleen
17:13 with rev. 154329 ppl doesn't build anymore Rainer Emrich
16:45 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Thomas Gleixner
16:20 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Frederic Weisbecker
16:19 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Andrew Haley
16:13 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Steven Rostedt
16:13 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions H. Peter Anvin
16:07 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Thomas Gleixner
16:03 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Steven Rostedt
15:59 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Richard Guenther
15:55 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions H. Peter Anvin
15:53 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Richard Guenther
15:51 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Richard Guenther
15:46 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions H. Peter Anvin
15:45 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Andrew Haley
15:41 RE: Understanding IRA Ian Bolton
15:39 Re: BUG: GCC-4.4.x changes the function frame on some functions Thomas Gleixner
14:27 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Ulrich Weigand
14:02 Re: [Dwarf-Discuss] Does gcc optimization impacts retrieving Dwarf information? Richard Guenther
13:56 Re: [Dwarf-Discuss] Does gcc optimization impacts retrieving Dwarf information? Mark Wielaard
13:46 Re: [Dwarf-Discuss] Does gcc optimization impacts retrieving Dwarf information? M. Mohan Kumar
11:01 Re: [Dwarf-Discuss] Does gcc optimization impacts retrieving Dwarf information? Mark Wielaard
05:25 Re: git mirror repacked, new branches Bernie Innocenti
05:12 Re: git mirror repacked, new branches Alexandre Oliva
03:44 Re: Build logs of GCC, G++ and GNAT on FreeBSD x86_64 now available gcc
02:43 Re: Disabling the heuristic inliner Paolo Carlini
01:22 Re: Disabling the heuristic inliner Shaun Jackman

November 18, 2009
23:21 Disabling the heuristic inliner Shaun Jackman
23:05 build failure bootstrapping trunk on Ubuntu 9.10 Matt
21:45 Re: RFC: PR 25137: moving -Wmissing-braces to -Wextra? Paolo Carlini
20:47 Re: New g++ template stress/regression test? Gerald Pfeifer
20:27 Re: RFC: PR 25137: moving -Wmissing-braces to -Wextra? Richard Henderson
20:08 Re: Supporting decimal float on additional platforms Joseph S. Myers
20:03 Re: git mirror repacked, new branches Bernie Innocenti
19:20 Re: Supporting decimal float on additional platforms Janis Johnson
18:47 Re: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] install-plugin Makefile target Joern Rennecke
18:45 Re: RFC: PR 25137: moving -Wmissing-braces to -Wextra? Paolo Carlini
18:39 Re: git mirror repacked, new branches H.J. Lu
18:27 Re: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] install-plugin Makefile target Basile STARYNKEVITCH
18:20 Supporting decimal float on additional platforms Rainer Orth
18:10 Re: git mirror repacked, new branches Bernie Innocenti
17:41 Re: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] install-plugin Makefile target Diego Novillo
17:18 Re: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] install-plugin Makefile target Rafael Espindola
17:06 [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] install-plugin Makefile target Joern Rennecke
16:35 Re: RFC: PR 25137: moving -Wmissing-braces to -Wextra? Richard Henderson
15:14 Re: git mirror repacked, new branches H.J. Lu
14:28 Re: [Dwarf-Discuss] Does gcc optimization impacts retrieving Dwarf information? Ian Lance Taylor
12:49 Re: [Dwarf-Discuss] Does gcc optimization impacts retrieving Dwarf information? M. Mohan Kumar
12:44 C++ comp_cdtor FUNCTION_DECL tree nodes with DECL_LANG_SPECIFIC but no DECL_CONTEXT: valid or not? Dave Korn
11:39 Re: Build logs of GCC, G++ and GNAT on FreeBSD x86_64 now available Eric Botcazou
11:34 Loop pragmas dilemma Bingfeng Mei
11:20 Re: Build logs of GCC, G++ and GNAT on FreeBSD x86_64 now available gcc
11:04 Re: Build logs of GCC, G++ and GNAT on FreeBSD x86_64 now available Eric Botcazou
11:00 Re: Build logs of GCC, G++ and GNAT on FreeBSD x86_64 now available gcc
10:51 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Paul Edwards
10:48 Re: Build logs of GCC, G++ and GNAT on FreeBSD x86_64 now available Dave Korn
09:01 Build logs of GCC, G++ and GNAT on FreeBSD x86_64 now available gcc
01:43 Re: RFC: PR 25137: moving -Wmissing-braces to -Wextra? Gabriel Dos Reis
01:34 Re: RFC: PR 25137: moving -Wmissing-braces to -Wextra? Mark Mitchell
01:30 Re: RFC: PR 25137: moving -Wmissing-braces to -Wextra? Gabriel Dos Reis
01:17 Re: RFC: PR 25137: moving -Wmissing-braces to -Wextra? Jonathan Wakely
00:53 Re: RFC: PR 25137: moving -Wmissing-braces to -Wextra? Mark Mitchell
00:42 Re: RFC: PR 25137: moving -Wmissing-braces to -Wextra? Joe Buck
00:08 Re: RFC: PR 25137: moving -Wmissing-braces to -Wextra? Ian Lance Taylor

November 17, 2009
23:11 gcc-4.4-20091117 is now available gccadmin
22:58 Re: RFC: PR 25137: moving -Wmissing-braces to -Wextra? Paolo Carlini
22:49 Re: RFC: PR 25137: moving -Wmissing-braces to -Wextra? Ian Lance Taylor
22:33 Re: RFC: PR 25137: moving -Wmissing-braces to -Wextra? Jonathan Wakely
22:07 Re: RFC: PR 25137: moving -Wmissing-braces to -Wextra? Ian Lance Taylor
20:35 Re: I want to use C and C + + Justin P. Mattock
20:33 Re: I want to use C and C + + Jonathan Wakely
20:18 I want to use C and C + + abdelali ghoulam
19:21 Re: targetm.vectorize.builtin_vec_perm Richard Henderson
18:16 Re: RFC: PR 25137: moving -Wmissing-braces to -Wextra? Mark Mitchell
17:55 RFC: PR 25137: moving -Wmissing-braces to -Wextra? Paolo Carlini
14:43 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Grigori Fursin
14:37 [variadic templates]feature request: n-th element of expansion Larry Evans
14:30 Re: gcc Digest 16 Nov 2009 18:04:16 -0000 Issue 6154 Ian Lance Taylor
12:51 Re: targetm.vectorize.builtin_vec_perm Dorit Nuzman
11:21 RE: gcc Digest 16 Nov 2009 18:04:16 -0000 Issue 6154 Adrian Wadey
09:10 Re: targetm.vectorize.builtin_vec_perm Ira Rosen
08:59 Re: targetm.vectorize.builtin_vec_perm Ira Rosen
02:39 Re: targetm.vectorize.builtin_vec_perm Joern Rennecke
01:40 targetm.vectorize.builtin_vec_perm Richard Henderson

November 16, 2009
21:30 Re: gccgo: A gcc frontend for Go, a new programming language Ian Lance Taylor
19:36 Re: gccgo: A gcc frontend for Go, a new programming language Sebastian Pop
18:04 Re: multi threading & load average Jonathan Wakely
17:35 RE: Understanding IRA Ian Bolton
08:13 multi threading & load average Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh
00:33 git mirror repacked, new branches Bernie Innocenti

November 15, 2009
22:54 gcc-4.3-20091115 is now available gccadmin
20:01 Re: Whole program optimization and functions-only-called-once. Tim Prince
17:59 Re: handling of TAB in column number Tom Tromey
17:35 Re: semantic of used_define cpp callback? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
17:34 Re: handling of TAB in column number Arnaud Charlet
17:26 Re: semantic of used_define cpp callback? Arnaud Charlet
17:25 Re: handling of TAB in column number Tom Tromey
17:20 Re: semantic of used_define cpp callback? Tom Tromey
14:58 Re: Whole program optimization and functions-only-called-once. Toon Moene
14:44 Re: Whole program optimization and functions-only-called-once. Richard Guenther
14:22 Re: i370 port - finally building Paul Edwards
14:07 Re: Whole program optimization and functions-only-called-once. Toon Moene
13:12 handling of TAB in column number Arnaud Charlet
11:14 semantic of used_define cpp callback? Arnaud Charlet
10:31 Re: Whole program optimization and functions-only-called-once. Steven Bosscher

November 14, 2009
22:13 Re: Whole program optimization and functions-only-called-once. Richard Guenther
22:05 Re: Whole program optimization and functions-only-called-once. Toon Moene
20:14 Re: Whole program optimization and functions-only-called-once. Steven Bosscher
19:52 Re: Whole program optimization and functions-only-called-once. Richard Guenther
19:30 Re: howto graphically view .cfg file produced by -fdump-tree-cfg Diego Novillo
12:55 Re: Whole program optimization and functions-only-called-once. Toon Moene
11:50 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Grigori Fursin
11:28 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Paul Edwards
10:49 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Ralf Wildenhues
08:52 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Paul Edwards
08:00 CFP (deadline extension): GROW'10 (2nd Workshop on GCC Research Opportunities) Grigori Fursin

November 13, 2009
21:24 Re: -Warray-bounds false negative Matt
21:15 Re: -Warray-bounds false negative Andrew Pinski
21:10 -Warray-bounds false negative Matt
16:31 Re: (C++) mangling vector types Mark Mitchell
16:29 Re: (C++) mangling vector types Gabriel Dos Reis
15:11 Re: more graphite merges before gcc 4.5 branch? Jack Howarth
12:57 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Ulrich Weigand
12:18 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Paul Edwards
12:08 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Ulrich Weigand
12:01 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Ulrich Weigand
11:43 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Paul Edwards

November 12, 2009
23:57 Re: (C++) mangling vector types Mark Mitchell
23:45 Re: (C++) mangling vector types Jason Merrill
22:52 gcc-4.5-20091112 is now available gccadmin
22:19 Re: (C++) mangling vector types Mark Mitchell
22:06 Re: (C++) mangling vector types Jason Merrill
21:48 Re: (C++) mangling vector types Mark Mitchell
21:42 Re: (C++) mangling vector types Jason Merrill
21:41 Re: Whole program optimization and functions-only-called-once. Jan Hubicka
21:32 Re: (C++) mangling vector types Mark Mitchell
21:20 Re: (C++) mangling vector types Dave Korn
21:16 Re: Making a struct field constant, when this struct is imported to a particular Cpp files Dave Korn
20:56 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Paul Edwards
20:50 Re: gcc/REVISION in trunk? Joel Sherrill
20:45 gcc/REVISION in trunk? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
20:10 Re: Build broken in libstdc++ on x86_64-linux Jan Hubicka
20:06 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Ralf Wildenhues
20:01 Re: (C++) mangling vector types Jason Merrill
19:22 Re: Build broken in libstdc++ on x86_64-linux Paolo Carlini
19:15 Re: Build broken in libstdc++ on x86_64-linux Hans-Peter Nilsson
18:23 Re: more graphite merges before gcc 4.5 branch? David Edelsohn
18:19 Re: Build broken in libstdc++ on x86_64-linux Jan Hubicka
18:18 Re: (C++) mangling vector types Mark Mitchell
18:16 Build broken in libstdc++ on x86_64-linux Paolo Carlini
17:49 Re: (C++) mangling vector types Jason Merrill
17:08 Re: Preserving the argument spills for GDB Jean Christophe Beyler
17:07 Re: Preserving the argument spills for GDB Jean Christophe Beyler
17:03 more graphite merges before gcc 4.5 branch? Jack Howarth
17:02 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!) Richard Guenther
17:01 Re: is LTO aimed for large programs? Robert Dewar
16:59 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!) Jack Howarth
16:58 Re: (C++) mangling vector types Joseph S. Myers
16:51 Re: (C++) mangling vector types Ulrich Drepper
16:46 Re: Whole program optimization and functions-only-called-once. Jan Hubicka
16:46 Re: is LTO aimed for large programs? Jan Hubicka
16:36 Re: (C++) mangling vector types Jason Merrill
16:24 Re: (C++) mangling vector types Daniel Jacobowitz
16:16 Re: Whole program optimization and functions-only-called-once. Jan Hubicka
16:14 Re: (C++) mangling vector types Ulrich Drepper
16:10 Re: (C++) mangling vector types Richard Henderson
16:02 Re: How to split mulsi3 pattern Richard Henderson
15:43 Re: Updating Primary and Secondary platform list for gcc-4.5 ??? Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:25 (C++) mangling vector types Jason Merrill
15:11 Re: Updating Primary and Secondary platform list for gcc-4.5 ??? David Edelsohn
15:00 Re: Updating Primary and Secondary platform list for gcc-4.5 ??? Kaveh R. Ghazi
14:03 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Paul Edwards
14:03 Re: Making a struct field constant, when this struct is imported to a particular Cpp files Axel Freyn
13:45 Making a struct field constant, when this struct is imported to a particular Cpp files ansis atteka
13:40 Re: How to split mulsi3 pattern Mohamed Shafi
13:27 Re: Strange optimisation problem - gcc 4.3.2 Mark Cave-Ayland
12:35 Re: Strange optimisation problem - gcc 4.3.2 Andrew Haley
12:11 Re: Strange optimisation problem - gcc 4.3.2 Mark Cave-Ayland
10:27 Re: Strange optimisation problem - gcc 4.3.2 Andrew Haley
10:20 Re: Strange optimisation problem - gcc 4.3.2 Bernd Roesch
08:25 Re: Creating a function dynamically Taro Okumichi

November 11, 2009
23:16 Re: gccgo: A gcc frontend for Go, a new programming language Ian Lance Taylor
22:24 Re: gccgo: A gcc frontend for Go, a new programming language Basile STARYNKEVITCH
21:49 Re: gccgo: A gcc frontend for Go, a new programming language Joseph S. Myers
21:22 Invitation avant-premiÃre Rotary espoir en tête
21:18 Re: gccgo: A gcc frontend for Go, a new programming language Basile STARYNKEVITCH
21:12 Re: gccgo: A gcc frontend for Go, a new programming language Basile STARYNKEVITCH
21:09 Re: gccgo: A gcc frontend for Go, a new programming language Ian Lance Taylor
20:54 Re: gccgo: A gcc frontend for Go, a new programming language Chris Lattner
20:43 Re: gccgo: A gcc frontend for Go, a new programming language Joe Buck
20:20 Re: gccgo: A gcc frontend for Go, a new programming language Joseph S. Myers
20:09 RE: Understanding IRA Ian Bolton
20:07 Re: libtool update? Ralf Wildenhues
19:29 Creating a function dynamically Taro Okumichi
19:26 Re: gccgo: A gcc frontend for Go, a new programming language Basile STARYNKEVITCH
18:36 RE: Understanding IRA Ian Bolton
18:14 Re: gccgo: A gcc frontend for Go, a new programming language Frank Ch. Eigler
17:41 The Linux binutils 2.20.51.0.3 is released H.J. Lu
17:04 Re: Understanding IRA Vladimir Makarov
16:47 Re: libtool update? Rainer Emrich
16:44 native x86_64-w64-mingw32 fails to boostrap Rainer Emrich
16:30 Strange optimisation problem - gcc 4.3.2 Mark Cave-Ayland
16:12 Re: Understanding IRA Jeff Law
15:19 RE: Understanding IRA Ian Bolton
14:32 Re: [c++]pt.c:most_specialized_class appears to substitute outer args for inner params Larry Evans
01:39 License of gccgo frontend Ian Lance Taylor
00:22 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!) David Edelsohn

November 10, 2009
23:21 gccgo: A gcc frontend for Go, a new programming language Ian Lance Taylor
23:06 Fwd: Re: Understanding IRA Jeff Law
22:49 gcc-4.4-20091110 is now available gccadmin
21:17 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Grigori Fursin
17:38 RE: Understanding IRA Ian Bolton
17:37 Re: How to split mulsi3 pattern Richard Henderson
17:21 Re: Understanding IRA Jeff Law
17:03 Re: Updating Primary and Secondary platform list for gcc-4.5 ??? Mark Mitchell
16:50 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!) Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:45 Re: help on - adding a new pass to gcc Basile STARYNKEVITCH
16:37 RE: help on - adding a new pass to gcc Bingfeng Mei
16:36 Re: help on - adding a new pass to gcc Andrew Pinski
16:25 help on - adding a new pass to gcc ddmetro
16:13 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!) David Edelsohn
15:59 Is this patch of vector shift in 4.5? Bingfeng Mei
15:56 Re: i370 port Ian Lance Taylor
15:51 Re: i370 port Paul Edwards
15:36 Re: i370 port Ian Lance Taylor
14:58 Re: i370 port Paul Edwards
13:48 How to split mulsi3 pattern Mohamed Shafi
13:21 RE: How to avoid a tree node being garbage collected after C frontend? Bingfeng Mei
12:19 Re: How to avoid a tree node being garbage collected after C frontend? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
12:19 RE: Understanding IRA Dave Hudson
11:01 RE: How to avoid a tree node being garbage collected after C frontend? Bingfeng Mei
06:18 Re: pure64 patch for 4.5.0 Justin P. Mattock
06:16 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!) Kaveh R. GHAZI
06:12 Re: pure64 patch for 4.5.0 Ian Lance Taylor
05:16 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Joern Rennecke
02:55 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Justin P. Mattock
02:37 答复: How to run gcc test suite in pure mingw32 environment? 徐持恒
02:09 pure64 patch for 4.5.0 Justin P. Mattock

November 09, 2009
23:10 Re: i370 port Paul Edwards
21:19 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Grigori Fursin
19:00 Re: How to avoid a tree node being garbage collected after C frontend? Ian Lance Taylor
18:15 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Joern Rennecke
17:15 Re: Preserving the argument spills for GDB Jean Christophe Beyler
17:05 How to avoid a tree node being garbage collected after C frontend? Bingfeng Mei
16:59 Re: Updating Primary and Secondary platform list for gcc-4.5 ??? Richard Guenther
16:50 Re: Updating Primary and Secondary platform list for gcc-4.5 ??? Dennis Clarke
16:17 Re: Updating Primary and Secondary platform list for gcc-4.5 ??? Rainer Orth
16:16 Re: How to support 40bit GP register Richard Henderson
15:57 Re: i370 port Ian Lance Taylor
15:46 Re: Updating Primary and Secondary platform list for gcc-4.5 ??? Dennis Clarke
15:40 Re: Preserving the argument spills for GDB Ian Lance Taylor
15:34 Re: Updating Primary and Secondary platform list for gcc-4.5 ??? Rainer Orth
15:26 Re: How to write shift and add pattern? Ian Lance Taylor
15:22 Re: Preserving the argument spills for GDB Jean Christophe Beyler
14:55 Re: i370 port Paul Edwards
14:46 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Grigori Fursin
14:28 Re: 答复: How to run gcc test suite in pu re mingw32 environment? Dave Korn
14:28 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Grigori Fursin
14:14 Re: How to support 40bit GP register Mohamed Shafi
14:13 RE: Understanding IRA Ian Bolton
12:53 Re: How to write shift and add pattern? Mohamed Shafi
12:52 Re: is LTO aimed for large programs? Diego Novillo
12:49 Re: How to write shift and add pattern? Mohamed Shafi
12:48 Re: is LTO aimed for large programs? Richard Guenther
12:35 Re: is LTO aimed for large programs? Diego Novillo
11:04 Re: How to run gcc test suite in pure mingw32 environment? Kai Tietz
10:52 Re: How to run gcc test suite in pure mingw32 environment? Kai Ruottu
09:57 Re: is LTO aimed for large programs? Richard Guenther
09:44 Re: is LTO aimed for large programs? Tobias Burnus
09:21 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!) Paolo Bonzini
07:50 Re: 答复: How to run gcc test suite in pure mingw3 2 environment? Kai Tietz
07:13 Re: is LTO aimed for large programs? Eric Botcazou
07:13 答复: How to run gcc test suite in pure mingw32 environment? 徐持恒
06:43 Re: is LTO aimed for large programs? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
06:43 Re: How to run gcc test suite in pure mingw32 environment? Kai Tietz
06:38 Re: How to run gcc test suite in pure mingw32 environment? Dave Korn
05:38 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!) Kaveh R. GHAZI
05:33 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!) Kaveh R. Ghazi
03:01 Re: How to do executable individualization using optimization options ? Byoungyoung Lee
02:49 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! John David Anglin
02:26 How to run gcc test suite in pure mingw32 environment? 徐持恒
01:43 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Joern Rennecke
01:14 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!) Paolo Bonzini
00:23 Re: Lattice Mico32 port Sébastien Bourdeauducq

November 08, 2009
23:31 Re: is LTO aimed for large programs? Robert Dewar
23:09 howto graphically view .cfg file produced by -fdump-tree-cfg Larry Evans
23:03 is LTO aimed for large programs? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
22:57 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Kaz Kojima
22:47 gcc-4.3-20091108 is now available gccadmin
21:57 Re: [Re: new plugin events] Gerald Pfeifer
21:45 Re: [Re: new plugin events] Basile STARYNKEVITCH
21:44 Re: [Re: new plugin events] Joern Rennecke
21:40 Re: [Re: new plugin events] Richard Guenther
21:29 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!) David Edelsohn
21:13 Re: [Re: new plugin events] Gerald Pfeifer
21:07 Re: [Re: new plugin events] Richard Guenther
21:03 Re: [Re: new plugin events] Richard Guenther
20:47 Re: [Re: new plugin events] Joern Rennecke
18:40 Re: link list & thread Ian Lance Taylor
18:10 Re: [Re: new plugin events] Terrence Miller
17:42 Re: [Re: new plugin events] Richard Guenther
17:35 [Re: new plugin events] Terrence Miller
10:43 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Janus Weil
09:35 link list & thread Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh
06:22 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!) Kaveh R. Ghazi
04:40 RE: MPC version 0.8 released! Weddington, Eric
02:33 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Gerald Pfeifer
02:01 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!) David Edelsohn

November 07, 2009
22:06 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Dave Korn
20:02 Re: Updating Primary and Secondary platform list for gcc-4.5 ??? Gerald Pfeifer
19:38 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Gerald Pfeifer
19:36 Re: How to do executable individualization using optimization options ? Ian Lance Taylor
17:39 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Kaveh R. Ghazi
17:39 Re: Updating Primary and Secondary platform list for gcc-4.5 ??? Eric Botcazou
16:56 Updating Primary and Secondary platform list for gcc-4.5 ??? Kaveh R. GHAZI
15:27 RE: new plugin events Grigori Fursin
14:44 Re: new plugin events Basile STARYNKEVITCH
14:28 RE: new plugin events Grigori Fursin
14:06 Re: new plugin events Richard Guenther
13:22 How to do executable individualization using optimization options ? Byoungyoung Lee
12:25 RE: new plugin events Grigori Fursin
11:50 Re: new plugin events Basile STARYNKEVITCH
11:01 Re: new plugin events Steven Bosscher
10:50 Re: new plugin events Basile STARYNKEVITCH
09:38 How to do executable individualization using optimization options ? Byoungyoung Lee

November 06, 2009
23:37 Re: new plugin events Joseph S. Myers
23:25 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Joseph S. Myers
22:45 Re: new plugin events Richard Guenther
22:23 Re: new plugin events Richard Guenther
21:58 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Kaveh R. Ghazi
21:41 Re: new plugin events Basile STARYNKEVITCH
21:21 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Justin P. Mattock
19:52 Re: new plugin events Richard Guenther
19:33 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Paolo Carlini
19:28 Re: new plugin events Basile STARYNKEVITCH
19:24 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Ian Lance Taylor
19:08 Re: new plugin events Diego Novillo
19:07 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Paolo Carlini
19:05 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Richard Guenther
19:04 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Paolo Carlini
19:01 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Paolo Carlini
19:01 new plugin events Basile STARYNKEVITCH
18:51 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Richard Guenther
18:44 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Grigori Fursin
18:37 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Paolo Carlini
18:30 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Joern Rennecke
18:18 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Grigori Fursin
18:16 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Basile STARYNKEVITCH
17:53 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Paolo Carlini
17:44 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Eric Botcazou
17:38 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Paolo Carlini
17:28 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Eric Botcazou
17:21 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Paolo Carlini
17:16 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Richard Guenther
17:14 Re: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Joern Rennecke
17:13 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Paolo Carlini
17:09 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Grigori Fursin
16:59 Re: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Basile STARYNKEVITCH
16:56 Re: New g++ template stress/regression test? Sebastian Mach
16:48 Re: very different compilation times [no optimisation] Basile STARYNKEVITCH
16:37 Re: very different compilation times [no optimisation] Basile STARYNKEVITCH
16:24 Re: Do BLKmode bit-fields still exist? Michael Matz
16:17 Re: How to write shift and add pattern? Richard Henderson
16:12 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Grigori Fursin
16:00 Re: very different compilation times [no optimisation] Ian Lance Taylor
15:54 Re: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Basile STARYNKEVITCH
15:49 Re: very different compilation times [no optimisation] Dave Korn
15:46 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Grigori Fursin
15:43 Re: very different compilation times [no optimisation] Basile STARYNKEVITCH
15:36 Re: very different compilation times [no optimisation] Basile STARYNKEVITCH
15:35 Re: very different compilation times [no optimisation] Ian Lance Taylor
15:34 Re: How to write shift and add pattern? Ian Lance Taylor
15:28 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Joern Rennecke
15:16 Re: very different compilation times [no optimisation] Dave Korn
15:12 Re: New g++ template stress/regression test? Dave Korn
15:09 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Grigori Fursin
15:04 very different compilation times [no optimisation] Basile STARYNKEVITCH
14:54 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Joern Rennecke
14:29 Re: Storing 16bit values in upper part of 32bit registers Markus L
14:09 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Grigori Fursin
13:30 Re: How to write shift and add pattern? Mohamed Shafi
12:53 RE: Understanding IRA Dave Hudson
11:29 Re: Do BLKmode bit-fields still exist? Eric Botcazou
10:14 New g++ template stress/regression test? Sebastian Mach
09:54 Re: Do BLKmode bit-fields still exist? Richard Guenther
09:47 Re: Do BLKmode bit-fields still exist? Eric Botcazou
05:18 Re: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Yuanjie HUANG
02:09 Re: Storing 16bit values in upper part of 32bit registers H. Peter Anvin

November 05, 2009
23:34 Re: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Ian Lance Taylor
22:50 gcc-4.5-20091105 is now available gccadmin
20:59 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Eric Botcazou
20:29 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Mikael Pettersson
19:06 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Kaveh R. Ghazi
18:16 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Dennis Clarke
18:05 RE: Understanding IRA Ian Bolton
17:53 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Rainer Orth
17:42 Re: Do BLKmode bit-fields still exist? Jeff Law
17:36 RE: Understanding IRA Ian Bolton
17:22 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Dennis Clarke
17:20 Re: MPC version 0.8 released! Rainer Orth
17:03 Do BLKmode bit-fields still exist? Michael Matz
16:27 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Grigori Fursin
15:54 MPC version 0.8 released! Kaveh R. GHAZI
14:34 Re: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Yuanjie Huang
13:54 RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Grigori Fursin
13:26 Re: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Joern Rennecke
11:17 [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Grigori Fursin
04:53 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Dave Korn
04:31 Bonjour Monsieur Hadja Zanab Diallo
03:36 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Justin Mattock
00:23 Re: Understanding IRA Jeff Law
00:21 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Dave Korn

November 04, 2009
23:20 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 KOSAKI Motohiro
21:50 Re: Whole program optimization and functions-only-called-once. Richard Guenther
21:30 Re: Whole program optimization and functions-only-called-once. Andrew Pinski
21:22 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Justin Mattock
21:20 Re: Whole program optimization and functions-only-called-once. Toon Moene
20:56 MicroBlaze update Michael Eager
20:39 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Justin P. Mattock
19:49 Re: Understanding IRA Jeff Law
19:33 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Dave Korn
19:26 Re: Whole program optimization and functions-only-called-once. Richard Guenther
19:19 Whole program optimization and functions-only-called-once. Toon Moene
18:17 Mercurial mirror of mainline not updated anymore? Rainer Orth
17:52 RE: Understanding IRA Ian Bolton
17:13 Re: Understanding IRA Vladimir Makarov
16:47 Re: i370 port Ulrich Weigand
16:45 Re: Preserving the argument spills for GDB Ian Lance Taylor
16:40 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Justin Mattock
16:39 Re: How to support 40bit GP register Richard Henderson
16:34 Re: Preserving the argument spills for GDB Nathan Froyd
16:24 Re: Preserving the argument spills for GDB Jean Christophe Beyler
15:30 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Dave Korn
15:29 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Andrew Morton
15:08 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Justin P. Mattock
14:47 Re: PATCH: Support --enable-gold=both --with-linker=[bfd|gold] H.J. Lu
14:41 Re: IRA is not looking into the predicates ? Jeff Law
14:12 Re: How to support 40bit GP register Dave Korn
13:43 Re: IRA is not looking into the predicates ? Mohamed Shafi
13:42 Re: IRA is not looking into the predicates ? Mohamed Shafi
13:35 Re: How to support 40bit GP register Mohamed Shafi
12:58 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Dave Korn
09:32 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 KOSAKI Motohiro
09:14 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Jiri Slaby
06:44 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Justin P. Mattock
06:24 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Andrew Morton
05:21 Re: i370 port Paul Edwards
05:09 Re: PATCH: Support --enable-gold=both --with-linker=[bfd|gold] Roland McGrath
01:40 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Justin P. Mattock
01:18 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 KOSAKI Motohiro

November 03, 2009
23:28 Re: PATCH: Support --enable-gold=both --with-linker=[bfd|gold] H.J. Lu
23:02 Re: Understanding IRA Jeff Law
22:50 gcc-4.4-20091103 is now available gccadmin
22:23 Re: PATCH: Support --enable-gold=both --with-linker=[bfd|gold] Roland McGrath
22:19 Re: PATCH: Support --enable-gold=both --with-linker=[bfd|gold] H.J. Lu
22:04 Re: Preserving the argument spills for GDB Ian Lance Taylor
21:15 Re: How to debug lto1 ICE? Andrew Pinski
21:12 Re: How to debug lto1 ICE? Rafael Espindola
21:09 Re: Preserving the argument spills for GDB Jean Christophe Beyler
20:57 How to debug lto1 ICE? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
19:01 Preserving the argument spills for GDB Jean Christophe Beyler
18:00 Re: help on - instruction scheduling passes in gcc Ian Lance Taylor
17:33 help on - instruction scheduling passes in gcc ddmetro
17:33 help on - instruction scheduling passes in gcc ddmetro
17:33 help on - instruction scheduling passes in gcc ddmetro
17:27 help on - instruction scheduling passes in gcc ddmetro
17:25 help on - instruction scheduling passes in gcc ddmetro
17:25 help on - instruction scheduling passes in gcc ddmetro
16:52 Re: Lattice Mico32 port David Edelsohn
16:29 RE: Understanding IRA Ian Bolton
03:39 [c++]pt.c:most_specialized_class appears to substitute outer args for inner params Larry Evans
00:56 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Justin P. Mattock

November 02, 2009
22:34 Re: undefined reference to `gt_pch_nx_tree_code' Aravinda
22:12 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Justin P. Mattock
22:06 PATCH: Support --enable-gold=both --with-linker=[bfd|gold] H.J. Lu
22:05 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Jiri Slaby
22:02 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Justin Mattock
21:49 Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Jiri Slaby
21:42 Re: Process for proposing new C/C++ language extensions. Basile STARYNKEVITCH
21:29 cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0 Justin Mattock
21:28 Process for proposing new C/C++ language extensions. johnchristian
20:23 RE; BAD WEATHER IS COMING... How will you reach your people? info
20:20 RE: plugin hooks Grigori Fursin
20:20 incorrect place for LTO options description Denis Onischenko
18:01 RE; BAD WEATHER IS COMING... How will you reach your people? info
17:48 Re: Three old entries from PROBLEMS Richard Henderson
17:37 Re: Three old entries from PROBLEMS Richard Henderson
15:01 RE: RFC PRE-ing REFERENCE expressions Richard Guenther
14:59 RE: RFC PRE-ing REFERENCE expressions Rahul Kharche
14:45 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Paul Edwards
12:47 RE: plugin hooks Joern Rennecke
10:07 Re: Three old entries from PROBLEMS Paolo Bonzini
07:57 Re: Three old entries from PROBLEMS Joern Rennecke
07:46 Re: Three old entries from PROBLEMS Joern Rennecke
03:06 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!) Kaveh R. Ghazi
00:04 Re: Three old entries from PROBLEMS Paolo Bonzini

November 01, 2009
23:41 Three old entries from PROBLEMS Gerald Pfeifer
22:50 gcc-4.3-20091101 is now available gccadmin
22:45 Re: undefined reference to `gt_pch_nx_tree_code' Laurynas Biveinis
22:37 Re: undefined reference to `gt_pch_nx_tree_code' Aravinda
21:57 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!) Kaz Kojima
20:28 Re: undefined reference to `gt_pch_nx_tree_code' Laurynas Biveinis
17:54 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!) Gerald Pfeifer
05:02 Re: enable-build-with-cxx bootstrap compare broken by r149964 Jason Merrill
00:17 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!) John David Anglin


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3