This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: delete dead feature branches?
- From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
- To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, gdr at integrable-solutions dot net, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:17:33 -0700
- Subject: Re: delete dead feature branches?
- References: <h9in34$4pu$1@ger.gmane.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0909251650450.30532@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <4ABD0F1E.5030807@redhat.com> <206fcf960909251214u5770c7b5o141614226e28fdff@mail.gmail.com> <84fc9c000909251220r62d518bka48cd3a13d0d5ea0@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0909251932570.6234@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <4AD33BA2.60107@gnu.org> <4AD39C64.3020304@redhat.com>
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 10/12/2009 10:22 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>> Yep. Anyone deleting dead branches should add a link to the last "live"
>> version in branches.html. It seems easier to me to move them under
>> branches/dead, and possibly create branches/merged.
>
> Multiple directory levels under branches/ confuse git-svn; it thinks "dead"
> is a single branch. ÂI'd rather not expand on that usage.
That seems like a huge bug in git-svn because we already use multiple
directory levels under branches. Hint ibm and redhat and debain.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski