gcc archive
date index for October, 2009

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

October 31, 2009
22:10 Re: Library ABI seriously broken!! Paolo Carlini
22:08 Re: Library ABI seriously broken!! Jason Merrill
21:36 Joker Board Commercal 3 (лучшая доска)_|||| joker
18:10 Re: [RFC] md reorg plans for 4.6? Steven Bosscher
06:31 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!) Kaveh R. Ghazi
05:11 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!) Dave Korn
04:02 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!) Ed Smith-Rowland
03:13 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!) Ed Smith-Rowland
00:13 Re: [RFC] md reorg plans for 4.6? Ian Lance Taylor

October 30, 2009
22:27 Re: Library ABI seriously broken!! Paolo Carlini
19:46 Re: Reducing fortran testcase with delta. Andrew Pinski
18:31 [RFC] md reorg plans for 4.6? Paolo Bonzini
18:18 Re: Library ABI seriously broken!! Jason Merrill
17:48 Re: IRA is not looking into the predicates ? Jeff Law
15:51 Re: IRA is not looking into the predicates ? Ian Lance Taylor
14:50 Re: RFC PRE-ing REFERENCE expressions Richard Guenther
14:22 RFC PRE-ing REFERENCE expressions Rahul Kharche
13:20 Re: Library ABI seriously broken!! Richard Guenther
13:15 Re: Library ABI seriously broken!! Paolo Carlini
13:14 IRA is not looking into the predicates ? Mohamed Shafi
13:09 Re: Library ABI seriously broken!! Richard Guenther
12:54 Re: Library ABI seriously broken!! Paolo Carlini
12:28 Re: Library ABI seriously broken!! Jerry Quinn
11:48 Library ABI seriously broken!! Paolo Carlini
09:23 Re: Reducing fortran testcase with delta. Li Feng
08:42 Re: Reducing fortran testcase with delta. VandeVondele Joost
08:08 Reducing fortran testcase with delta. Li Feng
04:20 Re: "uninitialized variable" warning from compiler Ian Lance Taylor
04:16 Re: SHN_UNDEF symbols with non-zero value in MIPS shared object Ian Lance Taylor
03:31 Re: Possibly gcc/ld bug Ian Lance Taylor
01:16 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!) Kaveh R. Ghazi
01:16 Re: MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!) Kaveh R. Ghazi

October 29, 2009
22:55 gcc-4.5-20091029 is now available gccadmin
19:34 "uninitialized variable" warning from compiler Uma shankar
19:26 SHN_UNDEF symbols with non-zero value in MIPS shared object Uma shankar
17:19 MPC 0.8 prerelease tarball (last release before MPC is mandatory!) Kaveh R. GHAZI
15:09 Re: simplify_relational_operation and unsigned char Dave Korn
14:45 Re: simplify_relational_operation and unsigned char Richard Henderson
14:44 Re: [PATCH][LTO] Fix PR41858 Richard Guenther
14:31 Re: [PATCH][LTO] Fix PR41858 Toon Moene
14:29 Re: [PATCH][LTO] Fix PR41858 Richard Guenther
14:18 [PATCH][LTO] Fix PR41858 Toon Moene
12:46 Possibly gcc/ld bug Bluddy
10:35 simplify_relational_operation and unsigned char Amir Gonnen
05:35 Re: enable-build-with-cxx bootstrap compare broken by r149964 Jason Merrill
05:07 Re: enable-build-with-cxx bootstrap compare broken by r149964 Jerry Quinn

October 28, 2009
21:44 Re: when (not) use bugzilla for GCC? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
21:29 Re: plugin hooks Basile STARYNKEVITCH
20:36 Re: plugin hooks Richard Guenther
20:32 Re: plugin specific LTO data? Richard Guenther
19:34 Re: plugin hooks Basile STARYNKEVITCH
19:02 Re: plugin hooks Rafael Espindola
18:59 Re: plugin hooks Rafael Espindola
18:56 Re: plugin hooks Rafael Espindola
18:13 Re: dg-error vs. i18n? Ross Ridge
17:34 plugin specific LTO data? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
17:34 help on - writing a testcase to detect structural hazard in gcc ddmetro
15:55 Re: dg-error vs. i18n? Joseph S. Myers
15:35 Re: enable-build-with-cxx bootstrap compare broken by r149964 Jason Merrill
15:29 Re: Problems with selective scheduling Andrey Belevantsev
15:03 Re: plugin hooks Basile STARYNKEVITCH
14:26 Puzzles about implementation of bb-reorder pass Amker.Cheng
13:47 Re: Problems with selective scheduling Markus L
11:30 Re: enable-build-with-cxx bootstrap compare broken by r149964 Jerry Quinn
08:29 Should warning of -Wunreachable-code be generated when optimization is taken? Eric Fisher
03:33 Re: dg-error vs. i18n? Ross Ridge

October 27, 2009
22:55 gcc-4.4-20091027 is now available gccadmin
20:19 Re: Dead Store Elimination Jakub Jelinek
20:18 Re: Why does GCC Preprocessor NOT support such macro? Jakub Jelinek
20:18 Re: RFC: allowing fold to change location of args (PR/41451) Jakub Jelinek
19:50 Re: Testsuite regular expression question Andreas Schwab
18:54 Re: dg-error vs. i18n? Dave Korn
18:23 Re: -use-linker-plugin passed to ld Ian Lance Taylor
17:24 Re: -use-linker-plugin passed to ld Rafael Espindola
17:22 Re: -use-linker-plugin passed to ld Andrew Pinski
17:22 Re: -use-linker-plugin passed to ld Rafael Espindola
17:16 Re: Testsuite regular expression question Steve Ellcey
17:13 Re: -use-linker-plugin passed to ld Rafael Espindola
17:01 Re: Testsuite regular expression question Steve Ellcey
17:00 Re: Testsuite regular expression question Andreas Schwab
16:45 Re: -use-linker-plugin passed to ld Ian Lance Taylor
16:25 Re: Testsuite regular expression question Steve Ellcey
16:19 Re: -use-linker-plugin passed to ld Andreas Schwab
15:55 Re: plugin hooks Richard Guenther
15:51 Re: plugin hooks Joseph S. Myers
15:50 Re: -use-linker-plugin passed to ld Rafael Espindola
15:49 Re: plugin hooks Basile STARYNKEVITCH
15:39 Re: plugin hooks Richard Guenther
15:29 Re: dg-error vs. i18n? Eric Blake
15:20 Re: plugin hooks Basile STARYNKEVITCH
15:06 Re: plugin hooks Basile STARYNKEVITCH
14:57 Re: plugin hooks Ian Lance Taylor
14:19 Re: plugin hooks Basile STARYNKEVITCH
13:29 Re: plugin hooks Ian Lance Taylor
12:22 Re: plugin hooks Basile STARYNKEVITCH
12:18 Re: plugin hooks Richard Guenther
12:16 plugin hooks Basile STARYNKEVITCH
12:03 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Paul Edwards
11:58 Re: Problems with selective scheduling Alexander Monakov
10:38 Re: Testsuite regular expression question Andreas Schwab
09:51 Problems with selective scheduling Markus L
06:09 Re: Testsuite regular expression question Kaveh R. GHAZI
03:45 undefined reference to `gt_pch_nx_tree_code' Aravinda

October 26, 2009
23:35 Re: -use-linker-plugin passed to ld Daniel Jacobowitz
23:27 Re: Some GCC porting questions Ian Lance Taylor
23:07 Testsuite regular expression question Steve Ellcey
22:10 Re: -use-linker-plugin passed to ld Hans-Peter Nilsson
21:44 Re: RFC: allowing fold to change location of args (PR/41451) Richard Guenther
21:42 Re: RFC: allowing fold to change location of args (PR/41451) Aldy Hernandez
20:46 Re: RFC: allowing fold to change location of args (PR/41451) Richard Guenther
20:23 Re: when (not) use bugzilla for GCC? Ian Lance Taylor
19:57 Re: when (not) use bugzilla for GCC? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
17:31 Re: Problems with acats test suite not being run? Laurent GUERBY
17:29 Re: RFC: allowing fold to change location of args (PR/41451) Aldy Hernandez
16:41 Re: RFC: allowing fold to change location of args (PR/41451) Richard Guenther
16:40 Re: RFC: allowing fold to change location of args (PR/41451) Andrew Pinski
16:37 Re: RFC: allowing fold to change location of args (PR/41451) Aldy Hernandez
16:13 Re: RFC: allowing fold to change location of args (PR/41451) Richard Guenther
16:08 Some GCC porting questions palpar
15:39 RFC: allowing fold to change location of args (PR/41451) Aldy Hernandez
14:56 Re: No c++0x threads using win32 threading model (with MinGW-w64) NightStrike
14:41 Re: when (not) use bugzilla for GCC? Richard Guenther
14:39 Re: when (not) use bugzilla for GCC? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
14:06 Re: when (not) use bugzilla for GCC? Richard Guenther
14:00 Re: when (not) use bugzilla for GCC? Ian Lance Taylor
13:54 Re: enable-build-with-cxx bootstrap compare broken by r149964 Jason Merrill
11:57 Re: Problems with acats test suite not being run? Christian Joensson
11:14 Re: enable-build-with-cxx bootstrap compare broken by r149964 Jakub Jelinek
07:11 Re: when (not) use bugzilla for GCC? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
06:52 Problems with acats test suite not being run? Christian Joensson
02:01 Re: when (not) use bugzilla for GCC? Joseph S. Myers

October 25, 2009
22:56 gcc-4.3-20091025 is now available gccadmin
18:54 Re: Building gold from binutils-2.20 alongside gcc trunk errors out: Toon Moene
18:48 Re: Building gold from binutils-2.20 alongside gcc trunk errors out: Richard Guenther
18:42 Re: Building gold from binutils-2.20 alongside gcc trunk errors out: Toon Moene
18:32 when (not) use bugzilla for GCC? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
17:36 Re: dg-error vs. i18n? Joseph S. Myers
14:54 Re: delete dead feature branches? Gerald Pfeifer
12:19 Building gold from binutils-2.20 alongside gcc trunk errors out: Toon Moene
11:38 Re: Bootstrap failure with graphite Richard Guenther
11:24 Re: Bootstrap failure with graphite Steven Bosscher
11:19 Re: Bootstrap failure with graphite Richard Guenther
11:08 Bootstrap failure with graphite Steven Bosscher

October 24, 2009
20:05 Re: dg-error vs. i18n? Dave Korn
15:17 Re: dg-error vs. i18n? Charles Wilson
11:41 Re: dg-error vs. i18n? Andreas Schwab
11:31 Re: dg-error vs. i18n? Andreas Schwab
09:04 Re: Error when building cross compiler Denis Onischenko
08:59 Re: Error when building cross compiler Denis Onischenko
08:03 Re: Duplicate GCC warnings Dave Korn
05:06 Duplicate GCC warnings Ralf CorsÃpius
04:53 LLVM 2.6 Release Chris Lattner
04:26 Re: dg-error vs. i18n? Charles Wilson
04:11 Re: enable-build-with-cxx bootstrap compare broken by r149964 Jerry Quinn
03:18 Re: -use-linker-plugin passed to ld Rafael Espindola
02:28 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Ulrich Weigand
01:28 Re: A forward declaration used by template class issue on gcc 4.4.1 Ian Lance Taylor
00:20 Re: dg-error vs. i18n? Dave Korn
00:04 Re: dg-error vs. i18n? Dave Korn

October 23, 2009
23:19 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Paul Edwards
23:08 Re: dg-error vs. i18n? Joseph S. Myers
23:04 Re: dg-error vs. i18n? Andrew Pinski
23:00 Re: dg-error vs. i18n? Richard Guenther
22:46 dg-error vs. i18n? Dave Korn
21:56 Re: Type-based alias analysis and alias sets Richard Guenther
19:12 Re: Why does GCC Preprocessor NOT support such macro? Andrew Pinski
19:07 Re: Why does GCC Preprocessor NOT support such macro? Jean Christophe Beyler
19:00 Re: Type-based alias analysis and alias sets Eric Botcazou
18:45 Re: -use-linker-plugin passed to ld Ian Lance Taylor
18:35 Re: -use-linker-plugin passed to ld Steven Bosscher
18:21 Re: -use-linker-plugin passed to ld Ian Lance Taylor
16:49 A forward declaration used by template class issue on gcc 4.4.1 Zhang Lin
16:20 Re: Why does GCC Preprocessor NOT support such macro? Zhang Lin
15:45 Re: -use-linker-plugin passed to ld Rafael Espindola
15:16 Re: Type-based alias analysis and alias sets Eric Botcazou
15:02 Re: -use-linker-plugin passed to ld Rafael Espindola
14:58 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Ulrich Weigand
14:57 -use-linker-plugin passed to ld Ian Lance Taylor
14:40 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Ian Lance Taylor
14:36 Re: Typo in internals Ian Lance Taylor
14:32 Re: Supporting FP cmp lib routines Joern Rennecke
14:15 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Paul Edwards
14:05 Re: Supporting FP cmp lib routines Mohamed Shafi
14:04 Re: Why does GCC Preprocessor NOT support such macro? John Graham
13:43 Why does GCC Preprocessor NOT support such macro? Zhang Lin
11:52 Re: Type-based alias analysis and alias sets Richard Guenther
11:30 Type-based alias analysis and alias sets Eric Botcazou
07:33 Typo in internals Mohamed Shafi

October 22, 2009
22:58 gcc-4.5-20091022 is now available gccadmin
22:04 Re: Understanding IRA Jeff Law
19:26 A cool giveaway for your readers Blake Holloway
18:26 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Paul Edwards
18:03 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Ulrich Weigand
17:53 Re: Dead Store Elimination Jeff Law
17:14 Re: Dead Store Elimination Pranav Bhandarkar
17:13 Make Non-Stop Guaranteed Automatic Profits Online check this website out... Randy
09:51 Re: two ideas to improve C++ Laurent Rineau
09:12 Re: Dead Store Elimination Richard Guenther
09:06 Re: --enable-plugin option overloaded Andrew Haley
07:16 Re: --enable-plugin option overloaded Matthias Klose
06:57 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Paul Edwards
06:33 Re: CFG,DFG Paolo Bonzini
06:31 Dead Store Elimination Pranav Bhandarkar
06:24 Re: When did arc-elf last build? Paolo Bonzini

October 21, 2009
23:58 Re: CFG,DFG Ian Lance Taylor
23:14 Re: How to support 40bit GP register Richard Henderson
19:56 cloud_slon ÑÐÑÐÑ ÑÐÑÐÑÑ ÐÐÑ Ð ÐÑÐÐÐÑÐ ÐÑÐÐÐÑ
19:28 CFG,DFG swati raina
15:56 Re: gcc ld error Ian Lance Taylor
15:46 gcc ld error daniel tian
14:26 How to support 40bit GP register Mohamed Shafi
12:51 RE: Lattice Mico32 port Jon Beniston
00:45 Re: two ideas to improve C++ Ian Lance Taylor

October 20, 2009
23:03 gcc-4.4-20091020 is now available gccadmin
22:58 two ideas to improve C++ Ireneusz Szpilewski
20:19 Re: [MIPS] cannot split restore_gp Richard Sandiford
19:29 Re: __attribute__((optimize)) and fast-math related oddities Michael Meissner
19:12 Re: Alias analysis or DSE problem? Justin Seyster
18:13 Re: __attribute__((optimize)) and fast-math related oddities H.J. Lu
16:34 Re: [RFC] Enabling -flto in libstdc++? Joseph S. Myers
15:30 [RFC] Enabling -flto in libstdc++? Diego Novillo
14:18 Re: Need help in understanding code generated for C++ exception handling Ian Lance Taylor
13:55 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Ulrich Weigand
13:04 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Paul Edwards
09:20 Re: __attribute__((optimize)) and fast-math related oddities Richard Guenther
09:18 Re: Alias analysis or DSE problem? Richard Guenther
05:11 Need help in understanding code generated for C++ exception handling Shankar Iyer
00:53 [MIPS] cannot split restore_gp Fu, Chao-Ying

October 19, 2009
23:54 Re: __attribute__((optimize)) and fast-math related oddities tbp
23:34 Re: Alias analysis or DSE problem? Justin Seyster
22:26 Re: When did arc-elf last build? Joern Rennecke
21:53 Re: When did arc-elf last build? Joel Sherrill
21:09 Improving code with no offset addressing Michael Hope
19:48 Re: C++ Plugins Terrence Miller
19:21 Re: Understanding IRA Vladimir Makarov
18:31 Re: C++ Plugins Benjamin Smedberg
18:31 RE: Understanding IRA Ian Bolton
17:47 Re: __attribute__((optimize)) and fast-math related oddities H.J. Lu
17:43 Re: --enable-plugin option overloaded Andrew Haley
17:40 Re: char drawstrings[DRAW_MAX][] = { " .. give error Ian Lance Taylor
17:37 Re: --enable-plugin option overloaded Ian Lance Taylor
17:34 Re: __attribute__((optimize)) and fast-math related oddities Ian Lance Taylor
14:19 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Ulrich Weigand
12:45 char drawstrings[DRAW_MAX][] = { " .. give error Bernd Roesch
12:27 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Paul Edwards
11:19 GCC 4.4.2 Released Jakub Jelinek
08:48 Re: When did arc-elf last build? Richard Guenther
08:43 Re: --enable-plugin option overloaded Andrew Haley
02:00 Re: When did arc-elf last build? Joern Rennecke
01:19 When did arc-elf last build? Joel Sherrill

October 18, 2009
22:55 gcc-4.3-20091018 is now available gccadmin
22:08 --enable-plugin option overloaded Matthias Klose
21:11 Re: help regarding instruction scheduling in gcc - dfa(deterministic finite automaton) Ben Elliston
17:03 Re: Dealing with warnings on __attribute__((user)) when dehydra is not loaded tglek
15:34 Re: Constraint modifier for partially overlaping operands Richard Henderson
15:17 help regarding instruction scheduling in gcc - dfa(deterministic finite automaton) ddmetro

October 17, 2009
22:47 Re: GC overhead just because of aligning long double? Richard Guenther
22:30 GC overhead just because of aligning long double? Richard Guenther
21:08 __attribute__((optimize)) and fast-math related oddities tbp
17:35 Re: Constraint modifier for partially overlaping operands Andrew Hutchinson
17:23 Re: Constraint modifier for partially overlaping operands Dave Korn
17:01 Re: Constraint modifier for partially overlaping operands Richard Henderson
16:18 Re: Constraint modifier for partially overlaping operands Andrew Hutchinson
16:01 Re: Constraint modifier for partially overlaping operands Dave Korn
14:42 Re: Bug in binop rotate ? Andrew Hutchinson
14:14 Re: Bug in binop rotate ? Richard Guenther
13:46 Bug in binop rotate ? Andrew Hutchinson
11:41 Re: Alias analysis or DSE problem? Richard Guenther
06:04 Re: Constraint modifier for partially overlaping operands Ian Lance Taylor
02:10 Constraint modifier for partially overlaping operands Andrew Hutchinson

October 16, 2009
22:44 Alias analysis or DSE problem? Justin Seyster
16:59 Re: Dealing with warnings on __attribute__((user)) when dehydra is not loaded Tom Tromey
16:46 Re: Dealing with warnings on __attribute__((user)) when dehydra is not loaded Basile STARYNKEVITCH
16:34 Re: Dealing with warnings on __attribute__((user)) when dehydra is not loaded Benjamin Smedberg
16:19 News Portal Crna-kronika.hr Emil Milinkovic
16:11 Re: Dealing with warnings on __attribute__((user)) when dehydra is not loaded Tom Tromey
15:45 Re: Understanding IRA Jeff Law
15:23 Re: Ada Copyright Notice Nit Arnaud Charlet
15:05 Re: Understanding IRA Vladimir Makarov
14:57 Re: Understanding IRA Vladimir Makarov
14:22 Re: Dealing with warnings on __attribute__((user)) when dehydra is not loaded Basile STARYNKEVITCH
14:16 Re: Ada Copyright Notice Nit Ian Lance Taylor
13:51 Understanding IRA Ian Bolton
13:47 Re: Dealing with warnings on __attribute__((user)) when dehydra is not loaded Basile STARYNKEVITCH
13:43 Re: Turning off unrolling to certain loops Jean Christophe Beyler
13:39 Ada Copyright Notice Nit Joel Sherrill
13:38 Re: Dealing with warnings on __attribute__((user)) when dehydra is not loaded Diego Novillo
13:33 Re: Dealing with warnings on __attribute__((user)) when dehydra is not loaded Diego Novillo
12:44 Re: Dealing with warnings on __attribute__((user)) when dehydra is not loaded Basile STARYNKEVITCH
12:17 Dealing with warnings on __attribute__((user)) when dehydra is not loaded Diego Novillo
10:11 Is gcj dead? Yuri
09:09 RE: Turning off unrolling to certain loops Bingfeng Mei
05:15 MicroBlaze update Michael Eager

October 15, 2009
23:01 gcc-4.5-20091015 is now available gccadmin
22:42 Re: problems with gcc installation Ben Elliston
22:30 Re: help: standard name of vector mode Hans-Peter Nilsson
20:29 Re: Bus error gcc compiler for any for ( x in array ) inside Objective-C++ template Ian Lance Taylor
19:51 Re: checking for debug a plugin on a production compiler? Rafael Espindola
18:26 Re: Question on C++-0x constexpr Gabriel Dos Reis
17:16 Re: GCC 4.4.2 Status Report (2009-10-15) Jakub Jelinek
16:37 Re: help: standard name of vector mode Ian Lance Taylor
16:27 Re: Turning off unrolling to certain loops Jean Christophe Beyler
16:25 Question on C++-0x constexpr Ed Smith-Rowland
16:12 RE: Turning off unrolling to certain loops Bingfeng Mei
15:56 Re: Storing 16bit values in upper part of 32bit registers Richard Henderson
15:43 Re: GCC 4.4.2 Status Report (2009-10-15) Ryan Mansfield
15:33 Re: Turning off unrolling to certain loops Jean Christophe Beyler
14:57 Re: Storing 16bit values in upper part of 32bit registers sumanth
14:41 Storing 16bit values in upper part of 32bit registers Markus L
13:13 GCC 4.4.2 Status Report (2009-10-15) Jakub Jelinek
10:00 Re: Turning off unrolling to certain loops Zdenek Dvorak
09:49 help: standard name of vector mode 彭建章
09:32 RE: Turning off unrolling to certain loops Bingfeng Mei
08:17 problems with gcc installation yzysea
07:46 Bus error gcc compiler for any for ( x in array ) inside Objective-C++ template John Holdsworth
00:45 Re: delete dead feature branches? Ben Elliston
00:32 Re: loop optimization in gcc Tobias Grosser

October 14, 2009
21:28 Re: Turning off unrolling to certain loops Zdenek Dvorak
20:41 Re: Why does template constuctor only work at global scope? Bug? Jonathan Wakely
20:07 checking for debug a plugin on a production compiler? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
19:09 Why does template constuctor only work at global scope? Bug? Ben Bridgwater
18:58 Re: LTO and the inlining of functions only called once. Paolo Bonzini
18:56 Re: LTO and the inlining of functions only called once. Paolo Bonzini
18:29 Re: Turning off unrolling to certain loops Jean Christophe Beyler
18:26 Re: loop optimization in gcc sandeep soni
18:20 Re: [4.4] Strange performance regression? francesco biscani
16:49 Re: LTO and the inlining of functions only called once. Toon Moene
15:42 Re: LTO and the inlining of functions only called once. Daniel Jacobowitz
15:32 Re: loop optimization in gcc Tobias Grosser
14:43 Re: loop optimization in gcc sandeep soni
14:33 Re: LTO and the inlining of functions only called once. Jan Hubicka
14:28 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Paul Edwards
14:04 Re: [4.4] Strange performance regression? Tim Prince
13:48 Re: LTO and the inlining of functions only called once. Toon Moene
13:31 Re: LTO and the inlining of functions only called once. Toon Moene
11:32 èåèåéåèäçææåè160 0å éèæå Plurk.com èååè Plurk
10:05 Re: [4.4] Strange performance regression? Joern Rennecke
09:36 Re: LTO and the inlining of functions only called once. Richard Guenther
06:33 Re: delete dead feature branches? Michael Matz
06:23 Re: delete dead feature branches? Alexandre Oliva
05:55 Re: Escape the unnecessary re-optimization in automatic parallelization. Alexey Salmin
05:07 Re: delete dead feature branches? Jason Merrill
04:20 Re: [4.4] Strange performance regression? Mark Tall
04:15 Re: [4.4] Strange performance regression? Ian Lance Taylor
03:16 Re: GCC 4.4.2 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Jack Howarth
02:18 Re: delete dead feature branches? Joern Rennecke
02:06 Re: [4.4] Strange performance regression? Joern Rennecke
01:37 Re: delete dead feature branches? Daniel Berlin
00:51 Re: delete dead feature branches? Ben Elliston

October 13, 2009
22:55 gcc-4.4-20091013 is now available gccadmin
21:12 Re: [4.4] Strange performance regression? Ian Lance Taylor
21:00 [4.4] Strange performance regression? francesco biscani
19:03 Re: Warning for future branch merges TO mainline Richard Henderson
18:54 Re: Warning for future branch merges TO mainline Dave Korn
18:43 Re: Warning for future branch merges TO mainline Jeff Law
18:31 Re: LTO and the inlining of functions only called once. Toon Moene
17:46 Re: LTO and the inlining of functions only called once. Adam Nemet
17:34 Warning for future branch merges TO mainline Richard Henderson
16:49 Re: Added myself to MAINTAINERS Benjamin Kosnik
15:19 Re: LTO question Richard Guenther
15:19 RE: LTO question Bingfeng Mei
15:15 Re: LTO question Richard Guenther
14:53 Re: LTO and the inlining of functions only called once. Jeff Law
13:50 Re: LTO question Diego Novillo
13:48 Re: delete dead feature branches? Jason Merrill
13:47 GNAT/RTEMS Status with 4.5.0 20091012 r152668 Joel Sherrill
13:47 RE: LTO question Bingfeng Mei
13:30 Re: LTO question Diego Novillo
13:27 Re: LTO and the inlining of functions only called once. Daniel Jacobowitz
12:51 Re: Escape the unnecessary re-optimization in automatic parallelization. Yuri Kashnikoff
12:47 LTO question Bingfeng Mei
12:40 Re: Added myself to MAINTAINERS Paolo Carlini
12:32 Added myself to MAINTAINERS Ed Smith-Rowland
12:26 Re: symbol "#" generated by CPP(c preprocessor) Andreas Schwab
12:17 Re: symbol "#" generated by CPP(c preprocessor) Paul Brook
12:05 symbol "#" generated by CPP(c preprocessor) daniel tian
09:42 Re: LTO and the inlining of functions only called once. Paul Brook
06:39 Re: loop optimization in gcc Tobias Grosser
01:29 Re: LTO and the inlining of functions only called once. Jeff Law
01:19 Re: LTO and the inlining of functions only called once. Michael Matz
01:05 Re: delete dead feature branches? Michael Matz

October 12, 2009
22:18 Re: LTO and the inlining of functions only called once. Jeff Law
21:21 Re: delete dead feature branches? Jason Merrill
21:17 Re: delete dead feature branches? Andrew Pinski
21:15 Re: delete dead feature branches? Jason Merrill
18:03 Re: loop optimization in gcc sandeep soni
17:58 Re: loop optimization in gcc Ian Lance Taylor
17:44 Re: loop optimization in gcc sandeep soni
17:32 Re: inlining problems Ian Lance Taylor
17:16 inlining problems Thomas Heller
17:08 Re: status of http://sshproxy.sourceware.org:443/ Ian Lance Taylor
16:59 Re: glibc configure: error: Need linker with .init_array/.fini_array support Ian Lance Taylor
16:35 status of http://sshproxy.sourceware.org:443/ Loren James Rittle
15:52 Re: Issues of the latest trunk with LTO merges Daniel Jacobowitz
15:48 Re: Issues of the latest trunk with LTO merges Richard Henderson
15:38 Re: VOIDmode in ZERO_EXTEND crashed daniel tian
15:10 RE: Issues of the latest trunk with LTO merges Bingfeng Mei
14:34 Re: Issues of the latest trunk with LTO merges Richard Guenther
14:31 Issues of the latest trunk with LTO merges Bingfeng Mei
14:24 cross build x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu to i686-pc-cygwin fails in libstdc++-v3 Rainer Emrich
14:22 Re: delete dead feature branches? Paolo Bonzini
14:20 Re: VOIDmode in ZERO_EXTEND crashed Paolo Bonzini
11:02 Re: VOIDmode in ZERO_EXTEND crashed daniel tian
10:50 Re: VOIDmode in ZERO_EXTEND crashed Joern Rennecke
10:37 Re: VOIDmode in ZERO_EXTEND crashed daniel tian
10:31 glibc configure: error: Need linker with .init_array/.fini_array support jeffiedward
10:19 RE: VOIDmode in ZERO_EXTEND crashed Jon Beniston
10:17 VOIDmode in ZERO_EXTEND crashed daniel tian
08:59 Re: building LTO plugin fails for x86_64-unknown -linux-gnu Richard Guenther
08:53 Re: building LTO plugin fails for x86_64-unknown -linux-gnu Rainer Emrich
06:43 Re: loop optimization in gcc Ian Lance Taylor

October 11, 2009
22:51 gcc-4.3-20091011 is now available gccadmin
22:25 Re: delete dead feature branches? Ben Elliston
18:03 Re: [g++ 4.4] Unicode string literal support? Paolo Carlini
17:58 Re: [g++ 4.4] Unicode string literal support? Jakub Jelinek
17:42 Re: [g++ 4.4] Unicode string literal support? Andrew Pinski
17:40 Re: [g++ 4.4] Unicode string literal support? Andrew Pinski
17:36 Re: [g++ 4.4] Unicode string literal support? Paolo Carlini
16:23 Re: building LTO plugin fails for x86_64-unknown -linux-gnu Richard Guenther
16:21 Re: building LTO plugin fails for x86_64-unknown -linux-gnu Richard Guenther
16:13 C++ Plugins Terrence Miller
16:05 building LTO plugin fails for x86_64-unknown -linux-gnu Rainer Emrich
15:21 Re: Escape the unnecessary re-optimization in automatic parallelization. Li Feng
14:50 loop optimization in gcc sandeep soni
14:31 Re: [g++ 4.4] Unicode string literal support? Paolo Carlini
13:30 [g++ 4.4] Unicode string literal support? Beman Dawes

October 10, 2009
17:26 Re: LTO and the inlining of functions only called once. Toon Moene
17:16 Re: LTO and the inlining of functions only called once. Joseph S. Myers
16:40 Re: LTO and the inlining of functions only called once. Richard Guenther
16:24 Re: LTO and the inlining of functions only called once. Jeff Law
15:33 The Linux binutils 2.20.51.0.2 is released H.J. Lu
15:28 Re: LTO and the inlining of functions only called once. Diego Novillo
15:27 Re: LTO and the inlining of functions only called once. Jan Hubicka
15:17 Re: LTO and the inlining of functions only called once. Daniel Jacobowitz
15:10 Re: Linkage problem with rescent gcc 4.5 in MinGW build Kai Tietz
15:01 Re: LTO and the inlining of functions only called once. Richard Guenther
14:25 Linkage problem with rescent gcc 4.5 in MinGW build Sergey Sadovnikov
13:40 Re: LTO and the inlining of functions only called once. Toon Moene
12:31 Re: LTO and the inlining of functions only called once. Jan Hubicka
12:18 Re: LTO and the inlining of functions only called once. Toon Moene
11:50 Re: LTO and the inlining of functions only called once. Richard Guenther
11:47 Re: LTO and the inlining of functions only called once. Richard Guenther
11:34 Re: LTO and the inlining of functions only called once. Toon Moene
11:00 Re: LTO and the inlining of functions only called once. Richard Guenther
10:55 LTO and the inlining of functions only called once. Toon Moene
09:28 Re: Escape the unnecessary re-optimization in automatic parallelization. Joern Rennecke
09:16 Re: LTO: Speedup. Toon Moene
02:25 Escape the unnecessary re-optimization in automatic parallelization. Li Feng

October 09, 2009
17:48 Re: Lattice Mico32 port Richard Henderson

October 08, 2009
22:51 gcc-4.5-20091008 is now available gccadmin
22:19 Re: --enable-build-with-cxx bootstrap failure Dmitry Gorbachev
20:58 --enable-build-with-cxx bootstrap failure Theodore Papadopoulo
18:52 GCC 4.4.2 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Jakub Jelinek
16:23 Re: Turning off unrolling to certain loops Jean Christophe Beyler
16:18 Re: Turning off unrolling to certain loops Zdenek Dvorak
14:22 Re: Turning off unrolling to certain loops Jean Christophe Beyler
13:55 Re: libjava and ada broken on x86_64 H.J. Lu
13:09 libjava and ada broken on x86_64 Diego Novillo
12:30 Re: Any very recent inlining changes (libstdc++' ABI check fails in mainline) ? Paolo Carlini
12:18 Re: Any very recent inlining changes (libstdc++' ABI check fails in mainline) ? Paolo Carlini
11:51 Re: Any very recent inlining changes (libstdc++' ABI check fails in mainline) ? Jan Hubicka
11:21 Re: [RFA] dwarf2out.c:eliminate_regs() bug Maxim Kuvyrkov
10:56 Re: GCC's switch table code generation Edd Barrett
09:54 Re: Any very recent inlining changes (libstdc++' ABI check fails in mainline) ? Paolo Carlini
06:55 Re: Scev analysing number of loop iterations returns (2^32-1) instead of -1 Tobias Grosser
06:54 Re: Scev analysing number of loop iterations returns (2^32-1) instead of -1 Zdenek Dvorak
06:49 Re: Scev analysing number of loop iterations returns (2^32-1) instead of -1 Zdenek Dvorak
04:06 Re: GCC's switch table code generation Ian Lance Taylor
02:09 RE: why emitting unwind labels? Jack Howarth
01:25 why emitting unwind labels? Jack Howarth
00:50 GCC's switch table code generation Edd Barrett

October 07, 2009
18:51 Re: Scev analysing number of loop iterations returns (2^32-1) instead of -1 Richard Guenther
17:21 Re: Scev analysing number of loop iterations returns (2^32-1) instead of -1 Tobias Grosser
16:51 Re: LTO: Speedup -- some preliminary SPEC2000 results Jan Hubicka
16:30 Re: Scev analysing number of loop iterations returns (2^32-1) instead of -1 Tobias Grosser
15:44 Re: Scev analysing number of loop iterations returns (2^32-1) instead of -1 Richard Guenther
15:35 Re: Scev analysing number of loop iterations returns (2^32-1) instead of -1 Tobias Grosser
15:23 Re: Scev analysing number of loop iterations returns (2^32-1) instead of -1 Richard Guenther
15:17 Re: Scev analysing number of loop iterations returns (2^32-1) instead of -1 Tobias Grosser
15:16 Re: LTO and LTO Plugin Reviewers Rafael Espindola
14:52 Re: LTO and LTO Plugin Reviewers Ian Lance Taylor
14:42 Re: Scev analysing number of loop iterations returns (2^32-1) instead of -1 Richard Guenther
14:40 Re: LTO and LTO Plugin Reviewers Diego Novillo
14:39 Re: LTO: Speedup -- some preliminary SPEC2000 results Richard Guenther
14:37 Scev analysing number of loop iterations returns (2^32-1) instead of -1 Tobias Grosser
14:34 Re: LTO and LTO Plugin Reviewers Daniel Jacobowitz
14:34 Re: LTO and LTO Plugin Reviewers Diego Novillo
14:29 Re: LTO and LTO Plugin Reviewers Basile STARYNKEVITCH
14:25 Re: LTO: Speedup -- some preliminary SPEC2000 results Vladimir Makarov
14:13 Re: LTO and LTO Plugin Reviewers Diego Novillo
14:12 Re: LTO and LTO Plugin Reviewers Ian Lance Taylor
14:12 Re: LTO and LTO Plugin Reviewers Diego Novillo
14:12 Re: LTO and LTO Plugin Reviewers Richard Guenther
14:11 Re: LTO and LTO Plugin Reviewers Basile STARYNKEVITCH
14:09 Re: Any very recent inlining changes (libstdc++' ABI check fails in mainline) ? Jan Hubicka
14:02 Re: LTO and LTO Plugin Reviewers Diego Novillo
13:55 Re: LTO and LTO Plugin Reviewers Basile STARYNKEVITCH
13:37 LTO and LTO Plugin Reviewers David Edelsohn
13:26 Re: Any very recent inlining changes (libstdc++' ABI check fails in mainline) ? Richard Guenther
12:33 Re: Any very recent inlining changes (libstdc++' ABI check fails in mainline) ? Jan Hubicka
12:22 Re: Any very recent inlining changes (libstdc++' ABI check fails in mainline) ? Paolo Carlini
11:59 Re: Any very recent inlining changes (libstdc++' ABI check fails in mainline) ? Jan Hubicka
10:32 Re: Any very recent inlining changes (libstdc++' ABI check fails in mainline) ? Paolo Carlini
10:29 Re: Any very recent inlining changes (libstdc++' ABI check fails in mainline) ? Richard Guenther
10:24 Any very recent inlining changes (libstdc++' ABI check fails in mainline) ? Paolo Carlini
10:23 CFP reminder: GROW'10 - 2nd Workshop on GCC Research Opportunities Grigori Fursin
09:13 Re: Collapsing control-flow that leads to undefined behavior Richard Guenther
06:53 Collapsing control-flow that leads to undefined behavior Charles J. Tabony
02:50 Re: how to get the .dfa output file in gcc Ben Elliston

October 06, 2009
23:13 Re: new libstdc++-v3 decimal failures Janis Johnson
22:56 Re: new libstdc++-v3 decimal failures Jack Howarth
22:56 gcc-4.4-20091006 is now available gccadmin
22:56 Re: Request for code review - (ZEE patch : Redundant Zero extension elimination) Paolo Bonzini
22:53 Re: new libstdc++-v3 decimal failures Jack Howarth
22:40 Re: new libstdc++-v3 decimal failures Janis Johnson
22:37 Re: new libstdc++-v3 decimal failures Jack Howarth
22:34 Re: new libstdc++-v3 decimal failures Benjamin Kosnik
22:30 Re: new libstdc++-v3 decimal failures Janis Johnson
22:19 Re: new libstdc++-v3 decimal failures Jack Howarth
22:01 Re: LTO: Speedup. Jan Hubicka
21:41 Re: LTO: Speedup. Jan Hubicka
20:10 LTO: Speedup. Toon Moene
18:59 Re[2]: Is this code legal? Sergey Sadovnikov
18:21 Re: COMPONENT_REF problem ? Pranav Bhandarkar
18:11 RE: Lattice Mico32 port Jon Beniston
17:29 Re: Request for code review - (ZEE patch : Redundant Zero extension elimination) Sriraman Tallam
16:45 Re: new libstdc++-v3 decimal failures Janis Johnson
16:24 Re: new libstdc++-v3 decimal failures Janis Johnson
14:01 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Ulrich Weigand
13:38 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Paul Edwards
13:34 Re: Turning off unrolling to certain loops Jean Christophe Beyler
13:15 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Ulrich Weigand
13:04 new libstdc++-v3 decimal failures Jack Howarth
12:11 Re: SIGILL on Sparc Piotr Wyderski
10:05 Re: Is this code legal? Paolo Bonzini
09:52 Re: SIGILL on Sparc Paolo Bonzini
09:48 Re: COMPONENT_REF problem ? Richard Guenther
09:32 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Paul Edwards
09:28 SIGILL on Sparc Piotr Wyderski
06:54 Re: Turning off unrolling to certain loops Zdenek Dvorak
03:10 Re: How to split 40bit data types load/store? Richard Henderson
03:09 Re: OpenMP 3.0 libgomp ABI documentation for TASK construct Qihang Huang
01:01 Re: COMPONENT_REF problem ? Pranav Bhandarkar

October 05, 2009
23:30 Post-LTO branch merge (trunk@152453) report for i386-*-freebsd7.2 Loren James Rittle
21:41 Re: [g++-4.5]kudos on O(1) template lookup work Jason Merrill
20:46 Turning off unrolling to certain loops Jean Christophe Beyler
19:29 Is this code legal? Sergey Sadovnikov
17:27 Re: Lattice Mico32 port Ian Lance Taylor
17:23 Re: Error when building cross compiler Ian Lance Taylor
16:54 Re: Inline assembly operand specification Ian Lance Taylor
14:47 [g++-4.5]kudos on O(1) template lookup work Larry Evans
14:42 Re: LTO branch merged into trunk - trunk remains CLOSED Frank Ch. Eigler
14:03 Re: How to split 40bit data types load/store? Mohamed Shafi
13:46 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Michael Matz
13:38 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Paul Edwards
13:17 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Michael Matz
13:15 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Ulrich Weigand
13:08 Trunk is now OPEN Diego Novillo
00:11 Re: ext/profile/mh.cc compile error on darwin Jack Howarth

October 04, 2009
22:51 gcc-4.3-20091004 is now available gccadmin
22:51 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Paul Edwards
19:29 Re: OpenMP 3.0 libgomp ABI documentation for TASK construct Antoniu Pop
19:07 Re: gcc mirror in Bangalore, India Gerald Pfeifer
18:52 Re: [PATCH] Adjust develop.html to reflect recent practice Gerald Pfeifer
16:58 Re: Trunk is closed for LTO merge Toon Moene
15:38 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Ulrich Weigand
13:28 RE: Lattice Mico32 port Jon Beniston
13:00 Error when building cross compiler Denis Onischenko
08:54 Re: LTO branch merged into trunk - trunk remains CLOSED Richard Guenther
06:50 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Paul Edwards
06:04 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Ian Lance Taylor
05:14 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Paul Edwards
04:44 Re: Should #ident really be deprecated? Tom Tromey
04:11 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Ian Lance Taylor
03:00 OpenMP 3.0 libgomp ABI documentation for TASK construct Qihang Huang
02:40 ext/profile/mh.cc compile error on darwin Jack Howarth
02:34 Should #ident really be deprecated? Ian Lance Taylor
01:45 Re: LTO branch merged into trunk - trunk remains CLOSED Ryan Hill
01:05 Re: LTO branch merged into trunk - trunk remains CLOSED Diego Novillo

October 03, 2009
23:40 Re: LTO branch merged into trunk - trunk remains CLOSED Diego Novillo
22:31 Re: LTO branch merged into trunk - trunk remains CLOSED Richard Guenther
21:36 Re: LTO branch merged into trunk - trunk remains CLOSED Diego Novillo
21:33 Re: LTO branch merged into trunk - trunk remains CLOSED Richard Guenther
21:12 LTO branch merged into trunk - trunk remains CLOSED Diego Novillo
18:37 Re: how to get the .dfa output file in gcc ddmetro
18:35 RE: got the .dfa output file in gcc ddmetro
14:45 Re: Trunk is closed for LTO merge Diego Novillo
14:44 Re: Trunk is closed for LTO merge Richard Guenther
14:34 Re: Trunk is closed for LTO merge Diego Novillo
14:30 Re: Trunk is closed for LTO merge Toon Moene
14:19 Re: Trunk is closed for LTO merge Diego Novillo
14:13 Re: Trunk is closed for LTO merge Toon Moene
13:24 Re: COMPONENT_REF problem ? Richard Guenther
11:39 Trunk is closed for LTO merge Diego Novillo
10:43 COMPONENT_REF problem ? Pranav Bhandarkar
09:15 Re: [lto] Committed doc feedback and c++ fixes to branch Richard Guenther
06:35 gcc mirror in Bangalore, India Vineet Dwivedi

October 02, 2009
23:22 Re: [lto] Committed doc feedback and c++ fixes to branch Diego Novillo
23:00 Inline assembly operand specification ZoltÃn KÃcsi
22:53 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Paul Edwards
22:16 Re: [lto] Committed doc feedback and c++ fixes to branch Richard Guenther
19:24 Re: arm-elf multilib issues Samuel Tardieu
16:00 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Ian Lance Taylor
15:13 Re: [LTO] Request for testing: Last merge from trunk before final merge Rainer Orth
14:45 Re: define_memory_constraint and REG_OK_STRICT Richard Henderson
13:30 Re: Prague GCC folks meeting summary report Andi Kleen
12:41 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Paul Edwards
12:15 Re: Reload going wrong for addition. Mohamed Shafi
12:03 Re: define_memory_constraint and REG_OK_STRICT Mohamed Shafi
09:45 Re: Prague GCC folks meeting summary report Richard Guenther
01:12 Re: arm-elf multilib issues zoltan
01:00 Re: arm-elf multilib issues Alexandre Pereira Nunes
00:21 Re: Prague GCC folks meeting summary report Joe Buck
00:19 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Paul Edwards
00:00 Re: Prague GCC folks meeting summary report Andi Kleen

October 01, 2009
23:43 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Paul Edwards
23:31 Re: Request for trunk freeze for LTO merge Richard Guenther
23:22 Re: arm-elf multilib issues Paul Brook
23:18 Request for trunk freeze for LTO merge Diego Novillo
23:10 Re: arm-elf multilib issues Paul Brook
22:55 gcc-4.5-20091001 is now available gccadmin
22:48 Re: arm-elf multilib issues zoltan
22:22 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Toon Moene
21:38 Re: Request for code review - (ZEE patch : Redundant Zero extension elimination) Sriraman Tallam
21:10 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script David Edelsohn
20:35 Re: arm-elf multilib issues Joel Sherrill
18:36 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Ian Lance Taylor
16:05 Re: vta: Scheduler breaks var_location info (S/390 bootstrap failure) Andreas Krebbel
16:00 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Paul Edwards
15:06 vta: Scheduler breaks var_location info (S/390 bootstrap failure) Andreas Krebbel
14:34 Re: "Defaulted and deleting functions" with template members Jason Merrill
14:28 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Paul Brook
14:19 Re: arm-elf multilib issues Paul Brook
14:00 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Paul Edwards
13:31 arm-elf multilib issues Joel Sherrill
12:40 Re: Dw2 CIE no longer contains personality routine augmentation? Dave Korn
09:23 [gnu.org #263454] Re: Headsup: Rogue or hacked account spamming via RT? re: [gnu.org #263454] Jose E. Marchesi via RT
08:38 Re: Dw2 CIE no longer contains personality routine augmentation? Richard Guenther
06:00 Re: SUBREG Unrecognizable RTL daniel tian
04:59 Re: [LTO] Request for testing: Last merge from trunk before final merge Andrew Pinski
04:58 Re: [LTO] Request for testing: Last merge from trunk before final merge Andrew Pinski
00:33 Dw2 CIE no longer contains personality routine augmentation? Dave Korn
00:17 Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2009-09-19) Neil Vachharajani
00:16 Re: i370 port - constructing compile script Joseph S. Myers


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3