This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC 4..4.x speed regression - help?

From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
To: Martin Guy <martinwguy at gmail dot com>
Cc: ami_stuff <ami_stuff at o2 dot pl>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:42:09 +0200
Subject: Re: GCC 4..4.x speed regression - help?
References: <2fdfa587.3e8d2013.4a87ec55.d57bd@o2.pl> <74af2d11.6acc4366.4a8812b9.bdfcd@o2.pl> <56d259a00908160902q54cda0a6nab0d7eb28abd8d48@mail.gmail.com>

On 08/16/2009 06:02 PM, Martin Guy wrote:

Yes, GCC is bigger and slower and for several architectures generates
bigger, slower code with every release, though saying so won't make
you very popular on this list! :)

But surprise, if you report a bug, chances are it will be fixed (especially for something as well known as gzip).

And it is actually useless to post on the mailing list, since the bug is there for interested people anyway.

Paolo

References:
- GCC 4..4.x speed regression - help?
  - From: ami_stuff
- Re: GCC 4..4.x speed regression - help?
  - From: ami_stuff
- Re: GCC 4..4.x speed regression - help?
  - From: Martin Guy

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]