This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: order of -D and -U is significant

From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
To: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 11:19:49 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: order of -D and -U is significant
References: <F827A1300CC73247B0255EEEA5FFFB3B012A8BABDE5B@ABGEX70E.FSC.NET> <m3ljlzhb8j.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20090804160330.GA19998@synopsys.com> <90EDB998-87F5-41C4-846E-E5999AB8AB53@ihug.co.nz> <20090804224404.GC19998@synopsys.com> <20090805005805.GJ1239@prunille.vinc17.org> <4A794BE5.5030205@gmail.com>

On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, Dave Korn wrote:

> to integrate this behaviour into the driver.  Perhaps we could even do the old
> behave-differently-according-to-argv[0] trick, although I'm not sure if that
> isn't slightly discouraged these days.

The proper thing is to build a separate driver binary (optionally, if 
configured to do so) and install it as "c99", rather than a wrapper script 
or depending on argv[0].

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

References:
- order of -D and -U is significant
  - From: Unruh, Erwin
- Re: order of -D and -U is significant
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: order of -D and -U is significant
  - From: Joe Buck
- Re: order of -D and -U is significant
  - From: Ross Smith
- Re: order of -D and -U is significant
  - From: Joe Buck
- Re: order of -D and -U is significant
  - From: Vincent Lefevre
- Re: order of -D and -U is significant
  - From: Dave Korn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]