This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: putc vs. fputc

From: Martin Guy <martinwguy at gmail dot com>
To: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com>
Cc: GCC Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 13:06:46 +0100
Subject: Re: putc vs. fputc
References: <5787cf470907240137r3aefeeebsc9478c510d97ce85@mail.gmail.com>

On 7/24/09, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> wrote:
>  The source of gcc uses both, fputc and putc. I would like to do some
>  janitorial work and change fputc to putc.

putc and fputc have different semantics:
fputc is guaranteed to be a function while putc may be a macro.

    M

"He who has nothing to do, combs dogs" - Sicilian saying

Follow-Ups:
- Re: putc vs. fputc
  - From: Uros Bizjak

References:
- putc vs. fputc
  - From: Uros Bizjak

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]