This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Should -Wjump-misses-init be in -Wall?
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Joe Buck<Joe.Buck@synopsys.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Alan Modra<amodra@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>> > ..., but I think this warning should be in -Wc++-compat, not -Wall
>> > or even -Wextra. ?Why? ?I'd argue the warning is useless for C code,
>> > unless you care about C++ style.
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:35:48AM -0700, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>> I do not think it is useless for C99 codes because C99 allows
>> C++ style declarations/initialization in the middle of a block.
>
> But if the initialization is skipped and the variable is then used,
> won't we get an uninitialized-variable warning?
Did we get any in the cases Ian reported?
-- Gaby