This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Questionable function renaming

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 04:34:01PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 06:49:58AM -0700, Bingfeng Mei wrote:
> > Thanks, I didn't notice both functions have different arguments after transformation.  
> > However, gprof produces T.251 in its statistics, completely unknown
> > to user. Could GCC use more informative name here, e.g., saveInputFileMetaInfo.251?
> 
> The current trunk (what is to become gcc 4.5) already gives clones a
> more sensible name, in your example it would be
> saveInputFileMetaInfo.clone.0 (IIRC).

Yeah, see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg01186.html

	Jakub
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]