This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: bitfields: types vs modes?
- From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
- To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: iant at google dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 17:32:43 -0400
- Subject: Re: bitfields: types vs modes?
- References: <200903100433.n2A4XKNL011948@greed.delorie.com> <200904010511.n315Ba28010006@greed.delorie.com> <m3ocvhkkew.fsf@google.com> <49DA30F0.1090105@codesourcery.com> <200904062003.n36K3WHc001273@greed.delorie.com> <49DA689F.20400@codesourcery.com> <200905201948.n4KJmv4N017890@greed.delorie.com> <m3eiuj1o9z.fsf@google.com> <4A14715C.6040009@codesourcery.com>
> I think the ARM specification is pretty sensible, and would make a
> good cross-platform approach.
Could you distill it for us? If it's acceptable to my two customers,
it would be a good starting point to define an API for the targets.