On 2009-05-04, at 07:36 +0200, Oliver Kellogg wrote:
Robert Dewar wrote:
How about not doing the name expansion in-place but rather
storing the expanded name in an extra node field?
You could have a separate vector for expanded names I suppose ...
So be it. I will change the code to not overwrite the Name field
with the expanded name but rather store the expanded name in a
data structure separate from the Node.
Luckily, this change was limited to the Exp_Dbug package body.
FYI I am appending the diff.
The new Q_E_Name array holds the Name_Id for the expanded name
of a given entity. The implementation as a fixed array is
preliminary and I would appreciate suggestions on a better
data structure to use.