This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: heise.de comment on 4.4.0 release

From: Toon Moene <toon at moene dot org>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
Cc: Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at netcologne dot de>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:57:51 +0200
Subject: Re: heise.de comment on 4.4.0 release
References: <1240668120.2883.2.camel@meiner.onlinehome.de> <de8d50360904250712i105377c8s52625cd60b50a69c@mail.gmail.com>

Andrew Pinski wrote:

On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 7:02 AM, Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> wrote:

Can somebody with access to SPEC sources confirm / deny and file a bug
report, if appropriate?


It is an x87 bug only and has already been filed:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39856  and working on
being fixed already.

A x87 bug only exposed using SPEC ?!?!?!?

What are these guys thinking - like, lets cripple this benchmark and use completely out of date floating point arithmetic ?

Duh, I hope the rest of their reporting is more useful ...

--
Toon Moene - e-mail: toon@moene.org - phone: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG  Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
At home: http://moene.org/~toon/
Progress of GNU Fortran: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.4/changes.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: heise.de comment on 4.4.0 release
  - From: Tobias Burnus

References:
- heise.de comment on 4.4.0 release
  - From: Thomas Koenig
- Re: heise.de comment on 4.4.0 release
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]