This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [cond-optab] svn branch created, looking for reviews for the "cleanup" parts
- From: Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>
- To: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, Andreas Krebbel <Andreas dot Krebbel at de dot ibm dot com>, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com>
- Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 14:15:35 -0700
- Subject: Re: [cond-optab] svn branch created, looking for reviews for the "cleanup" parts
- References: <49DB22F5.7050806@gnu.org> <84fc9c000904070259l5b356bb7pfefcdfcdc9076e3c@mail.gmail.com> <49DB2BCF.6000109@gnu.org>
- Reply-to: janis187 at us dot ibm dot com
On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 12:32 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Thanks, this leaves out:
>
> r145593: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg00545.html (i386)
> r145594: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg00545.html (s390)
> r145597, r145598, r145599:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg00947.html (gen*)
> r145603: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-04/msg00496.html (gen*, RTL)
> r145655: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-04/msg00492.html (testsuite)
What's the point of the compile-only tests? It would be much more
useful to have tests that execute and check that the results are
correct for a variety of input values.
Janis