gcc archive
author index for April, 2009

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]

Search: Limit to:

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

=?big5?b?RG91ZyBLd2FuICjD9q62vHcp?=

2009-04-28 21:52 Documentation on running dejagnu with qemu?

房陈

2009-04-21 02:05 How does gcc compile source code just like *(ptr base + offset) ?

梁?

2009-04-14 07:20 Why GCC 4.1.2 casting "short int" to "short unsigned int" ?

Manuel López-Ibáñez

2009-04-01 16:55 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-14 22:21 Re: messaging
2009-04-23 08:17 Re: new offset outside bounds of constant string warning
2009-04-23 15:23 [wwwdocs] Error on http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.4/changes.html (-Wsequence-points)
2009-04-28 14:08 Re: new offset outside bounds of constant string warning
2009-04-29 12:13 Re: gcc-in-cxx update
2009-04-29 13:42 Re: gcc-in-cxx update
2009-04-29 13:53 Re: gcc-in-cxx update
2009-04-29 15:19 Re: gcc-in-cxx update
2009-04-29 15:55 Re: gcc-in-cxx update

Adam Nemet

2009-04-02 16:23 fwprop and CSE const anchor opt
2009-04-04 18:04 Re: fwprop and CSE const anchor opt
2009-04-05 18:58 Re: fwprop and CSE const anchor opt
2009-04-08 07:05 Re: fwprop and CSE const anchor opt
2009-04-10 16:40 cleanup tests failing on MIPS64
2009-04-11 21:56 Re: cleanup tests failing on MIPS64
2009-04-12 06:08 Re: cleanup tests failing on MIPS64
2009-04-12 19:45 Re: cleanup tests failing on MIPS64

Adayadil Thomas

2009-04-22 19:55 Restricted version for GCC?

Albert Cohen

2009-04-30 21:53 Re: [graphite] Weekly phone call notes

Albert Hopkins

2009-04-30 19:43 Is this valid c++ ?

Alex Turjan

2009-04-22 15:19 Re: [gSoc] [graphite] general plan for Automatic parallelization in Graphite

Alexandre Pereira Nunes

2009-04-20 17:00 Re: Reserving a number of consecutive registers

Americo Barbosa da Cunha Junior

2009-04-23 22:58 16 bits char string from C to FORTRAN
2009-04-24 04:05 Re: 16 bits char string from C to FORTRAN

Andi Kleen

2009-04-24 20:34 Re: -O3 and new optimizations in 4.4.0
2009-04-25 07:34 Re: Making CFLAGS=-g1 bigger but more useful
2009-04-25 15:36 Re: Making CFLAGS=-g1 bigger but more useful
2009-04-25 17:41 Re: Making CFLAGS=-g1 bigger but more useful

Andreas Krebbel

2009-04-03 08:29 Re: Call for testers: MPC-0.6 released
2009-04-09 10:47 Re: [cond-optab] svn branch created, looking for reviews for the "cleanup" parts

Andreas Schwab

2009-04-07 21:58 Re: Missing data alignment on MIPS
2009-04-24 10:41 Re: dodgy syntax in acx.m4?

Andreas Tobler

2009-04-03 22:01 Re: Call for testers: MPC-0.6 released
2009-04-04 11:24 Re: Call for testers: MPC-0.6 released

Andrew Haley

2009-04-01 09:55 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-01 11:29 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-01 11:47 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-01 12:06 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-01 13:19 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-01 14:10 Re: Revised GCC Runtime Library Exception
2009-04-24 14:20 Re: What version of Boehm for --enable-objc-gc ?
2009-04-28 18:10 Re: Checking for the Programming Language inside GCC

Andrew Pinski

2009-04-13 23:22 Re: align of local char array seem not work.
2009-04-14 16:22 Re: Question about creating stdint.h on systems that don't have it
2009-04-20 21:35 Re: For backend maintainers: changes for C++ compatibility
2009-04-23 19:20 Re: -O3 and new optimizations in 4.4.0
2009-04-24 14:22 Re: What version of Boehm for --enable-objc-gc ?
2009-04-25 14:12 Re: heise.de comment on 4.4.0 release
2009-04-28 03:49 Re: variadic arguments not thread safe on amd64?
2009-04-28 14:20 Re: Slush, please?
2009-04-30 15:11 Re: gcc-4.4.0 Build Report: Success on Open Solaris 2008.11, x86_64
2009-04-30 21:57 Re: [graphite] Weekly phone call notes

Andrey Belevantsev

2009-04-08 16:25 Re: Fixing the pre-pass scheduler on x86 (Bug 38403)

Arnaud Charlet

2009-04-03 14:09 Re: [Ada] runtime license wording change and Ada bootstrap, gcc/ada/scn.adb Determine_License
2009-04-07 13:25 problem with incremental build with Ada

Arthur Schwarz

2009-04-09 16:45 Diagnostic Messaging Suggestion
2009-04-09 18:33 Re: Diagnostic Messaging Suggestion
2009-04-10 16:19 Possible messaging changes
2009-04-10 17:57 Redirecting I/O
2009-04-10 23:22 operator=() issue
2009-04-11 00:28 Re: operator=() issue
2009-04-11 02:40 Re: operator=() issue
2009-04-13 17:38 messaging
2009-04-13 18:13 messages
2009-04-13 21:39 Re: messages
2009-04-14 02:56 Re: messages
2009-04-14 03:04 Re: messages
2009-04-14 15:49 Re: messages
2009-04-14 21:24 Re: messaging
2009-04-16 19:06 Diagnostic Messaging Suggestion
2009-04-16 20:54 Re: Diagnostic Messaging Suggestion
2009-04-16 21:30 Re: Diagnostic Messaging Suggestion
2009-04-16 22:41 Re: Diagnostic Messaging Suggestion

aschwarz1309

2009-04-14 16:21 Re: messaging

Basile STARYNKEVITCH

2009-04-01 11:53 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-01 12:06 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-01 17:22 Plugins & GGC ie GTY
2009-04-01 18:37 Re: Plugins & GGC ie GTY
2009-04-01 20:48 Re: Plugins & GGC ie GTY
2009-04-02 05:34 Re: Plugins & GGC ie GTY
2009-04-03 15:06 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-28 18:02 Re: Checking for the Programming Language inside GCC

Ben Elliston

2009-04-08 11:01 Re: Intermittent/non-reproducible gcc testsuite failures
2009-04-11 22:53 Re: The gcc-in-cxx branch now completes bootstrap
2009-04-16 00:15 Re: Question about top-level configure code and in-tree builds
2009-04-23 05:50 new offset outside bounds of constant string warning
2009-04-28 04:51 Re: new offset outside bounds of constant string warning
2009-04-28 22:35 Re: Documentation on running dejagnu with qemu?

Bernd Roesch

2009-04-01 08:44 Re: stdint.h type information needed
2009-04-09 13:09 align of local char array seem not work.

Bill Wendling

2009-04-20 21:12 Re: [LLVMdev] Summer of Code 2009 "Support for an ELF writer"

bing wang

2009-04-15 08:19 the highest edition could be installed on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4

Blower, Melanie

2009-04-10 14:24 request for legal forms for copyright assignment

Brad Hards

2009-04-26 08:40 questions about plugin API

Brian O'Mahoney

2009-04-14 23:06 Error messages

Cary Coutant

2009-04-02 18:44 Re: generating functions and eh region
2009-04-10 18:36 Re: Redirecting I/O

Chris Lattner

2009-04-01 16:16 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-10 21:07 Re: GCC RES: Restrictive Exception Specification: 0.1 - Alpha. Feedback Request.
2009-04-17 16:51 Re: Diagnostic Messaging Suggestion
2009-04-30 05:56 Re: format argument does not have string type

Christopher Faylor

2009-04-24 15:17 [[webmaster] New contact address for ftp.fu-berlin.de]

Cristianno Martins

2009-04-27 18:39 Polyhedral Model
2009-04-27 22:26 Re: Polyhedral Model

Damian Pietras

2009-04-24 07:38 Wrong information about GnuPG keys at page listing GCC mirrors

Daniel Berlin

2009-04-01 17:25 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-05 00:19 Re: update_version_svn (was: Minimum required GNAT version for bootstrap of GNAT on gcc trunk)
2009-04-25 23:03 Re: Any plans to upgrade svn repository format to 1.5.0+ ?
2009-04-30 03:02 Re: [graphite] Weekly phone call notes

Daniel Franke

2009-04-05 15:49 [fortran] spurious initialized warning with select-case?
2009-04-05 17:44 Re: [fortran] spurious initialized warning with select-case?

Daniel Jacobowitz

2009-04-01 17:04 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-17 18:06 Re: Diagnostic Messaging Suggestion
2009-04-28 15:08 Re: gcc-gdb compatibilty

Danny Smith

2009-04-04 06:59 RE: Patch for mingw stdint information

Dave Korn

2009-04-01 11:59 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-01 12:45 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-01 12:49 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-01 12:53 Re: stdint.h type information needed
2009-04-02 06:44 Re: stdint.h type information needed
2009-04-02 09:10 Re: stdint.h type information needed
2009-04-03 07:05 Re: generating functions and eh region
2009-04-03 09:02 Re: stdint.h type information needed
2009-04-03 11:35 Re: stdint.h type information needed
2009-04-03 11:53 Re: generating functions and eh region
2009-04-03 12:20 Re: stdint.h type information needed
2009-04-03 12:23 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-03 12:42 [SOLVED] Re: stdint.h type information needed
2009-04-03 14:53 Re: generating functions and eh region
2009-04-03 18:30 Re: gcc-4.5-20090402 is now available
2009-04-03 18:55 Re: generating functions and eh region
2009-04-03 18:58 Re: stdint.h type information needed
2009-04-03 19:32 Re: generating functions and eh region
2009-04-03 19:42 Re: generating functions and eh region
2009-04-03 20:36 Is the testsuite broken or did I get the RUNTESTFLAGS syntax wrong?
2009-04-04 05:33 Re: GCC releases - busy or broken site
2009-04-04 12:26 Re: Patch for mingw stdint information
2009-04-04 13:36 [SOLVED] Re: Is the testsuite broken or did I get the RUNTESTFLAGS syntax wrong?
2009-04-07 02:00 Re: Debugging gcc front end
2009-04-07 12:57 Re: Need some help with fixincludes.
2009-04-07 13:10 Re: [Fwd: ICE with crx-elf-gcc 4.5.0 20090407]
2009-04-07 14:58 Re: Need some help with fixincludes.
2009-04-07 15:47 Re: First PPL 0.10.1 release candidate
2009-04-07 15:49 Re: Call for testers: MPC-0.6 released
2009-04-07 16:06 Re: First PPL 0.10.1 release candidate
2009-04-07 17:58 Re: [PPL-devel] First PPL 0.10.1 release candidate
2009-04-08 09:04 Re: [SOLVED] Re: stdint.h type information needed
2009-04-08 11:07 Re: First PPL 0.10.1 release candidate
2009-04-08 11:12 Re: Intermittent/non-reproducible gcc testsuite failures
2009-04-10 03:10 Re: Diagnostic Messaging Suggestion
2009-04-10 03:39 Re: [RFC] Get rid of awkward semantics for subtypes
2009-04-10 14:38 Target-dependent, language dependent LDFLAGS during build?
2009-04-10 17:18 Re: question on 16 bit registers with 32 bit pointers
2009-04-10 17:25 Re: Possible messaging changes
2009-04-11 00:30 Re: question on 16 bit registers with 32 bit pointers
2009-04-13 18:55 Re: messages
2009-04-13 22:30 Re: question on 16 bit registers with 32 bit pointers
2009-04-13 22:42 Re: messages
2009-04-14 03:41 Re: messages
2009-04-15 13:39 Re: GCC 4.4.0-rc1 available
2009-04-15 14:00 Re: GCC 4.4.0-rc1 available
2009-04-15 14:16 Re: GCC 4.4.0-rc1 available
2009-04-15 14:24 Re: GCC 4.4.0-rc1 available
2009-04-16 00:19 Re: GCC 4.4.0-rc1 available
2009-04-18 16:50 [RFC] Massive recursion in tree_ssa_phiprop_1?
2009-04-19 12:25 Re: [RFC] Massive recursion in tree_ssa_phiprop_1?
2009-04-20 04:29 Re: [RFC] Massive recursion in tree_ssa_phiprop_1?
2009-04-21 14:21 Re: EH tree is invalid
2009-04-21 16:16 Re: EH tree is invalid
2009-04-24 13:39 Re: Slight tree reorganization for cygming platforms
2009-04-24 14:12 Re: Slight tree reorganization for cygming platforms
2009-04-25 14:33 Re: heise.de comment on 4.4.0 release
2009-04-27 11:44 Re: ICE in ira.c
2009-04-27 12:18 Re: ICE in ira.c
2009-04-27 14:30 Re: EH tree is invalid
2009-04-27 18:47 Re: Polyhedral Model

David Ayers

2009-04-08 12:33 Re: Syntactic sugar to access arrays and hashes in Objective-C
2009-04-10 08:51 Re: Fwd: Objective-C and C99 strict aliasing

David Edelsohn

2009-04-01 03:04 Revised GCC Runtime Library Exception
2009-04-01 14:42 Re: Revised GCC Runtime Library Exception
2009-04-01 15:24 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-27 14:32 Nick Clifton appointed FRV maintainer

David Fang

2009-04-11 00:22 Re: operator=() issue
2009-04-11 00:46 Re: operator=() issue
2009-04-28 20:31 Re: conversion of .cc 3.3.5 files to gcc 4.3.2
2009-04-30 15:56 Re: gcc-4.4.0 Build Report: Success on Open Solaris 2008.11, x86_64

David Ronis

2009-04-23 15:54 -O3 and new optimizations in 4.4.0
2009-04-23 16:07 Re: -O3 and new optimizations in 4.4.0

Denis Onischenko

2009-04-23 07:32 GCC 4.5: "nonconstant array index in initializer" error
2009-04-23 17:46 Re: GCC 4.5: "nonconstant array index in initializer" error
2009-04-23 20:38 Re: GCC 4.5: "nonconstant array index in initializer" error
2009-04-25 18:12 Re: GCC 4.5: "nonconstant array index in initializer" error
2009-04-25 19:19 Re: GCC 4.5: "nonconstant array index in initializer" error

Dennis Clarke

2009-04-26 02:15 Re: gcc-4.4.0 Build Report: Success on Open Solaris 2008.11, x86_64
2009-04-26 03:01 Re: gcc-4.4.0 Build Report: Success on Open Solaris 2008.11, x86_64
2009-04-26 18:40 Re: gcc-4.4.0 Build Report: Success on Open Solaris 2008.11, x86_64
2009-04-29 14:35 Re: gcc-4.4.0 Build Report: Success on Open Solaris 2008.11, x86_64

Diego Novillo

2009-04-01 16:19 [plugins]: Mainline merge @145344
2009-04-01 18:26 Re: [plugins]: Mainline merge @145344
2009-04-03 15:05 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-06 16:35 [lto] Mainline merge @145453
2009-04-06 17:54 Re: [lto] Mainline merge @145453
2009-04-08 17:20 [lto] Merge from mainline @145637
2009-04-15 03:21 [plugins] Merge with post-plugins trunk @146060
2009-04-21 12:18 [lto] Problems with cgraph_state updating
2009-04-21 12:58 [plugins] Branch closed

DJ Delorie

2009-04-01 01:25 Re: stdint.h type information needed
2009-04-01 02:14 Re: stdint.h type information needed
2009-04-01 05:11 Re: bitfields: types vs modes?
2009-04-06 20:05 Re: bitfields: types vs modes?
2009-04-16 00:57 M32C vs PR tree-optimization/39233
2009-04-16 01:23 Re: M32C vs PR tree-optimization/39233
2009-04-16 01:25 Re: M32C vs PR tree-optimization/39233
2009-04-16 18:05 Re: M32C vs PR tree-optimization/39233
2009-04-21 02:24 [m32c] IRA reload failures in libstdc++
2009-04-23 00:51 Re: [m32c] IRA reload failures in libstdc++
2009-04-23 03:47 Re: [m32c] IRA reload failures in libstdc++
2009-04-23 16:24 Re: [m32c] IRA reload failures in libstdc++
2009-04-23 17:38 Re: [m32c] IRA reload failures in libstdc++
2009-04-23 21:10 dg-warning: bogus target expectations?
2009-04-24 00:34 testsuite fixes for small doubles
2009-04-24 01:57 Re: testsuite fixes for small doubles
2009-04-24 16:43 Re: testsuite fixes for small doubles
2009-04-24 18:20 Re: testsuite fixes for small doubles
2009-04-25 01:49 Re: testsuite fixes for small doubles
2009-04-27 23:08 Re: dg-warning: bogus target expectations?
2009-04-27 23:27 Re: testsuite fixes for small doubles
2009-04-27 23:41 Re: dg-warning: bogus target expectations?

Dodji Seketeli

2009-04-09 21:41 Re: Can't pass temporary with hidden copy ctor as const ref

Dominique Dhumieres

2009-04-07 10:57 Need some help with fixincludes.
2009-04-07 13:17 Re: Need some help with fixincludes.
2009-04-07 16:30 Re: Need some help with fixincludes.
2009-04-07 16:44 Re: Need some help with fixincludes.
2009-04-08 17:11 Re: Need some help with fixincludes.

Eduardo Cruz

2009-04-07 00:10 lookup_name
2009-04-07 15:01 Re: lookup_name

Eli Zaretskii

2009-04-14 13:30 libiberty configuration for DJGPP
2009-04-14 14:10 needed-list fails in libiberty
2009-04-14 14:10 needed-list fails in libiberty

Eric Botcazou

2009-04-05 16:52 Re: [fortran] spurious initialized warning with select-case?
2009-04-09 22:04 [RFC] Get rid of awkward semantics for subtypes
2009-04-12 07:37 Re: [RFC] Get rid of awkward semantics for subtypes
2009-04-12 20:19 Re: [RFC] Get rid of awkward semantics for subtypes
2009-04-20 16:30 Re: Reserving a number of consecutive registers
2009-04-20 17:09 Re: Reserving a number of consecutive registers
2009-04-20 17:46 Re: Reserving a number of consecutive registers
2009-04-20 18:55 Re: Reserving a number of consecutive registers
2009-04-24 19:16 Re: Emit jump insn in function prologue
2009-04-30 19:13 Re: Reserving a number of consecutive registers

Esben Mose Hansen

2009-04-27 18:54 The C++0x lambda branch
2009-04-29 19:34 Re: gcc-in-cxx update / multi-targeted gcc
2009-04-29 19:43 [lambda] Segmentation fault in simple lambda program
2009-04-30 19:32 Re: [lambda] Segmentation fault in simple lambda program

Eus

2009-04-30 11:54 Re: (extern int vs. int) and (extern function vs. function) (was: gcc-in-cxx update)

Fabrice Feray

2009-04-24 13:59 What version of Boehm for --enable-objc-gc ?

fearyourself

2009-04-17 18:50 Reserving a number of consecutive registers
2009-04-20 13:46 Re: Reserving a number of consecutive registers
2009-04-20 16:33 Re: Reserving a number of consecutive registers
2009-04-20 17:25 Re: Reserving a number of consecutive registers
2009-04-20 18:33 Re: Reserving a number of consecutive registers

Frank Ch. Eigler

2009-04-03 19:34 Re: Revised GCC Runtime Library Exception
2009-04-25 00:25 Making CFLAGS=-g1 bigger but more useful

2009-04-03 10:07 Re: stdint.h type information needed
2009-04-03 11:53 Re: stdint.h type information needed
2009-04-03 17:52 Re: stdint.h type information needed
2009-04-03 19:52 Patch for stdint support on darwin
2009-04-03 20:20 Patch for mingw stdint information
2009-04-03 20:44 IRIX stdint patch

Gabriel Dos Reis

2009-04-09 16:46 Re: My plans on EH infrastructure
2009-04-17 17:09 Re: GCC 4.3.2 bug (was: Illegal subtraction in tmp-dive_1.s)

Gabriele SVELTO

2009-04-06 08:46 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM

gccadmin

2009-04-02 22:50 gcc-4.5-20090402 is now available
2009-04-05 22:48 gcc-4.3-20090405 is now available
2009-04-07 22:47 gcc-4.4-20090407 is now available
2009-04-09 22:47 gcc-4.5-20090409 is now available
2009-04-12 22:49 gcc-4.3-20090412 is now available
2009-04-14 22:48 gcc-4.4-20090414 is now available
2009-04-16 22:54 gcc-4.5-20090416 is now available
2009-04-19 22:46 gcc-4.3-20090419 is now available
2009-04-21 22:48 gcc-4.4-20090421 is now available
2009-04-23 22:48 gcc-4.5-20090423 is now available
2009-04-26 22:48 gcc-4.3-20090426 is now available
2009-04-28 22:46 gcc-4.4-20090428 is now available
2009-04-30 22:48 gcc-4.5-20090430 is now available

Geert Bosch

2009-04-20 17:05 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed
2009-04-20 18:55 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed

Gerald Pfeifer

2009-04-03 19:46 Re: gcc-4.5-20090402 is now available
2009-04-04 18:44 Re: Fwd: gcc-4.2-20090304 is now available
2009-04-04 18:57 update_version_svn (was: Minimum required GNAT version for bootstrap of GNAT on gcc trunk)
2009-04-06 19:53 PATCH for Re: "Host/Target specific installation notes for GCC": broken link
2009-04-06 19:55 Re: typo in gcc-4.4 changes
2009-04-06 20:11 Re: Call for testers: MPC-0.6 released
2009-04-06 20:17 Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13)
2009-04-06 21:10 Re: GCC Compile Farm News: 12 architectures now available
2009-04-08 02:20 Re: update_version_svn
2009-04-24 12:11 Re: Wrong information about GnuPG keys at page listing GCC mirrors
2009-04-26 21:50 Re: typo in gcc-4.4 changes

Guilherme Puglia

2009-04-05 16:14 Debugging gcc front end
2009-04-06 17:20 C front end trouble
2009-04-08 19:01 Re: Debugging gcc front end

H.J. Lu

2009-04-05 15:25 Re: Bootstrap broken on sparc-linux trunk between 145310:145425 because of new genattrtab.c va_arg (p, HOST_WIDE_INT) warning
2009-04-15 13:48 Re: GCC 4.4.0-rc1 available
2009-04-15 14:05 Re: GCC 4.4.0-rc1 available
2009-04-15 14:36 Re: GCC 4.4.0-rc1 available
2009-04-20 19:46 The Linux binutils 2.19.51.0.4 is released
2009-04-28 04:18 Re: variadic arguments not thread safe on amd64?
2009-04-28 13:45 Re: new offset outside bounds of constant string warning

Hans Nieuwenhuizen

2009-04-28 20:23 conversion of .cc 3.3.5 files to gcc 4.3.2

Hans-Peter Nilsson

2009-04-06 16:06 Re: Invalid reload inheritance with paradoxical subregs
2009-04-06 17:42 Re: generating functions and eh region
2009-04-06 18:28 Re: Invalid reload inheritance with paradoxical subregs
2009-04-14 00:01 Re: question on 16 bit registers with 32 bit pointers
2009-04-28 14:17 Slush, please?

Ian Lance Taylor

2009-04-01 05:33 Re: bitfields: types vs modes?
2009-04-01 14:49 Re: Revised GCC Runtime Library Exception
2009-04-01 14:54 Re: generating functions and eh region
2009-04-01 15:57 Re: generating functions and eh region
2009-04-01 18:22 Re: generating functions and eh region
2009-04-03 14:16 Re: generating functions and eh region
2009-04-03 14:38 Re: generating functions and eh region
2009-04-03 14:44 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-03 15:08 Re: generating functions and eh region
2009-04-03 19:16 Re: generating functions and eh region
2009-04-03 19:48 Re: Revised GCC Runtime Library Exception
2009-04-06 19:06 Re: Debugging gcc front end
2009-04-06 19:09 Re: C front end trouble
2009-04-06 19:11 Re: generating functions and eh region
2009-04-07 04:50 Re: lookup_name
2009-04-08 21:42 Re: Fwd: Objective-C and C99 strict aliasing
2009-04-09 18:03 Re: Diagnostic Messaging Suggestion
2009-04-09 18:53 Re: Diagnostic Messaging Suggestion
2009-04-10 01:41 Re: Fwd: Objective-C and C99 strict aliasing
2009-04-10 15:06 Re: request for legal forms for copyright assignment
2009-04-10 17:50 Re: Question about top-level configure code and in-tree builds
2009-04-10 20:24 Re: Possible messaging changes
2009-04-10 23:48 Re: operator=() issue
2009-04-11 00:32 Re: operator=() issue
2009-04-11 04:14 Re: Question about top-level configure code and in-tree builds
2009-04-14 14:22 Re: libiberty configuration for DJGPP
2009-04-14 17:02 Re: Query gcc support on sigma design board
2009-04-15 15:21 Re: the highest edition could be installed on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
2009-04-15 15:25 Re: Error message when using ASM_DECLARE_FUNCTION_NAME macro
2009-04-20 21:31 For backend maintainers: changes for C++ compatibility
2009-04-20 22:06 CONSTRAINT__LIMIT
2009-04-21 03:55 Re: How does gcc compile source code just like *(ptr base + offset) ?
2009-04-21 14:52 Re: Side effects on memory access
2009-04-22 14:41 Re: Urgent Question regarding GCOV
2009-04-22 20:09 Re: Machine description
2009-04-22 20:10 Re: Restricted version for GCC?
2009-04-23 00:42 Re: messaging
2009-04-23 18:39 Re: Machine description
2009-04-23 20:48 Re: new offset outside bounds of constant string warning
2009-04-24 00:14 Re: Side effects on memory access
2009-04-24 03:32 Re: 16 bits char string from C to FORTRAN
2009-04-24 17:27 Re: Emit jump insn in function prologue
2009-04-24 19:12 Re: Emit jump insn in function prologue
2009-04-24 20:24 Re: Emit jump insn in function prologue
2009-04-25 17:31 Re: Making CFLAGS=-g1 bigger but more useful
2009-04-25 17:35 Re: gcc-gdb compatibilty
2009-04-25 19:04 Re: Making CFLAGS=-g1 bigger but more useful
2009-04-27 17:28 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed
2009-04-27 17:32 Re: Side effects on memory access
2009-04-28 05:13 Re: Why "global" variable can't be processed properly ?
2009-04-28 05:16 Re: variadic arguments not thread safe on amd64?
2009-04-29 07:39 gcc-in-cxx update
2009-04-29 13:56 Re: gcc-in-cxx update
2009-04-29 14:23 Re: gcc-in-cxx update / multi-targeted gcc
2009-04-29 14:44 Re: Unexpected offsets when eliminating SP
2009-04-29 14:54 Re: gcc-in-cxx update
2009-04-30 00:26 Re: [lambda] Segmentation fault in simple lambda program
2009-04-30 18:58 Re: (extern int vs. int) and (extern function vs. function) (was: gcc-in-cxx update)
2009-04-30 21:54 Re: Is this valid c++ ?

Jack Howarth

2009-04-09 01:45 x86_64-apple-darwin libjava build broken on gcc 4.4 branch
2009-04-09 01:59 x86_64-apple-darwin libjava build broken on gcc 4.4 branch
2009-04-09 13:01 Re: x86_64-apple-darwin libjava build broken on gcc 4.4 branch
2009-04-09 13:14 Re: x86_64-apple-darwin libjava build broken on gcc 4.4 branch
2009-04-15 12:01 Re: Parma Polyhedra Library 0.10.1
2009-04-15 13:19 Re: Parma Polyhedra Library 0.10.1
2009-04-15 14:53 Re: Parma Polyhedra Library 0.10.1
2009-04-17 13:23 Re: Snapshots of PPL 0.10.2 available for testing
2009-04-21 20:04 http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.4/changes.html
2009-04-24 13:54 Re: -O3 and new optimizations in 4.4.0
2009-04-27 14:08 tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1 failures at -m64 on powerpc
2009-04-30 04:59 format argument does not have string type

Jakub Jelinek

2009-04-02 21:04 Re: Call for testers: MPC-0.6 released
2009-04-14 12:57 GCC 4.4.0-rc1 available
2009-04-14 13:12 GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-04-14)
2009-04-15 14:22 Re: GCC 4.4.0-rc1 available
2009-04-20 10:00 branches/gcc-4_4-branch frozen in preparation of 4.4.0 release
2009-04-23 06:06 Re: new offset outside bounds of constant string warning
2009-04-23 07:12 GCC 4.4.0 Released
2009-04-24 10:21 Re: gcc-4.4.0.tar.gz.sig, expired key

James Dennett

2009-04-14 18:18 Re: messaging
2009-04-16 19:48 Re: Diagnostic Messaging Suggestion
2009-04-20 02:19 Re: vector<> issue in g++?
2009-04-20 07:30 Re: GCC 4.3.2 bug (was: Illegal subtraction in tmp-d ive_1.s)‏
2009-04-20 07:36 Re: vector<> issue in g++?
2009-04-23 23:58 Re: GCC 4.5: "nonconstant array index in initializer" error
2009-04-24 01:47 Re: GCC 4.5: "nonconstant array index in initializer" error
2009-04-30 19:40 Re: (extern int vs. int) and (extern function vs. function) (was: gcc-in-cxx update)

Jan Hubicka

2009-04-06 17:44 Re: [lto] Mainline merge @145453
2009-04-08 14:50 My plans on EH infrastructure
2009-04-08 15:33 Re: My plans on EH infrastructure
2009-04-08 15:43 Re: My plans on EH infrastructure
2009-04-08 18:02 Re: My plans on EH infrastructure
2009-04-08 21:11 Re: My plans on EH infrastructure
2009-04-11 21:51 Re: My plans on EH infrastructure
2009-04-19 13:29 Re: [RFC] Massive recursion in tree_ssa_phiprop_1?
2009-04-19 18:48 Re: [RFC] Massive recursion in tree_ssa_phiprop_1?
2009-04-20 10:38 Re: [RFC] Massive recursion in tree_ssa_phiprop_1?
2009-04-24 18:38 Re: Emit jump insn in function prologue

Janis Johnson

2009-04-01 22:13 Re: Call for testers: MPC-0.6 released
2009-04-08 17:47 Re: Support question for GCC
2009-04-08 21:15 Re: [cond-optab] svn branch created, looking for reviews for the "cleanup" parts
2009-04-27 22:09 Re: testsuite fixes for small doubles
2009-04-27 22:44 Re: dg-warning: bogus target expectations?
2009-04-27 23:38 Re: dg-warning: bogus target expectations?
2009-04-29 23:29 Re: gcc-4.4.0 Build Report: Success on Open Solaris 2008.11, x86_64
2009-04-30 16:39 Re: gcc-4.4.0 Build Report: Success on Open Solaris 2008.11, x86_64

Jason Mancini

2009-04-20 05:14 Re: GCC 4. 3.2 bug (w as: Illega l subtract ion in tmp -dive_1.s) ‏

Jason Merrill

2009-04-10 20:55 Re: GCC RES: Restrictive Exception Specification: 0.1 - Alpha. Feedback Request.
2009-04-10 21:19 Re: GCC RES: Restrictive Exception Specification: 0.1 - Alpha. Feedback Request.

Jay Foad

2009-04-24 10:16 dodgy syntax in acx.m4?
2009-04-24 10:44 Re: dodgy syntax in acx.m4?

Jayashree Ramani

2009-04-22 14:18 Urgent Question regarding GCOV
2009-04-22 14:46 Re: Urgent Question regarding GCOV

Jean Christophe Beyler

2009-04-21 21:22 Inefficient loads in certain loops depending on data declaration
2009-04-21 21:23 Re: Reserving a number of consecutive registers
2009-04-22 18:48 Machine description
2009-04-23 14:38 Re: Machine description
2009-04-30 13:53 Re: Reserving a number of consecutive registers

Jim Wilson

2009-04-13 23:19 Re: align of local char array seem not work.
2009-04-30 00:13 Re: Unexpected offsets when eliminating SP

Joe Buck

2009-04-01 18:02 Re: missing return value
2009-04-02 00:43 Re: Revised GCC Runtime Library Exception
2009-04-03 19:53 Re: Revised GCC Runtime Library Exception
2009-04-08 18:53 Re: Support question for GCC
2009-04-09 18:24 Re: Diagnostic Messaging Suggestion
2009-04-11 00:40 Re: operator=() issue
2009-04-13 23:08 Re: messages
2009-04-14 16:23 Re: messages
2009-04-17 03:45 Re: Diagnostic Messaging Suggestion
2009-04-17 05:12 Re: Advantage of switch-case
2009-04-17 05:19 Re: Advantage of switch-case
2009-04-17 19:35 Re: GCC + libJIT + Domain Specific Languages Concept Integration
2009-04-17 21:09 Re: GCC + libJIT + Domain Specific Languages Concept Integration
2009-04-20 21:05 Re: Summer of Code 2009 "Support for an ELF writer"
2009-04-24 00:39 Re: GCC 4.5: "nonconstant array index in initializer" error
2009-04-24 21:56 Re: -O3 and new optimizations in 4.4.0
2009-04-28 18:13 Re: Checking for the Programming Language inside GCC

Joern Rennecke

2009-04-01 13:18 Re: Revised GCC Runtime Library Exception
2009-04-01 13:35 Re: Invalid reload inheritance with paradoxical subregs
2009-04-01 13:48 Re: Revised GCC Runtime Library Exception
2009-04-01 22:49 Re: Plugins & GGC ie GTY
2009-04-02 14:58 Re: Invalid reload inheritance with paradoxical subregs
2009-04-20 14:04 Re: GCC 4.3.2 bug (was: Illegal subtraction in tmp-dive_1.s)?
2009-04-21 12:08 Re: [m32c] IRA reload failures in libstdc++
2009-04-23 03:14 Re: [m32c] IRA reload failures in libstdc++
2009-04-23 05:41 Re: [m32c] IRA reload failures in libstdc++
2009-04-23 17:09 Re: [m32c] IRA reload failures in libstdc++
2009-04-29 10:47 Re: gcc-in-cxx update / multi-targeted gcc
2009-04-29 12:01 Re: gcc-in-cxx update / multi-targeted gcc
2009-04-29 18:12 Re: gcc-in-cxx update / multi-targeted gcc
2009-04-29 18:48 Re: gcc-in-cxx update / multi-targeted gcc
2009-04-29 23:33 Re: gcc-in-cxx update / multi-targeted gcc

John David Anglin

2009-04-12 19:04 Re: cleanup tests failing on MIPS64
2009-04-14 16:18 Re: Question about creating stdint.h on systems that don't have it
2009-04-14 16:24 Re: Question about creating stdint.h on systems that don't have it
2009-04-14 18:37 Re: Question about creating stdint.h on systems that don't have it

John Engelhart

2009-04-08 20:58 Fwd: Objective-C and C99 strict aliasing
2009-04-09 21:46 Re: Fwd: Objective-C and C99 strict aliasing

John Holdsworth

2009-04-09 18:14 Re: Syntactic sugar to access arrays and hashes in Objective-C

Jonathan Wakely

2009-04-04 13:00 Re: typo in gcc-4.4 changes
2009-04-06 20:14 Re: typo in gcc-4.4 changes
2009-04-14 19:20 Re: messages
2009-04-14 19:34 Re: messaging
2009-04-22 10:31 Re: typo in gcc-4.4 changes
2009-04-27 08:29 Re: typo in gcc-4.4 changes

Joseph Awinongya

2009-04-03 10:46 Life

Joseph S. Myers

2009-04-01 00:53 stdint.h type information needed
2009-04-01 01:57 Re: stdint.h type information needed
2009-04-01 12:42 Re: stdint.h type information needed
2009-04-01 12:47 Re: stdint.h type information needed
2009-04-08 00:33 Re: [SOLVED] Re: stdint.h type information needed
2009-04-08 00:36 Re: Revised GCC Runtime Library Exception
2009-04-08 00:37 Re: Patch for mingw stdint information
2009-04-08 00:39 Re: update_version_svn (was: Minimum required GNAT version for bootstrap of GNAT on gcc trunk)
2009-04-08 00:43 Re: Bootstrap broken on sparc-linux trunk between 145310:145425 because of new genattrtab.c va_arg (p, HOST_WIDE_INT) warning
2009-04-08 00:47 Re: Need some help with fixincludes.
2009-04-10 18:33 Re: c99 stdint.h question
2009-04-14 14:19 Re: needed-list fails in libiberty
2009-04-14 15:50 Re: Question about creating stdint.h on systems that don't have it
2009-04-17 22:28 Re: 'Obsolete' architectures in GCC 4.4
2009-04-20 22:49 Re: For backend maintainers: changes for C++ compatibility
2009-04-21 19:30 GCC 4.4.1 Status Report (2009-04-21)
2009-04-21 19:49 GCC 4.5.0 Status Report (2009-04-21)
2009-04-23 15:32 Re: GCC 4.5: "nonconstant array index in initializer" error
2009-04-23 15:58 Re: -O3 and new optimizations in 4.4.0
2009-04-23 16:16 Re: -O3 and new optimizations in 4.4.0
2009-04-23 18:56 Re: GCC 4.5: "nonconstant array index in initializer" error
2009-04-24 09:00 Re: testsuite fixes for small doubles
2009-04-24 17:30 Re: testsuite fixes for small doubles
2009-04-25 18:43 Re: GCC 4.5: "nonconstant array index in initializer" error
2009-04-29 11:22 Re: gcc-in-cxx update
2009-04-29 11:27 Re: gcc-in-cxx update / multi-targeted gcc
2009-04-29 13:22 Re: gcc-in-cxx update / multi-targeted gcc
2009-04-29 13:29 Re: gcc-in-cxx update
2009-04-29 13:31 Re: gcc-in-cxx update / multi-targeted gcc
2009-04-29 14:57 Re: gcc-in-cxx update
2009-04-29 15:06 Re: gcc-in-cxx update / multi-targeted gcc
2009-04-29 15:44 Re: gcc-in-cxx update

Justin Seyster

2009-04-24 02:58 [plugins] Name for pass_all_optimizations

Kai Henningsen

2009-04-14 06:13 Re: messaging
2009-04-14 18:01 Re: messaging

Kai Tietz

2009-04-03 17:03 Re: generating functions and eh region
2009-04-04 08:38 Re: Patch for mingw stdint information

Kate Minola

2009-04-23 19:11 Re: -O3 and new optimizations in 4.4.0

Kaveh R. Ghazi

2009-04-01 18:42 Call for testers: MPC-0.6 released
2009-04-01 20:37 Re: Call for testers: MPC-0.6 released
2009-04-01 21:03 Re: Call for testers: MPC-0.6 released
2009-04-02 00:12 Re: Call for testers: MPC-0.6 released
2009-04-02 20:55 Re: Call for testers: MPC-0.6 released
2009-04-02 21:18 Re: Call for testers: MPC-0.6 released
2009-04-02 22:12 Re: Call for testers: MPC-0.6 released
2009-04-07 03:28 Re: Call for testers: MPC-0.6 released
2009-04-07 15:32 Re: Call for testers: MPC-0.6 released
2009-04-10 16:42 Question about top-level configure code and in-tree builds
2009-04-11 03:56 Re: Question about top-level configure code and in-tree builds
2009-04-16 01:13 Re: Question about top-level configure code and in-tree builds
2009-04-24 01:53 Re: testsuite fixes for small doubles
2009-04-28 15:53 Re: Using MPC Library with GCC
2009-04-29 17:15 Re: gcc-in-cxx update / multi-targeted gcc

Keith Thompson

2009-04-24 03:10 gcc-4.4.0.tar.gz.sig, expired key
2009-04-24 17:12 Re: gcc-4.4.0.tar.gz.sig, expired key

Kesari Reddy

2009-04-01 18:51 Need Help with downloading gcc binaries for x86 Atom Processor for CentOS.

Kirill Kononenko

2009-04-01 09:34 GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-01 09:48 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-01 11:08 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-01 11:41 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-01 11:51 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-01 11:56 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-01 12:09 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-01 12:14 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-01 12:17 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-01 12:54 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-01 13:23 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-01 15:34 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-01 15:35 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-01 16:20 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-01 17:48 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-01 19:20 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-03 11:50 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-03 11:53 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-03 12:26 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-03 14:33 (mcs | csc | cscc) & gcc & libJIT == LLVM ?
2009-04-03 14:54 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-03 15:33 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-05 08:42 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-05 09:25 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-17 07:15 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-17 19:10 GCC + libJIT + Domain Specific Languages Concept Integration
2009-04-20 20:34 Summer of Code 2009 "Support for an ELF writer"
2009-04-21 04:03 Re: [LLVMdev] Summer of Code 2009 "Support for an ELF writer"

Laurent GUERBY

2009-04-03 13:48 [Ada] runtime license wording change and Ada bootstrap, gcc/ada/scn.adb Determine_License
2009-04-05 09:02 Bootstrap on powerpc-linux trunk broken between r145531 and r145540 internal compiler error: in fold_convert, at fold-const.c:2506
2009-04-05 09:25 Bootstrap broken on sparc-linux trunk between 145310:145425 because of new genattrtab.c va_arg (p, HOST_WIDE_INT) warning
2009-04-05 15:50 Annoucing regressions and bootstrap fail? (was: Bootstrap broken on sparc-linux trunk between 145310:145425 because of new genattrtab.c va_arg (p, HOST_WIDE_INT) warning)
2009-04-06 15:00 Re: Minimum required GNAT version for bootstrap of GNAT on gcc trunk
2009-04-06 21:22 Re: GCC Compile Farm News: 12 architectures now available
2009-04-07 10:46 Re: [cond-optab] svn branch created, looking for reviews for the "cleanup" parts
2009-04-07 14:08 Re: problem with incremental build with Ada
2009-04-21 20:37 Enable Ada when there is an Ada compiler? (Was: [PATCH] Simplified switch conversion in simple cases)

Laurynas Biveinis

2009-04-25 09:06 Any plans to upgrade svn repository format to 1.5.0+ ?
2009-04-28 18:06 Re: Any plans to upgrade svn repository format to 1.5.0+ ?
2009-04-29 20:18 svn 1.5.0 merge support

Li Feng

2009-04-22 14:10 [gSoc] [graphite] general plan for Automatic parallelization in Graphite

lloyd konneker

2009-04-11 14:06 successfully bootstrapped 4.3.3 from 4.3.1-1ubuntu2

manjunatha srinivasan

2009-04-14 15:37 Query gcc support on sigma design board

Marc Glisse

2009-04-02 03:08 Re: Call for testers: MPC-0.6 released

Mario Linke

2009-04-23 17:25 Build report for AIX 6.1
2009-04-27 14:52 Build report for AIX 5.3

Mark Mitchell

2009-04-06 16:28 Re: GCC + libJIT instead of LLVM
2009-04-06 16:42 Re: bitfields: types vs modes?
2009-04-06 20:40 Re: bitfields: types vs modes?
2009-04-17 05:03 Re: The gcc-in-cxx branch now completes bootstrap
2009-04-17 20:15 Re: GCC + libJIT + Domain Specific Languages Concept Integration
2009-04-27 18:00 Using MPC Library with GCC
2009-04-28 21:19 Slush: Bug-Fixes Only for Middle End and Primary Platforms

Mass Mailer

2009-04-15 06:51 [Ann] Test
2009-04-15 06:51 [Ann] Test

Matt Hoosier

2009-04-09 20:23 Can't pass temporary with hidden copy ctor as const ref

Matt Provost

2009-04-28 03:37 variadic arguments not thread safe on amd64?
2009-04-28 04:00 Re: variadic arguments not thread safe on amd64?

Michael Eager

2009-04-08 06:45 Intermittent/non-reproducible gcc testsuite failures
2009-04-08 14:25 Re: Intermittent/non-reproducible gcc testsuite failures
2009-04-13 16:30 Re: Intermittent/non-reproducible gcc testsuite failures

Michael Hope

2009-04-21 09:27 Side effects on memory access
2009-04-23 21:42 Re: Side effects on memory access
2009-04-26 09:57 Re: Side effects on memory access
2009-04-27 21:58 Re: Side effects on memory access
2009-04-29 10:02 Unexpected offsets when eliminating SP

Michael Matz

2009-04-09 13:18 Re: [cond-optab] svn branch created, looking for reviews for the "cleanup" parts

Michael Meissner

2009-04-13 21:32 Re: question on 16 bit registers with 32 bit pointers
2009-04-30 22:27 Please help me test the power7-meissner branch before I submit the changes

Miles Bader

2009-04-24 03:10 Re: GCC 4.5: "nonconstant array index in initializer" error

Nathan Froyd

2009-04-03 19:28 Re: generating functions and eh region

Nicholas Yue

2009-04-04 04:10 GCC releases - busy or broken site

Nick Clifton

2009-04-03 14:23 Re: [Ada] runtime license wording change and Ada bootstrap, gcc/ada/scn.adb Determine_License
2009-04-21 11:48 Re: For backend maintainers: changes for C++ compatibility

Nordvall, Gary USNUNK NAVAIR 33, , LEGACY SERVER

2009-04-08 16:50 Support question for GCC

novembre.tait

2009-04-26 09:18 The best HYIP Started

Oliver Kellogg

2009-04-12 17:24 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed
2009-04-14 10:26 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed
2009-04-18 19:29 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed
2009-04-19 21:13 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed
2009-04-20 18:40 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed
2009-04-20 20:20 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed
2009-04-26 13:25 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed
2009-04-27 17:42 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed
2009-04-27 19:47 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed
2009-04-27 21:25 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed

Paolo Bonzini

2009-04-02 18:57 Re: Revised GCC Runtime Library Exception
2009-04-07 09:55 [cond-optab] svn branch created, looking for reviews for the "cleanup" parts
2009-04-07 10:30 Re: [cond-optab] svn branch created, looking for reviews for the "cleanup" parts
2009-04-07 10:33 Re: [cond-optab] svn branch created, looking for reviews for the "cleanup" parts
2009-04-07 16:35 Re: Need some help with fixincludes.
2009-04-07 17:34 Re: Need some help with fixincludes.
2009-04-08 15:40 Re: My plans on EH infrastructure
2009-04-09 06:30 Re: [cond-optab] svn branch created, looking for reviews for the "cleanup" parts
2009-04-09 09:35 Re: x86_64-apple-darwin libjava build broken on gcc 4.4 branch
2009-04-09 11:08 Re: [cond-optab] svn branch created, looking for reviews for the "cleanup" parts
2009-04-09 11:23 Re: [cond-optab] svn branch created, looking for reviews for the "cleanup" parts
2009-04-09 11:32 Re: [cond-optab] svn branch created, looking for reviews for the "cleanup" parts
2009-04-09 13:05 Re: x86_64-apple-darwin libjava build broken on gcc 4.4 branch
2009-04-09 13:49 Re: [cond-optab] svn branch created, looking for reviews for the "cleanup" parts
2009-04-10 06:32 Re: Fixing the pre-pass scheduler on x86 (Bug 38403)
2009-04-12 07:12 Re: [cond-optab] svn branch created, looking for reviews for the "cleanup" parts
2009-04-16 08:22 Re: M32C vs PR tree-optimization/39233
2009-04-20 06:29 Re: [RFC] Massive recursion in tree_ssa_phiprop_1?
2009-04-20 09:41 Re: [RFC] Massive recursion in tree_ssa_phiprop_1?
2009-04-25 10:46 Re: Making CFLAGS=-g1 bigger but more useful
2009-04-28 15:00 Re: Slush, please?

Paolo Piacentini

2009-04-19 23:16 vector<> issue in g++?

Paul Koning

2009-04-01 17:19 missing return value
2009-04-01 20:06 Re: missing return value
2009-04-03 20:24 Re: Revised GCC Runtime Library Exception
2009-04-07 17:29 Missing data alignment on MIPS
2009-04-08 01:11 RE: Missing data alignment on MIPS

Paul Smedley

2009-04-17 22:10 'Obsolete' architectures in GCC 4.4

Pedro Alves

2009-04-24 14:05 Re: Slight tree reorganization for cygming platforms

Peter Leist

2009-04-24 09:50 Emit jump insn in function prologue

Peter O'Gorman

2009-04-15 13:31 Re: Parma Polyhedra Library 0.10.1

Pierce Lopez

2009-04-04 04:50 typo in gcc-4.4 changes

Piotr Wyderski

2009-04-03 15:47 Re: gcc-4.5-20090402 is now available
2009-04-21 13:56 EH tree is invalid
2009-04-21 14:03 Re: EH tree is invalid
2009-04-21 14:41 Re: EH tree is invalid

Rainer Emrich

2009-04-06 08:51 Re: Call for testers: MPC-0.6 released

Rainer Orth

2009-04-07 16:42 Re: IRIX stdint patch
2009-04-08 10:45 Re: IRIX stdint patch

Ralf Wildenhues

2009-04-07 20:31 Re: Call for testers: MPC-0.6 released
2009-04-14 18:10 Re: Parma Polyhedra Library 0.10.1

Ramana Radhakrishnan

2009-04-07 10:03 Re: [cond-optab] svn branch created, looking for reviews for the "cleanup" parts
2009-04-08 22:29 Re: [cond-optab] svn branch created, looking for reviews for the "cleanup" parts
2009-04-09 12:32 RE: [cond-optab] svn branch created, looking for reviews for the "cleanup" parts

Revital1 Eres

2009-04-27 06:18 ICE in ira.c
2009-04-27 12:03 Re: ICE in ira.c

Richard Earnshaw

2009-04-29 09:44 Re: Documentation on running dejagnu with qemu?
2009-04-29 13:26 Re: gcc-in-cxx update / multi-targeted gcc

Richard Guenther

2009-04-01 13:30 Re: Revised GCC Runtime Library Exception
2009-04-01 18:26 Re: Plugins & GGC ie GTY
2009-04-01 20:16 Re: Call for testers: MPC-0.6 released
2009-04-01 20:41 Re: Call for testers: MPC-0.6 released
2009-04-01 21:21 Re: Call for testers: MPC-0.6 released
2009-04-02 14:27 [ANNOUNCE] Trunk freeze for alias-improvements branch Fri. Apr. 3rd 8am UTC
2009-04-03 10:25 Re: [ANNOUNCE] Trunk freeze for alias-improvements branch Fri. Apr. 3rd 8am UTC
2009-04-05 17:39 Re: Bootstrap on powerpc-linux trunk broken between r145531 and r145540 internal compiler error: in fold_convert, at fold-const.c:2506
2009-04-07 07:52 Re: Merging the alias-improvements branch
2009-04-07 09:59 Re: [cond-optab] svn branch created, looking for reviews for the "cleanup" parts
2009-04-07 10:01 Re: [cond-optab] svn branch created, looking for reviews for the "cleanup" parts
2009-04-08 15:19 Re: My plans on EH infrastructure
2009-04-08 15:25 Re: My plans on EH infrastructure
2009-04-08 15:37 Re: My plans on EH infrastructure
2009-04-08 17:40 Re: Support question for GCC
2009-04-10 07:22 Re: Fwd: Objective-C and C99 strict aliasing
2009-04-10 07:32 Re: [RFC] Get rid of awkward semantics for subtypes
2009-04-12 09:30 Re: [RFC] Get rid of awkward semantics for subtypes
2009-04-12 09:34 Re: The gcc-in-cxx branch now completes bootstrap
2009-04-14 09:06 Re: Why GCC 4.1.2 casting "short int" to "short unsigned int" ?
2009-04-14 15:51 Re: Parma Polyhedra Library 0.10.1
2009-04-15 08:50 Re: Parma Polyhedra Library 0.10.1
2009-04-15 12:44 Re: Parma Polyhedra Library 0.10.1
2009-04-15 16:43 Re: Parma Polyhedra Library 0.10.1
2009-04-16 07:56 Re: M32C vs PR tree-optimization/39233
2009-04-16 08:34 Re: M32C vs PR tree-optimization/39233
2009-04-16 14:49 Re: Snapshots of PPL 0.10.2 available for testing
2009-04-19 07:45 Re: [RFC] Massive recursion in tree_ssa_phiprop_1?
2009-04-19 18:38 Re: [RFC] Massive recursion in tree_ssa_phiprop_1?
2009-04-20 09:37 Re: [RFC] Massive recursion in tree_ssa_phiprop_1?
2009-04-20 10:40 Re: [RFC] Massive recursion in tree_ssa_phiprop_1?
2009-04-21 13:59 Re: EH tree is invalid
2009-04-28 20:51 Re: Checking for the Programming Language inside GCC
2009-04-29 08:48 Re: gcc-in-cxx update
2009-04-29 21:57 Re: [graphite] Weekly phone call notes
2009-04-29 22:15 Re: [graphite] Weekly phone call notes

Richard Kenner

2009-04-08 17:52 Re: Support question for GCC
2009-04-10 01:41 Re: [RFC] Get rid of awkward semantics for subtypes

Richard Sandiford

2009-04-04 09:22 Re: fwprop and CSE const anchor opt
2009-04-04 09:32 Re: typo in gcc-4.4 changes
2009-04-05 09:22 Re: fwprop and CSE const anchor opt
2009-04-06 19:19 Re: fwprop and CSE const anchor opt
2009-04-08 20:33 Re: fwprop and CSE const anchor opt

Rob Myers

2009-04-23 19:39 Updating gnu.org/software Fortran Page

Robert Dewar

2009-04-10 02:59 Re: [RFC] Get rid of awkward semantics for subtypes
2009-04-10 08:38 Re: [RFC] Get rid of awkward semantics for subtypes
2009-04-22 20:20 Re: Restricted version for GCC?
2009-04-24 13:13 Re: -O3 and new optimizations in 4.4.0
2009-04-24 14:49 Re: -O3 and new optimizations in 4.4.0
2009-04-26 13:51 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed

Roberto Bagnara

2009-04-07 07:42 First PPL 0.10.1 release candidate
2009-04-07 15:29 Re: First PPL 0.10.1 release candidate
2009-04-07 16:05 Re: [PPL-devel] First PPL 0.10.1 release candidate
2009-04-14 13:02 Parma Polyhedra Library 0.10.1
2009-04-14 16:58 Re: Parma Polyhedra Library 0.10.1
2009-04-15 14:36 Re: Parma Polyhedra Library 0.10.1
2009-04-15 15:29 Re: Parma Polyhedra Library 0.10.1
2009-04-15 16:50 Re: [PPL-devel] Parma Polyhedra Library 0.10.1
2009-04-16 12:08 Snapshots of PPL 0.10.2 available for testing
2009-04-18 08:49 Parma Polyhedra Library 0.10.2

robinhorde

2009-04-28 04:53 Why "global" variable can't be processed properly ?

Ryan Hill

2009-04-01 02:40 Re: [PPL-devel] PPL broken for Canadian-cross builds
2009-04-01 05:08 Re: [PPL-devel] PPL broken for Canadian-cross builds
2009-04-17 16:39 Re: Snapshots of PPL 0.10.2 available for testing

Sebastian Huber

2009-04-09 12:10 Re: Problems with DWARF debug info and GCC 4.3.2

Sebastian Pop

2009-04-01 05:03 Re: [PPL-devel] PPL broken for Canadian-cross builds
2009-04-24 13:10 Re: -O3 and new optimizations in 4.4.0
2009-04-24 13:30 Re: -O3 and new optimizations in 4.4.0
2009-04-29 22:07 Re: [graphite] Weekly phone call notes
2009-04-30 07:22 Re: [graphite] Weekly phone call notes

Sebastian Redl

2009-04-29 13:44 Re: gcc-in-cxx update

Segher Boessenkool

2009-04-11 20:48 Re: The gcc-in-cxx branch now completes bootstrap

Shameem Ahamed

2009-04-17 04:08 Advantage of switch-case

Shobaki, Ghassan

2009-04-08 00:37 Fixing the pre-pass scheduler on x86 (Bug 38403)
2009-04-09 21:28 RE: Fixing the pre-pass scheduler on x86 (Bug 38403)
2009-04-28 17:51 Checking for the Programming Language inside GCC

Smith-Rowland, Edward M

2009-04-30 17:20 Re: [lambda] Segmentation fault in simple lambda program

Stelian Pop

2009-04-10 15:24 question on 16 bit registers with 32 bit pointers
2009-04-10 18:44 Re: question on 16 bit registers with 32 bit pointers

Steve Ellcey

2009-04-03 16:56 Re: Call for testers: MPC-0.6 released
2009-04-10 17:24 c99 stdint.h question
2009-04-14 15:37 Question about creating stdint.h on systems that don't have it
2009-04-14 16:10 Re: Question about creating stdint.h on systems that don't have it
2009-04-14 16:31 Re: Question about creating stdint.h on systems that don't have it

Steve Kargl

2009-04-05 16:38 Re: [fortran] spurious initialized warning with select-case?

Steven Bosscher

2009-04-01 19:55 Re: Deprecating Itanium1 for GCC 4.4
2009-04-01 23:40 Re: Plugins & GGC ie GTY
2009-04-08 05:42 Re: Fixing the pre-pass scheduler on x86 (Bug 38403)
2009-04-08 17:25 Re: My plans on EH infrastructure
2009-04-28 22:49 Re: Slush: Bug-Fixes Only for Middle End and Primary Platforms
2009-04-29 22:19 Re: [graphite] Weekly phone call notes

sumanth

2009-04-25 12:01 gcc-gdb compatibilty
2009-04-29 04:25 Re: gcc-gdb compatibilty

Sylvain Pion

2009-04-08 17:47 Re: My plans on EH infrastructure
2009-04-08 17:49 Re: My plans on EH infrastructure
2009-04-08 19:35 Re: My plans on EH infrastructure
2009-04-08 22:52 Re: My plans on EH infrastructure

Taras Glek

2009-04-27 18:36 Re: Restricted version for GCC?

Theodore Papadopoulo

2009-04-08 19:10 Re: My plans on EH infrastructure

Thomas Koenig

2009-04-25 14:02 heise.de comment on 4.4.0 release

Thomas Neumann

2009-04-11 20:37 Re: The gcc-in-cxx branch now completes bootstrap
2009-04-12 06:59 Re: The gcc-in-cxx branch now completes bootstrap
2009-04-12 07:56 Re: The gcc-in-cxx branch now completes bootstrap

Tim Prince

2009-04-26 03:34 Re: heise.de comment on 4.4.0 release

Tobias Burnus

2009-04-25 16:43 Re: heise.de comment on 4.4.0 release
2009-04-28 18:57 Re: Checking for the Programming Language inside GCC

Tobias Grosser

2009-04-01 15:16 [graphite] Weekly phone call - Automatic parallelization
2009-04-23 07:01 Re: [gSoc] [graphite] general plan for Automatic parallelization in Graphite
2009-04-27 21:46 Re: Polyhedral Model
2009-04-28 05:43 Re: Polyhedral Model
2009-04-29 21:34 [graphite] Weekly phone call notes
2009-04-29 22:07 Re: [graphite] Weekly phone call notes

Tom Browder

2009-04-26 02:09 gcc-4.4.0 Build Report: Success on Open Solaris 2008.11, x86_64
2009-04-26 02:21 Re: gcc-4.4.0 Build Report: Success on Open Solaris 2008.11, x86_64
2009-04-26 12:10 Re: gcc-4.4.0 Build Report: Success on Open Solaris 2008.11, x86_64
2009-04-29 13:56 Re: gcc-4.4.0 Build Report: Success on Open Solaris 2008.11, x86_64
2009-04-29 15:26 Re: gcc-4.4.0 Build Report: Success on Open Solaris 2008.11, x86_64
2009-04-30 14:30 Re: gcc-4.4.0 Build Report: Success on Open Solaris 2008.11, x86_64

Tom Christensen

2009-04-07 18:27 Re: IRIX stdint patch

Tom Tromey

2009-04-17 17:59 Re: Diagnostic Messaging Suggestion
2009-04-27 18:19 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed
2009-04-27 20:29 Re: [gnat] reuse of ASTs already constructed

Toon Moene

2009-04-06 20:46 Re: Merging the alias-improvements branch
2009-04-25 14:42 Re: -O3 and new optimizations in 4.4.0
2009-04-25 14:58 Re: heise.de comment on 4.4.0 release

Uros Bizjak

2009-04-01 13:15 Invalid reload inheritance with paradoxical subregs
2009-04-02 10:52 Re: Invalid reload inheritance with paradoxical subregs
2009-04-06 18:16 Re: Invalid reload inheritance with paradoxical subregs
2009-04-07 10:37 Re: [cond-optab] svn branch created, looking for reviews for the "cleanup" parts
2009-04-07 11:53 Re: [cond-optab] svn branch created, looking for reviews for the "cleanup" parts
2009-04-07 13:00 Re: [cond-optab] svn branch created, looking for reviews for the "cleanup" parts
2009-04-11 18:08 Re: [cond-optab] svn branch created, looking for reviews for the "cleanup" parts

Vincent Lefevre

2009-04-20 13:17 Re: GCC 4.3.2 bug (was: Illegal subtraction in tmp-dive_1.s)
2009-04-20 13:35 Re: GCC 4.3.2 bug (was: Illegal subtraction in tmp-dive_1.s)?
2009-04-20 15:43 Re: GCC 4.3.2 bug (was: Illegal subtraction in tmp-dive_1.s)?
2009-04-21 15:41 Re: GCC 4.3.2 bug (was: Illegal subtraction in tmp-dive_1.s)
2009-04-23 15:08 Error on http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.4/changes.html (-Wsequence-points)

Vincent R.

2009-04-01 14:07 generating functions and eh region
2009-04-01 15:31 Re: generating functions and eh region
2009-04-01 18:11 Re: generating functions and eh region
2009-04-02 09:06 Re: generating functions and eh region
2009-04-03 10:23 Re: generating functions and eh region
2009-04-15 14:21 Error message when using ASM_DECLARE_FUNCTION_NAME macr o
2009-04-24 09:05 Slight tree reorganization for cygming platforms

Vladimir Makarov

2009-04-08 03:20 Re: Fixing the pre-pass scheduler on x86 (Bug 38403)
2009-04-08 16:09 Re: Fixing the pre-pass scheduler on x86 (Bug 38403)
2009-04-09 22:12 Re: Fixing the pre-pass scheduler on x86 (Bug 38403)
2009-04-21 03:22 Re: CONSTRAINT__LIMIT

Zdenek Dvorak

2009-04-16 01:15 Re: M32C vs PR tree-optimization/39233

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]

Search: Limit to:

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3

gcc archiveauthor index for April, 2009

gcc archive
author index for April, 2009