This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13)
- From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
- To: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
- Cc: Richard Kenner <kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu>, gdr at integrable-solutions dot net, Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot com, dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com, dje dot gcc at gmail dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, law at redhat dot com, mark at codesourcery dot com, rguenther at suse dot de, stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com
- Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 10:49:17 -0400
- Subject: Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2009-03-13)
- References: <20090320165858.GI27119@synopsys.com> <303e1d290903211737u20100ed4ie0c604e2801517a2@mail.gmail.com> <49C58A77.3000805@codesourcery.com> <4aca3dc20903211937k29299a7co9bf4add50a050f71@mail.gmail.com> <20090322050024.GA18893@synopsys.com> <4aca3dc20903220547v8923d55v9ac593f8400be6a9@mail.gmail.com> <10903221258.AA04666@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <206fcf960903220718oefa452ek60dcc1d933e1e093@mail.gmail.com> <10903221441.AA05218@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <f865508f0903220747q54111794sae258a8f44fee053@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 15:41, Richard Kenner
> <kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> wrote:
>>> I must admit that this interpretation is quite new to me.
>>> It certainly wasn't when EGCS reunited with gcc.
>>
>> I disagree. ?"reuniting with GCC" means "reuniting with the FSF".
>
> ... but not "raising a white flag".
If the SC now has a different mission/etc than they used to, they
should, you know, tell the rest of us and put it on the page, since
clearly nobody understands exactly what the GCC's project governance
is like?