This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: No address_cost calls when inlining ?


Ahhh ok, so basically I've hit the same wall as for the constant
folding and constant propagation!
Oh well, I will see how important it is for me to try to fix it in this case.

Thanks for the answer,
Jc

On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> I want the version of foo because the store with an address as
>> destination is costly on my architecture, which is why I defined
>> TARGET_ADDRESS_COST and added a cost when I get this scenario.
>> However, in the compilation of this code, it seems that, when the
>> function is inlined, the address_cost function does not seem to be
>> called anymore. Any ideas why ?
>
> This is (a variant of) PR33699.
>
> Paolo
>
>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]