This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: The gcc-in-cxx branch now completes bootstrap

From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
To: "Kaveh R. GHAZI" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2009 22:01:45 -0700
Subject: Re: The gcc-in-cxx branch now completes bootstrap
References: <m3eixa9hlq.fsf@google.com> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0903071009430.19909@caipclassic.rutgers.edu>

"Kaveh R. GHAZI" <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu> writes:

> I'm curious whether there are any detectable differences in the resulting
> compiler when built with g++ rather than gcc.  E.g. testsuite regressions,
> changes in the speed or size of cc1, etc.  Also, is cc1 linked with
> libstdc++.so ?  Stuff like that.
>
> Would you please consider checking this?

I haven't tested any of that stuff yet.  I will at some point, or of
course anybody else can checkout gcc-in-cxx branch.

On gcc-in-cxx branch cc1 is linked with libstdc++.so.

Ian

References:
- The gcc-in-cxx branch now completes bootstrap
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: The gcc-in-cxx branch now completes bootstrap
  - From: Kaveh R. GHAZI

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]