This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Near 1000 arm-eabi neon FAIL in C testsuite (PR38697 and PR39361)
- From: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- To: Laurent GUERBY <laurent at guerby dot net>
- Cc: Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>, Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>, gcc <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, John David Anglin <dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca>
- Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 22:45:24 +0100
- Subject: Re: Near 1000 arm-eabi neon FAIL in C testsuite (PR38697 and PR39361)
- References: <1236547150.11347.1924.camel@localhost>
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Laurent GUERBY <laurent@guerby.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Trunk on armv5tel-linux-gnueabi (compile farm gcc50) currently fails
> about 1000 C tests:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-03/msg00810.html
>
> 99% of those fail are neon FAIL:
>
> ...
> FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vst4_laneu32.c scan-assembler vst4.32[ \\t]+\\
> \\{(([dD][0-9]+\\\\[[0-9]+\\\\]-[dD][0-9]+\\\\[[0-9]+\\\\])|([dD][0-9]+\
> \\\[[0-9]+\\\\], [dD][0-9]+\\\\[[0-9]+\\\\], [dD][0-9]+\\\\[[0-9]+\\\\],
> [dD][0-9]+\\\\[[0-9]+\\\\]))\\\\}, \\\\[[rR][0-9]+\\\\]!?([ \
> \t]+@[a-zA-Z0-9 ]+)?\\n
> FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vst4_laneu8.c (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vst4_laneu8.c scan-assembler vst4.8[ \\t]+\\\\{(([dD][0-9]+\\\\[[0-9]+\\\\]-[dD][0-9]+\\\\[[0-9]+\\\\])|([dD][0-9]+\\\\[[0-9]+\\\\], [dD][0-9]+\\\\[[0-9]+\\\\], [dD][0-9]+\\\\[[0-9]+\\\\], [dD][0-9]+\\\\[[0-9]+\\\\]))\\\\}, \\\\[[rR][0-9]+\\\\]!?([ \\t]+@[a-zA-Z0-9 ]+)?\\n
>
> A while ago I opened (but there were far less neon FAIL):
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38697
>
> There is also:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39361
>
> arm-eabi is listed as primary platform here:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.4/criteria.html
>
> Do you know why all these tests are failing?
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-03/msg00442.html
Richard.
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Laurent
>
>