This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GNAT vs DW2/ZCX EH.

From: Arnaud Charlet <charlet at adacore dot com>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
Cc: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 12:24:44 +0100
Subject: Re: GNAT vs DW2/ZCX EH.
References: <49A7ECEF.8060305@gmail.com> <200902272035.57442.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <20090227200056.GA29011@adacore.com> <200902272134.42410.ebotcazou@adacore.com>

> IMO you cannot backport such an incompatible change to a release branch.  If 
> the Windows maintainers are confident enough with it and given that we know 
> there is no fundamental issue as far as GNAT is concerned, why not try?

Because stage 4 is not the right stage for such experiments.

Also, we're talking about cygwin AFAIK, which we've never built/tested,
so we have no idea what the state of things are there.

Arno

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GNAT vs DW2/ZCX EH.
  - From: Eric Botcazou

References:
- GNAT vs DW2/ZCX EH.
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: GNAT vs DW2/ZCX EH.
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: GNAT vs DW2/ZCX EH.
  - From: Arnaud Charlet
- Re: GNAT vs DW2/ZCX EH.
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]