This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: testsuite, simulators, and argv[0]
Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:
> Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:
>>
>>> However, I think an even better fix is just to hard-code the string and
>>> make it volatile. Presumably, the use of argv[0] here is just to keep
>>> the compiler from optimizing the program away. So, I suggest doing
>>> something like:
>>>
>>> volatile char *x = "pr36321.exe";
>>
>> ITYM:
>>
>> char *volatile x = "pr36321.exe";
>
> Either should work; in either case, the compiler cannot assume the
> length of the string is computable at compile-time. (For example, in
> the case I gave, the "r" character could magically become "\0".)
>
> But, yes, your version is probably clearer. Or, we can put the volatile
> in both places.
If you put the volatile on the target you'll get a warning due to the
discarded qualifier.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
- References:
- testsuite, simulators, and argv[0]
- Re: testsuite, simulators, and argv[0]
- Re: testsuite, simulators, and argv[0]
- Re: testsuite, simulators, and argv[0]
- Re: testsuite, simulators, and argv[0]
- Re: testsuite, simulators, and argv[0]
- Re: testsuite, simulators, and argv[0]