Re: Apple-employed maintainers (was Re: Apple, iPhone, and GPLv3 troubles)

[Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo dot msbb dot uc dot edu>]

On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 04:33:35PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > Well at least that explains their total inactivity in the last year. Is Dale
> > the one still allowed to read the gcc-patches mailing list?
> 
> No, that would be Stan just because he's not at Apple.
> 
> It must be said also that Mike Stump accepted to review/discuss
> Darwin/ObjC patches that he was CCed on, but most people don't know that
> they need to do so.
> 
> As a side note, Mike also wrote this last February:
> 
> > The SC knows of the issue
> 
> Still, after six months it would be nice to have a clearer idea of what
> will happen with respect to Darwin/ObjC, especially since the previous
> statement (which I suppose was "as clear as" Mike could do) was buried
> under an unrelated thread.
> 
> Paolo

Do we know if Apple still intends to update the ObjC in FSF gcc to v2.0?
                Jack