This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: IRA copy heuristics
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- To: "Vladimir Makarov" <vmakarov at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, rdsandiford at googlemail dot com, "GCC Patches" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 09:08:00 -0700
- Subject: Re: IRA copy heuristics
- References: <87vdxh53up.fsf@firetop.home> <48BD5DD5.2000501@redhat.com>
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> If using DF seems like the Right Thing, we could simply apply both
>> patches, which would give a similar same allocno order to the one
>> we have now. But it seemed better to look a bit deeper first...
>>
>
> Richard, please apply the both patches. As I wrote above there is no
> SPECFP regression anymore with the patches. They also solves some
> testsuite regressions concerning EH.
>
Hi Richard,
Could you please apply your use DF patch? It fixes EH regressions
as well as 434.zeusmp in SPEC CPU 2006?
Thanks.
--
H.J.