This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Update libtool? (was: Re: libstdc++, gdb and darwin)

From: Peter O'Gorman <peter at pogma dot com>
To: Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo dot msbb dot uc dot edu>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 11:17:03 -0500
Subject: Update libtool? (was: Re: libstdc++, gdb and darwin)
References: <20080805134651.GA19155@bromo.msbb.uc.edu> <48988051.1020002@pogma.com> <20080805214446.GA23703@bromo.msbb.uc.edu>

Jack Howarth wrote:
> Peter,
>     Thanks. If gcc's libtool is missing this dsymutil workaround, it would
> be nice if this could be fixed for both gcc trunk and 4.3.2.
>                             Jack

I went and looked for the patches that added dsymutil to libtool, looks
like I took the opportunity to rewrite all the darwin bits at the same
time, then had a couple of follow-up patches to fix bugs that I
introduced. It is not a small patch.

I wonder what the chances are of moving mainline gcc to a newer libtool
version? Introducing the darwin bits piecemeal would not be particularly
fun.

Peter
-- 
Peter O'Gorman
http://pogma.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Update libtool? (was: Re: libstdc++, gdb and darwin)
  - From: Jack Howarth

References:
- libstdc++, gdb and darwin
  - From: Jack Howarth
- Re: libstdc++, gdb and darwin
  - From: Peter O'Gorman
- Re: libstdc++, gdb and darwin
  - From: Jack Howarth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]