This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Recent libstdc++ regressions


Okay, i isolated the problem (we are folding based on the wrong type
for constants, so we have a case where 1 << 63 becomes 0 instead of a
very large value).
Working on a patch now.


On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This is likely to have been my patch.
>>> I'm minimizing the check_construct_destroy failure right now.
>>> If someone could give me some idea of what is causing the execution
>>> failures while i do that, i may be able to fix them faster :)
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for fixing the check_construct_destroy problem.
>>
>> I would suggest concentrating next on the vector/bool failure, which is
>> about a standard feature, not an extension. Frankly, I don't have any
>> special advice, the testcase is pretty straightforward...
>
> Working on it now :)
>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]