This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Should we remove java from the default bootstrap languages?

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Cc: NightStrike <nightstrike at gmail dot com>, "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo at google dot com>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, "Andrew Haley" <aph at redhat dot com>, "Kaveh R. GHAZI" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>, "Tom Tromey" <tromey at redhat dot com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 22:05:15 +0200
Subject: Re: Should we remove java from the default bootstrap languages?
References: <485A66B5.9030406@google.com> <b798aad50806210845r6dd5a78bx973a45d929f218e@mail.gmail.com> <b609cb3b0806210907l509960e6je33692973a06539d@mail.gmail.com>

> How is that irrelevant?  If the argument is that libjava takes too
> long to build on modern hardware, and someone else has a different
> view of what is modern hardware where the original argument is
> invalid... what makes your view "correct" and HJ's view "incorrect"?

Quad cores are available for exactly 1 architecture (x86) at affordable 
prices, GCC is supposed to support more than just x86.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Should we remove java from the default bootstrap languages?
  - From: Laurent GUERBY

References:
- Should we remove java from the default bootstrap languages?
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: Should we remove java from the default bootstrap languages?
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: Should we remove java from the default bootstrap languages?
  - From: NightStrike

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]