This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Official GCC git repository

From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead dot org>
To: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
Cc: Tobias Grosser <tobi-grosser at web dot de>, Bernardo Innocenti <bernie at codewiz dot org>, GCC Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Harvey Harrison <harvey dot harrison at gmail dot com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:27:30 +0100
Subject: Re: Official GCC git repository
References: <47D7F8DA.8060703@codewiz.org> <1205410672.843.22.camel@tobilaptop> <4aca3dc20803130947q4a37f007oc4d4ed281a68526@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 12:47 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> We will never use git exclusively as long as it requires as many
> workflow changes for people as it currently does.  This is not me
> speaking for the gcc community, this is me telling it like it is based
> on experience moving us to svn.
> Even simple things, like having to do git diff -rHEAD instead of git
> diff to see added files, etc.
> Regardless of how fast it is, until the UI is something people don't
> have to think about to work with, it's not going to fly.

Surely you jest? Isn't GCC using something really weird at the moment
like Subversion? 

-- 
dwmw2

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Official GCC git repository
  - From: Daniel Berlin

References:
- Official GCC git repository
  - From: Bernardo Innocenti
- Re: Official GCC git repository
  - From: Tobias Grosser
- Re: Official GCC git repository
  - From: Daniel Berlin

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]