This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gcc 4.3.0 i386 default question

From: "Andrew Pinski" <pinskia at gmail dot com>
To: "Joel Sherrill" <joel dot sherrill at oarcorp dot com>
Cc: "Richard Guenther" <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, "GCC List" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:13:07 -0700
Subject: Re: gcc 4.3.0 i386 default question
References: <47D7F58E.2000602@oarcorp.com> <84fc9c000803120826y214e9150if3e0c6ca235fd988@mail.gmail.com> <47D80042.7050208@oarcorp.com>

On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 9:09 AM, Joel Sherrill
<joel.sherrill@oarcorp.com> wrote:

>
>   10022a:       f2 0f 10 c0             movsd  %xmm0,%xmm0
>
>  Is there any way to skip these tests for particular HW features
>  that are not present?  There are similar failures on the PowerPC
>  target I use for reporting because it doesn't have Altivec.
>
>  Thanks.  Sorry for the bogus question.

These testcases are trying to check at runtime you have SSE2 or VMX support but
it looks like you don't have signal support so they are failing.

-- Pinski

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gcc 4.3.0 i386 default question
  - From: H.J. Lu

References:
- gcc 4.3.0 i386 default question
  - From: Joel Sherrill
- Re: gcc 4.3.0 i386 default question
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: gcc 4.3.0 i386 default question
  - From: Joel Sherrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]