gcc archive
date index for March, 2008

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

March 31, 2008
23:39 Re: please add DFP to gcc-4.3/changes.html Ben Elliston
23:08 Re: please add DFP to gcc-4.3/changes.html Janis Johnson
22:42 gcc-4.1-20080331 is now available gccadmin
22:07 Re: GCC : how to add VFPU to PSP Allegrex (MIPS target) ? Jim Wilson
21:47 Re: please add DFP to gcc-4.3/changes.html Benjamin Kosnik
20:52 Re: genattrtab segfault on RH 7.3 (powerpc cross) Jim Wilson
20:49 Re: [linux-cirrus] Re: wot to do with the Maverick Crunch patches? Ben Elliston
20:40 Re: Implementing a restrictive addressing mode for a gcc port Jim Wilson
20:31 Re: [RFH] Uninitialized warning as error is disabled on the trunk Jim Wilson
20:07 Re: please add DFP to gcc-4.3/changes.html Janis Johnson
19:56 Re: [linux-cirrus] Re: wot to do with the Maverick Crunch patches? Martin Guy
19:21 Re: Thread starvation and resource saturation in atomicity functions? Ian Lance Taylor
19:04 Re: Thread starvation and resource saturation in atomicity functions? David Daney
18:51 Thread starvation and resource saturation in atomicity functions? Chad Attermann
18:27 Re: GSOC Student application Tom Tromey
16:35 Re: GCC 4.3.0 compilation error Jim Wilson
16:16 Re: gcc-4.3.0/ppc32 inline assembly produces bad code Till Straumann
16:02 Re: GSOC Student application Joe Buck
15:47 Re: gcc-4.3.0/ppc32 inline assembly produces bad code Andreas Schwab
15:47 Re: gcc-4.3.0/ppc32 inline assembly produces bad code Till Straumann
15:41 Re: gcc-4.3.0/ppc32 inline assembly produces bad code Till Straumann
14:45 Re: [linux-cirrus] Re: wot to do with the Maverick Crunch patches? Brian Austin
14:44 Re: [linux-cirrus] Re: wot to do with the Maverick Crunch patches? Andrew McKay
14:15 Re: GSOC Student application J.C. Pizarro
13:26 Re: gcc-4.3.0/ppc32 inline assembly produces bad code Andreas Schwab
13:17 Re: gcc-4.3.0/ppc32 inline assembly produces bad code Daniel Jacobowitz
13:07 Re: gcc-4.3.0/ppc32 inline assembly produces bad code Andreas Schwab
12:50 Re: gcc-4.3.0/ppc32 inline assembly produces bad code Daniel Jacobowitz
11:31 Re: wot to do with the Maverick Crunch patches? Joseph S. Myers
10:02 4.3.1 Status Report (2008-03-31) Richard Guenther
09:55 GCC 4.2.4 Status Report (2008-03-31) Richard Guenther
09:19 Re: gcc-4.3.0/ppc32 inline assembly produces bad code Andreas Schwab
08:12 Re: Subject gcc testsuite testcase gcc.c-torture/compile/20010327-1.c Kai Tietz
06:57 Re: [linux-cirrus] Re: wot to do with the Maverick Crunch patches? linux-cirrus
05:47 Re: wot to do with the Maverick Crunch patches? Hasjim Williams
05:39 Re: GSOC Student application Paolo Bonzini
05:13 Re: Subject gcc testsuite testcase gcc.c-torture/compile/20010327-1.c Andrew Pinski
04:42 Re: Question: How can I upload my work? Joe Buck

March 30, 2008
20:09 Re: GSOC Student application Alexey Salmin
18:46 Re: [linux-cirrus] Re: wot to do with the Maverick Crunch patches? Martin Guy
17:34 Re: GSoC ideas David Daney
17:12 Re: GCC extension proposal (loop unswitching) Andi Kleen
16:54 Re: [linux-cirrus] wot to do with the Maverick Crunch patches? Brian Austin
16:15 Re: GSOC Student application J.C. Pizarro
16:08 Re: GSoC ideas Robert Millan
15:45 Re: GSoC ideas Tom Tromey
14:28 GCC extension proposal (loop unswitching) Nils Pipenbrinck
12:46 wot to do with the Maverick Crunch patches? Martin Guy
10:46 Re: GSoC ideas Robert Millan
03:14 Re: GSOC Student application Ian Lance Taylor
02:53 GCC 4.3.0 compilation error Wirawan Purwanto
02:29 Re: GSoC ideas Ian Lance Taylor

March 29, 2008
21:44 [RFH] Uninitialized warning as error is disabled on the trunk Andrew Pinski
19:56 GSoC ideas Robert Millan
17:45 Re: [Ada] gnat.dg/socket[12].adb test duplicates? Laurent GUERBY
15:13 Re: Question: How can I upload my work? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
14:36 Question: How can I upload my work? zio
06:41 Implementing a restrictive addressing mode for a gcc port Mohamed Shafi
06:39 GSOC Student application Alexey Salmin
04:16 E-gold owner Douglas Jackson has been killed bran dharmara
00:59 Re: gcc for Linux/x86 vs. Solaris/x86 Andrew Pinski
00:54 Re: gcc for Linux/x86 vs. Solaris/x86 Denys Vlasenko
00:46 Re: gcc for Linux/x86 vs. Solaris/x86 Andrew Pinski
00:24 Re: gcc for Linux/x86 vs. Solaris/x86 Joe Buck
00:18 Re: gcc for Linux/x86 vs. Solaris/x86 Denys Vlasenko

March 28, 2008
23:57 gcc for Linux/x86 vs. Solaris/x86 Alexandra (Sasha) Fedorova
22:56 gcc-4.4-20080328 is now available gccadmin
22:13 Re: [Ada] no run-time compilation (was: Clean up No_Run_Time tests in exp_ch4.adb) Laurent GUERBY
22:11 Re: please add DFP to gcc-4.3/changes.html Benjamin Kosnik
21:30 Re: Combined gcc + binutils source tree doesn't bootstrap H.J. Lu
21:27 Re: Combined gcc + binutils source tree doesn't bootstrap Ralf Wildenhues
21:22 Combined gcc + binutils source tree doesn't bootstrap H.J. Lu
17:49 Re: [tuples] Tuples branch frozen =?big5?b?RG91ZyBLd2FuICjD9q62v
17:34 Re: [tuples] Tuples branch frozen Diego Novillo
17:31 Re: [tuples] Tuples branch frozen =?big5?b?RG91ZyBLd2FuICjD9q62v
16:52 Re: [tuples] Tuples branch frozen Diego Novillo
14:35 Re: [tuples] Tuples branch frozen Diego Novillo
14:18 Subject gcc testsuite testcase gcc.c-torture/compile/20010327-1.c Kai Tietz
13:33 Re: [tuples] Tuples branch frozen Rafael Espindola
13:09 Re: [tuples] Tuples branch frozen Aldy Hernandez
12:48 [tuples] Tuples branch frozen Diego Novillo
08:43 Re: Un-deprecating CRX: Request to review and commit Pompapathi V Gadad
03:12 Successful native mingw build gcc 4.3.0 Jonathan Blanchard
00:35 Re: gimple Diego Novillo
00:32 Re: please add DFP to gcc-4.3/changes.html Janis Johnson
00:13 please add DFP to gcc-4.3/changes.html Benjamin Kosnik

March 27, 2008
23:55 gimple Dasarath Weeratunge
22:44 gcc-4.3-20080327 is now available gccadmin
17:36 Re: RFH: testers for ieee test Joern Rennecke
15:32 Re: SSA Vs unSSA Diego Novillo
15:28 Re: RFH: testers for ieee test Geert Bosch
14:36 Re: RFH: testers for ieee test Derek M Jones
14:32 gcc participation in C standards process Hallvard B Furuseth
13:18 Re: larger default page sizes... J.C. Pizarro
11:29 Re: Official GCC git repository Samuel Tardieu
10:00 Re: gcc-4.3.0/ppc32 inline assembly produces bad code Andreas Schwab
08:39 Re: Official GCC git repository Andreas Schwab
06:17 Re: Official GCC git repository Paolo Bonzini
04:13 Re: Official GCC git repository Harvey Harrison
04:03 Re: Official GCC git repository Daniel Berlin
03:12 Re: Official GCC git repository Harvey Harrison
03:11 Re: Official GCC git repository Harvey Harrison
02:58 Re: Official GCC git repository Daniel Berlin
02:57 Re: Official GCC git repository Daniel Berlin
02:15 Re: Official GCC git repository Harvey Harrison
02:12 Re: Official GCC git repository Harvey Harrison
02:05 Re: Official GCC git repository Daniel Berlin
02:04 Re: Official GCC git repository Daniel Berlin
01:58 RFH: testers for ieee test Joern Rennecke
00:35 Re: Official GCC git repository Harvey Harrison
00:15 Re: Official GCC git repository Harvey Harrison
00:02 Re: Official GCC git repository Daniel Berlin

March 26, 2008
23:29 Re: valgrind "uninitialized value" for __cxa_begin_catch? (Only if -static) Joe Buck
22:46 gcc-4.2-20080326 is now available gccadmin
22:29 Re: GCC 4.3 license in manual still under GPLv2 Mark Mitchell
22:20 Re: GCC 4.3 license in manual still under GPLv2 Richard Guenther
22:17 Re: GCC 4.3 license in manual still under GPLv2 Mark Mitchell
21:16 Re: GCC 4.3 license in manual still under GPLv2 Joseph S. Myers
20:06 Re: GCC 4.3 license in manual still under GPLv2 Mark Mitchell
19:55 Re: SSA Vs unSSA Richard Guenther
19:43 Re: Official GCC git repository Bernardo Innocenti
19:38 Re: gcc-4.3.0/ppc32 inline assembly produces bad code Till Straumann
18:39 Re: Official GCC git repository Daniel Berlin
18:37 Re: SSA Vs unSSA Andrew Haley
18:07 SSA Vs unSSA Fran Baena
17:54 Re: Official GCC git repository Aaron Gray
17:41 The Latest band
17:40 The Latest band
17:13 Re: Official GCC git repository Aaron Gray
17:07 Re: gcc-4.3.0/ppc32 inline assembly produces bad code Andreas Schwab
17:04 Re: parallel bootstrap failure: options.h Tom Tromey
17:00 parallel bootstrap failure: options.h Janis Johnson
16:41 Re: gcc-4.3.0/ppc32 inline assembly produces bad code Daniel Jacobowitz
16:32 Re: Official GCC git repository Frank Ch. Eigler
16:26 gcc-4.3.0/ppc32 inline assembly produces bad code Till Straumann
01:16 Re: larger default page sizes... J.C. Pizarro

March 25, 2008
22:40 Re: Draft SH uClinux FDPIC ABI Joseph S. Myers
22:03 Re: [trunk] Addition to subreg section of rtl.text. Jeff Law
21:43 Re: MAINTAINERS update (was: [wwwdocs] java/projects.html -- remove broken link) Joseph S. Myers
17:18 Re: ABI64 and register save area H.J. Lu
15:58 valgrind "uninitialized value" for __cxa_begin_catch? (Only if -static) Benjamin Redelings
14:56 Re: XDELETEVEC Richard Guenther
14:28 Re: subreg question Paul Brook
14:19 subreg question Jan Hoogerbrugge
13:05 XDELETEVEC Alexey Salmin
11:40 ABI64 and register save area Matteo Emanuele
04:46 Un-deprecating CRX: Request to review and commit Pompapathi V Gadad
00:30 Re: How should _Decimal64 and _Decimal128 be aligned on stack? H.J. Lu
00:07 Re: Regenerating configure scripts Michael Eager
00:05 Company Offer Micheal kun tang
00:04 Re: Regenerating configure scripts Michael Eager
00:03 Company Offer Micheal kun tang

March 24, 2008
23:41 Re: Regenerating configure scripts Brian Dessent
23:34 Re: Regenerating configure scripts Peter O'Gorman
23:00 Re: Regenerating configure scripts Michael Eager
22:43 gcc-4.1-20080324 is now available gccadmin
20:00 Re: Regenerating configure scripts Ralf Wildenhues
19:59 Re: Regenerating configure scripts H.J. Lu
19:58 Re: [PATCH] linux/fs.h - Convert debug functions declared inline __attribute__((format (printf,x,y) to statement expression macros Joe Perches
19:53 Re: Regenerating configure scripts Michael Eager
19:40 Re: Regenerating configure scripts Paolo Carlini
19:23 Re: Regenerating configure scripts Michael Eager
18:34 GCC : how to add VFPU to PSP Allegrex (MIPS target) ? Christophe Avoinne
18:11 Re: Regenerating configure scripts Ralf Wildenhues
18:09 Re: Regenerating configure scripts Richard Guenther
18:05 Regenerating configure scripts Michael Eager
16:25 Re: GSoC - Multithreaded linker Joe Buck
15:19 GSoC - Multithreaded linker danielpv
15:10 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/ needs a bit of help Benjamin Kosnik
14:46 Re: How to understand gcc source code? David Daney
14:07 Re: [trunk] Addition to subreg section of rtl.text. Paolo Bonzini
14:01 Re: How to understand gcc source code? NightStrike
13:47 Re: [trunk] Addition to subreg section of rtl.text. Kenneth Zadeck
13:39 Re: [trunk] Addition to subreg section of rtl.text. Richard Sandiford
13:25 Re: [trunk] Addition to subreg section of rtl.text. Richard Sandiford
12:50 RE: Basic block infrastructure after dbr pass Tomer Benyamini

March 23, 2008
23:12 Re: Problems with builtin setjmp receiver getting eliminated - Help David Daney
20:59 Re: Problems with builtin setjmp receiver getting eliminated - Help Andrew Hutchinson
19:38 Problems with builtin setjmp receiver getting eliminated - Help Andrew Hutchinson
19:21 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/ needs a bit of help Paolo Carlini
19:07 [wwwdocs] Re: GCC 4.2.4 Status Report (2008-03-15) Gerald Pfeifer
18:50 Re: How to understand gcc source code? Abhijat Vichare
17:33 Re: ARM/Thumb function attribute Daniel Jacobowitz
17:23 Re: ARM/Thumb function attribute Paul Brook
17:19 Re: ARM/Thumb function attribute Albert Cahalan
16:22 http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/ needs a bit of help Gerald Pfeifer
15:24 Re: [PATCH] linux/fs.h - Convert debug functions declared inline __attribute__((format (printf,x,y) to statement expression macros Denys Vlasenko
15:09 Re: How should _Decimal64 and _Decimal128 be aligned on stack? H.J. Lu
12:41 Re: How should _Decimal64 and _Decimal128 be aligned on stack? Ben Elliston
10:08 genattrtab segfault on RH 7.3 (powerpc cross) Sergei Poselenov
03:53 Re: How to understand gcc source code? Tim Prince
01:12 Re: MAINTAINERS update (was: [wwwdocs] java/projects.html -- remove broken link) Ben Elliston
00:24 Re: ARM/Thumb function attribute Paul Brook
00:11 ARM/Thumb function attribute Albert Cahalan

March 22, 2008
22:46 [wwwdocs] Re: GCC 4.4 schedule Gerald Pfeifer
21:16 [wwwdocs] Re: GCC 4.3.1 Status Report (2008-03-15) Gerald Pfeifer
21:16 Re: How to understand gcc source code? Robert Dewar
20:32 Re: How to understand gcc source code? Aaron Gray
20:06 Re: How to understand gcc source code? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
20:02 Re: How to understand gcc source code? Aaron Gray
19:58 Re: How to understand gcc source code? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
19:47 Re: How to understand gcc source code? Andrew Pinski
19:16 Re: How to understand gcc source code? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
18:40 Re: How to understand gcc source code? Richard Guenther
18:18 Re: How to understand gcc source code? Denys Vlasenko
18:05 MAINTAINERS update (was: [wwwdocs] java/projects.html -- remove broken link) Gerald Pfeifer
14:22 Re: How to understand gcc source code? Manuel López-Ibáñez
10:14 Re: How to understand gcc source code? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
10:08 [tuples] libgfortran building is broken Andrew Pinski
09:00 How to understand gcc source code? 梁?
04:00 Re: How should _Decimal64 and _Decimal128 be aligned on stack? H.J. Lu
01:02 Re: Is vec_init<mode> allowed to FAIL? Jim Wilson
00:37 Re: How should _Decimal64 and _Decimal128 be aligned on stack? Andrew Pinski
00:29 How should _Decimal64 and _Decimal128 be aligned on stack? H.J.

March 21, 2008
22:54 gcc-4.4-20080321 is now available gccadmin
18:23 Re: What licence(s) does GNAT and the runtime fall under now? Luke A. Guest
18:20 Re: What licence(s) does GNAT and the runtime fall under now? Robert Dewar
17:22 What licence(s) does GNAT and the runtime fall under now? Luke A. Guest
15:13 Re: Different *CFLAGS in gcc/Makefile.in Paolo Bonzini
12:33 Re: executable stack in gcc shared libs? Andrew Haley
12:26 Re: executable stack in gcc shared libs? pluto
12:09 Re: executable stack in gcc shared libs? Andrew Haley
11:56 Re: executable stack in gcc shared libs? pluto
11:25 Re: executable stack in gcc shared libs? Andrew Haley
01:46 Re: Have proposals for 2008 gcc summit been reviewed? Ben Elliston

March 20, 2008
23:34 Re: [trunk] Addition to subreg section of rtl.text. Joseph S. Myers
22:48 gcc-4.3-20080320 is now available gccadmin
22:00 Re: [trunk] Addition to subreg section of rtl.text. Bernd Schmidt
21:49 Re: [trunk] Addition to subreg section of rtl.text. Joseph S. Myers
21:28 Re: [trunk] Addition to subreg section of rtl.text. Bernd Schmidt
21:15 Re: Lexer/cpplib improvements Ian Lance Taylor
20:18 executable stack in gcc shared libs? PaweÅ Sikora
20:13 Re: GCC 4.3.0-20080228 (powerpc-linux-gnuspe) ICE on 20000718.c test Nathan Froyd
19:21 RE: A proposal to align GCC stack Ye, Joey
17:30 Re: [trunk] Addition to subreg section of rtl.text. Richard Sandiford
16:15 Re: [trunk] Addition to subreg section of rtl.text. Paolo Bonzini
16:01 Re: [trunk] Addition to subreg section of rtl.text. Bernd Schmidt
15:42 Re: Unaligned attribute pluto
15:39 Re: Unaligned attribute Daniel Jacobowitz
15:28 Exception handling on AIX5.3 with gcc 3.4.6 Shlom Marom
15:28 Unaligned attribute Jan Hoogerbrugge
15:26 Is vec_init<mode> allowed to FAIL? Jan Hoogerbrugge
15:11 Re: Obvious problem with Ada front-end patches handling Samuel Tardieu
15:11 Re: Have proposals for 2008 gcc summit been reviewed? Benjamin Kosnik
15:03 Have proposals for 2008 gcc summit been reviewed? H.J. Lu
14:56 Lexer/cpplib improvements Alexey Salmin
14:55 Re: Obvious problem with Ada front-end patches handling Arnaud Charlet
14:45 Re: Obvious problem with Ada front-end patches handling Samuel Tardieu
13:40 Re: Obvious problem with Ada front-end patches handling Arnaud Charlet
13:38 Re: [trunk] Addition to subreg section of rtl.text. Joern Rennecke
13:29 Re: Obvious problem with Ada front-end patches handling Arnaud Charlet
13:07 Re: Obvious problem with Ada front-end patches handling Joel Sherrill
12:00 Re: Obvious problem with Ada front-end patches handling Arnaud Charlet
11:49 Obvious problem with Ada front-end patches handling Samuel Tardieu
11:13 Re: [trunk] Addition to subreg section of rtl.text. Richard Kenner
11:04 Re: [trunk] Addition to subreg section of rtl.text. Paolo Bonzini
11:02 Re: [trunk] Addition to subreg section of rtl.text. Paolo Bonzini
10:43 Re: [trunk] Addition to subreg section of rtl.text. Richard Sandiford
10:40 Re: [trunk] Addition to subreg section of rtl.text. Richard Sandiford
07:47 Re: [trunk] Addition to subreg section of rtl.text. Paolo Bonzini
07:09 Re: C++ FE question: When is CLASSTYPE_VBASECLASSES valid? =?big5?b?RG91ZyBLd2FuICjD9q62v
06:27 Re: Basic block infrastructure after dbr pass Jim Wilson
06:10 Re: Different *CFLAGS in gcc/Makefile.in Jim Wilson
02:01 Re: C++ FE question: When is CLASSTYPE_VBASECLASSES valid? Mark Mitchell
01:27 Re: [trunk] Addition to subreg section of rtl.text. Joern Rennecke
01:26 Come join me on ssbbw4u... P Alb

March 19, 2008
23:01 Re: [trunk] Addition to subreg section of rtl.text. Richard Sandiford
22:57 Re: [trunk] Addition to subreg section of rtl.text. Richard Sandiford
22:42 gcc-4.2-20080319 is now available gccadmin
21:45 Re: [trunk] Addition to subreg section of rtl.text. Joern Rennecke
21:04 Re: GCC 4.3 license in manual still under GPLv2 Joseph S. Myers
20:35 Re: Different *CFLAGS in gcc/Makefile.in Basile STARYNKEVITCH
18:32 Re: Different *CFLAGS in gcc/Makefile.in Ralf Wildenhues
17:06 push_secondary_reload: give me a break... Joern Rennecke
16:05 GCC 4.3 license in manual still under GPLv2 qunying
15:31 Re: GNU linker ld Nick Clifton
15:05 Re: gcj broken on darwin Andrew Haley
14:59 Re: gcj broken on darwin David Daney
14:39 GNU linker ld Duncan Purll
14:18 Re: gcj broken on darwin Jack Howarth
14:00 Re: Basic block infrastructure after dbr pass Boris Boesler
13:57 Re: gcj broken on darwin Matthias Klose
13:50 Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available NightStrike
13:24 Re: C++0x rvalue references get clobbered somehow Doug Gregor
13:04 Re: gcj broken on darwin Andrew Haley
12:09 Re: [trunk] Addition to subreg section of rtl.text. Kenneth Zadeck
08:56 Re: va_list bug? Kai Tietz
08:40 Re: Regression with ltrans-7.f90 FX Coudert
08:25 C++0x rvalue references get clobbered somehow Lukas Mai
07:16 Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available Kaveh R. Ghazi
06:50 Re: 4.3.0 manual vs changes.html Ira Rosen
04:03 4.3.0 manual vs changes.html Bradley Lucier
03:59 gcj broken on darwin Jack Howarth
03:43 Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available Bruce Korb
01:40 Re: va_list bug? Andrew Pinski
00:58 va_list bug? Peter A. Felvegi

March 18, 2008
23:37 Re: hc11/12 port extension to s12x James Murray
23:23 Re: hc11/12 port extension to s12x David Daney
23:03 hc11/12 port extension to s12x James Murray
21:41 Re: [trunk] Addition to subreg section of rtl.text. Richard Sandiford
20:07 Different *CFLAGS in gcc/Makefile.in Basile STARYNKEVITCH
17:47 Re: Basic block infrastructure after dbr pass Richard Guenther
17:41 Re: Basic block infrastructure after dbr pass Boris Boesler
16:58 Re: Basic block infrastructure after dbr pass Ian Lance Taylor
16:22 Re: Basic block infrastructure after dbr pass Bernd Schmidt
16:15 Gcc support for Intel AVX H.J. Lu
15:22 Re: Basic block infrastructure after dbr pass Jim Wilson
15:21 Re: Basic block infrastructure after dbr pass Ian Lance Taylor
14:52 Re: Google Summer of Code 2008 mentors Ian Lance Taylor
14:43 Re: Google Summer of Code 2008 mentors David Daney
14:26 Re: Google Summer of Code 2008 mentors Ian Lance Taylor
12:57 Re: Google Summer of Code 2008 mentors Manuel López-Ibáñez
12:16 Re: Auto-vectorization: need to know what to expect Ira Rosen
12:15 Re: Auto-vectorization: need to know what to expect Ira Rosen
10:08 Re: Basic block infrastructure after dbr pass Boris Boesler
09:49 Re: Google Summer of Code 2008 mentors NightStrike
09:29 Re: why don't have 'umul' rtx code Paolo Bonzini
09:19 why don't have 'umul' rtx code Eric Fisher
02:29 Re: Status of Mercurial mirror Daniel Berlin
02:28 Re: Status of Mercurial mirror Daniel Berlin

March 17, 2008
23:55 Re: cc1plus-dummy linkage Joe Buck
23:48 cc1plus-dummy linkage Jack Howarth
22:46 gcc-4.1-20080317 is now available gccadmin
22:10 Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available Bruce Korb
21:52 Google Summer of Code 2008 mentors Ian Lance Taylor
21:49 Status of Mercurial mirror Tobias Schlüter
21:29 Re: Auto-vectorization: need to know what to expect Benoît Jacob
21:08 Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available Mark Mitchell
20:02 Re: Auto-vectorization: need to know what to expect Michael Meissner
19:49 Re: [trunk] Addition to subreg section of rtl.text. Joern Rennecke
19:31 Re: bootstrap failure on powerpc-linux Ben Elliston
19:03 Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available Daniel Jacobowitz
18:59 Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available Richard Kenner
18:54 Re: [trunk] Addition to subreg section of rtl.text. Richard Kenner
18:42 Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available Kaveh R. GHAZI
18:36 Re: [trunk] Addition to subreg section of rtl.text. Richard Sandiford
17:55 Re: Auto-vectorization: need to know what to expect Benoît Jacob
17:52 Re: Auto-vectorization: need to know what to expect Daniel Jacobowitz
17:39 Re: DFA state and arc explosion Jim Wilson
17:34 Re: xscale-elf-gcc: compilation of header file requested Jim Wilson
17:33 Re: Auto-vectorization: need to know what to expect Benoît Jacob
16:45 Re: Basic block infrastructure after dbr pass Jim Wilson
16:39 Re: insn appears multiple times Jim Wilson
16:20 Re: -B vs Multilib Jim Wilson
16:18 Re: Auto-vectorization: need to know what to expect Benoît Jacob
15:07 Re: Auto-vectorization: need to know what to expect H.J. Lu
14:59 Re: Auto-vectorization: need to know what to expect Richard Guenther
14:47 Auto-vectorization: need to know what to expect Benoît Jacob
12:55 RE: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available Dave Korn
12:20 RE: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available Dave Korn
11:52 Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available Jakub Jelinek
11:37 Re: Been Looking how gcc operates there is a major weaknesses in its optimiser. Peter Dolding
11:28 Basic block infrastructure after dbr pass Boris Boesler
11:16 insn appears multiple times Boris Boesler
10:28 Re: An error occured when building gcc4.3.0 Ben Elliston
10:28 Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available Richard Guenther
10:27 RE: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available Dave Korn
10:23 An error occured when building gcc4.3.0 pengliang
09:34 Re: Been Looking how gcc operates there is a major weaknesses in its optimiser. Andrew Haley
08:08 Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available Mark Mitchell
08:06 Re: bootstrap failure on powerpc-linux Andrew Pinski
07:58 bootstrap failure on powerpc-linux Ben Elliston
02:39 Re: -B vs Multilib Greg Schafer
00:56 Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available Gerald Pfeifer
00:17 Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available Kaveh R. GHAZI

March 16, 2008
22:27 Re: Been Looking how gcc operates there is a major weaknesses in its optimiser. Peter Dolding
18:32 Re: Been Looking how gcc operates there is a major weaknesses in its optimiser. Ian Lance Taylor
17:05 Re: [trunk] Addition to subreg section of rtl.text. Richard Kenner
17:04 Forward propagation before register allocation Andy H
16:28 Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available Brian Dessent
15:46 Re: [trunk] Addition to subreg section of rtl.text. Kenneth Zadeck
15:36 Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available NightStrike
15:07 xscale-elf-gcc: compilation of header file requested Ajit Mittal
14:15 Re: [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Mark Mitchell
14:15 Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available Mark Mitchell
13:32 Been Looking how gcc operates there is a major weaknesses in its optimiser. Peter Dolding
10:53 Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available Richard Guenther
10:36 Re: libtool for shared objects? Ralf Wildenhues
09:38 Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available NightStrike
09:37 Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available NightStrike
08:58 Re: [PATCH][RFC] Statistics "infrastructure" Richard Guenther
08:34 Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available Eric Botcazou
03:15 Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available Kaveh R. GHAZI
02:55 Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available Kaveh R. GHAZI
02:24 Re: [PATCH][RFC] Statistics "infrastructure" Zdenek Dvorak
02:07 Re: Official GCC git repository Angela Marie Thomas

March 15, 2008
23:50 Re: [PATCH][RFC] Statistics "infrastructure" Richard Guenther
23:44 Re: Official GCC git repository Florian Weimer
23:05 Re: [PATCH][RFC] Statistics "infrastructure" Zdenek Dvorak
22:57 Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available Robert Dewar
22:51 Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available Kaveh Ghazi
18:15 [PATCH][RFC] Statistics "infrastructure" Richard Guenther
15:29 Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available Eric Botcazou
14:21 Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available Richard Guenther
12:13 Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available Eric Botcazou
12:11 Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available Eric Botcazou
12:10 Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available Joseph S. Myers
12:01 Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available Richard Guenther
12:01 Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available Richard Guenther
11:42 Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available NightStrike
04:10 Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available Kaveh R. GHAZI
03:47 Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available Gabriel Dos Reis
02:15 successful build Christian Schüler
02:00 Re: Official GCC git repository Nicholas Nethercote
01:22 GCC 4.2.4 Status Report (2008-03-15) Joseph S. Myers
01:15 Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available Joe Buck
01:07 Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available Joe Buck
01:05 GCC 4.3.1 Status Report (2008-03-15) Joseph S. Myers
00:31 Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available Ian Lance Taylor

March 14, 2008
22:58 Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available Gabriel Dos Reis
22:47 gcc-4.4-20080314 is now available gccadmin
22:47 Re: [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Gabriel Dos Reis
22:43 Re: [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Gabriel Dos Reis
22:40 Re: [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Gabriel Dos Reis
22:38 Re: [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Gabriel Dos Reis
22:36 Re: [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Gabriel Dos Reis
22:34 Re: [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Gabriel Dos Reis
20:59 Re: Official GCC git repository Ollie Wild
20:45 Re: Official GCC git repository Stephen R. van den Berg
19:21 The Linux binutils 2.18.50.0.5 is released H.J. Lu
18:04 Re: dg-skip-if was Re: gcc 4.3.0 i386 default question Joseph S. Myers
17:55 Re: dg-skip-if was Re: gcc 4.3.0 i386 default question Janis Johnson
17:22 Re: dg-skip-if was Re: gcc 4.3.0 i386 default question Janis Johnson
15:22 Re: dg-skip-if was Re: gcc 4.3.0 i386 default question Joseph S. Myers
15:18 Re: dg-skip-if was Re: gcc 4.3.0 i386 default question Joel Sherrill
15:17 Re: Test Harness and SPARC VIS Instructions Uros Bizjak
14:47 Re: dg-skip-if was Re: gcc 4.3.0 i386 default question Paul Brook
14:45 Re: Test Harness and SPARC VIS Instructions Joel Sherrill
14:43 Re: Official GCC git repository Frank Ch. Eigler
14:38 Re: [Ada] GNAT BUG Assert_Failure uintp.adb:1593 Andreas Schwab
14:30 [Ada] GNAT BUG Assert_Failure uintp.adb:1593 Christian Joensson
14:06 Re: Official GCC git repository Frank Ch. Eigler
13:52 Re: Official GCC git repository Paolo Bonzini
13:47 Re: Official GCC git repository Daniel Berlin
13:44 Re: Official GCC git repository Daniel Berlin
12:24 Re: vectorizer default in 4.3.0 changes document missing Gerald Pfeifer
11:59 Re: update_path in gcc/prefix.h? Daniel Jacobowitz
11:28 RE: DFA state and arc explosion Bingfeng Mei
10:38 Re: Official GCC git repository Paolo Bonzini
10:35 Re: Official GCC git repository Paolo Bonzini
10:31 DFA state and arc explosion Bingfeng Mei
10:14 Re: Official GCC git repository Andrew Haley
09:13 Re: update_path in gcc/prefix.h? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
07:52 Re: Official GCC git repository Bernardo Innocenti
07:20 Re: Official GCC git repository Bernardo Innocenti
01:33 Re: Official GCC git repository Harvey Harrison
01:23 Re: Official GCC git repository Harvey Harrison
00:44 Re: dg-skip-if was Re: gcc 4.3.0 i386 default question Joseph S. Myers
00:18 Re: [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Chris Lattner

March 13, 2008
23:58 Re: [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Manuel López-Ibáñez
23:38 Re: [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Ian Lance Taylor
23:37 Re: [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Manuel López-Ibáñez
23:10 Re: Official GCC git repository Angela Marie Thomas
22:49 Re: Official GCC git repository Bernardo Innocenti
22:47 Re: Official GCC git repository Ben Elliston
22:45 gcc-4.3-20080313 is now available gccadmin
22:04 Re: [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Joe Buck
21:59 Re: Could someone please check if FSF received papers for Intel engineers? Daniel Jacobowitz
21:57 Re: [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Ian Lance Taylor
21:55 Re: Could someone please check if FSF received papers for Intel engineers? J.C. Pizarro
21:46 Re: Could someone please check if FSF received papers for Intel engineers? Andrew Pinski
21:39 Re: [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Chris Lattner
21:39 Re: Could someone please check if FSF received papers for Intel engineers? J.C. Pizarro
20:59 Re: Official GCC git repository David Woodhouse
20:41 Re: Could someone please check if FSF received papers for Intel engineers? Daniel Berlin
20:19 Re: [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Manuel López-Ibáñez
20:14 Re: Test Harness and SPARC VIS Instructions Uros Bizjak
20:06 Re: Test Harness and SPARC VIS Instructions Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)
19:46 Re: testsuite run-time test for sse2 support Joel Sherrill
19:45 dg-skip-if was Re: gcc 4.3.0 i386 default question Joel Sherrill
19:32 Re: Test Harness and SPARC VIS Instructions Joel Sherrill
19:15 Re: Could someone please check if FSF received papers for Intel engineers? J.C. Pizarro
19:03 Re: Could someone please check if FSF received papers for Intel engineers? Joe Buck
19:03 Re: testsuite run-time test for sse2 support Uros Bizjak
19:02 Re: Official GCC git repository Ralf Wildenhues
19:01 Re: Test Harness and SPARC VIS Instructions Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)
19:01 Re: Test Harness and SPARC VIS Instructions Uros Bizjak
19:00 Re: Official GCC git repository Joe Buck
18:58 Re: Test Harness and SPARC VIS Instructions Joel Sherrill
18:54 Re: Test Harness and SPARC VIS Instructions Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)
18:49 Re: Official GCC git repository Daniel Berlin
18:46 Re: Official GCC git repository Daniel Berlin
18:44 Re: Official GCC git repository Daniel Berlin
18:44 Re: Could someone please check if FSF received papers for Intel engineers? J.C. Pizarro
18:38 Re: [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Ian Lance Taylor
18:32 Test Harness and SPARC VIS Instructions Joel Sherrill
18:28 Re: Official GCC git repository Joe Buck
18:16 Re: Official GCC git repository Manuel López-Ibáñez
18:08 Re: Official GCC git repository Harvey Harrison
18:05 Re: Official GCC git repository Andrew Haley
18:02 Re: Official GCC git repository Paul Koning
18:01 Re: Official GCC git repository Bernardo Innocenti
17:55 Re: Official GCC git repository David Woodhouse
17:55 Re: testsuite run-time test for sse2 support Joel Sherrill
17:36 Re: Official GCC git repository Daniel Berlin
17:28 Re: Official GCC git repository David Woodhouse
17:22 Re: [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Tom Tromey
17:11 Re: [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Tom Tromey
16:48 Re: Official GCC git repository Daniel Berlin
15:49 Re: GCC 4.3 - Error: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Hans Kester
15:45 Re: RFC: adding knowledge of the int_fastN_t types to the compiler Joseph S. Myers
15:40 Re: RFC: adding knowledge of the int_fastN_t types to the compiler Joseph S. Myers
15:08 Re: testsuite run-time test for sse2 support Uros Bizjak
14:40 Re: testsuite run-time test for sse2 support Joel Sherrill
14:26 Re: testsuite run-time test for sse2 support Uros Bizjak
13:45 Re: Could someone please check if FSF received papers for Intel engineers? David Edelsohn
13:40 Could someone please check if FSF received papers for Intel engineers? H.J. Lu
12:18 Re: Official GCC git repository Tobias Grosser
08:23 Re: RFC: adding knowledge of the int_fastN_t types to the compiler FX Coudert
08:17 Re: RFC: adding knowledge of the int_fastN_t types to the compiler FX Coudert
07:00 Re: [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Chris Lattner
06:21 Re: [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Manuel López-Ibáñez
06:10 RE: [PATCH] Fix bug on soft emulation of float point in gcc/longlong.c Liu Yu
05:45 Re: [PATCH] Fix bug on soft emulation of float point in gcc/longlong.c Ian Lance Taylor
05:32 Re: [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Chris Lattner
05:15 Re: [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Ian Lance Taylor
04:49 [PATCH] Fix bug on soft emulation of float point in gcc/longlong.c Liu Yu
04:49 Re: [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Manuel López-Ibáñez
04:00 Re: [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Chris Lattner
03:00 Re: [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Manuel López-Ibáñez
02:00 Re: [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Ian Lance Taylor
00:30 Re: [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Manuel López-Ibáñez
00:20 Re: [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Manuel López-Ibáñez
00:08 Re: [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Manuel López-Ibáñez
00:05 Re: [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Manuel López-Ibáñez
00:01 Re: [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Manuel López-Ibáñez

March 12, 2008
22:43 gcc-4.2-20080312 is now available gccadmin
22:25 Re: Possible GCC 4.3 driver regression caused by your patch Mark Mitchell
20:16 Re: gcc 4.3.0 i386 default question Joel Sherrill
20:11 Re: gcc 4.3.0 i386 default question Joel Sherrill
19:58 Re: gcc 4.3.0 i386 default question Joel Sherrill
19:48 Re: gcc 4.3.0 i386 default question Joseph S. Myers
19:25 Re: gcc 4.3.0 i386 default question Jan Hubicka
19:23 Re: gcc 4.3.0 i386 default question David Edelsohn
19:16 Re: gcc 4.3.0 i386 default question Joel Sherrill
18:59 New wiki page for openmp and parallelization Diego Novillo
18:25 Re: RFC: adding knowledge of the int_fastN_t types to the compiler Joseph S. Myers
18:24 Re: gcc 4.3.0 i386 default question David Edelsohn
18:20 Re: gcc 4.3.0 i386 default question Paul Brook
18:20 Re: RFC: adding knowledge of the int_fastN_t types to the compiler Joseph S. Myers
18:18 Re: gcc 4.3.0 i386 default question Joel Sherrill
18:08 Re: RFC: adding knowledge of the int_fastN_t types to the compiler Ian Lance Taylor
18:08 Re: libtool for shared objects? Alexandre Oliva
18:07 Re: gcc 4.3.0 i386 default question David Edelsohn
17:57 Re: gcc 4.3.0 i386 default question Joel Sherrill
17:41 Re: gcc 4.3.0 i386 default question Paul Brook
17:29 Re: Official GCC git repository Samuel Tardieu
17:28 Re: gcc 4.3.0 i386 default question Joel Sherrill
17:03 Re: gcc 4.3.0 i386 default question H.J. Lu
17:02 Re: update_path in gcc/prefix.h? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
16:13 Re: gcc 4.3.0 i386 default question Andrew Pinski
16:10 Re: gcc 4.3.0 i386 default question Joel Sherrill
15:55 RFC: adding knowledge of the int_fastN_t types to the compiler FX Coudert
15:53 Re: update_path in gcc/prefix.h? Daniel Jacobowitz
15:38 Official GCC git repository Bernardo Innocenti
15:38 Re: gcc 4.3.0 i386 default question Jan Hubicka
15:26 Re: gcc 4.3.0 i386 default question Richard Guenther
15:24 gcc 4.3.0 i386 default question Joel Sherrill
15:08 Re: API for callgraph and IPA passes for whole program optimization Diego Novillo
15:07 update_path in gcc/prefix.h? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
13:11 Re: libtool for shared objects? Andreas Schwab
12:57 Re: libtool for shared objects? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
12:19 Re: Fwd: Porting gcc to a new architecture Samuel Tardieu
11:45 -B vs Multilib Greg Schafer
11:19 Re: API for callgraph and IPA passes for whole program optimization Jan Hubicka
10:08 Re: libtool for shared objects? Andreas Schwab
09:48 Re: New picoChip port and maintainers Hariharan
08:37 [PATCH] Fix bug on soft emulation of float point in gcc/longlong.c Liu Yu
07:55 Re: RTL definition Abhijat Vichare
07:43 Re: libtool for shared objects? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
07:06 Re: libtool for shared objects? Alexandre Oliva
06:58 Re: libtool for shared objects? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
06:15 Re: libtool for shared objects? Roberto Bagnara
06:11 Re: RTL definition Ben Elliston
06:02 Re: Porting gcc Ben Elliston
05:56 Porting gcc Schmave
05:47 Fwd: Porting gcc to a new architecture Schmave
02:54 Re: API for callgraph and IPA passes for whole program optimization Diego Novillo

March 11, 2008
23:19 gcc 4.2.3 : make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2 Dennis Clarke
21:24 Re: minor mistake in http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/changes.html = SSSE3 --> SSE3 Andrew Pinski
21:21 minor mistake in http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/changes.html = SSSE3 --> SSE3 Oliver Hessling
21:10 Re: libtool for shared objects? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
21:02 Re: libtool for shared objects? Andreas Schwab
20:54 Re: libtool for shared objects? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
20:43 Re: libtool for shared objects? Ralf Wildenhues
20:43 Re: libtool for shared objects? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
20:19 libtool for shared objects? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
20:15 Re: howto run cross testings with help of translators Ben Elliston
19:11 aneurin chandras hammond griswold gad gurjot
16:52 Re: The effects of closed loop SSA and Scalar Evolution Const Prop. Daniel Berlin
15:10 Re: [tuples] gimple_assign_subcode for GIMPLE_SINGLE_RHS Diego Novillo
15:03 Re: [tuples] gimple_assign_subcode for GIMPLE_SINGLE_RHS Zdenek Dvorak
14:53 Re: [tuples] gimple_assign_subcode for GIMPLE_SINGLE_RHS Diego Novillo
14:41 Re: The effects of closed loop SSA and Scalar Evolution Const Prop. Zdenek Dvorak
13:55 Re: RTL definition Ian Lance Taylor
13:23 Re: GCC 4.3 - Error: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Brian Dessent
13:13 Adding new section attribute Mohamed Shafi
12:38 The effects of closed loop SSA and Scalar Evolution Const Prop. Pranav Bhandarkar
12:33 howto run cross testings with help of translators Lijuan Hai
10:47 Re: RTL definition Fran Baena
09:44 GCC 4.3 - Error: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Hans Kester
07:10 Re: CRX and CR16 port maintainer Pompapathi V Gadad
06:43 Re: vectorizer default in 4.3.0 changes document missing Ira Rosen
01:48 Re: Possible GCC 4.3 driver regression caused by your patch Greg Schafer

March 10, 2008
22:42 gcc-4.1-20080310 is now available gccadmin
21:41 Re: GNAT on SVN Trunk Eric Botcazou
20:46 Re: GNAT on SVN Trunk Joel Sherrill
19:40 Re: GNAT on SVN Trunk Eric Botcazou
19:39 Re: GNAT on SVN Trunk Eric Botcazou
19:37 Re: GNAT on SVN Trunk Laurent GUERBY
19:33 GNAT on SVN Trunk Joel Sherrill
19:03 Re: Combine repeats matching on insn pairs and will ICE on 3. hutchinsonandy
19:00 Re: Constrain valid arguments to BIT_FIELD_REF Alexandre Oliva
18:41 Re: RTL definition Ian Lance Taylor
18:32 Re: Combine repeats matching on insn pairs and will ICE on 3. Ian Lance Taylor
17:57 Re: vectorizer default in 4.3.0 changes document missing Andi Kleen
17:56 Re: RTL definition Fran Baena
17:53 Re: vectorizer default in 4.3.0 changes document missing Andi Kleen
17:52 Re: vectorizer default in 4.3.0 changes document missing Joe Buck
17:44 Re: RTL definition Fran Baena
17:33 Re: vectorizer default in 4.3.0 changes document missing Andrew Pinski
17:27 Re: vectorizer default in 4.3.0 changes document missing Andi Kleen
17:25 Re: vectorizer default in 4.3.0 changes document missing Andrew Pinski
17:22 Re: vectorizer default in 4.3.0 changes document missing Andi Kleen
17:08 Re: -Wparentheses lumps too much together Derek M Jones
16:59 Re: vectorizer default in 4.3.0 changes document missing Andrew Pinski
16:37 CRX and CR16 port maintainer David Edelsohn
16:33 New picoChip port and maintainers David Edelsohn
16:31 vectorizer default in 4.3.0 changes document missing Andi Kleen
16:21 Re: RTL definition Jim Wilson
15:25 Re: [tuples] gimple_assign_subcode for GIMPLE_SINGLE_RHS Richard Guenther
15:13 Re: [tuples] gimple_assign_subcode for GIMPLE_SINGLE_RHS Diego Novillo
14:57 Re: Possible gcc-4.3 regression wrt bootstrapping the toolchain Jonas Meyer
14:34 Re: RTL definition Ramana Radhakrishnan
12:23 GCC 4.3.0-20080228 (powerpc-linux-gnuspe) ICE on 20000718.c test Sergei Poselenov
11:54 Re: Possible gcc-4.3 regression wrt bootstrapping the toolchain Paolo Bonzini
11:40 RTL definition Fran Baena
11:11 Re: Possible gcc-4.3 regression wrt bootstrapping the toolchain Jonas Meyer
11:08 Re: Possible gcc-4.3 regression wrt bootstrapping the toolchain Jakub Jelinek
10:57 Re: Possible gcc-4.3 regression wrt bootstrapping the toolchain Jonas Meyer
09:56 Re: Constrain valid arguments to BIT_FIELD_REF Richard Guenther
06:14 Re: Constrain valid arguments to BIT_FIELD_REF Robert Dewar
04:54 Re: Constrain valid arguments to BIT_FIELD_REF Alexandre Oliva

March 09, 2008
21:22 Re: [tuples] gimple_assign_subcode for GIMPLE_SINGLE_RHS Zdenek Dvorak
21:10 Re: Constrain valid arguments to BIT_FIELD_REF Richard Guenther
21:00 Re: Constrain valid arguments to BIT_FIELD_REF Alexandre Oliva
21:00 Re: [tuples] gimple_assign_subcode for GIMPLE_SINGLE_RHS Diego Novillo
20:57 Re: Constrain valid arguments to BIT_FIELD_REF Alexandre Oliva
20:57 Re: API for callgraph and IPA passes for whole program optimization Jan Hubicka
20:00 Re: Constrain valid arguments to BIT_FIELD_REF Eric Botcazou
19:51 Re: Constrain valid arguments to BIT_FIELD_REF Richard Guenther
19:37 Re: Constrain valid arguments to BIT_FIELD_REF Alexandre Oliva
19:34 Re: Possible gcc-4.3 regression wrt bootstrapping the toolchain Andrew Pinski
19:29 Possible gcc-4.3 regression wrt bootstrapping the toolchain Jonas Meyer
19:24 Re: [tuples] gimple_assign_subcode for GIMPLE_SINGLE_RHS Zdenek Dvorak
16:18 Re: API for callgraph and IPA passes for whole program optimization Kenneth Zadeck
15:47 Re: [tuples] gimple_assign_subcode for GIMPLE_SINGLE_RHS Diego Novillo
15:42 Re: [tuples] gimple_assign_subcode for GIMPLE_SINGLE_RHS Diego Novillo
15:31 Re: [tuples] gimple_assign_subcode for GIMPLE_SINGLE_RHS Richard Guenther
14:46 Re: [tuples] gimple_assign_subcode for GIMPLE_SINGLE_RHS Zdenek Dvorak
14:32 Re: [tuples] gimple_assign_subcode for GIMPLE_SINGLE_RHS Zdenek Dvorak
14:27 Re: API for callgraph and IPA passes for whole program optimization Jan Hubicka
13:38 Re: [tuples] gimple_assign_subcode for GIMPLE_SINGLE_RHS Diego Novillo
13:25 Re: [tuples] gimple_assign_subcode for GIMPLE_SINGLE_RHS Richard Guenther
13:18 Re: [tuples] gimple_assign_subcode for GIMPLE_SINGLE_RHS Diego Novillo
13:16 Re: [tuples] gimple_assign_subcode for GIMPLE_SINGLE_RHS Diego Novillo
13:16 Re: [tuples] gimple_assign_subcode for GIMPLE_SINGLE_RHS Richard Guenther
00:36 Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available Gerald Pfeifer
00:30 [tuples] gimple_assign_subcode for GIMPLE_SINGLE_RHS Zdenek Dvorak

March 08, 2008
23:13 Re: Seg fault in call_gmon_start Jim Wilson
22:05 Combine repeats matching on insn pairs and will ICE on 3. Andy H
20:06 Re: Constrain valid arguments to BIT_FIELD_REF Richard Guenther
19:57 Re: Constrain valid arguments to BIT_FIELD_REF Alexandre Oliva
19:20 Re: birthpoints in rtl. Alexandre Oliva
19:11 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Alexandre Oliva
17:13 Re: [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Tom Tromey
17:11 Re: [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Tom Tromey
15:33 Re: [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Jan Hubicka
14:39 Re: [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Andi Kleen
02:29 Re: [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Chris Lattner
02:07 Re: [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Ian Lance Taylor

March 07, 2008
22:50 gcc-4.4-20080307 is now available gccadmin
19:25 Need link ln -s ../lib64/libgomp.spec libgomp.spec in $prefix/lib on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Toon Moene
16:53 Re: [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Richard Guenther
16:46 Re: [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Tom Tromey
15:58 Re: Idea for code size reduction Philipp Marek
15:48 Re: Idea for code size reduction Ian Lance Taylor
14:10 Re: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Michael Matz
13:16 Re: RFC: Idea for code size reduction Philipp Marek
13:04 Re: RFC: Idea for code size reduction Philipp Marek
12:40 Re: RFC: Idea for code size reduction Jakub Jelinek
12:08 Re: RFC: Idea for code size reduction Richard Guenther
12:05 Re: RFC: Idea for code size reduction Philipp Marek
11:40 RE: Idea for code size reduction Philipp Marek
11:40 Re: RFC: Idea for code size reduction Jakub Jelinek
11:23 RE: Idea for code size reduction Dave Korn
11:15 Re: RFC: Idea for code size reduction Philipp Marek
11:10 Re: RFC: Idea for code size reduction Philipp Marek
10:52 Re: RFC: Idea for code size reduction michael
10:11 Re: RFC: Idea for code size reduction Richard Guenther
10:03 RFC: Idea for code size reduction Philipp Marek
08:30 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Florian Weimer
08:00 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Andreas Jaeger
06:53 Re: Patch: delete treelang Basile STARYNKEVITCH
06:46 Re: Injecting data declarations? Jim Wilson
06:42 Seg fault in call_gmon_start Desineni, Harikishan
04:56 Re: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Chris Lattner
02:36 C++ FE question: When is CLASSTYPE_VBASECLASSES valid? =?big5?b?RG91ZyBLd2FuICjD9q62v

March 06, 2008
23:24 Re: atomic accesses Lawrence Crowl
22:48 gcc-4.3-20080306 is now available gccadmin
22:14 Re: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Richard Guenther
22:05 Re: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Andi Kleen
21:38 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Artur Skawina
21:05 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2008-03-06) Joseph S. Myers
21:00 Re: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag H. Peter Anvin
20:59 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2008-03-06) Richard Guenther
20:54 Re: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Richard Guenther
20:44 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Toon Moene
20:42 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag H. Peter Anvin
20:16 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Jack Lloyd
19:45 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Paolo Bonzini
19:44 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Paolo Bonzini
19:35 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Robert Dewar
19:26 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Robert Dewar
19:24 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Robert Dewar
19:10 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2008-03-06) Joe Buck
18:55 Some regression numbers Andreas Meier
18:35 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Andrew Pinski
18:32 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Jack Lloyd
18:31 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2008-03-06) Joseph S. Myers
18:13 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Paolo Bonzini
18:10 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Olivier Galibert
18:10 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2008-03-06, 2nd editionOF) H.J. Lu
18:08 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2008-03-06) Joe Buck
17:59 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Joe Buck
17:35 Re: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Joe Buck
17:35 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag H.J. Lu
17:24 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag H. Peter Anvin
17:23 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag H. Peter Anvin
17:21 GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2008-03-06, 2nd editionOF) Jakub Jelinek
17:21 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag H. Peter Anvin
17:20 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv FX Coudert
17:18 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Robert Dewar
17:17 Re: GCC 4.4 schedule Tom Tromey
17:14 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag H.J. Lu
17:11 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag H. Peter Anvin
16:59 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag H.J. Lu
16:30 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Paolo Bonzini
16:27 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Äsmail DÃnmez
16:24 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Jakub Jelinek
16:15 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Artur Skawina
15:58 Injecting data declarations? Reuben Harris
15:57 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Robert Dewar
15:54 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag H. Peter Anvin
15:43 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag H.J. Lu
15:37 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag NightStrike
15:24 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag H. Peter Anvin
15:17 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Robert Dewar
15:09 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Robert Dewar
14:39 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Toon Moene
14:15 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Andrew Haley
14:12 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Olivier Galibert
14:06 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Olivier Galibert
14:03 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Paolo Bonzini
13:52 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Olivier Galibert
13:48 [tuples] Merged trunk->branch @132948 Diego Novillo
13:37 GCC 4.3 - Error: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Hans Kester (Ellips B.V.)
13:28 Enum in namespace Gonsolo
12:06 Re: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Richard Guenther
11:46 Re: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Andi Kleen
09:54 Re: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Andrew Haley
09:49 GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2008-03-06) Jakub Jelinek
09:46 Re: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Mikael Pettersson
09:17 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Jakub Jelinek
09:01 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Jakub Jelinek
08:44 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Andi Kleen
07:19 Re: atomic accesses Marty Leisner
03:23 Re: GCC build problem Jim Wilson
02:11 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Krzysztof Halasa
01:15 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag H. Peter Anvin
01:06 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Chris Lattner
00:51 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag H. Peter Anvin
00:50 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Aurelien Jarno
00:37 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Chris Lattner

March 05, 2008
23:26 [PING] Issues stopping us from removing libcall notes Steven Bosscher
23:22 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag David Daney
23:17 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Olivier Galibert
23:17 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Joe Buck
23:13 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Olivier Galibert
23:13 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Olivier Galibert
23:10 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag David Miller
23:08 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Michael Matz
23:02 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag H. Peter Anvin
22:51 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Michael Matz
22:46 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Ken Raeburn
22:42 gcc-4.2-20080305 is now available gccadmin
22:37 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Joe Buck
22:21 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag David Miller
22:17 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag David Miller
22:16 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag David Miller
22:13 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Adrian Bunk
22:13 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Joe Buck
22:09 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag H. Peter Anvin
21:59 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Michael Matz
21:54 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Chris Lattner
21:46 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Aurelien Jarno
21:44 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Richard Guenther
21:43 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Michael Matz
21:43 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Andrew Pinski
21:43 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Joe Buck
21:41 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Richard Guenther
21:40 Re: [PATCH] Make alias_sets_conflict_p less conservative Michael Matz
21:38 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag H. Peter Anvin
21:33 Re: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Richard Guenther
21:23 Re: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag David Miller
21:20 RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Joe Buck
21:18 Re: [PATCH] Make alias_sets_conflict_p less conservative Richard Kenner
21:11 Re: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag H. Peter Anvin
21:02 Re: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Michael Matz
20:57 Re: [PATCH] Make alias_sets_conflict_p less conservative Michael Matz
20:55 Re: Lots of new test failures on trunk due to unrecognizable insn Dominique Dhumieres
20:52 Re: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Aurelien Jarno
20:50 Re: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Jan Hubicka
20:48 Re: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag H. Peter Anvin
20:46 Re: atomic accesses Florian Weimer
20:43 Re: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Joe Buck
20:40 Re: [PATCH] Make alias_sets_conflict_p less conservative Richard Kenner
20:38 Re: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Michael Matz
20:33 GCC build problem Dasarath Weeratunge
20:32 Re: [PATCH] Make alias_sets_conflict_p less conservative Michael Matz
20:25 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Florian Weimer
20:24 Re: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Aurelien Jarno
20:03 Re: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Joe Buck
19:23 Re: [PATCH] Make alias_sets_conflict_p less conservative Richard Kenner
19:22 Soliciting help upgrading our bugzilla install Daniel Berlin
18:37 Re: atomic accesses Jakub Jelinek
18:10 Re: atomic accesses Andrew Haley
17:55 Re: atomic accesses Martin Jambor
17:54 Lots of new test failures on trunk due to unrecognizable insn Äsmail DÃnmez
16:58 Re: atomic accesses Paul Koning
16:56 Re: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag H.J. Lu
16:05 Re: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag H. Peter Anvin
15:38 Re: atomic accesses kai-gcc
15:30 Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Aurelien Jarno
15:15 Re: gcc 3.3.2 Wind River VxWorks PowerPC Richard Kenner
15:04 Re: gcc 3.3.2 Wind River VxWorks PowerPC David Edelsohn
14:45 gcc 3.3.2 Wind River VxWorks PowerPC Duncan Purll
14:41 Re: SPEC / testsuite results for disabling SFTs and the alias-oracle patches Diego Novillo
14:35 Re: [tuples] Branch frozen (again) Diego Novillo
14:27 Re: [PATCH] BIT_FIELD_REF_UNSIGNED considered harmful Richard Kenner
14:25 Re: Help with GCC on Cygwin Ian Lance Taylor
14:20 Re: [tuples] Branch frozen (again) Rafael Espindola
14:20 Re: [PATCH] BIT_FIELD_REF_UNSIGNED considered harmful Manfred Hollstein
14:14 Re: SPEC / testsuite results for disabling SFTs and the alias-oracle patches Richard Guenther
14:10 Re: [tuples] Branch frozen (again) Diego Novillo
13:13 Re: SPEC / testsuite results for disabling SFTs and the alias-oracle patches Diego Novillo
12:48 Re: Interoperability of Fortran array and C vector? Tobias Schlüter
12:48 Re: [PATCH] BIT_FIELD_REF_UNSIGNED considered harmful Diego Novillo
12:18 [PATCH] BIT_FIELD_REF_UNSIGNED considered harmful Richard Guenther
12:17 Re: Interoperability of Fortran array and C vector? Sa Liu
12:08 [tuples] Branch frozen (again) Diego Novillo
11:49 SPEC / testsuite results for disabling SFTs and the alias-oracle patches Richard Guenther
11:45 Re: GCC 4.4 schedule Sebastian Pop
09:27 Re: atomic accesses Andrew Haley
07:58 Re: static array with constant size Andrew Pinski
06:29 RE: Help with GCC on Cygwin Balaji V. Iyer
06:17 Re: static array with constant size Elazar Leibovich
05:39 Re: Help with GCC on Cygwin Ian Lance Taylor
05:13 Help with GCC on Cygwin Balaji V. Iyer
02:36 Re: [4.3/4.4]: PATCH: PR target/35453: nmmintrin.h defines macros SIDD_XXX Ian Lance Taylor
02:32 Re: [4.3/4.4]: PATCH: PR target/35453: nmmintrin.h defines macros SIDD_XXX Ian Lance Taylor
00:08 Re: Google Summer of Code 2008 Ian Lance Taylor
00:05 Re: [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Ian Lance Taylor
00:04 Re: atomic accesses Ross Ridge

March 04, 2008
22:50 Re: atomic accesses Paul Brook
21:42 Re: atomic accesses Paul Koning
21:32 Re: atomic accesses Andrew Haley
21:14 Re: atomic accesses Segher Boessenkool
21:14 Re: birthpoints in rtl. Diego Novillo
21:09 Re: birthpoints in rtl. Jan Hubicka
21:07 Re: birthpoints in rtl. Jan Hubicka
21:04 Re: birthpoints in rtl. Steven Bosscher
20:59 Re: atomic accesses Paul Koning
20:47 Re: plugin includes for MELT Ralf Wildenhues
20:47 Re: birthpoints in rtl. Richard Sandiford
20:26 Re: atomic accesses Segher Boessenkool
20:25 Re: Possible GCC 4.3 driver regression caused by your patch Greg Schafer
20:11 Re: birthpoints in rtl. Kenneth Zadeck
20:03 Re: birthpoints in rtl. Jan Hubicka
19:58 Re: birthpoints in rtl. Steven Bosscher
19:56 Re: birthpoints in rtl. Diego Novillo
19:55 Re: birthpoints in rtl. Kenneth Zadeck
19:48 Re: birthpoints in rtl. Richard Sandiford
19:39 Re: birthpoints in rtl. Kenneth Zadeck
19:22 Re: Benchmarks: 7z, bzip2 & gzip. Bernardo Innocenti
19:21 Re: birthpoints in rtl. Diego Novillo
19:13 Re: birthpoints in rtl. Steven Bosscher
19:09 Re: birthpoints in rtl. Steven Bosscher
18:59 Re: birthpoints in rtl. Diego Novillo
18:54 Re: birthpoints in rtl. Steven Bosscher
18:46 Re: atomic accesses David Daney
18:35 Re: atomic accesses Richard Guenther
18:32 Re: atomic accesses David Daney
18:22 [4.3/4.4]: PATCH: PR target/35453: nmmintrin.h defines macros SIDD_XXX H.J. Lu
17:41 Re: Benchmarks: 7z, bzip2 & gzip. Daniel Jacobowitz
17:26 Re: atomic accesses Paul Koning
17:11 Re: Constrain valid arguments to BIT_FIELD_REF Richard Guenther
17:03 Re: atomic accesses Andrew Haley
16:59 Re: Constrain valid arguments to BIT_FIELD_REF Andrew Pinski
16:51 Re: atomic accesses Jakub Jelinek
16:47 Re: Constrain valid arguments to BIT_FIELD_REF Richard Guenther
16:41 Re: Constrain valid arguments to BIT_FIELD_REF Jakub Jelinek
16:37 Re: atomic accesses Andrew Haley
16:32 Re: atomic accesses Paul Koning
16:15 Re: Constrain valid arguments to BIT_FIELD_REF Diego Novillo
16:07 Re: atomic accesses Paul Brook
15:56 Constrain valid arguments to BIT_FIELD_REF Richard Guenther
15:50 Re: atomic accesses Jakub Jelinek
15:46 Re: Swing replacements Joel Dice
14:01 Re: Interoperability of Fortran array and C vector? FX Coudert
13:51 Re: Information regarding issue with While Loop with O3 optimization Robert Dewar
13:47 Information regarding issue with While Loop with O3 optimization Raghukrishna Hegde
12:31 Re: atomic accesses Robert Dewar
11:19 Getting GCC to always dllimport vtables on X86? Reuben Harris
09:20 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2008-03-03) Richard Guenther
09:03 Re: Benchmarks: 7z, bzip2 & gzip. Martin Guy
08:14 Fwd: Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv amylaar
06:06 Re: Copy constructor access check while initializing a reference Gabriel Dos Reis
05:53 Re: gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available Gabriel Dos Reis
05:10 Re: Swing replacements Ted Byers
04:29 Re: atomic accesses Segher Boessenkool
04:21 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2008-03-03) H.J. Lu
04:09 Re: atomic accesses Robert Dewar
03:46 Re: atomic accesses Segher Boessenkool
03:20 Swing replacements geodejerry
02:51 Re: atomic accesses Robert Dewar
02:39 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Robert Dewar
02:38 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Robert Dewar
01:21 Re: atomic accesses Segher Boessenkool
01:16 Copy constructor access check while initializing a reference Peter A. Felvegi
00:59 Re: atomic accesses David Daney
00:26 atomic accesses Segher Boessenkool

March 03, 2008
23:59 Re: Invalid address after reload Jim Wilson
23:49 Re: compiler slowdown in 4.3 development Bruno Haible
22:53 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Eric Botcazou
22:47 Re: compiler slowdown in 4.3 development David Daney
22:45 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Eric Botcazou
22:41 gcc-4.1-20080303 is now available gccadmin
22:29 Re: new regression on 4.3.0 branch DJ Delorie
22:24 compiler slowdown in 4.3 development Bruno Haible
21:37 Re: GCC 4.4 schedule Jakub Jelinek
21:35 Re: Google Summer of Code 2008 Manuel López-Ibáñez
21:09 GCC 4.4 schedule Richard Guenther
20:56 GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2008-03-03) Richard Guenther
20:50 Google Summer of Code 2008 Doug Gregor
20:48 Google Summer of Code 2008 Doug Gregor
20:08 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Ross Ridge
18:36 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Ian Lance Taylor
18:15 Re: start.encap target in gcc/Makefile.in Basile STARYNKEVITCH
17:38 start.encap target in gcc/Makefile.in Basile STARYNKEVITCH
16:35 Re: Stan Shebs appointed maintainer for Darwin, Objc and Objc++ Stan Shebs
16:21 Re: Release planning for GCC 4.4? Richard Guenther
16:18 Release planning for GCC 4.4? Andrey Belevantsev
16:04 Re: [RFA] optimizing predictable branches on x86 Jan Hubicka
14:58 Stan Shebs appointed maintainer for Darwin, Objc and Objc++ Kaveh R. GHAZI
13:50 Re: Possible GCC 4.3 driver regression caused by your patch Hans-Peter Nilsson
13:48 Invalid address after reload Vander Aa Tom
13:44 Re: [RFA] optimizing predictable branches on x86 Paolo Bonzini
13:23 Re: [RFA] optimizing predictable branches on x86 Nick Piggin
13:12 Re: Possible GCC 4.3 driver regression caused by your patch Hans-Peter Nilsson
13:01 Re: [RFA] optimizing predictable branches on x86 Jan Hubicka
12:26 Re: [RFA] optimizing predictable branches on x86 Nick Piggin
12:09 Re: [RFA] optimizing predictable branches on x86 Jan Hubicka
12:04 Re: [RFA] optimizing predictable branches on x86 Jan Hubicka
11:55 Re: [RFA] optimizing predictable branches on x86 Jan Hubicka
11:48 Re: [RFA] optimizing predictable branches on x86 Paolo Bonzini
11:38 [RFA] optimizing predictable branches on x86 Jan Hubicka
11:14 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Andi Kleen
10:37 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Gabriel Paubert
08:07 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Paolo Bonzini
04:39 Re: optimizing predictable branches on x86 Nick Piggin
03:29 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Robert Dewar
01:27 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Ross Ridge
00:47 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Robert Dewar
00:38 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Andi Kleen
00:00 Re: Possible GCC 4.3 driver regression caused by your patch Alan Modra

March 02, 2008
23:58 Re: Excess registers pushed - regs_ever_live not right way? Andrew Hutchinson
23:28 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Robert Dewar
22:30 Re: Possible GCC 4.3 driver regression caused by your patch Greg Schafer
22:29 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Ross Ridge
21:38 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Robert Dewar
21:31 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Ross Ridge
20:27 [RFC] GCC caret diagnostics Manuel López-Ibáñez
20:00 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Robert Dewar
19:57 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Ross Ridge
19:31 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Robert Dewar
19:22 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Ross Ridge
18:32 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Robert Dewar
18:17 Re: Possible GCC 4.3 driver regression caused by your patch Carlos O'Donell
17:58 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Steven Bosscher
16:08 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Robert Dewar
15:48 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Frank Ch. Eigler
15:22 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Robert Dewar
15:21 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Robert Dewar
15:14 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Frank Ch. Eigler
14:31 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Robert Dewar
14:24 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Frank Ch. Eigler
13:03 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Richard Guenther
13:00 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Joseph S. Myers
11:52 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Robert Dewar
11:36 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Richard Kenner
11:29 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Robert Dewar
11:08 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Richard Guenther
10:47 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Mark Mitchell
10:47 Re: PR35401 and PR30572 are gcc 4.3.0 release blockers on darwin Mark Mitchell

March 01, 2008
23:01 Possible GCC 4.3 driver regression caused by your patch Greg Schafer
22:31 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Robert Dewar
22:21 Re: Excess registers pushed - regs_ever_live not right way? Andrew Hutchinson
22:16 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv FX Coudert
21:48 Re: Excess registers pushed - regs_ever_live not right way? Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)
21:48 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Robert Dewar
21:45 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Robert Dewar
21:43 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Robert Dewar
21:25 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Florian Weimer
21:19 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Florian Weimer
21:16 Re: PR35401 and PR30572 are gcc 4.3.0 release blockers on darwin Jack Howarth
20:12 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Robert Dewar
20:11 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Robert Dewar
20:04 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Florian Weimer
19:58 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Florian Weimer
19:53 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Florian Weimer
18:32 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Joseph S. Myers
18:27 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Joseph S. Myers
18:20 Re: Successfull build of gcc 4.2.3 with MinGW 5.13 in windows XP dju
17:27 Bootstrap failure building libobjc fixed Janne Blomqvist
17:05 Re: Excess registers pushed - regs_ever_live not right way? Andrew Hutchinson
16:00 Re: new regression on 4.3.0 branch DJ Delorie
15:54 Re: new regression on 4.3.0 branch Richard Guenther
15:49 new regression on 4.3.0 branch DJ Delorie
14:37 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Laurent GUERBY
14:35 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Robert Dewar
14:25 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Paolo Bonzini
14:21 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Joern Rennecke
14:20 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Paolo Bonzini
14:18 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Robert Dewar
14:15 Re: birthpoints in rtl. Paolo Bonzini
14:15 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Robert Dewar
14:14 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Richard Kenner
14:13 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Robert Dewar
14:12 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Richard Kenner
14:11 Re: birthpoints in rtl. Steven Bosscher
14:10 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Paolo Bonzini
14:10 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Richard Guenther
14:06 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Richard Kenner
14:05 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Robert Dewar
14:05 Re: birthpoints in rtl. Diego Novillo
14:01 Re: birthpoints in rtl. Diego Novillo
14:00 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Richard Guenther
13:58 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Robert Dewar
13:57 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Richard Guenther
13:55 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Robert Dewar
13:55 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Paolo Bonzini
13:53 Re: birthpoints in rtl. Diego Novillo
13:51 Re: birthpoints in rtl. Paolo Bonzini
13:50 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Richard Guenther
13:47 Re: birthpoints in rtl. Paolo Bonzini
13:38 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Robert Dewar
13:19 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Joseph S. Myers
13:10 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Joseph S. Myers
13:08 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Robert Dewar
12:33 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Richard Guenther
12:32 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Richard Guenther
12:31 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Richard Guenther
12:23 4.3.0-rc2 available Jakub Jelinek
11:52 Re: birthpoints in rtl. Jan Hubicka
11:24 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Richard Kenner
11:16 Re: birthpoints in rtl. Steven Bosscher
10:13 Re: birthpoints in rtl. Jan Hubicka
10:03 Re: birthpoints in rtl. Jan Hubicka
06:54 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Tom Tromey
05:18 RE: Successfull build of gcc 4.2.3 with MinGW 5.13 in windows XP Weddington, Eric
05:12 Re: Successfull build of gcc 4.2.3 with MinGW 5.13 in windows XP Brian Dessent
05:00 RE: Successfull build of gcc 4.2.3 with MinGW 5.13 in windows XP Weddington, Eric
04:49 Re: GCC wiki very slow? NightStrike
04:35 Re: Successfull build of gcc 4.2.3 with MinGW 5.13 in windows XP Brian Dessent
04:30 Re: Draft SH uClinux FDPIC ABI Alexandre Oliva
03:50 RE: Successfull build of gcc 4.2.3 with MinGW 5.13 in windows XP Weddington, Eric
03:01 Re: birthpoints in rtl. Kenneth Zadeck
02:48 Re: birthpoints in rtl. Diego Novillo
02:33 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Robert Dewar
02:17 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Joseph S. Myers
02:12 Re: PR35401 and PR30572 are gcc 4.3.0 release blockers on darwin Mark Mitchell
02:08 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Robert Dewar
02:05 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Robert Dewar
01:59 Re: PR35401 and PR30572 are gcc 4.3.0 release blockers on darwin Jack Howarth
01:57 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Robert Dewar
01:54 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Mark Mitchell
01:49 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Joseph S. Myers
01:39 Re: birthpoints in rtl. Kenneth Zadeck
01:26 Re: Issues stopping us from removing libcall notes Kenneth Zadeck
01:04 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Mark Mitchell
00:49 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Joseph S. Myers
00:23 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Richard Guenther
00:16 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv David Daney
00:14 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Richard Guenther
00:12 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Joseph S. Myers
00:11 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Richard Kenner
00:10 Re: birthpoints in rtl. Diego Novillo
00:05 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Mark Mitchell
00:04 Re: birthpoints in rtl. Steven Bosscher
00:04 Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv Richard Guenther


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3