This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Is objc++ supported?


From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>

From: "Mike Stump" <mrs@apple.com>

Perhaps others are rooted from generic parts of the compiler, not objc++. Still it would be nice to clean them up.

Agreed. If you want to work on it, I'd be happy to help out, just let me know.

Okay, I'll file PRs and add you to the CC list. :-)

The failures all had existing PRs. I've reconfirmed them all and added my 2 cents. Here's the list:


23610 obj-c++.dg/bitfield-[14].mm, obj-c++.dg/layout-1.mm fails with the GNU runtime
23613 obj-c++.dg/isa-field-1.mm fails with the GNU runtime
23614 obj-c++.dg/lookup-2.mm fails with the GNU runtime
23616 obj-c++.dg/try-catch-[29].mm (objc exceptions are broken) fails with the GNU Runtime
23716 obj-c++.dg/comp-types-10.mm ICE with the GNU runtime
27232 encode-3.mm fails with "deprecated conversion" warning
27247 FAIL: obj-c++.dg/cxx-ivars-2.mm execution test
27249 FAIL: obj-c++.dg/encode-8.mm execution test
31032 [4.3 Regression] expected tree that contains 'decl with RTL' structure, have 'field_decl' in assemble_external_real, at varasm.c:2225
32052 [4.3 Regression] encode-2.mm, encode-3.mm fail on at least powerpc-darwin
34193 [4.3 regression] FAIL: obj-c++.dg/gnu-runtime-2.mm (test for excess errors)


I think I can immediately eliminate 27232 and 34193 with minor testcase fixes.

       -Kaveh
--
Kaveh R. Ghazi




Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]