This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: sh-elf vs profiling

From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
To: bje at au1 dot ibm dot com
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 20:12:27 -0500
Subject: Re: sh-elf vs profiling
References: <200802062247.m16Ml7XO025360@greed.delorie.com> <1202346455.6454.2.camel@localhost>

> I guess it probably doesn't apply in this case (if you've straced the
> simulator), but please also keep in mind another gotcha:
> 
>     http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-12/msg00561.html

Yeah, doesn't apply.  There were no *attempts* at I/O from the
simulator.  I'm more inclined to think that the atexit() stuff got
corrupted, which lends strength to Kaz's suggestion.

References:
- sh-elf vs profiling
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: sh-elf vs profiling
  - From: Ben Elliston

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]