This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

RE: Replying to a mailing list thread

From: Ben Elliston <bje at au1 dot ibm dot com>
To: Dave Korn <dave dot korn at artimi dot com>
Cc: "'Rodrigo Dominguez'" <rdomingu at ECE dot NEU dot EDU>, "'NightStrike'" <nightstrike at gmail dot com>, "'Jonathan Wakely'" <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 10:42:43 +1100
Subject: RE: Replying to a mailing list thread
References: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0802021000330.21150@gateway.ece.neu.edu> <4348dea50802020724w77963f95we48295fbc750402d@mail.gmail.com> <b609cb3b0802020727jbf08e90w6082ca5fa72de121@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0802021036511.21150@gateway.ece.neu.edu> <01bd01c866b3$0b3aa130$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>

>   That decimal number is the index number of the post in the list archive.
> You can get the mailer daemon to re-send you a copy of the original post by
> sending a blank email to "gcc-get.DECIMALNUMBER" at gcc dot gnu dot
> org.

Will the message returned by the mailing list processor still contain
obfuscated addresses?  I suppose it would, if the message is extracted
directly from the archives.

Cheers, Ben

Follow-Ups:
- ML processing daemon borked? (was RE: Replying to a mailing list thread)
  - From: Dave Korn

References:
- Replying to a mailing list thread
  - From: Rodrigo Dominguez
- Re: Replying to a mailing list thread
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: Replying to a mailing list thread
  - From: NightStrike
- Re: Replying to a mailing list thread
  - From: Rodrigo Dominguez
- RE: Replying to a mailing list thread
  - From: Dave Korn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]