This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes and templates

From: Stephane Hockenhull <shockenhull at niceberg dot com>
To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Cc: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:02:54 -0500
Subject: Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes and templates
References: <200711261333.54555.shockenhull@niceberg.com> <20071126184035.GE17815@synopsys.com>

On Monday 26 November 2007 13:40, Joe Buck wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 01:33:54PM -0500, Stephane Hockenhull wrote:
> > hi, it seem stl templates are not mangled as other classes and templates
> >
> > I was wondering why and where in the g++ source code is that special case
> > implemented?
> >
> > it seem to cause a problem with -fleading-underscore
>
> AFAIK there is no special case, however there might be a bug lurking
> somewhere.  Do you have a specific case where -fleading-underscore messes
> up?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34166

the .stabs section differ from the actual call by 1 underscore prefix

-- 
Stephane Hockenhull
SSC-Studios.com

References:
- why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes and templates
  - From: Stephane Hockenhull
- Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes and templates
  - From: Joe Buck

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]