This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Progress on GCC plugins ?


Ian Lance Taylor wrote:

> I think it's quite important for gcc's long-term health to permit and
> even encourage academic researchers and students to use it.  And I see
> plugins as directly supporting that goal.  Note that I don't see any
> problem with requiring (or attempting to require) that any plugin be
> covered by the GPL.
> 
> So from my perspective the downside of plugins is very small, and the
> upside is very large.

I must admit I don't understand the upside.  I've always thought of
plugins as something proprietary programs need because their source
isn't open.

In my view, plugins will bitrot quickly as GCC's interface changes; and
they won't even help with the learning curve - does anyone believe for a
second you won't have to understand compiler internals to write a plugin?


Bernd
-- 
This footer brought to you by insane German lawmakers.
Analog Devices GmbH      Wilhelm-Wagenfeld-Str. 6      80807 Muenchen
Sitz der Gesellschaft Muenchen, Registergericht Muenchen HRB 40368
Geschaeftsfuehrer Thomas Wessel, William A. Martin, Margaret Seif


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]