This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tuples] meaning of DECL_SAVED_TREE while analyzing cgraph

From: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>
To: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
Cc: dnovillo at google dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 09:25:58 -0400
Subject: Re: [tuples] meaning of DECL_SAVED_TREE while analyzing cgraph
References: <20070726211122.GA17715@redhat.com> <20070727025118.GM10270@kam.mff.cuni.cz>

> The test there is sort of hack, I would just remove it at this stage and
> we can work out better fix for that testcase later.  I hope that with my
> plans for declaration merging pass we can get round such weird side
> effects of in place declaration replacement.

Will do.

How about all the other uses of DECL_SAVED_TREE in cgraph_analyze_functions?
DECL_SAVED_TREE shouldn't be used past the tree optimizers (??).

Aldy

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tuples] meaning of DECL_SAVED_TREE while analyzing cgraph
  - From: Jan Hubicka

References:
- [tuples] meaning of DECL_SAVED_TREE while analyzing cgraph
  - From: Aldy Hernandez
- Re: [tuples] meaning of DECL_SAVED_TREE while analyzing cgraph
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]