This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFH: GPLv3

From: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
To: "Doug Gregor" <doug dot gregor at gmail dot com>
Cc: "Basile STARYNKEVITCH" <basile at starynkevitch dot net>, "Mark Mitchell" <mark at codesourcery dot com>, GCC <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 10:53:30 -0400
Subject: Re: RFH: GPLv3
References: <4695B50B.6050108@codesourcery.com> <469623AA.3010903@starynkevitch.net> <doug.gregor@gmail.com> <24b520d20707120729m1f6f6586meede49a8e830ae84@mail.gmail.com> <200707121434.l6CEYcQ31608@makai.watson.ibm.com> <24b520d20707120749yf6e480aib56b3f193013fc3f@mail.gmail.com>

>>>>> Doug Gregor writes:

Doug> It seems obvious to me that it would be easiest to just move today's
Doug> mainline over to GPLv3, and have every GCC release >= 4.3 be GPLv3. We
Doug> could then either cut off the GCC 4.2 branch entirely or leave it
Doug> GPLv2. Then there are no surprises for anyone.

	Leaving released branches as GPLv2 is not an option.  That
definitely would be the path of least surprise.

David

Follow-Ups:
- RE: RFH: GPLv3
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: RFH: GPLv3
  - From: Benjamin Smedberg

References:
- RFH: GPLv3
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: RFH: GPLv3
  - From: Basile STARYNKEVITCH
- Re: RFH: GPLv3
  - From: Doug Gregor
- Re: RFH: GPLv3
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: RFH: GPLv3
  - From: Doug Gregor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]