This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: old intentional gcc bug?

> Still, if you use these two bootstrapped, slightly different compilers
> as base for a fresh bootstrap in a new build directory, you'll likely
> get identical results and that would still prove that there is no
> self-propagating back door in GCC on that configuration.

Probably.  But, as Mike told me privately, STABS are sensitive to the build 
directory, so I tried again and got identical executables byte-for-byte:

sunshine% ls -l gcc.cc/gcc/cc1
-rwxrwxr-x   1 eric     eric     46745912 Jun 25 03:30 gcc.cc/gcc/cc1
sunshine% ls -l gcc.gcc/gcc/cc1
-rwxrwxr-x   1 eric     eric     46745912 Jun 25 07:00 gcc.gcc/gcc/cc1
sunshine% cmp gcc.cc/gcc/cc1 gcc.gcc/gcc/cc1
sunshine%    

-- 
Eric Botcazou
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]