This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work
- From: "Sebastian Pop" <sebpop at gmail dot com>
- To: "Dorit Nuzman" <DORIT at il dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: "Daniel Berlin" <dberlin at dberlin dot org>, "Eric Botcazou" <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>, "Ian Lance Taylor" <iant at google dot com>, "Ira Rosen" <IRAR at il dot ibm dot com>, "Vladimir N. Makarov" <vmakarov at redhat dot com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 19:33:04 +0200
- Subject: Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work
- References: <4aca3dc20706180452y36303baei2e87048e207b0832@mail.gmail.com> <OF3FCBC2C4.F0CA06A3-ONC22572FE.0042BB52-C22572FE.00448F22@il.ibm.com>
On 6/18/07, Dorit Nuzman <DORIT@il.ibm.com> wrote:
> I can hand you more than the testcases i've given so far. There is
> tons of code out there that would benefit from straight line
Interesting. I wasn't aware of this potential. Please do send some of this
code. thanks!
I'm thinking about loops whose bodies contain a call that is not
inlined, so the code in that function looks like stright line code,
but in fact is called from inside a loop. This could happen even
because the compiler decided to outline the body of some loop, as is
the case for the openMP code gen, or autoparallelization.
Sebastian