Re: testsuite trigraphs.c failure due to cygwin <stdio.h>

[Tim Prince <n8tm at aol dot com>]

dave.korn@artimi.com wrote:
> On 04 June 2007 23:43, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> > "Timothy C Prince" <tprince> writes:
>
>   [ quoting an earlier post of mine ]
>
> > >   So, am I correct to believe that we need to use plain 'inline' for c99
> > > after gcc 4.4, and 'extern inline' before that?  That is, I think I need
> > > to write a test that looks like...  
> > >
> > >
> > > #if ((__GNUC__ > 4) || ((__GNUC__ == 4) && (__GNUC_MINOR__ >= 4))) \
> > >     && defined (__STRICT_ANSI__) && (__STRICT_ANSI__ != 0) \
> > >     && defined (__STDC_VERSION__) && (__STDC_VERSION__ >= 199901L)
> > > #define ELIDABLE_INLINE inline
> > > #else
> > > #define ELIDABLE_INLINE extern inline
> > > #endif
> > No, you shouldn't use anything along those lines.  You should check
> > for __GNUC_GNU_INLINE__ and __GNUC_STDC_INLINE__ as described in the
> > documentation.
> >
> > In fact I mentioned this in my reply to the message you quote above:
> >     http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-03/msg01093.html
> >
> > Ian
>
>
>   And I heeded your reply in the patch that eventually got applied to newlib.
>
>   This test passed when I "make check"ed 4.2.0 RC2.  I'll see if I can
> reproduce the problem.
>
>   Tim, are you sure you have the patched version of stdio.h in your
> /usr/include, or are you trying a combined build?

I have patched stdio.h, but it may not be your latest recommendation. 
The problem didn't show up in gcc-4.3 testsuite until last week.