gcc archive
date index for June, 2007

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

June 30, 2007
21:43 Re: PATCH: Regenerate aclocal.m4 and Makefile.in Andreas Schwab
20:41 Re: Does unrolling prevents doloop optimizations? Ayal Zaks
17:50 Re: PATCH: Regenerate aclocal.m4 and Makefile.in H.J. Lu
17:36 Re: Does unrolling prevents doloop optimizations? Zdenek Dvorak
17:34 Re: Does unrolling prevents doloop optimizations? Zdenek Dvorak
09:56 Re: Does unrolling prevents doloop optimizations? Ayal Zaks
08:30 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-29) Andreas Meier
07:52 Re: Does unrolling prevents doloop optimizations? Zdenek Dvorak
07:17 Re: Does unrolling prevents doloop optimizations? Ayal Zaks
06:55 Re: Does unrolling prevents doloop optimizations? Zdenek Dvorak

June 29, 2007
23:47 Re: failed to compile trunk svn rev 126124 Jan Hubicka
22:44 gcc-4.3-20070629 is now available gccadmin
22:41 Re: Question about validity of wfmath template code Daniel Schepler
22:21 Re: failed to compile trunk svn rev 126124 Janus Weil
21:46 Re: Fwd: INCOMING_RETURN_ADDR_RTX in ia64.h Jim Wilson
21:44 failed to compile trunk svn rev 126124 Basile STARYNKEVITCH
21:27 Re: PTR-PLUS merge into the mainline Andrew Pinski
20:50 GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-29) Mark Mitchell
20:37 Re: Status of trunk freeze Mark Mitchell
19:19 Re: Type-punning Herman Geza
19:12 Question about validity of wfmath template code Daniel Schepler
17:09 Some numbers on Regressions Andreas Meier
16:14 Re: Does unrolling prevents doloop optimizations? Zdenek Dvorak
14:01 Re: PTR-PLUS merge into the mainline Roman Zippel
12:36 Re: combine corrupts insns + dumps with insn cost problems Eric Botcazou
11:31 Re: [ARM] Cirrus EP93xx Maverick Crunch Support - CC modes / condexec / CC_REGNUM Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
10:52 Re: combine corrupts insns + dumps with insn cost problems Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
07:46 Re: combine corrupts insns + dumps with insn cost problems Eric Botcazou
06:23 Status of trunk freeze Steve Kargl
03:05 Re: PTR-PLUS merge into the mainline Andrew_Pinski
02:58 Re: LTO reader support for MEMORY_PARTITION_TAG Kenneth Zadeck
02:54 Re: PTR-PLUS merge into the mainline Roman Zippel
02:24 Re: LTO reader support for MEMORY_PARTITION_TAG Mark Mitchell
01:43 Re: [ARM] Cirrus EP93xx Maverick Crunch Support - CC modes / condexec / CC_REGNUM Hasjim Williams
00:43 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) michael.a

June 28, 2007
21:02 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) mark
20:21 Re: combine corrupts insns + dumps with insn cost problems Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
17:52 Re: Static const int as array bound inside class Andrew Pinski
13:44 Re: Proposal: adding two zeros to the integer cost to calibrate better. Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
13:14 Re: [ARM] Cirrus EP93xx Maverick Crunch Support - condexec / bugfixing / "co-processor offset out of range" Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
12:55 Re: [ARM] Cirrus EP93xx Maverick Crunch Support - "bge" pattern Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
10:00 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) michael.a
07:25 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) mark
06:36 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) michael.a
06:29 Static const int as array bound inside class Torquil Macdonald Sørensen
05:42 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) mark
05:14 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) michael.a
03:55 Re: [ARM] Cirrus EP93xx Maverick Crunch Support - condexec / bugfixing / "co-processor offset out of range" Hasjim Williams

June 27, 2007
22:47 gcc-4.2-20070627 is now available gccadmin
19:41 Proposal: adding two zeros to the integer cost to calibrate better. J.C. Pizarro
17:51 Re: combine corrupts insns + dumps with insn cost problems Eric Botcazou
17:47 Re: combine corrupts insns + dumps with insn cost problems Uros Bizjak
17:33 combine corrupts insns + dumps with insn cost problems Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
16:30 Re: [tuples/LTO] RFC: houghts on auto-generating GS_* data structures Ian Lance Taylor
16:18 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) Antoine Chavasse
15:18 Re: [tuples/LTO] RFC: houghts on auto-generating GS_* data structures Aldy Hernandez
15:09 Re: [tuples/LTO] RFC: houghts on auto-generating GS_* data structures Diego Novillo
11:57 Re: [tuples/LTO] RFC: houghts on auto-generating GS_* data structures Kenneth Zadeck
10:43 Re: How to use GCC testsuite..? Tehila Meyzels
10:31 Re: [ARM] Cirrus EP93xx Maverick Crunch Support - "bge" pattern Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
10:27 Re: How to use GCC testsuite..? Saurabh Verma
09:20 Re: m68k compound instructions Andreas Schwab
08:45 Re: [ARM] Cirrus EP93xx Maverick Crunch Support - "bge" pattern Hasjim Williams
08:42 Re: Type-punning Andreas Schwab
08:15 Re: [ARM] Cirrus EP93xx Maverick Crunch Support - "bge" pattern Hasjim Williams
06:18 Re: [ARM] Cirrus EP93xx Maverick Crunch Support - "bge" pattern Paolo Bonzini
04:22 Re: Help on testsuite failures, only with optimization & bootstrap Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)
02:35 Re: [tuples/LTO] RFC: houghts on auto-generating GS_* data structures Ian Lance Taylor
01:26 [ARM] Cirrus EP93xx Maverick Crunch Support - "bge" pattern Hasjim Williams
01:13 Re: [tuples/LTO] RFC: houghts on auto-generating GS_* data structures Kenneth Zadeck
00:38 Re: Type-punning Herman Geza
00:24 Re: Type-punning Andrew Pinski
00:18 Re: Type-punning Herman Geza

June 26, 2007
23:37 Re: Type-punning mark
23:31 Re: Type-punning Herman Geza
23:18 Re: [tuples/LTO] RFC: houghts on auto-generating GS_* data structures Ian Lance Taylor
22:44 Re: Type-punning Andrew Pinski
22:41 Help on testsuite failures, only with optimization & bootstrap Steve Ellcey
22:36 Re: Type-punning Silvius Rus
21:42 Re: Type-punning Herman Geza
21:21 Re: How to use GCC testsuite..? Tehila Meyzels
21:17 Re: Type-punning Silvius Rus
21:00 Re: LTO reader support for MEMORY_PARTITION_TAG Kenneth Zadeck
20:48 Re: Type-punning Andrew Pinski
20:31 Re: Type-punning Herman Geza
20:20 Re: Extending RTL expansion and CG with a new operation Pranav Bhandarkar
20:08 [tuples/LTO] RFC: houghts on auto-generating GS_* data structures Diego Novillo
20:00 Re: Type-punning Andrew Pinski
19:55 Re: Type-punning Herman Geza
17:45 Re: LTO reader support for MEMORY_PARTITION_TAG Kenneth Zadeck
16:24 LTO reader support for MEMORY_PARTITION_TAG Mark Mitchell
15:35 Re: A reload inheritance bug Mark Shinwell
15:08 Workshop on GCC for Research in Embedded and Parallel Systems Ayal Zaks
14:00 predominantly Samuel W . Mathews
06:35 Re: [gnu.org #220291] Copyright assignment François-Xavier Coudert
06:25 How to use GCC testsuite..? Venkatesan Jeevanandam
06:17 Re: old intentional gcc bug? Paolo Bonzini

June 25, 2007
22:41 gcc-4.1-20070625 is now available gccadmin
22:38 Re: [gnu.org #220291] Copyright assignment Mike Stump via RT
22:38 Re: [gnu.org #220291] Copyright assignment Mike Stump via RT
22:38 Re: [gnu.org #220291] Copyright assignment Mike Stump
22:28 Re: [gnu.org #220291] Copyright assignment Hui-May Chang via RT
22:11 [gnu.org #220291] Copyright assignment Jonas Jacobson via RT
18:29 Re: Suffix for __float128 FP constants H. J. Lu
18:11 Re: old intentional gcc bug? Mike Stump
18:06 Re: ppc64 __attribute__((visibility ("hidden"))) and multiple TOCs David Edelsohn
17:55 Re: old intentional gcc bug? Eric Botcazou
17:52 Re: GCC vs. Open64 Jiahua He
17:32 Re: GCC vs. Open64 Basile STARYNKEVITCH
17:07 Re: ppc64 __attribute__((visibility ("hidden"))) and multiple TOCs Jakub Jelinek
16:58 GCC vs. Open64 Jiahua He
16:48 Re: ppc64 __attribute__((visibility ("hidden"))) and multiple TOCs Mark Mitchell
16:43 Re: ppc64 __attribute__((visibility ("hidden"))) and multiple TOCs David Edelsohn
16:36 Re: ppc64 __attribute__((visibility ("hidden"))) and multiple TOCs Mark Mitchell
16:29 Re: ppc64 __attribute__((visibility ("hidden"))) and multiple TOCs Jakub Jelinek
16:20 Re: old intentional gcc bug? Geert Bosch
15:46 m68k compound instructions Maxim Kuvyrkov
14:16 Re: ppc64 __attribute__((visibility ("hidden"))) and multiple TOCs Mark Mitchell
14:02 Re: ppc64 __attribute__((visibility ("hidden"))) and multiple TOCs Alan Modra
13:43 Re: ppc64 __attribute__((visibility ("hidden"))) and multiple TOCs Daniel Jacobowitz
13:40 Re: ppc64 __attribute__((visibility ("hidden"))) and multiple TOCs David Edelsohn
13:31 Re: ppc64 __attribute__((visibility ("hidden"))) and multiple TOCs Mark Mitchell
13:29 Re: ppc64 __attribute__((visibility ("hidden"))) and multiple TOCs Jakub Jelinek
13:15 Re: ppc64 __attribute__((visibility ("hidden"))) and multiple TOCs David Edelsohn
13:08 Re: ppc64 __attribute__((visibility ("hidden"))) and multiple TOCs David Edelsohn
13:07 Re: relation between gcc/glibc version and linux kernel version?? Tim Prince
12:57 Re: ppc64 __attribute__((visibility ("hidden"))) and multiple TOCs Mark Mitchell
12:32 Re: ppc64 __attribute__((visibility ("hidden"))) and multiple TOCs Jakub Jelinek
12:22 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Mircea Namolaru
11:48 Re: ppc64 __attribute__((visibility ("hidden"))) and multiple TOCs Andrew Pinski
11:32 Re: ppc64 __attribute__((visibility ("hidden"))) and multiple TOCs David Edelsohn
11:28 ppc64 __attribute__((visibility ("hidden"))) and multiple TOCs Jakub Jelinek
09:19 Re: relation between gcc/glibc version and linux kernel version?? ganesh subramonian
05:01 Re: relation between gcc/glibc version and linux kernel version?? Tim Prince
04:52 Re: relation between gcc/glibc version and linux kernel version?? Mike Stump
04:32 relation between gcc/glibc version and linux kernel version?? ganesh subramonian

June 24, 2007
20:17 Re: old intentional gcc bug? Eric Botcazou
16:14 Re: old intentional gcc bug? Mike Stump
14:03 Re: Bootstrap comparison failure on powerpc64 for Ada Revital1 Eres
01:04 Re: old intentional gcc bug? Brooks Moses
00:26 Re: old intentional gcc bug? Ian Lance Taylor
00:23 RE: old intentional gcc bug? Dave Korn

June 23, 2007
22:13 Re: Bootstrap comparison failure on powerpc64 for Ada Eric Botcazou
21:53 Re: old intentional gcc bug? Brooks Moses
21:39 Re: old intentional gcc bug? Robert Dewar
21:20 Re: old intentional gcc bug? Erik Trulsson
20:36 Re: old intentional gcc bug? Robert Dewar
20:18 Re: A reload inheritance bug Mark Mitchell
19:51 Re: Bootstrap comparison failure on powerpc64 for Ada Revital1 Eres
18:47 Re: Bootstrap comparison failure on powerpc64 for Ada Eric Botcazou
16:19 Re: old intentional gcc bug? Erik Trulsson
15:35 old intentional gcc bug? krith htirk
10:53 Re: Bootstrap comparison failure on powerpc64 for Ada Eric Botcazou

June 22, 2007
22:44 gcc-4.3-20070622 is now available gccadmin
20:09 Re: m68k bootstrap problem Kenneth Zadeck
18:55 Re: [M16C] : 20 bit data access DJ Delorie
18:48 Re: m68k bootstrap problem Roman Zippel
18:37 Re: Type-punning Sergei Organov
18:14 Dataflow issues in the MIPS backend. David Daney
17:46 Re: Type-punning Silvius Rus
16:53 Re: Type-punning Chris Lattner
15:18 Re: m68k bootstrap problem Kenneth Zadeck
13:41 Extending RTL expansion and CG with a new operation Thomas Bernard
13:32 Re: Gcc trees Eddy Pronk
10:31 Re: [M16C] : 20 bit data access Naveen H.S.
09:30 Re: Type-punning Sergei Organov
06:06 RE: [M16C] : 20 bit data access Naveen H.S.
01:56 Re: Type-punning Silvius Rus

June 21, 2007
23:32 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) michael.a
23:11 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) michael.a
22:22 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) Michael Meissner
22:08 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) michael.a
19:31 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07) Michael Meissner
18:12 Re: Bootstrap comparison failure on powerpc64 for Ada Revital1 Eres
18:06 Re: Bootstrap comparison failure on powerpc64 for Ada Eric Botcazou
18:04 Re: $Revision$ in version string? Michael Eager
17:38 Re: Bootstrap comparison failure on powerpc64 for Ada Eric Botcazou
17:02 Re: Bootstrap comparison failure on powerpc64 for Ada Revital1 Eres
16:16 Re: Bootstrap comparison failure on powerpc64 for Ada Revital1 Eres
16:15 Re: Bootstrap comparison failure on powerpc64 for Ada Arnaud Charlet
16:09 Re: m68k bootstrap problem Kenneth Zadeck
16:07 Re: Bootstrap comparison failure on powerpc64 for Ada Eric Botcazou
15:54 Re: $Revision$ in version string? Tobias Burnus
15:45 Re: $Revision$ in version string? H. J. Lu
15:24 $Revision$ in version string? Uros Bizjak
14:46 Re: GCC Status Report (2007-06-15) H. J. Lu
14:32 Re: m68k bootstrap problem Paolo Bonzini
13:42 Bootstrap comparison failure on powerpc64 for Ada Revital1 Eres
13:25 Re: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/sse2-vec-5.c on gcc-4.2 branch Uros Bizjak
13:16 Re: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/sse2-vec-5.c on gcc-4.2 branch H. J. Lu
13:10 Re: m68k bootstrap problem Andreas Schwab
13:06 Re: Gcc trees Revital1 Eres
13:01 Re: m68k bootstrap problem Kenneth Zadeck
12:52 Gcc trees allozano
10:54 Re: m68k bootstrap problem Roman Zippel
09:33 high definition tv for your pc Ronald Lester
09:25 To TV Fans reg: MyTVPAL = HIGH DEFINITION TV FOR YOUR PC!!! Ronald Lester
09:22 To TV Fans reg: MyTVPAL = FREE HIGH DEFINITION TV FOR YOUR PC!!! Ronald Lester
09:17 Re: libgcc fails to compile if DItype is not supported [bswapdi2] Pompapathi V Gadad
09:16 To TV Fans From Ron reg: MyTVPAL = FREE HIGH DEFINITION TV FOR YOUR PC!!! Ronald Lester
08:50 Re: libgcc fails to compile if DItype is not supported [bswapdi2] Eric Christopher
08:15 FAIL: gcc.target/i386/sse2-vec-5.c on gcc-4.2 branch Uros Bizjak
06:49 Re: libjava is broken Keith Seitz
05:25 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) michael.a
04:49 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) michael.a
04:42 Re: libgcc fails to compile if DItype is not supported [bswapdi2] Pompapathi V Gadad
04:34 Re: libjava is broken David Daney
02:42 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) CaT
02:40 libjava is broken H. J. Lu
02:31 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) michael.a
02:25 Re: [tuples] Accessors for RHS of assignments Diego Novillo

June 20, 2007
23:52 Re: libgcc fails to compile if DItype is not supported [bswapdi2] Eric Christopher
23:13 Re: [tuples] Accessors for RHS of assignments Zdenek Dvorak
22:40 gcc-4.2-20070620 is now available gccadmin
21:42 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07) Michael Meissner
20:48 Re: m68k bootstrap problem Kenneth Zadeck
19:41 Re: m68k bootstrap problem Roman Zippel
18:41 Re: [tuples] Accessors for RHS of assignments Andrew MacLeod
18:31 Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility Mark Mitchell
18:19 [tuples] Accessors for RHS of assignments Diego Novillo
18:08 Re: m68k bootstrap problem Kenneth Zadeck
18:04 Re: m68k bootstrap problem Bernd Schmidt
17:58 Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility Chris Lattner
17:47 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07) Mark Mitchell
17:13 Re: m68k bootstrap problem Paolo Bonzini
17:08 Re: m68k bootstrap problem Kenneth Zadeck
17:06 Re: m68k bootstrap problem Kenneth Zadeck
17:05 Re: m68k bootstrap problem Paolo Bonzini
16:48 Re: m68k bootstrap problem Roman Zippel
16:12 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) michael.a
15:52 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07) Michael Meissner
15:51 Re: m68k bootstrap problem Kenneth Zadeck
15:34 Re: How to supress a specific kind of ansi-aliasing rules? Mike Stump
15:06 Re: [PATCH][RFC] Re-structure tree_ssa_useless_type_conversion_1 to work towards a middle-end type system Michael Matz
15:01 Re: [PATCH][RFC] Re-structure tree_ssa_useless_type_conversion_1 to work towards a middle-end type system Eric Botcazou
14:42 RE: [PATCH][RFC] Re-structure tree_ssa_useless_type_conversion_1 to work towards a middle-end type system Dave Korn
14:36 Re: Type system functions to their own file? Richard Guenther
14:34 Type system functions to their own file? Giovanni Bajo
14:33 Re: How to supress a specific kind of ansi-aliasing rules? Joseph S. Myers
14:32 Re: [PATCH][RFC] Re-structure tree_ssa_useless_type_conversion_1 to work towards a middle-end type system Michael Matz
14:25 Re: [PATCH][RFC] Re-structure tree_ssa_useless_type_conversion_1 to work towards a middle-end type system Andrew Pinski
14:22 Re: [PATCH][RFC] Re-structure tree_ssa_useless_type_conversion_1 to work towards a middle-end type system Richard Guenther
14:17 Re: How to supress a specific kind of ansi-aliasing rules? Ian Lance Taylor
14:17 Re: [PATCH][RFC] Re-structure tree_ssa_useless_type_conversion_1 to work towards a middle-end type system Michael Matz
13:40 Re: m68k bootstrap problem Roman Zippel
13:33 Re: How to supress a specific kind of ansi-aliasing rules? Daniel Jacobowitz
13:27 Re: How to supress a specific kind of ansi-aliasing rules? Diego Novillo
13:09 RE: How to supress a specific kind of ansi-aliasing rules? Bokhanko, Andrey S
13:04 Re: Severe increase in compilation time with 4.3.0 20070615 on powerpc-apple-darwin7 Richard Guenther
13:03 Re: preventing -m options being passed to the compiler Andrew Pinski
13:01 Re: m68k bootstrap problem Kenneth Zadeck
12:59 Re: How to supress a specific kind of ansi-aliasing rules? Diego Novillo
12:59 Re: Severe increase in compilation time with 4.3.0 20070615 on powerpc-apple-darwin7 Dominique Dhumieres
12:50 Re: m68k bootstrap problem Roman Zippel
12:37 Re: m68k bootstrap problem Kenneth Zadeck
12:19 Re: Severe increase in compilation time with 4.3.0 20070615 on powerpc-apple-darwin7 Richard Guenther
12:09 [PATCH][RFC] Re-structure tree_ssa_useless_type_conversion_1 to work towards a middle-end type system Richard Guenther
12:09 Re: m68k bootstrap problem Roman Zippel
11:57 RE: How to supress a specific kind of ansi-aliasing rules? Bokhanko, Andrey S
11:52 RE: How to supress a specific kind of ansi-aliasing rules? Bokhanko, Andrey S
11:41 Re: Severe increase in compilation time with 4.3.0 20070615 on powerpc-apple-darwin7 Dominique Dhumieres
11:33 Re: How to supress a specific kind of ansi-aliasing rules? Diego Novillo
11:25 Re: How to supress a specific kind of ansi-aliasing rules? Sergei Organov
10:52 RE: How to supress a specific kind of ansi-aliasing rules? Dave Korn
10:35 How to supress a specific kind of ansi-aliasing rules? Bokhanko, Andrey S
05:52 libgcc fails to compile if DItype is not supported [bswapdi2] Pompapathi V Gadad
05:14 Re: virtual stack regs. Paolo Bonzini
03:47 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07) Mark Mitchell
01:59 Re: preventing -m options being passed to the compiler Ben Elliston
01:40 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) Ross Ridge
00:55 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) Lawrence Crowl
00:44 preventing -m options being passed to the compiler Ben Elliston
00:11 Re: class 3 edges Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)

June 19, 2007
22:58 Re: Type-punning Silvius Rus
22:37 Type-punning Herman Geza
21:51 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07) Michael Meissner
21:01 class 3 edges Sunzir Deepur
20:51 Re: [M16C] : 20 bit data access DJ Delorie
20:35 scalar expansion and array privatization for loop distribution Jagasia, Harsha
19:52 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Toon Moene
18:41 Re: Object attribute tagging Eric Christopher
17:43 Re: m68k bootstrap problem Kenneth Zadeck
17:20 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) michael.a
16:05 Re: virtual stack regs. Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)
15:43 Re: Where can I find "sizeof" implementation in front end Paolo Bonzini
15:39 RE: Where can I find "sizeof" implementation in front end Dave Korn
15:25 Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility Mark Mitchell
15:20 Where can I find "sizeof" implementation in front end bjzheng
15:04 Re: cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o testcase Jakub Jelinek
14:49 Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility Richard Earnshaw
14:07 Re: Severe increase in compilation time with 4.3.0 20070615 on powerpc-apple-darwin7 Dominique Dhumieres
14:05 Re: m68k bootstrap problem Roman Zippel
14:02 Re: Severe increase in compilation time with 4.3.0 20070615 on powerpc-apple-darwin7 Richard Guenther
13:48 Severe increase in compilation time with 4.3.0 20070615 on powerpc-apple-darwin7 Dominique Dhumieres
13:41 Re: m68k bootstrap problem Kenneth Zadeck
13:35 m68k bootstrap problem Roman Zippel
13:28 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o testcase Revital1 Eres
13:19 Re: virtual stack regs. Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
12:48 Re: New LTO branch ready Daniel Berlin
12:33 Re: virtual stack regs. Kenneth Zadeck
11:55 run-time function adaptation for statically-compiled programs Grigori Fursin
11:23 RE: Object attribute tagging Dave Korn
10:10 Re: virtual stack regs. Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
09:11 Re: virtual stack regs. Uros Bizjak
09:05 Re: virtual stack regs. Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
09:04 Re: Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math? Richard Guenther
08:51 Re: virtual stack regs. Jan Hubicka
08:44 Re: Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math? Paolo Bonzini
08:03 Re: Object attribute tagging Richard Earnshaw
07:33 Re: Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math? Richard Guenther
06:00 Re: New LTO branch ready Mark Mitchell
05:57 Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility Mark Mitchell
05:39 Re: Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math? Uros Bizjak
04:47 Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility Chris Lattner
03:12 Re: Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math? Mark Mitchell
02:41 Re: Object attribute tagging H. J. Lu
02:31 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) michael.a
01:50 Object attribute tagging Joseph S. Myers
01:17 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) Daniel Jacobowitz
00:28 virtual stack regs. Kenneth Zadeck
00:05 Re: Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math? tbp

June 18, 2007
23:57 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) michael.a
23:12 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) Brian Dessent
23:07 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) michael.a
23:07 RE: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) Dave Korn
23:04 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Mark Mitchell
22:52 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) Eric Christopher
22:46 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) michael.a
22:41 gcc-4.1-20070618 is now available gccadmin
22:32 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) Eric Christopher
22:22 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) michael.a
22:11 RE: Fixed-point branch? Fu, Chao-Ying
21:46 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) Eric Christopher
21:45 Re: Suffix for __float128 FP constants H. J. Lu
21:36 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) michael.a
21:33 Re: Suffix for __float128 FP constants Steve Ellcey
21:30 Re: Fixed-point branch? Bernd Schmidt
21:08 Re: Suffix for __float128 FP constants H. J. Lu
21:06 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Richard Kenner
21:03 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Richard Kenner
21:00 The Linux binutils 2.17.50.0.17 is released H. J. Lu
20:59 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Daniel Berlin
20:58 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Daniel Berlin
20:57 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Daniel Berlin
20:54 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Richard Kenner
20:42 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Adam Nemet
20:07 Fwd: INCOMING_RETURN_ADDR_RTX in ia64.h Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)
20:06 RE: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Jagasia, Harsha
20:04 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Richard Kenner
20:01 Re: GCC Status Report (2007-06-15) Mark Mitchell
19:51 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Daniel Berlin
19:32 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Richard Kenner
19:26 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Adam Nemet
19:18 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Richard Kenner
19:16 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Richard Kenner
19:10 Re: Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math? Bradley Lucier
18:48 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Daniel Berlin
18:46 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Adam Nemet
18:38 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Richard Kenner
18:27 Re: Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math? Bradley Lucier
18:26 Re: Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math? Brooks Moses
18:26 RE: Fixed-point branch? Fu, Chao-Ying
18:15 Re: Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math? Uros Bizjak
18:10 Re: Suffix for __float128 FP constants Steve Ellcey
17:57 New LTO branch ready Daniel Berlin
17:48 Re: Suffix for __float128 FP constants H. J. Lu
17:45 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Daniel Berlin
17:33 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Sebastian Pop
17:25 Re: Suffix for __float128 FP constants Uros Bizjak
17:16 Re: Suffix for __float128 FP constants H. J. Lu
17:06 Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility Mark Mitchell
16:25 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Devang Patel
16:23 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Daniel Berlin
16:08 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) Andrew Haley
15:38 Requesting SVN write access (Was: [PATCH frv] Fix PR ...) Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
15:23 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Richard Kenner
15:10 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) Doug Gregor
14:58 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Daniel Berlin
14:58 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Daniel Berlin
14:56 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Richard Kenner
14:55 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Richard Kenner
14:49 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Daniel Berlin
14:32 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Richard Kenner
14:22 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) Joern Rennecke
14:20 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Daniel Berlin
14:19 Re: missing symbols Andrew Pinski
14:16 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Daniel Berlin
14:13 Re: missing symbols costin_c
13:52 missing symbols costin_c
13:38 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Richard Kenner
13:24 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) KJKHyperion
13:21 gcov / gcov-dump Eddy Pronk
13:08 Re: More vectorizer testcases? Dorit Nuzman
12:53 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Richard Kenner
12:32 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Eric Botcazou
12:26 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Dorit Nuzman
12:07 Re: Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math? tbp
12:06 Re: More vectorizer testcases? Giovanni Bajo
12:01 Re: Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math? tbp
11:55 Re: Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math? Richard Guenther
11:52 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Daniel Berlin
11:50 Re: Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math? Giovanni Bajo
11:46 Re: Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math? Uros Bizjak
11:37 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Daniel Berlin
11:24 Re: More vectorizer testcases? Dorit Nuzman
11:20 Re: Fixed-point branch? Bernd Schmidt
11:01 [M16C] : 20 bit data access Naveen H.S.
10:59 Re: Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math? Richard Guenther
10:52 Re: missed vectorization (was Some thoughts about steerring commitee work) Dorit Nuzman
10:47 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Dorit Nuzman
10:16 Re: Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math? tbp
10:11 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Dorit Nuzman
09:27 Re: Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math? Richard Guenther
09:06 Re: Resuming SPEC performance tracking at RedHat Michael Matz
08:54 Re: PR other/32351 [Was: Re: GCC Status Report (2007-06-15)] Paolo Bonzini
08:35 Re: Help in understanding ccp propagator Richard Guenther
06:46 Re: GCC Status Report (2007-06-15) Ben Elliston
06:35 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Eric Botcazou
06:30 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Eric Botcazou
05:29 Re: machine learning for loop unrolling Ken Raeburn
04:37 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Richard Kenner
02:44 Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility Chris Lattner
02:43 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Daniel Berlin
01:58 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) michael.a
01:47 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) Tim Prince
01:41 RE: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility Dave Korn
01:26 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) Ismail Dönmez
01:23 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) michael.a
00:15 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Richard Kenner

June 17, 2007
21:14 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Laurent GUERBY
21:06 Re: Suffix for __float128 FP constants Joseph S. Myers
21:02 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Daniel Berlin
20:57 Re: missed vectorization (was Some thoughts about steerring commitee work) Tim Prince
20:52 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Laurent GUERBY
20:28 Suffix for __float128 FP constants Uros Bizjak
20:22 Re: Fixing m68hc11 reorg after dataflow merge Kenneth Zadeck
19:31 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Daniel Berlin
19:09 Re: missed vectorization (was Some thoughts about steerring commitee work) Janne Blomqvist
19:06 Re: Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math? Giovanni Bajo
18:24 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Adam Nemet
18:22 Re: Help in understanding ccp propagator Revital1 Eres
18:20 Re: Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math? Uros Bizjak
17:47 Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math? Giovanni Bajo
17:43 More vectorizer testcases? Giovanni Bajo
17:41 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) michael.a
17:34 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) Aaron W. LaFramboise
17:31 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) michael.a
17:16 Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility Ross Ridge
17:16 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) michael.a
16:48 Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility Daniel Jacobowitz
16:47 Re: missed vectorization (was Some thoughts about steerring commitee work) Tim Prince
16:11 Re: GCC Status Report (2007-06-15) H. J. Lu
15:18 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Daniel Berlin
15:09 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) Robert Dewar
15:07 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) Robert Dewar
14:52 Re: init-regs pass initializes virtual-stack-vars? Uros Bizjak
14:51 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Ryan Hill
14:33 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) Ross Ridge
13:59 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Paolo Bonzini
12:11 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Ira Rosen
11:47 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Richard Kenner
10:44 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) Martin Jambor
08:30 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Dorit Nuzman
08:30 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Dorit Nuzman
08:04 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Eric Botcazou
07:36 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Eric Botcazou
06:39 Re: Fixing m68hc11 reorg after dataflow merge Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
05:13 Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility Chris Lattner
03:36 Re: Fixing m68hc11 reorg after dataflow merge Kenneth Zadeck
03:34 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Daniel Berlin
03:31 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Daniel Berlin
03:26 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) Robert Dewar
01:47 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Richard Kenner
01:32 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) michael.a
01:16 RE: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) michael.a
01:16 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Tim Prince
00:48 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) Joe Buck
00:06 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work H. J. Lu

June 16, 2007
23:59 Re: PR other/32351 [Was: Re: GCC Status Report (2007-06-15)] H. J. Lu
23:41 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Ryan Hill
23:31 Re: GCC Status Report (2007-06-15) Mark Mitchell
23:13 Re: GCC Status Report (2007-06-15) Mark Mitchell
23:06 RE: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility Danny Smith
22:49 Re: init-regs pass initializes virtual-stack-vars? Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
22:20 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Eric Botcazou
21:32 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Daniel Berlin
20:25 Re: Fixing m68hc11 reorg after dataflow merge Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)
20:23 RE: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) Dave Korn
19:29 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) michael.a
19:23 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) michael.a
19:21 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) David Fang
19:14 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) Andrew Pinski
19:08 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) michael.a
18:54 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Joe Buck
18:54 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) michael.a
18:53 Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility Mark Mitchell
18:42 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) Joe Buck
18:11 init-regs pass initializes virtual-stack-vars? Uros Bizjak
17:39 Re: Status of simulator targets after dataflow merge Mike Stein
17:34 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) Ross Ridge
16:52 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) michael.a
16:51 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) Robert Dewar
16:46 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) michael.a
16:13 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Daniel Berlin
15:53 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Dorit Nuzman
15:51 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Dorit Nuzman
15:39 Re: Access to raw repositories Andreas Schwab
15:31 Status of simulator targets after dataflow merge Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
15:29 PR other/32351 [Was: Re: GCC Status Report (2007-06-15)] Uros Bizjak
15:26 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Dorit Nuzman
15:20 Re: Access to raw repositories Bernardo Innocenti
15:04 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Joel Sherrill
13:25 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work H. J. Lu
13:18 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work H. J. Lu
13:17 Re: GCC Status Report (2007-06-15) H. J. Lu
11:01 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) Robert Dewar
09:30 Fixing m68hc11 reorg after dataflow merge Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
07:30 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Eric Botcazou
07:23 Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility Chris Lattner
06:59 Re: When EOL? Replacing GCJ by IcedTea, GCC by LLVM. Chris Lattner
06:45 Re: r125698 breaks bootstrap on trunk for i686-pc-linux-gnu Andrew Pinski
05:47 Re: GCC Status Report (2007-06-15) Andrew Pinski
05:09 PTR-PLUS merge into the mainline Andrew_Pinski
04:54 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) David Fang
04:51 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) Brooks Moses
04:10 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) michael.a
03:46 Re: GCC Status Report (2007-06-15) Andrew Pinski
03:45 Re: GCC Status Report (2007-06-15) Kaveh R. GHAZI
03:36 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Richard Kenner
03:33 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Richard Kenner
03:32 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Vladimir N. Makarov
03:28 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Richard Kenner
03:25 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Vladimir N. Makarov
03:12 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) Andrew Pinski
03:08 When EOL? Replacing GCJ by IcedTea, GCC by LLVM. J.C. Pizarro
03:04 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Vladimir N. Makarov
03:00 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) michael.a
02:43 Re: When EOL? Replacing GCJ by IcedTea, GCC by LLVM. Ian Lance Taylor
02:42 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Ian Lance Taylor
02:19 When EOL? Replacing GCJ by IcedTea, GCC by LLVM. J.C. Pizarro
02:17 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Andrew Pinski
02:03 Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility Daniel Jacobowitz
02:02 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work J.C. Pizarro
01:54 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work H. J. Lu
01:43 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Ian Lance Taylor
01:22 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Ian Lance Taylor
00:51 Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility Mark Mitchell
00:37 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Tobias Burnus
00:36 Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility Andrew Pinski
00:26 Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility Mark Mitchell

June 15, 2007
23:51 Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility Andrew Pinski
23:50 Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) Joe Buck
23:48 Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility Bill Wendling
23:47 Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility Mark Mitchell
23:25 I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors) michael.a
23:23 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Daniel Berlin
23:04 Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility Chris Lattner
22:55 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Richard Kenner
22:45 Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility Mark Mitchell
22:44 gcc-4.3-20070615 is now available gccadmin
22:40 GCC Status Report (2007-06-15) Mark Mitchell
22:29 Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility Bill Wendling
22:16 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Adam Nemet
21:43 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Vladimir N. Makarov
21:36 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Eric Botcazou
21:28 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Vladimir N. Makarov
21:13 Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Daniel Berlin
21:08 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Daniel Berlin
20:55 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Eric Botcazou
20:21 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Vladimir N. Makarov
19:41 Re: [patch,committed] Make Fortran maintainers "Non-Autopoiesis Maintainers" Diego Novillo
19:38 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Ian Lance Taylor
19:31 Re: [patch,committed] Make Fortran maintainers "Non-Autopoiesis Maintainers" Tobias Schlüter
19:28 Re: machine learning for loop unrolling Zdenek Dvorak
19:14 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Vladimir N. Makarov
19:10 Re: Access to raw repositories Andreas Schwab
18:58 Re: [patch,committed] Make Fortran maintainers "Non-Autopoiesis Maintainers" Brooks Moses
18:56 Access to raw repositories Bernardo Innocenti
18:43 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Ian Lance Taylor
18:36 Re: [patch,committed] Make Fortran maintainers "Non-Autopoiesis Maintainers" Kenneth Zadeck
17:56 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Joe Buck
17:50 Re: [fixed-point] Fixed-point branch merge plan Mark Mitchell
17:48 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Vladimir N. Makarov
17:07 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Joe Buck
16:52 Re: machine learning for loop unrolling Stefan Ciobaca
16:33 Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA Adam Nemet
16:14 RE: Some thoughts about steering committee work Kenneth Zadeck
16:07 RE: Libmudflap for sh-elf toolchain cannot access environment variable MUDFLAP_OPTIONS Deepen Mantri
15:32 Re: Libmudflap for sh-elf toolchain cannot access environment variable MUDFLAP_OPTIONS Andrew STUBBS
15:28 Re: Libmudflap for sh-elf toolchain cannot access environment variable MUDFLAP_OPTIONS Frank Ch. Eigler
15:20 RE: Libmudflap for sh-elf toolchain cannot access environment variable MUDFLAP_OPTIONS Deepen Mantri
14:35 Libmudflap for sh-elf toolchain cannot access environment variable MUDFLAP_OPTIONS Deepen Mantri
14:32 Re: Resuming SPEC performance tracking at RedHat Vladimir N. Makarov
14:32 Re: Resuming SPEC performance tracking at RedHat Diego Novillo
14:05 Re: Resuming SPEC performance tracking at RedHat Richard Guenther
13:58 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Vladimir N. Makarov
13:20 Resuming SPEC performance tracking at RedHat Vladimir N. Makarov
13:05 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Richard Kenner
12:49 Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Vladimir N. Makarov
11:01 Re: Libmudflap for sh-elf toolchain cannot access environment variable MUDFLAP_OPTIONS Andrew STUBBS
10:37 Libmudflap for sh-elf toolchain cannot access environment variable MUDFLAP_OPTIONS Deepen Mantri
08:12 Re: Some regressions from the dataflow merge Maxim Kuvyrkov
07:48 RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility Mark Mitchell
06:49 Re: [patch,committed] Make Fortran maintainers "Non-Autopoiesis Maintainers" FX Coudert
06:14 Re: [patch,committed] Make Fortran maintainers "Non-Autopoiesis Maintainers" Steve Kargl
05:31 Re: [patch,committed] Make Fortran maintainers "Non-Autopoiesis Maintainers" Brooks Moses
04:41 Re: [patch,committed] Make Fortran maintainers "Non-Autopoiesis Maintainers" Steve Kargl
03:50 Re: [patch,committed] Make Fortran maintainers "Non-Autopoiesis Maintainers" Brooks Moses

June 14, 2007
19:29 Re: Please fork soft-fp from libc DJ Delorie
19:04 Re: Please fork soft-fp from libc Uros Bizjak
18:28 Re: Please fork soft-fp from libc Jakub Jelinek
18:17 Re: Please fork soft-fp from libc Daniel Jacobowitz
18:14 Re: Please fork soft-fp from libc Uros Bizjak
17:34 Re: Please fork soft-fp from libc Jakub Jelinek
17:27 Re: How to submit Intel BID library patch? H. J. Lu
17:27 Re: Please fork soft-fp from libc Richard Guenther
17:14 Re: How to submit Intel BID library patch? Janis Johnson
17:02 RFA: (dataflow?) testsuite regression since last week Bob Wilson
16:36 Re: Please fork soft-fp from libc Joe Buck
16:32 Re: Please fork soft-fp from libc Joseph S. Myers
16:11 Re: Merge PTR_PLUS branch? Mark Mitchell
16:11 Please fork soft-fp from libc Uros Bizjak
14:37 Re: Some regressions from the dataflow merge Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)
13:57 Re: Ian Taylor appoined non-algorithmic GWP Ian Lance Taylor
13:31 How to submit Intel BID library patch? H. J. Lu
13:08 Re: maybe configure.ac problem ? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
13:08 Re: Diego Novillo appointed middle-end maintainer and non-algorithmic GWP Diego Novillo
13:04 maybe configure.ac problem ? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
11:53 [PATCH] Fix breakage Paolo Bonzini
11:04 r125698 breaks bootstrap on trunk for i686-pc-linux-gnu Thomas Veith
10:37 Diego Novillo appointed middle-end maintainer and non-algorithmic GWP David Edelsohn
10:36 Ian Taylor appoined non-algorithmic GWP David Edelsohn
10:06 Bootstrap failure on trunk Thomas Veith
08:09 Re: Some regressions from the dataflow merge Richard Guenther
05:09 Re: Splitting function arguments. Mohamed Shafi
04:44 Re: Merge PTR_PLUS branch? Diego Novillo
04:36 Re: Procedure to submit new port (CR16 processor) Pompapathi V Gadad
03:33 Re: Merge PTR_PLUS branch? Andrew Pinski
00:01 Merge PTR_PLUS branch? Mark Mitchell

June 13, 2007
22:42 gcc-4.2-20070613 is now available gccadmin
21:39 Re: Some regressions from the dataflow merge Richard Guenther
21:05 Re: Backtrace() called inside a signal handler traps while tracking an invalid function call. Daniel Jacobowitz
20:56 Backtrace() called inside a signal handler traps while tracking an invalid function call. supriya kannery
19:22 Re: Some regressions from the dataflow merge Kenneth Zadeck
18:52 Re: Generating a phi node Sebastian Pop
18:43 Generating a phi node Revital1 Eres
17:56 Re: Blackfin eh broken with dataflow merge Kenneth Zadeck
17:48 Re: Splitting function arguments. Ian Lance Taylor
17:47 Re: Procedure to submit new port (CR16 processor) Ian Lance Taylor
17:44 Blackfin eh broken with dataflow merge Bernd Schmidt
15:47 Re: Sparc bootstrap failure, dataflow related? Kaveh R. GHAZI
14:11 Re: sparc-rtems4.7-gcc versus fpu Joel Sherrill
14:08 Re: sparc-rtems4.7-gcc versus fpu Eric Botcazou
13:35 Re: LOG_LINKS information after dataflow merge Paolo Bonzini
13:32 LOG_LINKS information after dataflow merge Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
12:10 Re: sparc-rtems4.7-gcc versus fpu Joel Sherrill
11:18 sparc-rtems4.7-gcc versus fpu Peter A. Krauss
09:50 Splitting function arguments. Mohamed Shafi
08:08 Procedure to submit new port (CR16 processor) Pompapathi V Gadad
07:40 lock-less containers? dm . n9107
00:09 Re: Help in understanding ccp propagator Daniel Berlin

June 12, 2007
22:47 Access to .dynamic section of executable from shared library Konstantin Baydarov
22:25 MIPS bootstrap failure, dataflow related? David Daney
21:24 Re: Sparc bootstrap failure, dataflow related? Kenneth Zadeck
21:17 Sparc bootstrap failure, dataflow related? Kaveh R. GHAZI
20:45 Re: Some regressions from the dataflow merge Kenneth Zadeck
20:41 Re: Some regressions from the dataflow merge Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)
19:45 Re: Dataflow bug [RE: Large number of fortran testsuite failures] Paolo Bonzini
19:10 Re: Some regressions from the dataflow merge Richard Guenther
15:15 RE: Some regressions from the dataflow merge Dave Korn
14:59 Re: Creating new variable in tree level Richard Guenther
14:54 Re: Some regressions from the dataflow merge Kenneth Zadeck
14:53 Creating new variable in tree level Revital1 Eres
14:46 Re: Some regressions from the dataflow merge Richard Guenther
14:43 Re: Some regressions from the dataflow merge Kenneth Zadeck
14:35 RE: Some regressions from the dataflow merge Dave Korn
14:09 Re: Some regressions from the dataflow merge Richard Guenther
14:05 Re: Some regressions from the dataflow merge Kenneth Zadeck
13:35 Re: Does unrolling prevents doloop optimizations? Zdenek Dvorak
13:06 promoting function arguments - GCC 4.1.1 Rohit Arul Raj
12:39 Dataflow bug [RE: Large number of fortran testsuite failures] Dave Korn
12:37 Re: Does unrolling prevents doloop optimizations? Vladimir Yanovsky
12:37 Re: Large number of fortran testsuite failures FX Coudert
12:13 Re: Large number of fortran testsuite failures Paul Richard Thomas
12:10 Re: Help in understanding ccp propagator Revital1 Eres
11:48 Some regressions from the dataflow merge Richard Guenther
11:28 Re: Does unrolling prevents doloop optimizations? Zdenek Dvorak
10:35 Does unrolling prevents doloop optimizations? Vladimir Yanovsky
08:00 Large number of fortran testsuite failures Paul Richard Thomas
02:31 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07) Mark Mitchell

June 11, 2007
22:42 gcc-4.1-20070611 is now available gccadmin
22:37 [fixed-point] Fixed-point branch merge plan Fu, Chao-Ying
22:29 Re: STL in G++? Joe Buck
22:06 STL in G++? Dean Anderson
21:50 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07) H. J. Lu
21:33 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07) Michael Meissner
20:19 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07) Kaveh R. GHAZI
17:58 Re: Miscompilations for cris-elf on dataflow-branch Hans-Peter Nilsson
17:45 Re: [RFC] Aggregate mapping Daniel Jacobowitz
16:33 Re: Help understanding tree-affine.c Zdenek Dvorak
15:43 Help understanding tree-affine.c Revital1 Eres
15:26 Re: A reload inheritance bug Bernd Schmidt
13:19 Another reload inheritance bug Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
11:47 Dataflow maintainers David Edelsohn
11:25 Re: Miscompilations for cris-elf on dataflow-branch Kenneth Zadeck
11:03 Re: mf-runtime.c IC error.. Seema S. Ravandale
09:50 Re: FW: [gnu.org #336636] Needed Java Compilers for SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 Krupa Stephen Gadde
09:31 Re: A reload inheritance bug Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
09:04 mf-runtime.c IC error.. Seema S. Ravandale
08:56 Re: FW: [gnu.org #336636] Needed Java Compilers for SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 Richard Guenther
08:22 Re: A reload inheritance bug Mark Shinwell
05:47 Re: Miscompilations for cris-elf on dataflow-branch Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)
04:36 Re: Miscompilations for cris-elf on dataflow-branch Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)
04:30 FW: [gnu.org #336636] Needed Java Compilers for SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 Krupa Stephen Gadde
02:51 Miscompilations for cris-elf on dataflow-branch Hans-Peter Nilsson

June 10, 2007
23:24 LTO Status Report (2007-06-10) Mark Mitchell
22:54 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07) Mark Mitchell
21:54 Re: machine learning for loop unrolling Grigori Fursin
16:56 [RFC] Aggregate mapping Jim Tison
07:05 Re: Generating DWARF CIE info Eric Botcazou

June 09, 2007
23:29 Fwd: gcc 3.1.2 build on Solaris 2.9 - success Ray Holme
22:35 Re: Generating DWARF CIE info Michael Eager
21:57 Re: Generating DWARF CIE info Eric Botcazou
20:00 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07) Mark Mitchell
19:59 general register used as saving comparison result Ying Yi
18:49 Re: Generating DWARF CIE info Michael Eager
17:50 Re: Generating DWARF CIE info Eric Botcazou
14:58 Re: Generating DWARF CIE info Michael Eager
14:38 Re: Generating DWARF CIE info Eric Botcazou
13:48 Re: Generating DWARF CIE info Michael Eager
11:39 gcc 3.1.2 build on Solaris 2.9 Ray Holme
09:25 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07) Richard Guenther
07:54 Re: Generating DWARF CIE info Eric Botcazou
07:14 Re: machine learning for loop unrolling Maxim Kuvyrkov
06:52 Re: [bug] undefined symbols with -Woverloaded-virtual and -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage Brooks Moses
06:24 Re: [bug] undefined symbols with -Woverloaded-virtual and -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage Lothar Werzinger
02:23 Re: Fixed-point branch? Mark Mitchell
02:14 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07) Andrew Pinski
00:01 Re: machine learning for loop unrolling Zdenek Dvorak

June 08, 2007
23:52 MIPS results on the pointer_plus branch. David Daney
22:45 gcc-4.3-20070608 is now available gccadmin
22:33 [fixed-point] A diff file for all changes Fu, Chao-Ying
21:56 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07) Brooks Moses
21:53 RE: Fixed-point branch? Fu, Chao-Ying
20:36 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07) Mark Mitchell
20:27 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07) Mark Mitchell
20:18 Re: note_stores vs. PRE_DEC, POST_INC and so on Ian Lance Taylor
20:12 Generating DWARF CIE info Michael Eager
19:58 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07) Mike Stump
19:50 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07) Mark Mitchell
19:21 note_stores vs. PRE_DEC, POST_INC and so on Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
19:04 Re: machine learning for loop unrolling Kenneth Hoste
18:48 Re: PATCH COMMITTED: Don't break tests for enum in range Richard Kenner
18:36 Re: PATCH COMMITTED: Don't break tests for enum in range Tom Tromey
17:38 ada, gcc 4.3 and darwin? Jack Howarth
16:11 room for GCC Summit James Lemke
15:15 RE: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07) Cornea, Marius
14:31 machine learning for loop unrolling Stefan Ciobaca
14:20 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07) Janne Blomqvist
13:30 machine learning for loop unrolling Stefan Ciobaca
13:07 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07) H. J. Lu
13:00 Re: When was decimal floating point added to gcc? H. J. Lu
12:50 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07) Joseph S. Myers
07:40 Re: [rfc] Moving bbs back to pools Zdenek Dvorak
07:29 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07) Brooks Moses
07:20 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07) Mike Stump
07:16 Re: [OT] Re: Git repository with full GCC history Harvey Harrison
07:11 Re: [rfc] Moving bbs back to pools Jan Hubicka
07:06 Re: [rfc] Moving bbs back to pools Jan Hubicka
06:48 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07) Brooks Moses
05:33 GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07) Mark Mitchell
05:32 Re: [OT] Re: Git repository with full GCC history Bernardo Innocenti
05:01 Re: Fixed-point branch? Mark Mitchell
04:52 Writing to Subversion via Git Ollie Wild
04:34 Re: [OT] Re: Git repository with full GCC history Harvey Harrison

June 07, 2007
23:42 RE: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista Danny Smith
21:07 TeX sources for tuples document uploaded to the wiki Diego Novillo
18:37 Re: PATCH COMMITTED: Don't break tests for enum in range Richard Kenner
16:44 [mingw] arm-elf-gcc build error with fixincludes file error Brian Sidebotham
16:11 Re: DWARF-2 unwinder versus MIPS n32 Daniel Jacobowitz
16:05 Re: DWARF-2 unwinder versus MIPS n32 David Daney
15:59 RE: testsuite trigraphs.c failure due to cygwin <stdio.h> Dave Korn
15:54 Re: DWARF-2 unwinder versus MIPS n32 David Daney
15:51 Re: [rfc] Moving bbs back to pools Daniel Berlin
15:49 Re: [rfc] Moving bbs back to pools Richard Guenther
15:49 Re: [rfc] Moving bbs back to pools Daniel Berlin
15:43 Re: PATCH COMMITTED: Don't break tests for enum in range Richard Guenther
15:29 DWARF-2 unwinder versus MIPS n32 Daniel Jacobowitz
15:04 Re: [rfc] Moving bbs back to pools Zdenek Dvorak
15:02 Re: PATCH COMMITTED: Don't break tests for enum in range Richard Kenner
14:51 Re: [rfc] Moving bbs back to pools Ian Lance Taylor
14:43 Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista Ian Lance Taylor
14:31 Re: hash_rtx and volatile subexpressions Ian Lance Taylor
14:26 Re: [rfc] Moving bbs back to pools Ian Lance Taylor
14:21 Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista Matt Fago
14:03 hash_rtx and volatile subexpressions Andrey Belevantsev
13:52 Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista Ian Lance Taylor
13:05 Re: libjava is a train wreck. Daniel Berlin
13:03 Re: [rfc] Moving bbs back to pools Daniel Berlin
12:52 Re: A problem with the loop structure Vladimir Yanovsky
11:05 Any interest in i586-pc-interix3 configuration improvements? Kaz Sasayama
11:04 [rfc] Moving bbs back to pools Zdenek Dvorak
10:13 Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista Jakub Jelinek
10:09 Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista Paolo Bonzini
08:57 Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista Jakub Jelinek
08:36 Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista Florian Weimer
03:04 Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista Aaron Gray
02:47 Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista Richard Kenner
00:22 Re: [bug] undefined symbols with -Woverloaded-virtual and -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage Joe Buck

June 06, 2007
23:40 Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista Aaron Gray
22:44 Re: libjava is a train wreck. Ben Elliston
22:43 gcc-4.2-20070606 is now available gccadmin
22:41 Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista Robert Dewar
22:40 Re: When was decimal floating point added to gcc? Ben Elliston
22:40 Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista Robert Dewar
20:23 RE: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista Danny Smith
19:21 dataflow branch merge plans. Kenneth Zadeck
19:14 Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista Andrew Haley
19:08 Re: how to build executable instructions blocks dynamically Mike Stump
18:13 [bug] undefined symbols with -Woverloaded-virtual and -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage Lothar Werzinger
17:21 RE: current gcc trunk testsuite failure on cygwin: Assembler messages: Warning: end of file in string; '"' inserted: Warning: .stabs: missing comma Dave Korn
16:50 RE: current gcc trunk testsuite failure on cygwin: Assembler messages: Warning: end of file in string; '"' inserted: Warning: .stabs: missing comma Dave Korn
16:43 how to build executable instructions blocks dynamically Gorgonite
16:30 Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista Olivier Hainque
16:28 Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista Olivier Hainque
15:27 Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista Paolo Bonzini
15:02 Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista Jack Lloyd
14:46 Re: When was decimal floating point added to gcc? Gerald Pfeifer
14:40 Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista Simon Brenner
14:30 Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista Ian Lance Taylor
13:52 RE: segmentation fault Dave Korn
13:41 RE: testsuite trigraphs.c failure due to cygwin <stdio.h> Dave Korn
13:36 Re: libjava is a train wreck. Diego Novillo
13:34 Re: testsuite trigraphs.c failure due to cygwin <stdio.h> Tim Prince
12:26 Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista Richard Kenner
12:08 RE: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista Rupert Wood
12:06 gcj java help sharads
12:01 RE: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista Rupert Wood
11:42 Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista Andrew Haley
11:36 Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista Simon Brenner
11:26 RE: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista Dave Korn
11:13 RE: current gcc trunk testsuite failure on cygwin: Assembler messages: Warning: end of file in string; '"' inserted: Warning: .stabs: missing comma Dave Korn
11:13 RE: current gcc trunk testsuite failure on cygwin: Assembler messages: Warning: end of file in string; '"' inserted: Warning: .stabs: missing comma Dave Korn
11:04 Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista Simon Brenner
10:51 RE: testsuite trigraphs.c failure due to cygwin <stdio.h> Dave Korn
09:41 Re: Creating a patch ready for gcc-patches list Brian Sidebotham
09:36 Re: Creating a patch ready for gcc-patches list Jan-Benedict Glaw
09:30 Re: Creating a patch ready for gcc-patches list Manuel López-Ibáñez
09:15 Creating a patch ready for gcc-patches list Brian Sidebotham
07:48 use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista Olivier Hainque
00:50 Re: segmentation fault Ben Elliston

June 05, 2007
23:07 Re: Help in understanding ccp propagator Daniel Berlin
22:16 RE: Fixed-point branch? Fu, Chao-Ying
19:51 Re: Something weird with cp/decl.c switch statement Simon Baldwin
17:44 Re: linking problem with boost Mike Stump
17:39 Re: libjava is a train wreck. Mike Stump
17:35 Re: Something weird with cp/decl.c switch statement Aaron Gray
17:27 linking problem with boost ronnie_raj
17:19 Re: Fixed-point branch? Mark Mitchell
17:15 Re: vector compare Paul Brook
17:13 Re: Something weird with cp/decl.c switch statement Mark Mitchell
16:55 Re: Something weird with cp/decl.c switch statement Ian Lance Taylor
16:43 Re: Something weird with cp/decl.c switch statement Andrew Pinski
16:41 Re: libjava is a train wreck. Andrew Haley
16:36 Re: Something weird with cp/decl.c switch statement Aaron Gray
16:33 Re: libjava is a train wreck. David Daney
15:49 segmentation fault fred . cotton
15:30 RE: How to enable Mudflap in gcc 4.x? Deepen Mantri
15:28 Re: Something weird with cp/decl.c switch statement Andrew Haley
15:23 Re: Something weird with cp/decl.c switch statement Andrew Pinski
15:18 Re: Something weird with cp/decl.c switch statement Andrew Haley
15:13 Something weird with cp/decl.c switch statement Aaron Gray
13:53 Re: Bootstrap failure on ppc64 Ian Lance Taylor
13:34 Re: A reload inheritance bug Mark Shinwell
13:30 Re: Bootstrap failure on ppc64 Tim Prince
12:57 Re: A reload inheritance bug Bernd Schmidt
12:56 Re: vector compare Revital1 Eres
12:39 vector compare Ying Yi
12:17 Re: A reload inheritance bug Mark Shinwell
11:41 Re: A reload inheritance bug Bernd Schmidt
11:38 Re: Help in understanding ccp propagator Revital1 Eres
11:19 Re: A reload inheritance bug Mark Shinwell
10:43 Re: A reload inheritance bug Bernd Schmidt
07:06 Bootstrap failure on ppc64 Revital1 Eres
04:28 libjava is a train wreck. Steve Kargl
03:57 Re: Comments for empty for-loop parts (was Re: xserver: Branch 'master' - 6 commits) Bernardo Innocenti
03:16 Re: [OT] Re: Git repository with full GCC history Bernardo Innocenti
00:57 Re: current gcc trunk testsuite failure on cygwin: Assembler messages: Warning: end of file in string; '"' inserted: Warning: .stabs: missing comma Tim Prince
00:32 RE: Fixed-point branch? Fu, Chao-Ying

June 04, 2007
22:44 Re: testsuite trigraphs.c failure due to cygwin <stdio.h> Ian Lance Taylor
22:40 gcc-4.1-20070604 is now available gccadmin
20:42 Re: When was decimal floating point added to gcc? H. J. Lu
20:23 Re: When was decimal floating point added to gcc? Janis Johnson
19:05 testsuite trigraphs.c failure due to cygwin <stdio.h> Timothy C Prince
19:03 Re: Help in understanding ccp propagator Daniel Berlin
17:33 Re: What is purpose of numbered variables?? Diego Novillo
16:15 Re: [OT] Re: Git repository with full GCC history Jan-Benedict Glaw
16:02 current gcc trunk testsuite failure on cygwin: Assembler messages: Warning: end of file in string; '"' inserted: Warning: .stabs: missing comma Christian Joensson
11:24 Re: How to enable Mudflap in gcc 4.x? Frank Ch. Eigler
11:10 RE: How to enable Mudflap in gcc 4.x? Deepen Mantri
10:28 Re: Help in understanding ccp propagator Revital1 Eres
09:17 Re: [OT] Re: Git repository with full GCC history Bernardo Innocenti
09:13 Re: [OT] Re: Git repository with full GCC history David Woodhouse
08:12 Re: How to enable Mudflap in gcc 4.x? Eric Christopher
08:03 question about switch table ligang
07:40 RE: How to enable Mudflap in gcc 4.x? Deepen Mantri
07:22 Re: How to enable Mudflap in gcc 4.x? Eric Christopher
07:11 RE: How to enable Mudflap in gcc 4.x? Deepen Mantri
03:02 Libjava is broken again H. J. Lu
02:57 Re: [OT] Re: Git repository with full GCC history Harvey Harrison
02:29 Re: [OT] Re: Git repository with full GCC history Bernardo Innocenti

June 03, 2007
23:14 Re: [OT] Re: Git repository with full GCC history Harvey Harrison
22:45 Re: [OT] Re: Git repository with full GCC history Gabriel Paubert
19:54 Re: Help in understanding ccp propagator Daniel Berlin
15:28 Re: How to enable Mudflap in gcc 4.x? Frank Ch. Eigler
12:48 Help in understanding ccp propagator Revital1 Eres
12:42 Re: When was decimal floating point added to gcc? Gerald Pfeifer
11:53 Re: When was decimal floating point added to gcc? Ben Elliston
04:51 Re: gcc-current: badly worded warning? Eyal Lebedinsky
01:49 Re: When was decimal floating point added to gcc? H. J. Lu
01:17 Re: When was decimal floating point added to gcc? Peter Bergner

June 02, 2007
19:34 Re: Redefinition of symbol ??? Bruce Korb
19:29 Redefinition of symbol ??? Bruce Korb
14:35 When was decimal floating point added to gcc? H. J. Lu
05:50 Re: __builtin_apply_args - GCC 4.1.1 Ian Lance Taylor
04:47 Re: __builtin_apply_args - GCC 4.1.1 Mohamed Shafi

June 01, 2007
22:42 gcc-4.3-20070601 is now available gccadmin
21:36 Re: Predictive commoning miscompiles 482.sphinx3 in SPEC CPU 2006 H. J. Lu
20:31 Re: Predictive commoning miscompiles 482.sphinx3 in SPEC CPU 2006 Zdenek Dvorak
20:24 Re: Optimizations for itanium Andrey Belevantsev
19:45 What is purpose of numbered variables?? Seema S. Ravandale
18:55 Re: Predictive commoning miscompiles 482.sphinx3 in SPEC CPU 2006 Andrew Pinski
17:57 Re: Predictive commoning miscompiles 482.sphinx3 in SPEC CPU 2006 H. J. Lu
17:00 Re: DOC PATCH: attribute(alloc_size) Marcus Meissner
16:55 Re: Predictive commoning miscompiles 482.sphinx3 in SPEC CPU 2006 Andrew Pinski
16:44 Re: Predictive commoning miscompiles 482.sphinx3 in SPEC CPU 2006 H. J. Lu
16:37 Predictive commoning miscompiles 482.sphinx3 in SPEC CPU 2006 H. J. Lu
16:29 DOC PATCH: attribute(alloc_size) Marcus Meissner
15:58 Re: [OT] Re: Git repository with full GCC history Bernardo Innocenti
15:43 Re: Optimizations for itanium Vladimir N. Makarov
15:29 RE: Optimizations for itanium Prasad, Kamal R
15:26 Re: signal unwind and fp state Roman Zippel
15:22 Re: Optimizations for itanium Vladimir N. Makarov
15:18 [OT] Re: Git repository with full GCC history Gabriel Paubert
15:00 Re: Git repository with full GCC history Bernardo Innocenti
14:40 Re: [OT] Re: Git repository with full GCC history Bernardo Innocenti
14:30 Re: signal unwind and fp state Ian Lance Taylor
14:23 Re: __builtin_apply_args - GCC 4.1.1 Ian Lance Taylor
14:15 Re: Optimizations for itanium Ian Lance Taylor
13:51 signal unwind and fp state Roman Zippel
12:57 [OT] Re: Git repository with full GCC history Gabriel Paubert
12:45 synchronous cancel and "terminate called without an active exception" Pavel Emeliyanenko
11:12 Re: Very Fast: Directly Coded Lexical Analyzer J.C. Pizarro
10:51 Re: Git repository with full GCC history Jan-Benedict Glaw
10:26 Re: Very Fast: Directly Coded Lexical Analyzer Ronny Peine
10:13 Re: Git repository with full GCC history Gabriel Paubert
10:08 Re: Git repository with full GCC history David Woodhouse
09:08 __builtin_apply_args - GCC 4.1.1 Mohamed Shafi
08:57 Re: Git repository with full GCC history Jan-Benedict Glaw
08:51 Re: [OT] Re: Git repository with full GCC history Andreas Schwab
08:47 Re: Git repository with full GCC history Bernardo Innocenti
08:40 Re: Git repository with full GCC history Jan-Benedict Glaw
07:28 Re: Very Fast: Directly Coded Lexical Analyzer Frank Schaefer
07:26 [OT] Re: Git repository with full GCC history Gabriel Paubert
07:02 Optimizations for itanium Prasad, Kamal R
06:52 Re: Git repository with full GCC history Bernardo Innocenti
05:12 Re: Git repository with full GCC history Harvey Harrison
04:12 Re: Git repository with full GCC history Bernardo Innocenti
03:37 Re: Git repository with full GCC history Harvey Harrison
01:36 Re: Access to symbol table?? Daniel Berlin
01:35 Git repository with full GCC history Bernardo Innocenti
00:43 Re: Very Fast: Directly Coded Lexical Analyzer J.C. Pizarro


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3