This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
backport of Revision 120684 for Macintel into gcc 4.2.1?
- From: Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo dot msbb dot uc dot edu>
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: a dot tobler at schweiz dot org
- Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 23:00:39 -0400
- Subject: backport of Revision 120684 for Macintel into gcc 4.2.1?
Currently gcc 4.2.0 suffers from 90 libjava failures on i686-apple-darwin8
including the boehm gctest. Backporting the changes from revision 120684...
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=rev&revision=120684
as suggested in...
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.programming.garbage-collection.boehmgc/1416/match=xcode
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.programming.garbage-collection.boehmgc/1542/match=xcode
reduces the number of failures to 27. The remaining failures in the libjava testsuite are
now...
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: Process_5 -O3 execution - bytecode->native test
FAIL: StackTrace2 output - gij test
FAIL: StackTrace2 output - gij test
FAIL: StackTrace2 output - gij test
FAIL: StackTrace2 output - gij test
FAIL: SyncTest execution - gij test
FAIL: SyncTest execution - gij test
FAIL: SyncTest execution - gij test
FAIL: SyncTest execution - gij test
FAIL: Throw_2 execution - source compiled test
FAIL: Throw_2 execution - gij test
FAIL: Throw_2 execution - bytecode->native test
FAIL: Throw_2 execution - gij test
FAIL: Throw_2 -findirect-dispatch execution - bytecode->native test
FAIL: Throw_2 -O3 execution - source compiled test
FAIL: Throw_2 execution - gij test
FAIL: Throw_2 -O3 execution - bytecode->native test
FAIL: Throw_2 execution - gij test
FAIL: Throw_2 -O3 -findirect-dispatch execution - bytecode->native test
FAIL: initexc execution - gij test
FAIL: initexc execution - gij test
FAIL: initexc execution - gij test
FAIL: initexc execution - gij test
FAIL: stacktrace output - gij test
FAIL: stacktrace output - gij test
FAIL: stacktrace output - gij test
FAIL: stacktrace output - gij test
which includes one new failure (Process_5). Shouldn''t the changes in
revision 120684 be backported to gcc 4.2.1? Also does anyone know
if additional fixes to eliminate these remaining failures currently
reside in gcc trunk? Thanks in advance.
Jack