This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: A reload inheritance bug

From: Mark Shinwell <shinwell at codesourcery dot com>
To: Bernd Schmidt <bernds_cb1 at t-online dot de>
Cc: GCC Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Richard Sandiford <richard at codesourcery dot com>, Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen <rask at sygehus dot dk>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 16:29:03 +0100
Subject: Re: A reload inheritance bug
References: <4648D8E1.2070307@codesourcery.com> <464987DA.8070306@t-online.de> <4649B275.1020707@codesourcery.com> <4649C6CE.6000903@t-online.de>

Bernd Schmidt wrote:

Mark Shinwell wrote:
These dumps are of course taken before the application of my patch.

Hope that helps,
Thanks.  I may have missed it in the previous mails, but which piece of
code exactly decides to use R9 for reload 0 of insn 5314?


I'm afraid I'm not sure exactly -- but given that r9 is still deemed
to contain a valid reload, isn't that logic correct given the pseudo
register numbers in question?

Mark

References:
- A reload inheritance bug
  - From: Mark Shinwell
- Re: A reload inheritance bug
  - From: Bernd Schmidt
- Re: A reload inheritance bug
  - From: Mark Shinwell
- Re: A reload inheritance bug
  - From: Bernd Schmidt

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]