This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Status of the pointer_plus branch

From: "Andrew Pinski" <pinskia at gmail dot com>
To: "Andrew_Pinski at playstation dot sony dot com" <Andrew_Pinski at playstation dot sony dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 17:02:22 -0700
Subject: Re: Status of the pointer_plus branch
References: <OF46C3D931.FE5CA394-ON882572DA.002129F4-882572DA.0022E502@playstation.sony.com>

On 5/12/07, Andrew_Pinski@playstation.sony.com
<Andrew_Pinski@playstation.sony.com> wrote:

The two regressions which exist are:

FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-102.c scan-tree-dump-times possible dependence
between data-refs 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-104.c scan-tree-dump-times possible dependence
between data-refs 1


I had forgot to handle POINTER_PLUS_EXPR in split_constant_offset, I
am testing that patch with the merge from the mainline also right now.
So after this patch, there are no testsuite regressions on i686-linux-gnu.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

References:
- Status of the pointer_plus branch
  - From: Andrew_Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]