gcc archive
date index for April, 2007

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

April 30, 2007
21:44 gcc-4.1-20070430 is now available gccadmin
19:59 RE: AMD dual core opetron optimization Dave Korn
19:24 Re: GCC 4.2.0 RC2 Building Mark Mitchell
19:11 AMD dual core opetron optimization kernel coder
19:10 Re: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Jan Hubicka
19:08 Re: GCC 4.2.0 RC2 Building Mark Mitchell
19:08 Re: GCC 4.2.0 RC2 Building Eric Botcazou
19:01 GCC 4.2.0 RC2 Building Mark Mitchell
17:33 FW: Trying To Reach You Monday Linda Taylor
15:46 Re: Successfull Build of gcc on Cygwin WinXp SP2 Aaron Gray
11:11 Re: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Andreas Schwab
09:40 Re: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Richard Earnshaw

April 29, 2007
23:36 RE: how to start using gcc on windows Eric Weddington
23:22 Re: Effects of newly introduced -mpcX 80387 precision flag Tim Prince
18:00 Re: Effects of newly introduced -mpcX 80387 precision flag Bradley Lucier
17:43 Re: [doc,patch] Fortran compiler on Ultrix and clobbered registers John David Anglin
17:02 Re: Effects of newly introduced -mpcX 80387 precision flag Tim Prince
15:22 Re: Effects of newly introduced -mpcX 80387 precision flag Bradley Lucier
12:48 [doc,patch] Fortran compiler on Ultrix and clobbered registers FX Coudert
00:47 Re: how to start using gcc on windows Mike Stump
00:04 how to start using gcc on windows hill0093

April 28, 2007
22:43 Re: A problem with the loop structure Zdenek Dvorak
21:53 A problem with the loop structure Vladimir Yanovsky
20:05 Re: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Joerg Wunsch
18:26 debugging quality and gcc drizzle drizzle
15:27 RE: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Dave Korn
15:13 Re: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Andreas Schwab
14:55 Re: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues René Rebe
11:50 RE: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Dave Korn

April 27, 2007
23:49 GCC 4.2.0: Still planning on RC1, etc. Mark Mitchell
21:49 gcc-4.3-20070427 is now available gccadmin
20:51 Re: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Joerg Wunsch
20:48 Re: DR#314 update Geoffrey Keating
20:42 Re: general_operand() not accepting CONCAT? Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
20:38 Re: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Steven Bosscher
20:31 Re: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Joerg Wunsch
18:30 Re: Accessing signgam from the middle-end for builtin lgamma Kaveh R. GHAZI
16:28 RE: mismatch in parameter of builtin_ffs? Dave Korn
16:20 Re: RFC: obsolete __builtin_apply? Steve Ellcey
16:13 Gomp in mainline is broken H. J. Lu
15:58 Re: mismatch in parameter of builtin_ffs? Richard Henderson
15:47 Re: Performance analysis of Polyhedron/gas_dyn Robert Dewar
15:35 Re: Accessing signgam from the middle-end for builtin lgamma Tom Tromey
15:34 Re: Performance analysis of Polyhedron/gas_dyn Janne Blomqvist
15:24 Re: general_operand() not accepting CONCAT? Richard Henderson
14:50 Re: Performance analysis of Polyhedron/gas_dyn Robert Dewar
14:38 Re: Performance analysis of Polyhedron/gas_dyn Geert Bosch
14:23 mismatch in parameter of builtin_ffs? Erven ROHOU
14:00 Re: general_operand() not accepting CONCAT? Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
14:00 Re: assign numbers to warnings; treat selected warnings as errors Steven Bosscher
13:51 Re: assign numbers to warnings; treat selected warnings as errors Gabriel Dos Reis
10:13 Re: Performance analysis of Polyhedron/gas_dyn Janne Blomqvist
09:51 Re: DR#314 update Joseph S. Myers
09:14 Re: Performance analysis of Polyhedron/gas_dyn Andrew Pinski
08:27 Re: Performance analysis of Polyhedron/gas_dyn Richard Guenther
05:24 Re: DR#314 update Geoffrey Keating

April 26, 2007
23:38 Re: How to handle g++.dg/warn/multiple-overflow-warn-3.C failure Andrew Pinski
23:29 How to handle g++.dg/warn/multiple-overflow-warn-3.C failure Steve Ellcey
23:12 Intel IEEE 754r Decimal Floating-Point BID Library (beta version) now available Cornea, Marius
21:30 C++ front end: NON_DEPENDENT_EXPR and lvalue_p_1 Doug Gregor
20:53 Re: general_operand() not accepting CONCAT? Richard Henderson
20:10 [LWOW] INWESTYCYJNE INTERESY W UKRAINIE : 12-13 maja 2007 r., Lwow, Ukraina gcc@gcc.gnu.org Frances
19:49 Re: general_operand() not accepting CONCAT? Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
18:05 Re: [ARM optimization back-end] Strange bug in MySQL Emmanuel Fleury
17:07 RE: Accessing signgam from the middle-end for builtin lgamma Kaveh R. GHAZI
15:46 RE: Accessing signgam from the middle-end for builtin lgamma Dave Korn
15:26 Re: Accessing signgam from the middle-end for builtin lgamma Brian Dessent
14:54 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-24) Mark Mitchell
14:23 Re: Bug 29609 Tristan Gingold
14:11 RE: Accessing signgam from the middle-end for builtin lgamma Dave Korn
13:34 Re: [ARM optimization back-end] Strange bug in MySQL Jack Lloyd
13:33 Re: [ARM optimization back-end] Strange bug in MySQL Andrew Haley
13:29 Re: [ARM optimization back-end] Strange bug in MySQL Emmanuel Fleury
13:20 Re: [ARM optimization back-end] Strange bug in MySQL Andrew Haley
13:12 [ARM optimization back-end] Strange bug in MySQL Emmanuel Fleury
13:08 Bug 29609 Claus Fischer
11:16 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-24) Richard Guenther
10:13 Re: bootstrap broken on powerpc: implicit declaration of function 'pthread_getaffinity_np' Martin Michlmayr
10:00 Fwd: Enums and gcc's long long gdr
09:14 Re: Problem with patch for PR tree-optimization/29789 Richard Guenther
09:13 Re: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Richard Guenther
01:55 Re: Problem with patch for PR tree-optimization/29789 H. J. Lu
01:11 Re: bootstrap broken on powerpc: implicit declaration of function 'pthread_getaffinity_np' Andrew Pinski
01:08 RE: Problem with patch for PR tree-optimization/29789 Fu, Chao-Ying
00:59 Re: paired register loads and stores Andrew Pinski
00:13 Successfull Build of gcc on Cygwin WinXp SP2 James Tebneff

April 25, 2007
23:50 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-24) Mark Mitchell
23:16 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-24) Zdenek Dvorak
22:21 Re: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Ian Lance Taylor
21:22 Re: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Joerg Wunsch
21:01 Re: Problem with patch for PR tree-optimization/29789 H. J. Lu
20:55 Problem with patch for PR tree-optimization/29789 Steve Ellcey
18:49 Re: GIMPLE tuples document uploaded to wiki Diego Novillo
18:40 Re: GIMPLE tuples document uploaded to wiki Daniel Berlin
17:55 Q: Accessing signgam from the middle-end for builtin lgamma Kaveh R. GHAZI
16:12 Re: general_operand() not accepting CONCAT? Richard Henderson
15:53 Re: GIMPLE tuples document uploaded to wiki Diego Novillo
15:49 Re: GIMPLE tuples document uploaded to wiki Geert Bosch
15:01 Re: general_operand() not accepting CONCAT? Ian Lance Taylor
14:25 Re: GIMPLE tuples document uploaded to wiki Aldy Hernandez
11:51 general_operand() not accepting CONCAT? Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
11:16 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-24) Diego Novillo
11:02 RE: gcc/boehm-gc/misc.c:680: undefined reference to `_GC_get_thread_stack_base' Dave Korn
10:39 Re: gcc/boehm-gc/misc.c:680: undefined reference to `_GC_get_thread_stack_base' Brian Dessent
09:38 DR#314 update Joseph S. Myers
08:51 gcc/boehm-gc/misc.c:680: undefined reference to `_GC_get_thread_stack_base' Christian Joensson
08:21 Re: paired register loads and stores Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
08:18 Re: paired register loads and stores Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
07:54 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-24) Richard Guenther
05:43 [Committed] Fix PR30222 for 4.2 [Was: Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-24)] Andrew Pinski
00:00 RE: Builtins-vs-libcalls-vs-optimised-away-vs-still-emitting-an-undefined-symbol-reference Dave Korn

April 24, 2007
23:01 GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-24) Mark Mitchell
21:32 Changes to PR prioritization policy Mark Mitchell
21:21 [Announce] C++0x branch in GCC Subversion repository Doug Gregor
19:21 Re: Does vectorizer support extension? H. J. Lu
17:54 Re: Does vectorizer support extension? Dorit Nuzman
17:49 Re: What is the right usage of SAVE_EXPR? Mike Stump
16:33 Re: Builtins-vs-libcalls-vs-optimised-away-vs-still-emitting-an-undefined-symbol-reference Ian Lance Taylor
15:31 What is the right usage of SAVE_EXPR? Wolfgang Gellerich
15:26 Re: Builtins-vs-libcalls-vs-optimised-away-vs-still-emitting-an-undefined-symbol-reference Paul Brook
15:16 RE: Builtins-vs-libcalls-vs-optimised-away-vs-still-emitting-an-undefined-symbol-reference Dave Korn
15:01 Re: bitfield handling on m68k broken Roman Zippel
15:00 RE: Builtins-vs-libcalls-vs-optimised-away-vs-still-emitting-an-undefined-symbol-reference Dave Korn
14:52 Re: Builtins-vs-libcalls-vs-optimised-away-vs-still-emitting-an-undefined-symbol-reference Paul Brook
14:51 RE: Builtins-vs-libcalls-vs-optimised-away-vs-still-emitting-an-undefined-symbol-reference Dave Korn
14:37 Re: Where is gstdint.h Aaron Gray
14:34 Re: What's the status of autovectorization for MMX and 3DNow!? Zuxy Meng
14:34 Re: Builtins-vs-libcalls-vs-optimised-away-vs-still-emitting-an-undefined-symbol-reference Ian Lance Taylor
14:22 Re: bitfield handling on m68k broken Andreas Schwab
14:17 Difference in DWARF Info generated by GCC 3.4.6 and GCC 4.1.1 Rohit Arul Raj
14:11 Re: bitfield handling on m68k broken Roman Zippel
13:56 bitfield handling on m68k broken Roman Zippel
12:46 Re: New option: -fstatic-libgfortran H. J. Lu
11:51 Builtins-vs-libcalls-vs-optimised-away-vs-still-emitting-an-undefined-symbol-reference Dave Korn
10:42 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Sebastian Pop
10:17 Bonsoir Mlle Simone ADOU
08:56 Re: New option: -fstatic-libgfortran François-Xavier Coudert
07:37 Re: New option: -fstatic-libgfortran Philippe Schaffnit
07:34 Re: New option: -fstatic-libgfortran Brooks Moses
06:51 Re: New option: -fstatic-libgfortran Philippe Schaffnit
05:14 Re: Where is gstdint.h Tim Prince
05:11 Re: Bootstrap failure for current gcc trunk on cygwin: in set_curr_insn_source_location, at cfglayout.c:284 Paul Richard Thomas
00:15 Re: Bootstrap failure for current gcc trunk on cygwin: in set_curr_insn_source_location, at cfglayout.c:284 Jan Hubicka

April 23, 2007
23:32 Re: tuples: initial infrastructure Aldy Hernandez
22:04 Re: Does vectorizer support extension? H. J. Lu
22:01 debug output and register allocation drizzle drizzle
21:41 gcc-4.1-20070423 is now available gccadmin
21:38 bootstrap broken on powerpc: implicit declaration of function 'pthread_getaffinity_np' Martin Michlmayr
21:29 Re: HTML of -fdump-tree-XXXX proposal. Per Bothner
21:15 Re: tuples: initial infrastructure Richard Henderson
21:13 Re: Does vectorizer support extension? Dorit Nuzman
20:41 Re: Bootstrap failure for current gcc trunk on cygwin: in set_curr_insn_source_location, at cfglayout.c:284 Andrew Pinski
20:32 Re: Bootstrap failure for current gcc trunk on cygwin: in set_curr_insn_source_location, at cfglayout.c:284 Paul Richard Thomas
20:31 Re: tuples: initial infrastructure Aldy Hernandez
20:16 gcov in cross-compile: have a patch, seek direction Danny Backx
19:57 Re: tuples: initial infrastructure Richard Henderson
19:51 Re: Bootstrap failure for current gcc trunk on cygwin: in set_curr_insn_source_location, at cfglayout.c:284 Eric Botcazou
19:12 Re: GCC mini-summit - benchmarks H. J. Lu
19:02 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Kenneth . Hoste
18:58 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Jeffrey Law
18:57 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Diego Novillo
18:56 Re: Does vectorizer support extension? H. J. Lu
18:52 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Diego Novillo
18:40 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Kenneth . Hoste
18:38 RE: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Kenneth . Hoste
18:38 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Diego Novillo
18:37 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Kenneth . Hoste
18:29 Re: DF-branch benchmarking on SPEC2000 Vladimir Makarov
18:27 RE: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Dave Korn
18:22 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Kenneth . Hoste
18:15 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Diego Novillo
18:03 Re: Does vectorizer support extension? Dorit Nuzman
17:56 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Mark Mitchell
17:43 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Joe Buck
17:32 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Kaveh R. GHAZI
17:13 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Janis Johnson
17:11 Re: DF-branch benchmarking on SPEC2000 Steven Bosscher
17:09 Re: Where is gstdint.h Silvius Rus
16:49 Re: GCC mini-summit - benchmarks Steve Ellcey
16:36 Re: DF-branch benchmarking on SPEC2000 Seongbae Park
16:16 DF-branch benchmarking on SPEC2000 Vladimir Makarov
15:41 Re: Bootstrap failure for current gcc trunk on cygwin: in set_curr_insn_source_location, at cfglayout.c:284 Richard Guenther
15:34 Bootstrap failure for current gcc trunk on cygwin: in set_curr_insn_source_location, at cfglayout.c:284 Christian Joensson
15:08 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Mark Mitchell
14:23 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Richard Kenner
12:06 volunteer to help with Fortran Mikey
10:18 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Richard Earnshaw
08:29 Re: A recent patch increased GCC's memory consumption in some cases! Richard Guenther
03:21 Re: HTML of -fdump-tree-XXXX proposal. J.C. Pizarro
03:14 Re: maybe_infinite_loop? Daniel Berlin
01:43 Re: A recent patch increased GCC's memory consumption in some cases! Andrew Pinski
00:50 Re: GCC mini-summit Mark Mitchell
00:32 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Mark Mitchell
00:19 Program za knjigovodstvo sa PDV-om knjigovodstvonet

April 22, 2007
23:39 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Joe Buck
22:34 Re: Does vectorizer support extension? H. J. Lu
21:53 Re: Does vectorizer support extension? Dorit Nuzman
21:29 Re: Does vectorizer support extension? H. J. Lu
21:05 Re: Where is gstdint.h Tim Prince
20:50 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Laurent GUERBY
20:19 Re: Where is gstdint.h Aaron Gray
20:12 Re: Does vectorizer support extension? Dorit Nuzman
20:04 Re: Where is gstdint.h Tim Prince
19:24 Re: HTML of -fdump-tree-XXXX proposal. Per Bothner
18:13 Where is gstdint.h Aaron Gray
13:23 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Jan Hubicka
12:55 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Zdenek Dvorak
12:53 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Richard Guenther
12:50 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Laurent GUERBY
12:44 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Richard Guenther
12:42 visailu timo sodering
12:31 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Laurent GUERBY
12:24 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Jan Hubicka
12:00 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Zdenek Dvorak
11:29 oopsie, bootstrap comparison failure Dave Korn

April 21, 2007
23:20 Re: maybe_infinite_loop? Andrew Pinski
23:10 maybe_infinite_loop? Mike Stump
22:05 Re: How do you get the benefit of -fstrict-aliasing? Andrew Pinski
22:01 How do you get the benefit of -fstrict-aliasing? Bradley Lucier
21:44 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Mike Stump
17:48 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Laurent GUERBY
16:04 Re: A question on gimplifier Jim Wilson
16:01 Re: Problem building gcc on Cygwin Jim Wilson
15:59 Re: GCC mini-summit - benchmarks Jim Wilson
10:12 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Robert Dewar
03:38 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Mike Stump
02:01 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Diego Novillo
01:44 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Diego Novillo
01:42 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Robert Dewar
01:30 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture H. J. Lu
00:53 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Robert Dewar
00:19 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Zdenek Dvorak

April 20, 2007
23:59 RE: [MIPS] MADD issue Fu, Chao-Ying
23:29 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Robert Dewar
23:22 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Steve Ellcey
23:02 Re: gcc preprocessor Robert Dewar
22:29 Re: gcc preprocessor David Daney
22:21 Re: gcc preprocessor drizzle drizzle
21:48 gcc-4.3-20070420 is now available gccadmin
20:29 Re: GCC mini-summit - Patch tracker Tom Tromey
20:03 Re: GCC mini-summit - Patch tracker Daniel Berlin
18:44 Re: gcc preprocessor Joe Buck
18:36 Re: GCC mini-summit - Patch tracker Tom Tromey
18:06 RE: GCC mini-summit - Patch tracker Dave Korn
18:00 Re: GCC mini-summit - Patch tracker Tom Tromey
17:37 RE: gcc preprocessor Dave Korn
17:27 Re: gcc preprocessor drizzle drizzle
17:11 GCC mini-summit - Patch tracker Daniel Berlin
17:07 tuples: initial infrastructure Aldy Hernandez
17:06 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Joe Buck
17:00 Re: GCC mini-summit - unicorn with rainbows Joe Buck
16:57 Re: [MIPS] MADD issue Richard Sandiford
16:46 Re: [MIPS] MADD issue Ian Lance Taylor
16:38 Re: [MIPS] MADD issue Richard Sandiford
16:25 Re: [MIPS] MADD issue Ian Lance Taylor
15:05 Re: [MIPS] MADD issue Richard Sandiford
15:02 Does vectorizer support extension? H. J. Lu
14:58 Re: [MIPS] MADD issue Nigel Stephens
14:57 Re: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Ian Lance Taylor
14:44 Re: [M32C] Incorrect Frame information generated DJ Delorie
14:42 Re: GCC mini-summit Vladimir N. Makarov
14:32 Re: [MIPS] MADD issue Richard Sandiford
14:14 Re: GCC mini-summit Steven Bosscher
14:07 Re: [MIPS] MADD issue Nigel Stephens
14:07 Re: GCC mini-summit Vladimir N. Makarov
13:45 Re: GCC mini-summit Steven Bosscher
13:35 Re: GCC mini-summit Bernd Schmidt
13:32 Re: GCC mini-summit Vladimir N. Makarov
13:22 Re: GCC mini-summit Steven Bosscher
13:16 Re: GCC mini-summit Vladimir N. Makarov
12:09 Re: assign numbers to warnings; treat selected warnings as errors Manuel López-Ibáñez
11:41 Re: New option: -fstatic-libgfortran Bernhard Fischer
11:40 Re: assign numbers to warnings; treat selected warnings as errors Joseph S. Myers
11:37 Re: New option: -fstatic-libgfortran Joseph S. Myers
10:51 Re: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Kenneth Hoste
10:35 Re: assign numbers to warnings; treat selected warnings as errors Thomas Koenig
10:23 [M32C] Incorrect Frame information generated Ina Pandit
10:02 Re: GCC mini-summit - unicorn with rainbows Benjamin Kosnik
08:48 Re: arm,gcc and dsp instructions Richard Earnshaw
08:30 Re: arm,gcc and dsp instructions Eric Christopher
08:24 arm,gcc and dsp instructions Victor Librado
08:15 New option: -fstatic-libgfortran François-Xavier Coudert
07:58 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Ollie Wild
07:38 Re: GCC mini-summit - compiling for a particular architecture Kenneth Hoste
07:35 Re: GCC mini-summit - benchmarks Kenneth Hoste
06:31 GCC mini-summit Ian Lance Taylor
05:04 Re: Problem building gcc on Cygwin Brian Dessent
03:38 Problem building gcc on Cygwin Tom Dickens

April 19, 2007
22:59 Re: why no $pc offset in debug CFA? Richard Henderson
19:40 Re: why no $pc offset in debug CFA? Eric Botcazou
19:30 why no $pc offset in debug CFA? DJ Delorie
18:39 Re: HTML of -fdump-tree-XXXX proposal. J.C. Pizarro
17:04 The Linux binutils 2.17.50.0.15 is released H. J. Lu
08:30 RE: Can I have a more detailed documentation about gcc 4.1.2 frontend? Dave Korn
08:28 RE: HTML of -fdump-tree-XXXX proposal. Dave Korn
08:13 Can I have a more detailed documentation about gcc 4.1.2 frontend? 전보성
07:47 Re: HTML of -fdump-tree-XXXX proposal. Brooks Moses
07:01 Re: Segfault on OpenMP program Jakub Jelinek
06:05 Re: HTML of -fdump-tree-XXXX proposal. Andrew Pinski
05:56 Re: HTML of -fdump-tree-XXXX proposal. Mike Stump
01:35 Re: gcc preprocessor Joe Buck
01:07 gcc preprocessor drizzle drizzle

April 18, 2007
20:03 Re: HTML of -fdump-tree-XXXX proposal. J.C. Pizarro
17:38 Re: Segfault on OpenMP program Kenneth Hoste
14:47 Re: [DataFlow Branch] Query regarding an ICE in global.c Ramana Radhakrishnan
14:37 Re: [DataFlow Branch] Query regarding an ICE in global.c Kenneth Zadeck
14:28 Re: [DataFlow Branch] Query regarding an ICE in global.c Ramana Radhakrishnan
14:25 [DataFlow Branch] Query regarding an ICE in global.c Ramana Radhakrishnan
14:22 Re: Segfault on OpenMP program Jakub Jelinek
13:38 Re: Segfault on OpenMP program Paul Brook
11:44 RE: HTML of -fdump-tree-XXXX proposal. Dave Korn
11:34 Re: HTML of -fdump-tree-XXXX proposal. Robert Dewar
11:09 RE: Bootstrap is broken on i[345]86-linux Dave Korn
10:55 RE: [cygwin] Can't boostrap current gcc trunk with libjava: ../../../gcc/libjava/classpath/native/fdlibm/mprec.h:297:1: error: "_EXFUN" redefined Dave Korn
10:41 Re: [cygwin] Can't boostrap current gcc trunk with libjava: ../../../gcc/libjava/classpath/native/fdlibm/mprec.h:297:1: error: "_EXFUN" redefined Christian Joensson
10:22 RE: What are the chances of GCC for PRIMOS? Dave Korn
10:11 What are the chances of GCC for PRIMOS? Andrew Marlow
09:52 RE: What are the chances of GCC for PRIMOS? Dave Korn
09:29 What are the chances of GCC for PRIMOS? Andrew Marlow
07:38 RE: HTML of -fdump-tree-XXXX proposal. Dave Korn
05:28 Re: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Steven Bosscher
05:04 Re: HTML of -fdump-tree-XXXX proposal. David Daney
04:42 Re: Call to arms: testsuite failures on various targets Kaveh R. GHAZI
04:36 Re: HTML of -fdump-tree-XXXX proposal. Diego Novillo
01:48 HTML of -fdump-tree-XXXX proposal. J.C. Pizarro
01:11 Re: CompileFarm and reghunt Was: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-15) Janis Johnson
01:06 regression hunt tools Janis Johnson
00:38 Re: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Joe Buck
00:35 Re: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Joe Buck
00:08 Recommend lecture about the meaning of PHI function from SSA. J.C. Pizarro

April 17, 2007
23:58 Re: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Ian Lance Taylor
23:31 Re: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Dale Johannesen
23:20 Re: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Eric Christopher
23:19 Segfault on OpenMP program FX Coudert
23:17 RE: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Dave Korn
22:44 Re: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Ian Lance Taylor
22:36 RE: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Eric Weddington
22:36 Re: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Joerg Wunsch
22:28 RE: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Eric Weddington
22:27 Re: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Paul Brook
22:26 Re: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Mike Stump
22:26 Re: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Joerg Wunsch
22:25 Re: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Steven Bosscher
22:24 Re: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Joerg Wunsch
22:20 Re: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Ian Lance Taylor
22:16 RE: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Eric Weddington
22:15 Re: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Steven Bosscher
22:12 Re: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Joerg Wunsch
21:58 RE: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Eric Weddington
20:51 Re: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Steven Bosscher
20:12 Re: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Kenneth Hoste
17:49 Re: Duplicate assembler function names in cgraph Paulo J. Matos
17:23 Re: TREE_CODE: arrays and variables Diego Novillo
16:21 RE: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Eric Weddington
15:07 Re: Splay Tree Brian Makin
14:29 Re: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Ian Lance Taylor
14:15 Re: Duplicate assembler function names in cgraph Mike Stump
12:31 TREE_CODE: arrays and variables Andrea Callia D'Iddio
10:28 RE: EH references Dave Korn
10:11 Re: Duplicate assembler function names in cgraph Paulo J. Matos
10:08 Re: EH references Paulo J. Matos
09:36 Re: GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Steven Bosscher
09:28 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-15) Steven Bosscher
09:28 GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues Kenneth Hoste
09:19 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-15) Richard Guenther
08:54 Re: Builtin functions? Paulo J. Matos
06:17 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-15) Steven Bosscher
05:50 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-15) Maxim Kuvyrkov
02:03 Re: REG_NO_CONFLICT vs lower-subreg Paolo Bonzini
01:41 Re: Questions/Comments regarding my SoC application Ian Lance Taylor
01:37 Re: Questions/Comments regarding my SoC application Ian Lance Taylor
01:28 Re: REG_NO_CONFLICT vs lower-subreg Ian Lance Taylor
01:17 Re: REG_NO_CONFLICT vs lower-subreg Andrew Pinski
01:01 Re: REG_NO_CONFLICT vs lower-subreg Ian Lance Taylor
00:56 Re: Questions/Comments regarding my SoC application Dennis Weyland
00:50 Re: REG_NO_CONFLICT vs lower-subreg Paolo Bonzini
00:42 REG_NO_CONFLICT vs lower-subreg Bernd Schmidt
00:26 Re: Questions/Comments regarding my SoC application Ian Lance Taylor

April 16, 2007
23:07 Re: [cygwin] Can't boostrap current gcc trunk with libjava: ../../../gcc/libjava/classpath/native/fdlibm/mprec.h:297:1: error: "_EXFUN" redefined Tom Tromey
22:25 Re: Questions/Comments regarding my SoC application Dennis Weyland
21:42 gcc-4.1-20070416 is now available gccadmin
20:49 Re: Questions/Comments regarding my SoC application Ian Lance Taylor
20:10 CompileFarm and reghunt Was: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-15) Laurent GUERBY
19:59 RE: [cygwin] Can't boostrap current gcc trunk with libjava: ../../../gcc/libjava/classpath/native/fdlibm/mprec.h:297:1: error: "_EXFUN" redefined Dave Korn
19:49 Re: [cygwin] Can't boostrap current gcc trunk with libjava: ../../../gcc/libjava/classpath/native/fdlibm/mprec.h:297:1: error: "_EXFUN" redefined Charles Wilson
19:33 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-15) Paolo Bonzini
19:12 Re: Questions/Comments regarding my SoC application Dennis Weyland
19:06 Re: EH references Joseph S. Myers
18:49 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-15) Steven Bosscher
18:45 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-15) Tom Tromey
18:33 Re: EH references Tom Tromey
18:19 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-15) Tom Tromey
18:19 RE: [cygwin] Can't boostrap current gcc trunk with libjava: ../../../gcc/libjava/classpath/native/fdlibm/mprec.h:297:1: error: "_EXFUN" redefined Dave Korn
18:17 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-15) Mark Mitchell
18:10 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-15) Janis Johnson
18:06 Re: [cygwin] Can't boostrap current gcc trunk with libjava: ../../../gcc/libjava/classpath/native/fdlibm/mprec.h:297:1: error: "_EXFUN" redefined Tom Tromey
17:58 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-15) Mark Mitchell
17:51 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-15) Janis Johnson
17:37 Re: EH references Joe Buck
17:25 Re: EH references Joe Buck
17:12 Re: Builtin functions? Jan Hubicka
17:09 Re: Potential bug with g++ and OpenMP Ismail DÃnmez
17:07 Re: Builtin functions? 'Daniel Jacobowitz'
17:06 Re: Builtin functions? Daniel Berlin
17:05 Re: Difference in DWARF Info generated by GCC 3.4.6 and GCC 4.1.1 Ian Lance Taylor
17:03 Potential bug with g++ and OpenMP Theodore Papadopoulo
17:03 Re: EH references Ian Lance Taylor
16:59 Re: Duplicate assembler function names in cgraph Jan Hubicka
16:52 RE: Builtin functions? Dave Korn
16:50 Re: Duplicate assembler function names in cgraph Paulo J. Matos
16:46 Re: Builtin functions? Jan Hubicka
16:46 Re: Builtin functions? Jan Hubicka
16:45 Re: Builtin functions? Paulo J. Matos
16:44 Re: Builtin functions? Paulo J. Matos
16:37 Re: How to control the offset for stack operation? Ian Lance Taylor
16:36 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-15) Steven Bosscher
16:35 Re: Builtin functions? Daniel Berlin
16:30 Re: Builtin functions? Daniel Jacobowitz
16:18 Re: Duplicate assembler function names in cgraph Jan Hubicka
16:04 Builtin functions? Paulo J. Matos
14:34 Re: Questions/Comments regarding my SoC application Paolo Bonzini
12:30 Duplicate assembler function names in cgraph Paulo J. Matos
12:11 [cygwin] Can't boostrap current gcc trunk with libjava: ../../../gcc/libjava/classpath/native/fdlibm/mprec.h:297:1: error: "_EXFUN" redefined Christian Joensson
11:52 Difference in DWARF Info generated by GCC 3.4.6 and GCC 4.1.1 Rohit Arul Raj
11:40 EH references Paulo J. Matos
11:21 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-15) Richard Kenner
10:52 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-15) J.C. Pizarro
10:31 Re: How to control the offset for stack operation? Mohamed Shafi
10:30 RE: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-15) Dave Korn
10:28 generated files vs bootstrapping [Was: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report] Andrew Pinski
10:17 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-15) J.C. Pizarro
10:11 Re: How to control the offset for stack operation? J.C. Pizarro
10:08 RE: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-15) Dave Korn
09:56 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-15) J.C. Pizarro
09:47 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-15) J.C. Pizarro
09:41 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-15) François-Xavier Coudert
09:30 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-15) J.C. Pizarro
09:23 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-15) Andrew Pinski
09:08 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-15) François-Xavier Coudert
09:07 Re: How to control the offset for stack operation? Mohamed Shafi
09:03 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-15) J.C. Pizarro
08:52 [wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-15) Gerald Pfeifer
08:46 Re: How to control the offset for stack operation? J.C. Pizarro
08:44 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-15) François-Xavier Coudert
07:55 How to control the offset for stack operation? Mohamed Shafi
03:24 RE: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-15) Eric Weddington
03:19 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-15) Brooks Moses
02:17 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-15) Daniel Berlin
02:05 Re: Call to arms: testsuite failures on various targets Tim Prince
01:53 RE: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-15) John David Anglin

April 15, 2007
23:57 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-15) Mark Mitchell
23:44 RE: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-15) Dave Korn
22:50 GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-04-15) Mark Mitchell
22:47 Re: Status of PR21561 Bradley Lucier
22:37 Re: Status of PR21561 Andrew Pinski
22:30 Status of PR21561 Bradley Lucier
19:14 Re: error: "no newline at end of file" Mark Mitchell
19:13 Maintainers for C preprocessor Mark Mitchell
17:11 Re: Call to arms: testsuite failures on various targets Dorit Nuzman
16:35 Re: Call to arms: testsuite failures on various targets John David Anglin
15:40 Re: GIMPLE tuples document uploaded to wiki Daniel Berlin
10:05 Re: GIMPLE tuples document uploaded to wiki Diego Novillo
03:45 Re: GIMPLE tuples document uploaded to wiki Jan Hubicka
02:59 Re: GIMPLE tuples document uploaded to wiki Daniel Berlin
02:55 Re: GIMPLE tuples document uploaded to wiki Daniel Berlin
02:42 Re: GIMPLE tuples document uploaded to wiki Jan Hubicka
01:53 Re: GIMPLE tuples document uploaded to wiki Diego Novillo
01:14 Re: GIMPLE tuples document uploaded to wiki Jan Hubicka

April 14, 2007
21:09 Re: GIMPLE tuples document uploaded to wiki Diego Novillo
20:14 Re: GIMPLE tuples document uploaded to wiki Jan Hubicka
20:07 libffi failures on powerpc-apple-darwin7.9.0 Dominique Dhumieres
19:38 Re: A question on gimplifier Paul Brook
19:32 Re: A question on gimplifier H. J. Lu
19:23 Re: A question on gimplifier Andrew Pinski
19:14 Re: A question on gimplifier H. J. Lu
18:50 Re: A question on gimplifier Daniel Jacobowitz
18:29 A question on gimplifier H. J. Lu
18:17 Re: Call to arms: testsuite failures on various targets Dorit Nuzman
17:34 gcc-4.1.2 testsuite report MAC OS 10.3.9 Power PC G4 darwin7.9.0 Igor Nazarov
16:48 Re: Call to arms: testsuite failures on various targets Tim Prince
15:50 manipulating VCG files Sunzir Deepur
15:12 Re: Call to arms: testsuite failures on various targets John David Anglin
08:28 Re: Call to arms: testsuite failures on various targets Dorit Nuzman
07:40 Re: Call to arms: testsuite failures on various targets Tim Prince

April 13, 2007
21:45 gcc-4.3-20070413 is now available gccadmin
21:35 Re: RFC: Add target_isa_flags Andrew Pinski
21:27 Re: RFC: Add target_isa_flags H. J. Lu
21:13 Re: RFC: Add target_isa_flags Andrew Pinski
20:09 GIMPLE tuples document uploaded to wiki Diego Novillo
19:44 Re: RFC: Add target_isa_flags H. J. Lu
19:04 Re: RFC: Add target_isa_flags Andrew Pinski
18:33 RFC: Add target_isa_flags H. J. Lu
18:10 Re: Call to arms: testsuite failures on various targets Brooks Moses
17:05 Re: [MIPS] MADD issue Richard Sandiford
17:01 Re: [MIPS] MADD issue Paolo Bonzini
16:55 Re: [MIPS] MADD issue Ian Lance Taylor
16:19 tree_code and type safety Thomas Neumann
15:34 Re: RFA: i386 is running out target mask bits Richard Henderson
15:23 Re: [MIPS] MADD issue Nigel Stephens
15:09 Re: [MIPS] MADD issue Richard Sandiford
14:25 Re: [MIPS] MADD issue Nigel Stephens
13:22 Re: Recent dataflow branch SPEC2000 benchmarking Vladimir N. Makarov
13:07 Re: [MIPS] MADD issue Richard Sandiford
12:31 Re: Call to arms: testsuite failures on various targets Dominique Dhumieres
11:12 Re: [MIPS] MADD issue Paolo Bonzini
09:57 RE: Call to arms: testsuite failures on various targets Dave Korn
09:45 Re: Nonzero result when left-shift greater than width of unsigned type Ken Takusagawa
09:40 Re: Nonzero result when left-shift greater than width of unsigned type Marcus Meissner
09:38 Nonzero result when left-shift greater than width of unsigned type Ken Takusagawa
06:51 how to regenerate automake files Paolo Bonzini
06:43 Re: Call to arms: testsuite failures on various targets Jerry DeLisle
05:58 Re: Recent dataflow branch SPEC2000 benchmarking Steven Bosscher
05:20 Re: libstdc++.dylib linking problem on Darwin Eric Christopher
05:17 Re: libstdc++.dylib linking problem on Darwin Daniel Berlin
01:06 Re: libstdc++.dylib linking problem on Darwin Eric Christopher
01:02 Re: libstdc++.dylib linking problem on Darwin Daniel Jacobowitz
00:31 Re: RFA: i386 is running out target mask bits H. J. Lu
00:28 Re: RFA: i386 is running out target mask bits Richard Henderson
00:26 Re: Call to arms: testsuite failures on various targets Brooks Moses

April 12, 2007
23:44 Re: libstdc++.dylib linking problem on Darwin Eric Christopher
22:47 [MIPS] MADD issue Fu, Chao-Ying
22:14 Re: libstdc++.dylib linking problem on Darwin Geoffrey Keating
22:10 Re: RFA: i386 is running out target mask bits H. J. Lu
21:50 Re: RFA: i386 is running out target mask bits Richard Henderson
21:50 Re: RFA: i386 is running out target mask bits Joseph S. Myers
21:35 Re: RFA: i386 is running out target mask bits H. J. Lu
21:24 Re: Call to arms: testsuite failures on various targets FX Coudert
21:22 Call to arms: testsuite failures on various targets FX Coudert
20:26 Re: adding dependence from prefetch to load Zdenek Dvorak
20:24 Re: peephole patterns are not matching Jim Wilson
20:12 Re: anyone using svk? Rafael Espindola
19:49 Re: adding dependence from prefetch to load Jim Wilson
19:14 Re: Best of luck for GSoC 2007 participants! Laurent GUERBY
19:12 Re: RFA: i386 is running out target mask bits Steven Bosscher
19:03 Re: RFA: i386 is running out target mask bits Joseph S. Myers
19:02 Re: RFA: i386 is running out target mask bits H. J. Lu
18:58 Re: RFA: i386 is running out target mask bits Joseph S. Myers
18:53 Re: RFA: i386 is running out target mask bits H. J. Lu
18:52 Re: RFA: i386 is running out target mask bits H. J. Lu
18:41 Re: RFA: i386 is running out target mask bits Joseph S. Myers
18:40 Re: RFA: i386 is running out target mask bits DJ Delorie
17:57 New wiki page on testing compile times and memory usage Diego Novillo
17:54 RFA: i386 is running out target mask bits H. J. Lu
17:54 Re: [RFA] C++ language compatibility in sources [was RE: Add missing casts in gengtype-lex] Mark Mitchell
17:52 Re: [RFA] C++ language compatibility in sources [was RE: Add missing casts in gengtype-lex] Mike Stump
17:01 Re: Recent dataflow branch SPEC2000 benchmarking Steven Bosscher
16:28 Re: [RFA] C++ language compatibility in sources [was RE: Add missing casts in gengtype-lex] Joe Buck
16:16 Re: adding dependence from prefetch to load George Caragea
16:05 RE: [RFA] C++ language compatibility in sources [was RE: Add missing casts in gengtype-lex] Dave Korn
15:59 Re: [RFA] C++ language compatibility in sources [was RE: Add missing casts in gengtype-lex] Paul Brook
15:47 RE: [RFA] C++ language compatibility in sources [was RE: Add missing casts in gengtype-lex] Dave Korn
15:46 Re: adding dependence from prefetch to load Zdenek Dvorak
15:39 Re: [RFA] C++ language compatibility in sources [was RE: Add missing casts in gengtype-lex] Thomas Neumann
15:35 RE: [RFA] C++ language compatibility in sources [was RE: Add missing casts in gengtype-lex] Dave Korn
15:31 Re: [RFA] C++ language compatibility in sources [was RE: Add missing casts in gengtype-lex] Paul Brook
15:20 [RFA] C++ language compatibility in sources [was RE: Add missing casts in gengtype-lex] Dave Korn
15:09 Re: Recent dataflow branch SPEC2000 benchmarking Vladimir Makarov
15:06 Re: Toolchain for Maverick Crunch FPU Paul Brook
14:43 Re: Recent dataflow branch SPEC2000 benchmarking Steven Bosscher
14:40 Re: FW: [M16C] : 20 bit data pointer DJ Delorie
14:23 Re: Recent dataflow branch SPEC2000 benchmarking Vladimir Makarov
14:02 libstdc++.dylib linking problem on Darwin Douglas Gregor
14:01 Re: anyone using svk? Richard Earnshaw
14:01 Best of luck for GSoC 2007 participants! Laurynas Biveinis
13:34 Re: anyone using svk? Andrey Belevantsev
13:13 anyone using svk? Rafael Espindola
13:02 Re: Toolchain for Maverick Crunch FPU Richard Earnshaw
12:58 Re: Re : Problem with gcc 3.4.0 & 3.4.6 in ARM thumb mode regarding stack buffer allocation Richard Earnshaw
12:16 FW: [M16C] : 20 bit data pointer Naveen H.S.
11:07 Re: Toolchain for Maverick Crunch FPU Kai Ruottu
10:52 RE: Re : Problem with gcc 3.4.0 & 3.4.6 in ARM thumb mode regarding stack buffer allocation Dave Korn
09:49 Re: peephole patterns are not matching Mohamed Shafi
09:37 Re: peephole patterns are not matching Andreas Schwab
09:09 Re: Re : Problem with gcc 3.4.0 & 3.4.6 in ARM thumb mode regarding stack buffer allocation Steven Bosscher
09:09 Re: Re : Problem with gcc 3.4.0 & 3.4.6 in ARM thumb mode regarding stack buffer allocation Andrew Haley
08:59 Re : Problem with gcc 3.4.0 & 3.4.6 in ARM thumb mode regarding stack buffer allocation Mick CORNUT
08:45 peephole patterns are not matching Mohamed Shafi
08:41 Re: Problem with gcc 3.4.0 & 3.4.6 in ARM thumb mode regarding stack buffer allocation Andrew Haley
08:36 Problem with gcc 3.4.0 & 3.4.6 in ARM thumb mode regarding stack buffer allocation Mick CORNUT
04:29 Re: Recent dataflow branch SPEC2000 benchmarking Steven Bosscher

April 11, 2007
23:56 GCC mini-summit at Google during Gelato conference Ian Lance Taylor
23:56 Re: Inclusion in an official release of a new throw-like qualifier Brian Ellis
22:57 adding dependence from prefetch to load George Caragea
22:36 Re: Inclusion in an official release of a new throw-like qualifier Brendon Costa
22:05 Recent dataflow branch SPEC2000 benchmarking Vladimir Makarov
18:44 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Toon Moene
16:49 RE: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Dave Korn
16:05 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Andi Kleen
15:55 RE: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Dave Korn
15:53 RE: Constrain not satisfied - floating point insns. Dave Korn
15:52 Re: Constrain not satisfied - floating point insns. Ian Lance Taylor
15:48 Re: Constrain not satisfied - floating point insns. Rohit Arul Raj
15:46 Re: Inclusion in an official release of a new throw-like qualifier Sergio Giro
15:24 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Paolo Bonzini
14:45 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Richard Henderson
10:55 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Andi Kleen
10:55 Re: Inclusion in an official release of a new throw-like qualifier Aaron W. LaFramboise
02:01 Re: Inclusion in an official release of a new throw-like qualifier Brendon Costa
01:53 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Mark Mitchell
01:46 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Gabriel Dos Reis
01:25 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Diego Novillo
01:19 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Richard Henderson
01:12 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Richard Henderson
01:03 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Richard Henderson
00:57 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Diego Novillo
00:49 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Ian Lance Taylor
00:48 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Diego Novillo
00:30 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Richard Henderson
00:23 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Daniel Jacobowitz

April 10, 2007
22:43 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Mark Mitchell
22:05 Re: Inclusion in an official release of a new throw-like qualifier Sergio Giro
21:28 PHI_NODE memory reduction, WAS: Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Andrew Pinski
21:24 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Andrew MacLeod
21:23 Re: Inclusion in an official release of a new throw-like qualifier Mike Stump
21:06 Re: Inclusion in an official release of a new throw-like qualifier Sergio Giro
21:03 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal J.C. Pizarro
20:54 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Andrew MacLeod
20:32 RE: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Dave Korn
20:12 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal J.C. Pizarro
20:11 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Diego Novillo
20:09 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Andi Kleen
20:04 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Andrew Pinski
20:03 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Diego Novillo
19:53 RE: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Andrew MacLeod
19:50 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Diego Novillo
19:39 RE: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Dave Korn
19:29 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Daniel Berlin
19:18 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Daniel Berlin
19:02 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Diego Novillo
18:30 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal J.C. Pizarro
18:27 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Andrew Pinski
18:22 Re: A microoptimization of isnegative or greaterthan2millions. J.C. Pizarro
18:18 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Ian Lance Taylor
18:16 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Diego Novillo
18:14 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Ian Lance Taylor
18:13 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Andrew MacLeod
18:10 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Lawrence Crowl
18:08 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Mike Stump
17:58 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Diego Novillo
17:54 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal J.C. Pizarro
17:54 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Ian Lance Taylor
17:53 Re: A microoptimization of isnegative or greaterthan2millions. Ian Lance Taylor
17:53 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Ian Lance Taylor
17:32 Re: A microoptimization of isnegative or greaterthan2millions. J.C. Pizarro
17:30 A microoptimization of isnegative or greaterthan2millions. J.C. Pizarro
17:04 Re: Information regarding -fPIC support for Interix gcc Joe Buck
16:25 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Andrew MacLeod
15:28 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Diego Novillo
15:03 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Richard Guenther
15:00 Re: Inclusion in an official release of a new throw-like qualifier Jason Merrill
14:55 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Diego Novillo
14:45 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Richard Guenther
14:30 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal J.C. Pizarro
14:29 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal J.C. Pizarro
14:27 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Diego Novillo
14:24 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal J.C. Pizarro
14:18 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Diego Novillo
14:17 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Diego Novillo
14:07 Re: Possible bug in preprocessor Richard Smith
13:36 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Diego Novillo
13:24 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Diego Novillo
13:10 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Diego Novillo
12:59 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Diego Novillo
12:17 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal J.C. Pizarro
12:01 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Richard Guenther
10:09 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Paolo Bonzini
06:43 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Steven Bosscher
06:08 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal J.C. Pizarro
05:43 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Andrew Pinski
05:42 Re: Inclusion in an official release of a new throw-like qualifier Sergio Giro
05:25 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal J.C. Pizarro
04:49 RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Diego Novillo
01:14 Re: Inclusion in an official release of a new throw-like qualifier Jason Merrill
00:52 Re: Generating RTL for function call sequences from GIMPLE Richard Henderson
00:20 Re: Questions/Comments regarding my SoC application Dennis Weyland
00:12 RE: Integer overflow in operator new Dave Korn

April 09, 2007
22:55 RE: Generating RTL for function call sequences from GIMPLE Dave Korn
22:17 Re: Integer overflow in operator new. Solved? Experimental i686 code. J.C. Pizarro
22:11 Re: Documenting -fargument-noalias-anything in gcc-4.2/changes.html Gerald Pfeifer
21:58 Re: x86 inc/dec on core2 H. J. Lu
21:41 gcc-4.1-20070409 is now available gccadmin
21:36 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Gabriel Dos Reis
21:12 Re: Generating RTL for function call sequences from GIMPLE Richard Henderson
21:08 Re: Integer overflow in operator new. Solved? Experimental i686 code. J.C. Pizarro
21:05 RE: Information regarding -fPIC support for Interix gcc Mayank Kumar
21:02 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Joe Buck
20:49 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Lawrence Crowl
19:56 Re: Integer overflow in operator new. Solved? Andrew Pinski
19:39 Re: Possible bug in preprocessor Jim Wilson
19:35 Re: Integer overflow in operator new. Solved? Mike Stump
19:29 Re: DWARF Formats - GCC 4.1.1 Jim Wilson
19:25 Re: -Wextra and enumerator/non-enumerator in conditional expressions Jim Wilson
19:14 Re: Integer overflow in operator new. Solved? J.C. Pizarro
19:13 Re: x86 inc/dec on core2 Vladimir N. Makarov
19:05 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Tom Tromey
18:57 Re: Integer overflow in operator new. Solved? J.C. Pizarro
18:52 Inclusion in an official release of a new throw-like qualifier Sergio Giro
18:52 Re: Integer overflow in operator new J.C. Pizarro
18:42 Re: Integer overflow in operator new. Solved? Andrew Pinski
18:42 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Lawrence Crowl
18:40 Re: Generating RTL for function call sequences from GIMPLE Richard Guenther
18:38 Re: Integer overflow in operator new. Solved? Ian Lance Taylor
18:38 Generating RTL for function call sequences from GIMPLE Dave Korn
18:29 Re: Integer overflow in operator new. Solved? J.C. Pizarro
18:28 Re: Integer overflow in operator new. Solved? J.C. Pizarro
18:23 Re: static symbol occurs twice in the executable. Mike Stump
18:13 Re: x86 inc/dec on core2 H. J. Lu
17:50 Re: x86 inc/dec on core2 Mike Stump
17:23 Re: Integer overflow in operator new. Solved? Joe Buck
16:47 Re: Integer overflow in operator new. Solved? Andrew Pinski
16:38 Re: Integer overflow in operator new. Solved? J.C. Pizarro
16:21 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Joe Buck
15:49 Re: Integer overflow in operator new J.C. Pizarro
15:44 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Ross Smith
15:12 Re: Integer overflow in operator new J.C. Pizarro
13:49 static symbol occurs twice in the executable. Chris Dams
13:41 Re: Integer overflow in operator new J.C. Pizarro
09:59 Re: Integer overflow in operator new J.C. Pizarro
09:47 Re: Integer overflow in operator new J.C. Pizarro
09:46 Re: Integer overflow in operator new J.C. Pizarro
08:08 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Ross Ridge
06:58 Re: Miscompilation... Bill Wendling
06:35 RE: Miscompilation... Dave Korn
05:51 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Joe Buck
04:40 Re: Miscompilation... Bill Wendling
03:52 Re: x86 inc/dec on core2 Zuxy Meng
01:51 Miscompilation... Bill Wendling
01:35 Re: Integer overflow in operator new J.C. Pizarro
01:24 Re: Integer overflow in operator new J.C. Pizarro
01:22 Re: Integer overflow in operator new J.C. Pizarro
01:09 Re: Integer overflow in operator new J.C. Pizarro
00:01 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Ross Smith

April 08, 2007
23:27 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Robert Dewar
22:23 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Florian Weimer
21:59 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Andrew Haley
21:37 Re: x86 inc/dec on core2 Vladimir N. Makarov
19:19 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Andrew Pinski
18:31 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Bradley Lucier
16:56 Re: x86 inc/dec on core2 Uros Bizjak
16:32 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Ross Ridge
16:14 Re: x86 inc/dec on core2 Robert Dewar
16:05 Re: x86 inc/dec on core2 Mike Stump
15:41 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Robert Dewar
14:22 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Marc Espie
14:19 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Marc Espie
13:34 Re: x86 inc/dec on core2 H. J. Lu
13:05 RE: Integer overflow in operator new Dave Korn
12:58 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Andreas Schwab
12:01 RE: Integer overflow in operator new Dave Korn
10:21 Re: x86 inc/dec on core2 Robert Dewar
10:13 Re: x86 inc/dec on core2 Uros Bizjak
09:43 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Florian Weimer
07:24 VCG viewer... Sunzir Deepur
07:11 Re: can't find VCG viewer Sunzir Deepur
07:09 Re: can't find VCG viewer Sunzir Deepur
01:45 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Ross Ridge

April 07, 2007
23:29 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Gabriel Dos Reis
23:28 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Gabriel Dos Reis
22:49 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Joe Buck
22:39 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Joe Buck
22:37 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Joe Buck
22:05 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Ross Ridge
21:27 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Gabriel Dos Reis
19:36 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Ross Ridge
17:38 Documenting -fargument-noalias-anything in gcc-4.2/changes.html Toon Moene
17:11 Re: Variable scope debug info Robert Dewar
17:07 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Daniel Jacobowitz
16:33 Re: Variable scope debug info Rob Quill
15:06 RE: bugzilla admin request Dave Korn
15:01 Re: bugzilla admin request Andrew Pinski
14:57 RE: bugzilla admin request Dave Korn
14:37 Re: bugzilla admin request Paul Brook
14:29 bugzilla admin request Dave Korn
14:10 Re: x86 inc/dec on core2 H. J. Lu
12:17 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Gabriel Dos Reis
12:08 Re: Integer overflow in operator new J.C. Pizarro
11:58 Re: Integer overflow in operator new J.C. Pizarro
11:41 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Robert Dewar
11:37 Re: Integer overflow in operator new J.C. Pizarro
10:54 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Robert Dewar
10:15 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Florian Weimer
09:30 Re: x86 inc/dec on core2 Uros Bizjak
07:05 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Ross Ridge
05:03 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Joe Buck
04:46 Re: Super bad accuracy in the output of gprof when is used -pg. Joe Buck
03:31 Re: Super bad accuracy in the output of gprof when is used -pg. J.C. Pizarro
03:23 Super bad accuracy in the output of gprof when is used -pg. J.C. Pizarro
01:34 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Karl Chen
01:11 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Gabriel Dos Reis
00:04 Re: Integer overflow in operator new J.C. Pizarro

April 06, 2007
23:55 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Gabriel Dos Reis
23:54 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Gabriel Dos Reis
23:51 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Gabriel Dos Reis
23:33 Re: Integer overflow in operator new J.C. Pizarro
23:13 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Lawrence Crowl
23:12 Re: Integer overflow in operator new J.C. Pizarro
23:06 Re: Build report: Successful build of gcc 4.1.2 on Cygwin (Win XP Pro SP2) Aaron W. LaFramboise
23:02 Re: Integer overflow in operator new David Daney
22:57 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Andrew Pinski
22:45 Re: Integer overflow in operator new Karl Chen
22:35 Re: Integer overflow in operator new J.C. Pizarro
21:44 gcc-4.3-20070406 is now available gccadmin
21:17 Re: x86 inc/dec on core2 H. J. Lu
20:27 x86 inc/dec on core2 Mike Stump
20:15 Integer overflow in operator new Karl Chen
20:12 Re: Variable scope debug info Pedro Alves
17:00 Re: Variable scope debug info Joe Buck
16:55 Re: Variable scope debug info Joe Buck
15:04 Re: Variable scope debug info Brian Ellis
10:50 Re: Variable scope debug info Rob Quill
10:38 Re: Variable scope debug info Rob Quill
08:10 Build report: Successful build of gcc 4.1.2 on Cygwin (pthreads) Jesper de Jong
06:06 Has anyone ever tried to implement lazy strength reduction for GCC? Steven Bosscher
05:16 Re: Build report: Successful build of gcc 4.1.2 on Cygwin (Win XP Pro SP2) Brian Dessent
05:05 Re: Build report: Successful build of gcc 4.1.2 on Cygwin (Win XP Pro SP2) Aaron W. LaFramboise
00:18 Re: Variable scope debug info Daniel Jacobowitz

April 05, 2007
20:34 RE: Bootstrap is broken on i[345]86-linux Meissner, Michael
18:44 Re: Variable scope debug info Mike Stump
17:59 Re: Variable scope debug info Joe Buck
17:21 Re: Variable scope debug info Brian Ellis
16:46 Re: Variable scope debug info Joe Buck
16:37 Re: Variable scope debug info Rob Quill
16:32 Re: Variable scope debug info Joe Buck
16:01 Re: Variable scope debug info Ian Lance Taylor
15:07 Re: Build report: Successful build of gcc 4.1.2 on Cygwin (Win XP Pro SP2) Jesper de Jong
14:41 Re: bad edge created in CFG ? Sunzir Deepur
13:37 Variable scope debug info Rob Quill
13:24 RE: Build report: Successful build of gcc 4.1.2 on Cygwin (Win XP Pro SP2) Dave Korn
13:12 Re: Request for Bugzilla-only permissions Daniel Berlin
13:09 Re: Proposal: changing representation of memory references Daniel Berlin
13:09 Request for Bugzilla-only permissions Eric Weddington
12:51 Re: Build report: Successful build of gcc 4.1.2 on Cygwin (Win XP Pro SP2) Brian Dessent
11:35 Build report: Successful build of gcc 4.1.2 on Cygwin (Win XP Pro SP2) Jesper de Jong
09:23 Re: Proposal: changing representation of memory references Richard Guenther
08:35 Re: Proposal: changing representation of memory references Zdenek Dvorak
06:39 Re: VAX backend status Paolo Bonzini
02:09 Re: Proposal: changing representation of memory references Seongbae Park
01:01 Re: Proposal: changing representation of memory references Ian Lance Taylor
00:56 Re: VAX backend status Ian Lance Taylor
00:49 -Wextra and enumerator/non-enumerator in conditional expressions Ching, Jimen \(US SSA\)

April 04, 2007
22:21 Re: Extension for a throw-like C++ qualifier Brendon Costa
20:42 Re: Proposal: changing representation of memory references Toon Moene
20:05 Re: Proposal: changing representation of memory references Zdenek Dvorak
19:41 Re: Proposal: changing representation of memory references Zdenek Dvorak
19:33 Re: Proposal: changing representation of memory references Richard Henderson
19:27 Re: Proposal: changing representation of memory references Zdenek Dvorak
18:51 Re: Proposal: changing representation of memory references Richard Kenner
18:07 Re: Proposal: changing representation of memory references J.C. Pizarro
17:19 Re: Proposal: changing representation of memory references Richard Henderson
17:03 Re: Proposal: changing representation of memory references Daniel Berlin
17:00 Re: Proposal: changing representation of memory references Daniel Berlin
16:54 Re: Proposal: changing representation of memory references Andrew Pinski
16:49 Re: Proposal: changing representation of memory references Zdenek Dvorak
16:35 Re: Proposal: changing representation of memory references Daniel Berlin
16:32 ONLINE JOB OFFER JEAN BODILLON
15:57 Re: Proposal: changing representation of memory references Zdenek Dvorak
15:45 Re: Proposal: changing representation of memory references Daniel Berlin
15:45 Re: Proposal: changing representation of memory references Daniel Berlin
15:35 Re: Proposal: changing representation of memory references Zdenek Dvorak
15:34 Possible bug regarding C++ SFINAE Daniel Walker
15:13 Re: Proposal: changing representation of memory references Richard Guenther
15:13 Re: Extension for a throw-like C++ qualifier Sergio Giro
15:05 Re: Proposal: changing representation of memory references Zdenek Dvorak
15:00 Re: Proposal: changing representation of memory references Zdenek Dvorak
14:50 Re: Proposal: changing representation of memory references Richard Guenther
14:35 Proposal: changing representation of memory references Zdenek Dvorak
14:33 Re: gfortran and power calculation Richard Guenther
13:57 gfortran and power calculation jbijak
09:39 gcc mirror admin
02:57 ANNOUNCEMENT: Workshop on GCC Internals Uday Khedker
00:55 Test report for gcc 4.1.2 on Cygwin 1.5.24-2 Tonko Juricic

April 03, 2007
22:39 Re: Bootstrap is broken on i[345]86-linux H. J. Lu
22:22 Re: Possible bug in preprocessor JoseD
22:18 Re: Bootstrap is broken on i[345]86-linux Steven Bosscher
22:02 Bootstrap is broken on i[345]86-linux FX Coudert
19:29 Re: RFC: Enable __declspec for Linux/x86 Ross Ridge
18:57 Re: Gcc and gfortran installation on MacBook Pro Mike Stump
18:05 Re: Effects of newly introduced -mpcX 80387 precision flag Richard Henderson
18:01 Re: libcc_s.so and libc.so curcular dependency on FreeBSD Richard Henderson
17:00 Re: libcc_s.so and libc.so curcular dependency on FreeBSD Mike Stump
16:11 Re: libcc_s.so and libc.so curcular dependency on FreeBSD Ian Lance Taylor
15:43 Re: Information regarding -fPIC support for Interix gcc Ian Lance Taylor
12:34 RE: Information regarding -fPIC support for Interix gcc Mayank Kumar
10:42 DWARF Formats - GCC 4.1.1 Rohit Arul Raj
10:21 RE: RFC: Enable __declspec for Linux/x86 Dave Korn
08:56 Re: Effects of newly introduced -mpcX 80387 precision flag Uros Bizjak
08:53 Re: Effects of newly introduced -mpcX 80387 precision flag Richard Guenther
08:52 Re: Questions/Comments regarding my SoC application Paolo Bonzini
08:46 Effects of newly introduced -mpcX 80387 precision flag Uros Bizjak
02:54 libcc_s.so and libc.so curcular dependency on FreeBSD Alexander Kabaev
01:13 Re: x86-64 -mcx16, picky __sync_val_compare_and_swap? Richard Henderson
00:36 Re: RFC: Enable __declspec for Linux/x86 Andrew Pinski

April 02, 2007
23:54 Re: x86-64 -mcx16, picky __sync_val_compare_and_swap? tbp
22:26 Re: RFC: Enable __declspec for Linux/x86 H. J. Lu
22:11 Re: RFC: Enable __declspec for Linux/x86 Andrew Pinski
21:50 Re: RFC: Enable __declspec for Linux/x86 Joe Buck
21:44 Questions/Comments regarding my SoC application Dennis Weyland
21:43 Re: VAX backend status Andrew Pinski
21:41 gcc-4.1-20070402 is now available gccadmin
21:34 Re: VAX backend status Toon Moene
21:26 Re: RFC: Enable __declspec for Linux/x86 Steven Bosscher
21:21 Re: RFC: Enable __declspec for Linux/x86 Andrew Pinski
21:18 Re: RFC: Enable __declspec for Linux/x86 Andrew Pinski
21:16 Re: RFC: Enable __declspec for Linux/x86 Mike Stump
21:16 Re: RFC: Enable __declspec for Linux/x86 Andrew Pinski
21:11 Re: RFC: Enable __declspec for Linux/x86 H. J. Lu
21:06 Re: RFC: Enable __declspec for Linux/x86 Andrew Pinski
21:03 RFC: Enable __declspec for Linux/x86 H. J. Lu
20:59 Re: -Wswitch-enum and -Wswitch-default Joe Buck
20:34 Re: -Wswitch-enum and -Wswitch-default Manuel López-Ibáñez
19:48 RE: -Wswitch-enum and -Wswitch-default Ching, Jimen \(US SSA\)
19:02 Re: How can I get VRP information for an RTX? Ian Lance Taylor
18:58 Re: Information regarding -fPIC support for Interix gcc Ian Lance Taylor
18:19 Re: how to convince someone about migrating from gcc-2.95 to gcc-3.x Robert Dewar
18:07 Re: x86-64 -mcx16, picky __sync_val_compare_and_swap? Richard Henderson
15:59 Re: Extension for a throw-like C++ qualifier Mike Stump
15:45 Re: How can I get VRP information for an RTX? David Daney
14:36 Re: error: "no newline at end of file" Manuel López-Ibáñez
14:23 x86-64 -mcx16, picky __sync_val_compare_and_swap? tbp
14:04 Re: error: "no newline at end of file" Martin Michlmayr
12:57 Re: error: "no newline at end of file" Manuel López-Ibáñez
12:29 Re: wide chars with 16 BITS_PER_UNIT Thomas Gill
12:23 Re: error: "no newline at end of file" Martin Michlmayr
11:58 Re: error: "no newline at end of file" Manuel López-Ibáñez
11:04 Re: Gcc and gfortran installation on MacBook Pro Andrew Haley
10:56 Re: How can I get VRP information for an RTX? Andrew Haley
09:57 Re: Gcc and gfortran installation on MacBook Pro Aurélien Benoit-Lévy
09:56 Re: Gcc and gfortran installation on MacBook Pro Aurélien Benoit-Lévy
09:46 Re: how to convince someone about migrating from gcc-2.95 to gcc-3.x Benjamin Kosnik
09:32 Re: Extension for a throw-like C++ qualifier Brendon Costa
07:52 Re: how to convince someone about migrating from gcc-2.95 to gcc-3.x ganesh subramonian
06:48 RE: Information regarding -fPIC support for Interix gcc Mayank Kumar
06:04 Re: how to convince someone about migrating from gcc-2.95 to gcc-3.x Chris Lattner
05:48 Re: how to convince someone about migrating from gcc-2.95 to gcc-3.x Joe Buck
05:42 Re: how to convince someone about migrating from gcc-2.95 to gcc-3.x Joe Buck
05:20 Re: How can I get VRP information for an RTX? Andrew Pinski

April 01, 2007
22:58 Re: error: "no newline at end of file" Zack Weinberg
22:47 Re: Extension for a throw-like C++ qualifier Sergio Giro
22:43 Re: error: "no newline at end of file" Robert Dewar
21:54 Re: error: "no newline at end of file" Zack Weinberg
21:54 Re: error: "no newline at end of file" Zack Weinberg
21:42 Re: error: "no newline at end of file" Martin Michlmayr
21:20 Re: How can I get VRP information for an RTX? David Daney
20:03 Re: How can I get VRP information for an RTX? Andrew Pinski
17:55 VAX backend status Matt Thomas
17:27 Re: how to convince someone about migrating from gcc-2.95 to gcc-3.x Robert Dewar
15:34 Re: error: "no newline at end of file" Robert Dewar
15:31 re: how to convince someone about migrating from gcc-2.95 to gcc-3.x Dan Kegel
15:31 Re: error: "no newline at end of file" Zack Weinberg
13:42 Re: error: "no newline at end of file" Martin Michlmayr
13:16 Re: how to convince someone about migrating from gcc-2.95 to gcc-3.x Richard Guenther
13:12 Re: How can I get VRP information for an RTX? Richard Guenther
12:20 Re: how to convince someone about migrating from gcc-2.95 to gcc-3.x Marcin Dalecki
12:19 RE: how to convince someone about migrating from gcc-2.95 to gcc-3.x Dave Korn
11:58 Re: how to convince someone about migrating from gcc-2.95 to gcc-3.x Paul Brook
11:00 RE: how to convince someone about migrating from gcc-2.95 to gcc-3.x Dave Korn
09:07 Re: gcc regression on Darwin Andreas Schwab
09:04 gcc regression on Darwin Dominique Dhumieres
07:20 How can I get VRP information for an RTX? David Daney
06:08 how to convince someone about migrating from gcc-2.95 to gcc-3.x ganesh subramonian
02:35 Re: Discrepancies in real.c:mpfr_to_real and fortran/trans-const.c:gfc_conv_mpfr_to_tree? Kaveh R. GHAZI
00:31 RE: Writing a option pass Dave Korn


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3