This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: SSE (Pentium 3) - Is this correct?

From: "mal content" <artifact dot one at googlemail dot com>
To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 07:14:52 +0000
Subject: Re: SSE (Pentium 3) - Is this correct?
References: <8e96a0b90701072243n468f0934k3e4f135cec61a606@mail.gmail.com> <OF7B738198.9860EE21-ONC225725D.0025784C-C225725D.00266FD5@il.ibm.com> <8e96a0b90701072314h48cb721au6dd6d0e34faeb0dc@mail.gmail.com>

On 08/01/07, Revital1 Eres <ERES@il.ibm.com> wrote:


-ftree-vectorize flag is missing.
(see http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/tree-ssa/vectorization.html for more info
about
the flags you should use)


Ah, didn't know about that. I don't have that flag on my main dev machine
(still using 3.4 branch) but I do have it on my laptop.

Also, currently the vectorizer is applied only on loops. (please see the
Auto-vectorization
page for examples)


Ah, didn't know about that either. Is it likely to work on non-looped code in
the future? Not that it matters that much as this code is generated and easy
to change.

thanks,
MC

References:
- SSE (Pentium 3) - Is this correct?
  - From: mal content
- Re: SSE (Pentium 3) - Is this correct?
  - From: Revital1 Eres

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]